Comparison of in-situ Raman studies of SOFC with thick single-crystal and thin-film magnetron sputtered membranes

In current work, we conducted comparative studies of electrolyte-supported and anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells by means of electrochemical techniques (studies of I-V curves and impedance spectroscopy) as well as using Raman spectroscopy from the inner interface of the anode electrode and soli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solid state ionics 2020-01, Vol.344, p.115091, Article 115091
Hauptverfasser: Agarkov, D.A., Burmistrov, I.N., Eliseeva, G.M., Ionov, I.V., Rabotkin, S.V., Semenov, V.A., Solovyev, A.A., Tartakovskii, I.I., Bredikhin, S.I.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 115091
container_title Solid state ionics
container_volume 344
creator Agarkov, D.A.
Burmistrov, I.N.
Eliseeva, G.M.
Ionov, I.V.
Rabotkin, S.V.
Semenov, V.A.
Solovyev, A.A.
Tartakovskii, I.I.
Bredikhin, S.I.
description In current work, we conducted comparative studies of electrolyte-supported and anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells by means of electrochemical techniques (studies of I-V curves and impedance spectroscopy) as well as using Raman spectroscopy from the inner interface of the anode electrode and solid electrolyte. Electrolyte-supported (ESC) SOFCs were based on thick single-crystalline 8YSZ anion conductor membrane and had multilayered composite electrodes. Anode-supported cells (ASC) were based on thick two-layered commercially available anode supports, the thin-film electrolyte was deposited using a magnetron sputtering technique. Comparative studies showed a significant dependence of 460 cm−1 Raman peak both on fuel mixture composition and current load applied to the cell. Linear dependences of OCV on normalized peak area gave an opportunity to estimate local anodic overpotential on the current load applied for both SOFC structures. Application of ASC model cells gave an opportunity to significantly extend a range of current loads applied. Analysis of impedance spectra gave the opportunity to study the structure of complex resistance as well as the structure of local anodic overpotential obtained. •Comparative studies ESC/ASC SOFCs via electrochemical techniques and Raman spectroscopy.•Significant dependence of 460 cm−1 peak (GDC sublayer) on fuel composition and current load was shown.•Local anodic overpotential was estimated using dependences of OCV on Raman peak area.•Application of model ASC gave an opportunity to significantly extend a range of current loads.•Impedance spectra showed Raman estimated anode overpotential to be contribution of the fuel oxidation anode reaction.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ssi.2019.115091
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2352593683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167273819306885</els_id><sourcerecordid>2352593683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-60c6a318b448e8ad421cb5e2d1ced534999bafdf43019802dbb252243cc08d4d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEqXwANwscU7xkqSOOKGKTUKqxHK2HHtCXRqn9Tgg3h5X5cxpDv8yMx8hl5zNOOP19XqG6GeC8WbGecUafkQmXM1FMa9Vc0wm2TMvxFyqU3KGuGaM1VLVE7JbDP3WRI9DoENHfSjQp5G-mN4Eiml0HnAvvC7vF_TbpxVNK28_KfrwsYHCxh9MZkNNcHshFJ3f9LQ3HwFSzJW4HVOCCI720LfRBMBzctKZDcLF35yS9_u7t8Vj8bx8eFrcPhdWiioVNbO1kVy1ZalAGVcKbtsKhOMWXCXLpmla07mulPlnxYRrW1EJUUprmXKlk1NydejdxmE3Aia9HsYY8kotZCWqRtZKZhc_uGwcECN0eht9b-KP5kzvyeq1zmT1nqw-kM2Zm0MG8vlfHqJG6yHku3wEm7Qb_D_pX98hgjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352593683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of in-situ Raman studies of SOFC with thick single-crystal and thin-film magnetron sputtered membranes</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Agarkov, D.A. ; Burmistrov, I.N. ; Eliseeva, G.M. ; Ionov, I.V. ; Rabotkin, S.V. ; Semenov, V.A. ; Solovyev, A.A. ; Tartakovskii, I.I. ; Bredikhin, S.I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Agarkov, D.A. ; Burmistrov, I.N. ; Eliseeva, G.M. ; Ionov, I.V. ; Rabotkin, S.V. ; Semenov, V.A. ; Solovyev, A.A. ; Tartakovskii, I.I. ; Bredikhin, S.I.</creatorcontrib><description>In current work, we conducted comparative studies of electrolyte-supported and anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells by means of electrochemical techniques (studies of I-V curves and impedance spectroscopy) as well as using Raman spectroscopy from the inner interface of the anode electrode and solid electrolyte. Electrolyte-supported (ESC) SOFCs were based on thick single-crystalline 8YSZ anion conductor membrane and had multilayered composite electrodes. Anode-supported cells (ASC) were based on thick two-layered commercially available anode supports, the thin-film electrolyte was deposited using a magnetron sputtering technique. Comparative studies showed a significant dependence of 460 cm−1 Raman peak both on fuel mixture composition and current load applied to the cell. Linear dependences of OCV on normalized peak area gave an opportunity to estimate local anodic overpotential on the current load applied for both SOFC structures. Application of ASC model cells gave an opportunity to significantly extend a range of current loads applied. Analysis of impedance spectra gave the opportunity to study the structure of complex resistance as well as the structure of local anodic overpotential obtained. •Comparative studies ESC/ASC SOFCs via electrochemical techniques and Raman spectroscopy.•Significant dependence of 460 cm−1 peak (GDC sublayer) on fuel composition and current load was shown.•Local anodic overpotential was estimated using dependences of OCV on Raman peak area.•Application of model ASC gave an opportunity to significantly extend a range of current loads.•Impedance spectra showed Raman estimated anode overpotential to be contribution of the fuel oxidation anode reaction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-2738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7689</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2019.115091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Anode-supported ; Anodes ; Comparative studies ; Conductors ; Electrodes ; Electrolyte-supported ; Electrolytes ; Electrolytic cells ; Fuel cells ; Fuel mixtures ; Magnetron sputtering ; Membranes ; Overpotential ; Raman spectroscopy ; Single crystals ; Single-crystal solid electrolyte ; Solid electrolytes ; Solid oxide fuel cells ; Thin films ; Thin-film electrolyte</subject><ispartof>Solid state ionics, 2020-01, Vol.344, p.115091, Article 115091</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-60c6a318b448e8ad421cb5e2d1ced534999bafdf43019802dbb252243cc08d4d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-60c6a318b448e8ad421cb5e2d1ced534999bafdf43019802dbb252243cc08d4d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.115091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agarkov, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burmistrov, I.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliseeva, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionov, I.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabotkin, S.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semenov, V.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solovyev, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartakovskii, I.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bredikhin, S.I.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of in-situ Raman studies of SOFC with thick single-crystal and thin-film magnetron sputtered membranes</title><title>Solid state ionics</title><description>In current work, we conducted comparative studies of electrolyte-supported and anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells by means of electrochemical techniques (studies of I-V curves and impedance spectroscopy) as well as using Raman spectroscopy from the inner interface of the anode electrode and solid electrolyte. Electrolyte-supported (ESC) SOFCs were based on thick single-crystalline 8YSZ anion conductor membrane and had multilayered composite electrodes. Anode-supported cells (ASC) were based on thick two-layered commercially available anode supports, the thin-film electrolyte was deposited using a magnetron sputtering technique. Comparative studies showed a significant dependence of 460 cm−1 Raman peak both on fuel mixture composition and current load applied to the cell. Linear dependences of OCV on normalized peak area gave an opportunity to estimate local anodic overpotential on the current load applied for both SOFC structures. Application of ASC model cells gave an opportunity to significantly extend a range of current loads applied. Analysis of impedance spectra gave the opportunity to study the structure of complex resistance as well as the structure of local anodic overpotential obtained. •Comparative studies ESC/ASC SOFCs via electrochemical techniques and Raman spectroscopy.•Significant dependence of 460 cm−1 peak (GDC sublayer) on fuel composition and current load was shown.•Local anodic overpotential was estimated using dependences of OCV on Raman peak area.•Application of model ASC gave an opportunity to significantly extend a range of current loads.•Impedance spectra showed Raman estimated anode overpotential to be contribution of the fuel oxidation anode reaction.</description><subject>Anode-supported</subject><subject>Anodes</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Conductors</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Electrolyte-supported</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>Electrolytic cells</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Fuel mixtures</subject><subject>Magnetron sputtering</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Overpotential</subject><subject>Raman spectroscopy</subject><subject>Single crystals</subject><subject>Single-crystal solid electrolyte</subject><subject>Solid electrolytes</subject><subject>Solid oxide fuel cells</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><subject>Thin-film electrolyte</subject><issn>0167-2738</issn><issn>1872-7689</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlOwzAQhi0EEqXwANwscU7xkqSOOKGKTUKqxHK2HHtCXRqn9Tgg3h5X5cxpDv8yMx8hl5zNOOP19XqG6GeC8WbGecUafkQmXM1FMa9Vc0wm2TMvxFyqU3KGuGaM1VLVE7JbDP3WRI9DoENHfSjQp5G-mN4Eiml0HnAvvC7vF_TbpxVNK28_KfrwsYHCxh9MZkNNcHshFJ3f9LQ3HwFSzJW4HVOCCI720LfRBMBzctKZDcLF35yS9_u7t8Vj8bx8eFrcPhdWiioVNbO1kVy1ZalAGVcKbtsKhOMWXCXLpmla07mulPlnxYRrW1EJUUprmXKlk1NydejdxmE3Aia9HsYY8kotZCWqRtZKZhc_uGwcECN0eht9b-KP5kzvyeq1zmT1nqw-kM2Zm0MG8vlfHqJG6yHku3wEm7Qb_D_pX98hgjA</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Agarkov, D.A.</creator><creator>Burmistrov, I.N.</creator><creator>Eliseeva, G.M.</creator><creator>Ionov, I.V.</creator><creator>Rabotkin, S.V.</creator><creator>Semenov, V.A.</creator><creator>Solovyev, A.A.</creator><creator>Tartakovskii, I.I.</creator><creator>Bredikhin, S.I.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Comparison of in-situ Raman studies of SOFC with thick single-crystal and thin-film magnetron sputtered membranes</title><author>Agarkov, D.A. ; Burmistrov, I.N. ; Eliseeva, G.M. ; Ionov, I.V. ; Rabotkin, S.V. ; Semenov, V.A. ; Solovyev, A.A. ; Tartakovskii, I.I. ; Bredikhin, S.I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-60c6a318b448e8ad421cb5e2d1ced534999bafdf43019802dbb252243cc08d4d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anode-supported</topic><topic>Anodes</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Conductors</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Electrolyte-supported</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>Electrolytic cells</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Fuel mixtures</topic><topic>Magnetron sputtering</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Overpotential</topic><topic>Raman spectroscopy</topic><topic>Single crystals</topic><topic>Single-crystal solid electrolyte</topic><topic>Solid electrolytes</topic><topic>Solid oxide fuel cells</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><topic>Thin-film electrolyte</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agarkov, D.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burmistrov, I.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eliseeva, G.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionov, I.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rabotkin, S.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semenov, V.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solovyev, A.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartakovskii, I.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bredikhin, S.I.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Solid state ionics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agarkov, D.A.</au><au>Burmistrov, I.N.</au><au>Eliseeva, G.M.</au><au>Ionov, I.V.</au><au>Rabotkin, S.V.</au><au>Semenov, V.A.</au><au>Solovyev, A.A.</au><au>Tartakovskii, I.I.</au><au>Bredikhin, S.I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of in-situ Raman studies of SOFC with thick single-crystal and thin-film magnetron sputtered membranes</atitle><jtitle>Solid state ionics</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>344</volume><spage>115091</spage><pages>115091-</pages><artnum>115091</artnum><issn>0167-2738</issn><eissn>1872-7689</eissn><abstract>In current work, we conducted comparative studies of electrolyte-supported and anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells by means of electrochemical techniques (studies of I-V curves and impedance spectroscopy) as well as using Raman spectroscopy from the inner interface of the anode electrode and solid electrolyte. Electrolyte-supported (ESC) SOFCs were based on thick single-crystalline 8YSZ anion conductor membrane and had multilayered composite electrodes. Anode-supported cells (ASC) were based on thick two-layered commercially available anode supports, the thin-film electrolyte was deposited using a magnetron sputtering technique. Comparative studies showed a significant dependence of 460 cm−1 Raman peak both on fuel mixture composition and current load applied to the cell. Linear dependences of OCV on normalized peak area gave an opportunity to estimate local anodic overpotential on the current load applied for both SOFC structures. Application of ASC model cells gave an opportunity to significantly extend a range of current loads applied. Analysis of impedance spectra gave the opportunity to study the structure of complex resistance as well as the structure of local anodic overpotential obtained. •Comparative studies ESC/ASC SOFCs via electrochemical techniques and Raman spectroscopy.•Significant dependence of 460 cm−1 peak (GDC sublayer) on fuel composition and current load was shown.•Local anodic overpotential was estimated using dependences of OCV on Raman peak area.•Application of model ASC gave an opportunity to significantly extend a range of current loads.•Impedance spectra showed Raman estimated anode overpotential to be contribution of the fuel oxidation anode reaction.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssi.2019.115091</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-2738
ispartof Solid state ionics, 2020-01, Vol.344, p.115091, Article 115091
issn 0167-2738
1872-7689
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2352593683
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anode-supported
Anodes
Comparative studies
Conductors
Electrodes
Electrolyte-supported
Electrolytes
Electrolytic cells
Fuel cells
Fuel mixtures
Magnetron sputtering
Membranes
Overpotential
Raman spectroscopy
Single crystals
Single-crystal solid electrolyte
Solid electrolytes
Solid oxide fuel cells
Thin films
Thin-film electrolyte
title Comparison of in-situ Raman studies of SOFC with thick single-crystal and thin-film magnetron sputtered membranes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A44%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20in-situ%20Raman%20studies%20of%20SOFC%20with%20thick%20single-crystal%20and%20thin-film%20magnetron%20sputtered%20membranes&rft.jtitle=Solid%20state%20ionics&rft.au=Agarkov,%20D.A.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=344&rft.spage=115091&rft.pages=115091-&rft.artnum=115091&rft.issn=0167-2738&rft.eissn=1872-7689&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssi.2019.115091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2352593683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352593683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167273819306885&rfr_iscdi=true