Genesis of the Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit in the Ningwu Basin, eastern China: Constraints from apatite chemistry

The Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit is located in the Ningwu volcanic basin in eastern China. The deposit comprises massive and brecciated ores in the main orebody, located at the contact between a gabbro–diorite porphyry and biotite–pyroxene andesites, and sub‐economic stockwork and disseminated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geological journal (Chichester, England) England), 2020-02, Vol.55 (2), p.1450-1467
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Jin‐Jie, Chen, Bao‐Yun, Che, Lin‐Rui, Wang, Tie‐Zhu, Liu, Shuai‐Jie, Horvath, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1467
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1450
container_title Geological journal (Chichester, England)
container_volume 55
creator Yu, Jin‐Jie
Chen, Bao‐Yun
Che, Lin‐Rui
Wang, Tie‐Zhu
Liu, Shuai‐Jie
Horvath, P.
description The Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit is located in the Ningwu volcanic basin in eastern China. The deposit comprises massive and brecciated ores in the main orebody, located at the contact between a gabbro–diorite porphyry and biotite–pyroxene andesites, and sub‐economic stockwork and disseminated ores. Among the four stages of alteration and mineralization, apatite coexists with magnetite, andradite, and quartz in massive magnetite ore and occurs in disseminated magnetite ore, coexisting with magnetite, siderite (after diopside), and quartz for Stage 2 iron mineralization. Apatite is also present in the altered gabbro–diorite porphyry. The apatites from the massive and disseminated magnetite–apatite ores are fluor‐ and hydroxyl‐ variety. Those from the altered gabbro–diorite porphyry show extensive solid solution between the hydroxyl‐apatite, fluor‐apatite, and chlor‐apatite end members. The apatites at Meishan record oxidized states during formation of the mineral deposit. The SO3 contents of apatite in the Meishan deposit mostly vary from 0.4 to 1.2 wt%, with the highest value of 4.97 wt%. MnO contents in apatites from our study are less than 0.17 wt%, and most values are below detection limit, indicating that the apatite formed in a high ƒO2 magmatic–hydrothermal fluid. The strong Eu depletion in apatites at Meishan resulted from the fractionation of plagioclase. The gabbro–diorite porphyry, magnetite, and apatite show similar LREE‐enriched patterns with significant negative Eu anomalies for apatite and magnetite, and no Eu anomaly for the gabbro–diorite porphyry. The gabbro–diorite porphyry and Stage 2 apatite associated with iron mineralization have also similar primitive mantle‐normalized trace element patterns, suggesting that the mineralization was related to gabbro–diorite porphyry. The REE pattern with significant negative Eu anomalies in apatite from the Meishan deposit is comparable with that of other Kiruna‐type deposits elsewhere in the world.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/gj.3495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2353760860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2353760860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-2465bb50c730c6a0739361280d2238393a85ffe729c542b1fffebc83a47ce3823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpiFewxMAAKWc7zgcbRFBABRaYLSd1GketXWxXpUy8A2_Ik5C2MDLd_XU_3UmH0DGBAQGgF5N2wOKc76AegTyPCLB4F_UAUtr1HPbRgfctACEQkx76GCqjvPbY1jg0Cj8q7RtpsHbWYPuux-r780vOZdBB4bGaW68D1mZjn7SZLBf4WnptzrGSPihncNFoIy9xYY0PTmoTPK6dneG_JVWjZrobrQ7RXi2nXh391j56vb15Ke6i0fPwvrgaRRXNch7ROOFlyaFKGVSJhJTlLCE0gzGlLOuCzHhdq5TmFY9pSeoulFXGZJxWimWU9dHJdu_c2beF8kG0duFMd1JQxlmaQJZAp063qnLWe6dqMXd6Jt1KEBDrx4pJK9aP7eTZVi71VK3-Y2L4sNE_4VB5ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2353760860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genesis of the Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit in the Ningwu Basin, eastern China: Constraints from apatite chemistry</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Yu, Jin‐Jie ; Chen, Bao‐Yun ; Che, Lin‐Rui ; Wang, Tie‐Zhu ; Liu, Shuai‐Jie ; Horvath, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jin‐Jie ; Chen, Bao‐Yun ; Che, Lin‐Rui ; Wang, Tie‐Zhu ; Liu, Shuai‐Jie ; Horvath, P.</creatorcontrib><description>The Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit is located in the Ningwu volcanic basin in eastern China. The deposit comprises massive and brecciated ores in the main orebody, located at the contact between a gabbro–diorite porphyry and biotite–pyroxene andesites, and sub‐economic stockwork and disseminated ores. Among the four stages of alteration and mineralization, apatite coexists with magnetite, andradite, and quartz in massive magnetite ore and occurs in disseminated magnetite ore, coexisting with magnetite, siderite (after diopside), and quartz for Stage 2 iron mineralization. Apatite is also present in the altered gabbro–diorite porphyry. The apatites from the massive and disseminated magnetite–apatite ores are fluor‐ and hydroxyl‐ variety. Those from the altered gabbro–diorite porphyry show extensive solid solution between the hydroxyl‐apatite, fluor‐apatite, and chlor‐apatite end members. The apatites at Meishan record oxidized states during formation of the mineral deposit. The SO3 contents of apatite in the Meishan deposit mostly vary from 0.4 to 1.2 wt%, with the highest value of 4.97 wt%. MnO contents in apatites from our study are less than 0.17 wt%, and most values are below detection limit, indicating that the apatite formed in a high ƒO2 magmatic–hydrothermal fluid. The strong Eu depletion in apatites at Meishan resulted from the fractionation of plagioclase. The gabbro–diorite porphyry, magnetite, and apatite show similar LREE‐enriched patterns with significant negative Eu anomalies for apatite and magnetite, and no Eu anomaly for the gabbro–diorite porphyry. The gabbro–diorite porphyry and Stage 2 apatite associated with iron mineralization have also similar primitive mantle‐normalized trace element patterns, suggesting that the mineralization was related to gabbro–diorite porphyry. The REE pattern with significant negative Eu anomalies in apatite from the Meishan deposit is comparable with that of other Kiruna‐type deposits elsewhere in the world.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0072-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1034</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gj.3495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Liverpool: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Apatite ; apatite chemistry ; Biotite ; Calcium ferrous silicates ; Calcium magnesium silicates ; Depletion ; Diopside ; Diorite ; Economics ; Fractionation ; Gabbro ; Iron oxides ; Kiruna‐type ; Magma ; Magnetite ; Meishan magnetite–apatite deposit ; Mineral deposits ; Mineralization ; Minerals ; ore genesis ; Ores ; Organic chemistry ; Plagioclase ; Quartz ; rare earth element ; Siderite ; Solid solutions ; Sulfur trioxide ; Trace elements</subject><ispartof>Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2020-02, Vol.55 (2), p.1450-1467</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-2465bb50c730c6a0739361280d2238393a85ffe729c542b1fffebc83a47ce3823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-2465bb50c730c6a0739361280d2238393a85ffe729c542b1fffebc83a47ce3823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7051-2528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fgj.3495$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fgj.3495$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jin‐Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Bao‐Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Che, Lin‐Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tie‐Zhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuai‐Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Genesis of the Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit in the Ningwu Basin, eastern China: Constraints from apatite chemistry</title><title>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</title><description>The Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit is located in the Ningwu volcanic basin in eastern China. The deposit comprises massive and brecciated ores in the main orebody, located at the contact between a gabbro–diorite porphyry and biotite–pyroxene andesites, and sub‐economic stockwork and disseminated ores. Among the four stages of alteration and mineralization, apatite coexists with magnetite, andradite, and quartz in massive magnetite ore and occurs in disseminated magnetite ore, coexisting with magnetite, siderite (after diopside), and quartz for Stage 2 iron mineralization. Apatite is also present in the altered gabbro–diorite porphyry. The apatites from the massive and disseminated magnetite–apatite ores are fluor‐ and hydroxyl‐ variety. Those from the altered gabbro–diorite porphyry show extensive solid solution between the hydroxyl‐apatite, fluor‐apatite, and chlor‐apatite end members. The apatites at Meishan record oxidized states during formation of the mineral deposit. The SO3 contents of apatite in the Meishan deposit mostly vary from 0.4 to 1.2 wt%, with the highest value of 4.97 wt%. MnO contents in apatites from our study are less than 0.17 wt%, and most values are below detection limit, indicating that the apatite formed in a high ƒO2 magmatic–hydrothermal fluid. The strong Eu depletion in apatites at Meishan resulted from the fractionation of plagioclase. The gabbro–diorite porphyry, magnetite, and apatite show similar LREE‐enriched patterns with significant negative Eu anomalies for apatite and magnetite, and no Eu anomaly for the gabbro–diorite porphyry. The gabbro–diorite porphyry and Stage 2 apatite associated with iron mineralization have also similar primitive mantle‐normalized trace element patterns, suggesting that the mineralization was related to gabbro–diorite porphyry. The REE pattern with significant negative Eu anomalies in apatite from the Meishan deposit is comparable with that of other Kiruna‐type deposits elsewhere in the world.</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Apatite</subject><subject>apatite chemistry</subject><subject>Biotite</subject><subject>Calcium ferrous silicates</subject><subject>Calcium magnesium silicates</subject><subject>Depletion</subject><subject>Diopside</subject><subject>Diorite</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Fractionation</subject><subject>Gabbro</subject><subject>Iron oxides</subject><subject>Kiruna‐type</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Magnetite</subject><subject>Meishan magnetite–apatite deposit</subject><subject>Mineral deposits</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>ore genesis</subject><subject>Ores</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Plagioclase</subject><subject>Quartz</subject><subject>rare earth element</subject><subject>Siderite</subject><subject>Solid solutions</subject><subject>Sulfur trioxide</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><issn>0072-1050</issn><issn>1099-1034</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10L1OwzAQB3ALgUQpiFewxMAAKWc7zgcbRFBABRaYLSd1GketXWxXpUy8A2_Ik5C2MDLd_XU_3UmH0DGBAQGgF5N2wOKc76AegTyPCLB4F_UAUtr1HPbRgfctACEQkx76GCqjvPbY1jg0Cj8q7RtpsHbWYPuux-r780vOZdBB4bGaW68D1mZjn7SZLBf4WnptzrGSPihncNFoIy9xYY0PTmoTPK6dneG_JVWjZrobrQ7RXi2nXh391j56vb15Ke6i0fPwvrgaRRXNch7ROOFlyaFKGVSJhJTlLCE0gzGlLOuCzHhdq5TmFY9pSeoulFXGZJxWimWU9dHJdu_c2beF8kG0duFMd1JQxlmaQJZAp063qnLWe6dqMXd6Jt1KEBDrx4pJK9aP7eTZVi71VK3-Y2L4sNE_4VB5ig</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Yu, Jin‐Jie</creator><creator>Chen, Bao‐Yun</creator><creator>Che, Lin‐Rui</creator><creator>Wang, Tie‐Zhu</creator><creator>Liu, Shuai‐Jie</creator><creator>Horvath, P.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7051-2528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Genesis of the Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit in the Ningwu Basin, eastern China: Constraints from apatite chemistry</title><author>Yu, Jin‐Jie ; Chen, Bao‐Yun ; Che, Lin‐Rui ; Wang, Tie‐Zhu ; Liu, Shuai‐Jie ; Horvath, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-2465bb50c730c6a0739361280d2238393a85ffe729c542b1fffebc83a47ce3823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Apatite</topic><topic>apatite chemistry</topic><topic>Biotite</topic><topic>Calcium ferrous silicates</topic><topic>Calcium magnesium silicates</topic><topic>Depletion</topic><topic>Diopside</topic><topic>Diorite</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Fractionation</topic><topic>Gabbro</topic><topic>Iron oxides</topic><topic>Kiruna‐type</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Magnetite</topic><topic>Meishan magnetite–apatite deposit</topic><topic>Mineral deposits</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>ore genesis</topic><topic>Ores</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Plagioclase</topic><topic>Quartz</topic><topic>rare earth element</topic><topic>Siderite</topic><topic>Solid solutions</topic><topic>Sulfur trioxide</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Jin‐Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Bao‐Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Che, Lin‐Rui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Tie‐Zhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuai‐Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horvath, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Jin‐Jie</au><au>Chen, Bao‐Yun</au><au>Che, Lin‐Rui</au><au>Wang, Tie‐Zhu</au><au>Liu, Shuai‐Jie</au><au>Horvath, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genesis of the Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit in the Ningwu Basin, eastern China: Constraints from apatite chemistry</atitle><jtitle>Geological journal (Chichester, England)</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1450</spage><epage>1467</epage><pages>1450-1467</pages><issn>0072-1050</issn><eissn>1099-1034</eissn><abstract>The Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit is located in the Ningwu volcanic basin in eastern China. The deposit comprises massive and brecciated ores in the main orebody, located at the contact between a gabbro–diorite porphyry and biotite–pyroxene andesites, and sub‐economic stockwork and disseminated ores. Among the four stages of alteration and mineralization, apatite coexists with magnetite, andradite, and quartz in massive magnetite ore and occurs in disseminated magnetite ore, coexisting with magnetite, siderite (after diopside), and quartz for Stage 2 iron mineralization. Apatite is also present in the altered gabbro–diorite porphyry. The apatites from the massive and disseminated magnetite–apatite ores are fluor‐ and hydroxyl‐ variety. Those from the altered gabbro–diorite porphyry show extensive solid solution between the hydroxyl‐apatite, fluor‐apatite, and chlor‐apatite end members. The apatites at Meishan record oxidized states during formation of the mineral deposit. The SO3 contents of apatite in the Meishan deposit mostly vary from 0.4 to 1.2 wt%, with the highest value of 4.97 wt%. MnO contents in apatites from our study are less than 0.17 wt%, and most values are below detection limit, indicating that the apatite formed in a high ƒO2 magmatic–hydrothermal fluid. The strong Eu depletion in apatites at Meishan resulted from the fractionation of plagioclase. The gabbro–diorite porphyry, magnetite, and apatite show similar LREE‐enriched patterns with significant negative Eu anomalies for apatite and magnetite, and no Eu anomaly for the gabbro–diorite porphyry. The gabbro–diorite porphyry and Stage 2 apatite associated with iron mineralization have also similar primitive mantle‐normalized trace element patterns, suggesting that the mineralization was related to gabbro–diorite porphyry. The REE pattern with significant negative Eu anomalies in apatite from the Meishan deposit is comparable with that of other Kiruna‐type deposits elsewhere in the world.</abstract><cop>Liverpool</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/gj.3495</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7051-2528</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0072-1050
ispartof Geological journal (Chichester, England), 2020-02, Vol.55 (2), p.1450-1467
issn 0072-1050
1099-1034
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2353760860
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Anomalies
Apatite
apatite chemistry
Biotite
Calcium ferrous silicates
Calcium magnesium silicates
Depletion
Diopside
Diorite
Economics
Fractionation
Gabbro
Iron oxides
Kiruna‐type
Magma
Magnetite
Meishan magnetite–apatite deposit
Mineral deposits
Mineralization
Minerals
ore genesis
Ores
Organic chemistry
Plagioclase
Quartz
rare earth element
Siderite
Solid solutions
Sulfur trioxide
Trace elements
title Genesis of the Meishan iron oxide–apatite deposit in the Ningwu Basin, eastern China: Constraints from apatite chemistry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T03%3A15%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genesis%20of%20the%20Meishan%20iron%20oxide%E2%80%93apatite%20deposit%20in%20the%20Ningwu%20Basin,%20eastern%20China:%20Constraints%20from%20apatite%20chemistry&rft.jtitle=Geological%20journal%20(Chichester,%20England)&rft.au=Yu,%20Jin%E2%80%90Jie&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1450&rft.epage=1467&rft.pages=1450-1467&rft.issn=0072-1050&rft.eissn=1099-1034&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gj.3495&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2353760860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2353760860&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true