Monte Carlo simulations of noble gas ion beam sputtering yield of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO with various thin coatings in AC‐PDP cells

MgO is one of the popular materials to be used as protection of the phosphor layer from plasma damage and reduction of the discharge voltages in the alternating current–type plasma display panel (AC‐PDP) cells. However, one limitation on the AC‐PDP lifetime is plasma erosion of MgO barrier coating....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surface and interface analysis 2020-03, Vol.52 (3), p.84-90
Hauptverfasser: Elhaitamy, Ouafae, El Marsi, Meriem, Lahlou, Latifa, El Ghazaouy, Kamal, Salama, Latifa, Rochd, Sanaa, Moultif, Rachida, Dezairi, Aouatif
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 90
container_issue 3
container_start_page 84
container_title Surface and interface analysis
container_volume 52
creator Elhaitamy, Ouafae
El Marsi, Meriem
Lahlou, Latifa
El Ghazaouy, Kamal
Salama, Latifa
Rochd, Sanaa
Moultif, Rachida
Dezairi, Aouatif
description MgO is one of the popular materials to be used as protection of the phosphor layer from plasma damage and reduction of the discharge voltages in the alternating current–type plasma display panel (AC‐PDP) cells. However, one limitation on the AC‐PDP lifetime is plasma erosion of MgO barrier coating. In order to maintain or extend the lifetime of the AC‐PDP, we have applied potential materials such as alumina (α‐Al2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and aluminum titanate (Al2TiO5) as a thin coating on the alkaline earth metal oxides. This review focuses on the effect of α‐Al2O3, TiO2, and Al2TiO5 on sputtering yields of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO bombarded by Ne+ and Xe+ ions in the energy range 100 to 300 eV. The SRIM‐2013 simulations have been compared with the available experimental data to test the validity of the model potential and to extract the surface binding energies. These energies are employed to obtain more realistic sputtering yields of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO coated with three different ceramic coatings. Our results have shown that the coated surfaces exhibit better erosion resistance than the uncoated surfaces. It is found that the Al2TiO5 coating provided superior protection against physical sputtering of the substrate; it will demonstrate better performance in comparison with α‐Al2O3 or TiO2 coating.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/sia.6721
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2352536642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2352536642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-acba36a7d828310f9541eef143511ad17731a5b4e646348d00ca827f9501fb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs4p-CcEvHiwMy9p0_Y456_BxgbbvaRt2mV0yUxax25evPs3-peYOa9e3oPHh--DL0LXQAZACL13Sgx4TOEE9YCkPEhTSE5Rj0BIAxpSOEcXzq0JIQlLeA99To1uJR4J2xjs1KZrRKuMdthUWJu8kbgWDvsLzqXYYLft2lZapWu8V7IpD2xaz-58gB8L64fQJX4QM7xT7Qq_C6tM53C7UhoXxmfr2sdpPBx9f3zNH-e4kE3jLtFZJRonr_52Hy2fn5aj12AyexmPhpOgoCmDQBS5YFzEZUITBqRKoxCkrCBkEYAoIY4ZiCgPJQ85C5OSkEIkNPaOQJVz1kc3x9itNW-ddG22Np3V_mNGWUQjxnlIvbo9qsIa56yssq1VG2H3GZDs0HHmO84OHXsaHOlONXL_r8sW4-Gv_wH5YnxC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352536642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monte Carlo simulations of noble gas ion beam sputtering yield of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO with various thin coatings in AC‐PDP cells</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Elhaitamy, Ouafae ; El Marsi, Meriem ; Lahlou, Latifa ; El Ghazaouy, Kamal ; Salama, Latifa ; Rochd, Sanaa ; Moultif, Rachida ; Dezairi, Aouatif</creator><creatorcontrib>Elhaitamy, Ouafae ; El Marsi, Meriem ; Lahlou, Latifa ; El Ghazaouy, Kamal ; Salama, Latifa ; Rochd, Sanaa ; Moultif, Rachida ; Dezairi, Aouatif</creatorcontrib><description>MgO is one of the popular materials to be used as protection of the phosphor layer from plasma damage and reduction of the discharge voltages in the alternating current–type plasma display panel (AC‐PDP) cells. However, one limitation on the AC‐PDP lifetime is plasma erosion of MgO barrier coating. In order to maintain or extend the lifetime of the AC‐PDP, we have applied potential materials such as alumina (α‐Al2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and aluminum titanate (Al2TiO5) as a thin coating on the alkaline earth metal oxides. This review focuses on the effect of α‐Al2O3, TiO2, and Al2TiO5 on sputtering yields of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO bombarded by Ne+ and Xe+ ions in the energy range 100 to 300 eV. The SRIM‐2013 simulations have been compared with the available experimental data to test the validity of the model potential and to extract the surface binding energies. These energies are employed to obtain more realistic sputtering yields of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO coated with three different ceramic coatings. Our results have shown that the coated surfaces exhibit better erosion resistance than the uncoated surfaces. It is found that the Al2TiO5 coating provided superior protection against physical sputtering of the substrate; it will demonstrate better performance in comparison with α‐Al2O3 or TiO2 coating.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-2421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9918</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sia.6721</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>alkaline earth metal oxides ; Alkaline earth metals ; Aluminum oxide ; Aluminum titanates ; Barium oxides ; Calcium oxide ; Ceramic coatings ; Computer simulation ; Erosion resistance ; erosion yield ; ion beam ; Ion beam sputtering ; Ion bombardment ; Magnesium oxide ; Metal oxides ; Phosphors ; plasma display panel ; Plasma erosion ; Rare gases ; Reinforced reaction injection molding ; Strontium oxides ; Substrates ; surface binding energy ; Titanium ; Titanium dioxide ; α‐Al2O3, TiO2, and Al2TiO5 thin coatings</subject><ispartof>Surface and interface analysis, 2020-03, Vol.52 (3), p.84-90</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-acba36a7d828310f9541eef143511ad17731a5b4e646348d00ca827f9501fb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-acba36a7d828310f9541eef143511ad17731a5b4e646348d00ca827f9501fb63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1007-3954 ; 0000-0002-9075-8450 ; 0000-0002-0826-2844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsia.6721$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsia.6721$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elhaitamy, Ouafae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Marsi, Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahlou, Latifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Ghazaouy, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salama, Latifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochd, Sanaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moultif, Rachida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dezairi, Aouatif</creatorcontrib><title>Monte Carlo simulations of noble gas ion beam sputtering yield of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO with various thin coatings in AC‐PDP cells</title><title>Surface and interface analysis</title><description>MgO is one of the popular materials to be used as protection of the phosphor layer from plasma damage and reduction of the discharge voltages in the alternating current–type plasma display panel (AC‐PDP) cells. However, one limitation on the AC‐PDP lifetime is plasma erosion of MgO barrier coating. In order to maintain or extend the lifetime of the AC‐PDP, we have applied potential materials such as alumina (α‐Al2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and aluminum titanate (Al2TiO5) as a thin coating on the alkaline earth metal oxides. This review focuses on the effect of α‐Al2O3, TiO2, and Al2TiO5 on sputtering yields of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO bombarded by Ne+ and Xe+ ions in the energy range 100 to 300 eV. The SRIM‐2013 simulations have been compared with the available experimental data to test the validity of the model potential and to extract the surface binding energies. These energies are employed to obtain more realistic sputtering yields of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO coated with three different ceramic coatings. Our results have shown that the coated surfaces exhibit better erosion resistance than the uncoated surfaces. It is found that the Al2TiO5 coating provided superior protection against physical sputtering of the substrate; it will demonstrate better performance in comparison with α‐Al2O3 or TiO2 coating.</description><subject>alkaline earth metal oxides</subject><subject>Alkaline earth metals</subject><subject>Aluminum oxide</subject><subject>Aluminum titanates</subject><subject>Barium oxides</subject><subject>Calcium oxide</subject><subject>Ceramic coatings</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Erosion resistance</subject><subject>erosion yield</subject><subject>ion beam</subject><subject>Ion beam sputtering</subject><subject>Ion bombardment</subject><subject>Magnesium oxide</subject><subject>Metal oxides</subject><subject>Phosphors</subject><subject>plasma display panel</subject><subject>Plasma erosion</subject><subject>Rare gases</subject><subject>Reinforced reaction injection molding</subject><subject>Strontium oxides</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>surface binding energy</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Titanium dioxide</subject><subject>α‐Al2O3, TiO2, and Al2TiO5 thin coatings</subject><issn>0142-2421</issn><issn>1096-9918</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M9LwzAUB_AgCs4p-CcEvHiwMy9p0_Y456_BxgbbvaRt2mV0yUxax25evPs3-peYOa9e3oPHh--DL0LXQAZACL13Sgx4TOEE9YCkPEhTSE5Rj0BIAxpSOEcXzq0JIQlLeA99To1uJR4J2xjs1KZrRKuMdthUWJu8kbgWDvsLzqXYYLft2lZapWu8V7IpD2xaz-58gB8L64fQJX4QM7xT7Qq_C6tM53C7UhoXxmfr2sdpPBx9f3zNH-e4kE3jLtFZJRonr_52Hy2fn5aj12AyexmPhpOgoCmDQBS5YFzEZUITBqRKoxCkrCBkEYAoIY4ZiCgPJQ85C5OSkEIkNPaOQJVz1kc3x9itNW-ddG22Np3V_mNGWUQjxnlIvbo9qsIa56yssq1VG2H3GZDs0HHmO84OHXsaHOlONXL_r8sW4-Gv_wH5YnxC</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Elhaitamy, Ouafae</creator><creator>El Marsi, Meriem</creator><creator>Lahlou, Latifa</creator><creator>El Ghazaouy, Kamal</creator><creator>Salama, Latifa</creator><creator>Rochd, Sanaa</creator><creator>Moultif, Rachida</creator><creator>Dezairi, Aouatif</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-3954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-8450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-2844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Monte Carlo simulations of noble gas ion beam sputtering yield of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO with various thin coatings in AC‐PDP cells</title><author>Elhaitamy, Ouafae ; El Marsi, Meriem ; Lahlou, Latifa ; El Ghazaouy, Kamal ; Salama, Latifa ; Rochd, Sanaa ; Moultif, Rachida ; Dezairi, Aouatif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2931-acba36a7d828310f9541eef143511ad17731a5b4e646348d00ca827f9501fb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>alkaline earth metal oxides</topic><topic>Alkaline earth metals</topic><topic>Aluminum oxide</topic><topic>Aluminum titanates</topic><topic>Barium oxides</topic><topic>Calcium oxide</topic><topic>Ceramic coatings</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Erosion resistance</topic><topic>erosion yield</topic><topic>ion beam</topic><topic>Ion beam sputtering</topic><topic>Ion bombardment</topic><topic>Magnesium oxide</topic><topic>Metal oxides</topic><topic>Phosphors</topic><topic>plasma display panel</topic><topic>Plasma erosion</topic><topic>Rare gases</topic><topic>Reinforced reaction injection molding</topic><topic>Strontium oxides</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>surface binding energy</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Titanium dioxide</topic><topic>α‐Al2O3, TiO2, and Al2TiO5 thin coatings</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elhaitamy, Ouafae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Marsi, Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lahlou, Latifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Ghazaouy, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salama, Latifa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rochd, Sanaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moultif, Rachida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dezairi, Aouatif</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Surface and interface analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elhaitamy, Ouafae</au><au>El Marsi, Meriem</au><au>Lahlou, Latifa</au><au>El Ghazaouy, Kamal</au><au>Salama, Latifa</au><au>Rochd, Sanaa</au><au>Moultif, Rachida</au><au>Dezairi, Aouatif</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monte Carlo simulations of noble gas ion beam sputtering yield of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO with various thin coatings in AC‐PDP cells</atitle><jtitle>Surface and interface analysis</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>84</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>84-90</pages><issn>0142-2421</issn><eissn>1096-9918</eissn><abstract>MgO is one of the popular materials to be used as protection of the phosphor layer from plasma damage and reduction of the discharge voltages in the alternating current–type plasma display panel (AC‐PDP) cells. However, one limitation on the AC‐PDP lifetime is plasma erosion of MgO barrier coating. In order to maintain or extend the lifetime of the AC‐PDP, we have applied potential materials such as alumina (α‐Al2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and aluminum titanate (Al2TiO5) as a thin coating on the alkaline earth metal oxides. This review focuses on the effect of α‐Al2O3, TiO2, and Al2TiO5 on sputtering yields of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO bombarded by Ne+ and Xe+ ions in the energy range 100 to 300 eV. The SRIM‐2013 simulations have been compared with the available experimental data to test the validity of the model potential and to extract the surface binding energies. These energies are employed to obtain more realistic sputtering yields of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO coated with three different ceramic coatings. Our results have shown that the coated surfaces exhibit better erosion resistance than the uncoated surfaces. It is found that the Al2TiO5 coating provided superior protection against physical sputtering of the substrate; it will demonstrate better performance in comparison with α‐Al2O3 or TiO2 coating.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sia.6721</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-3954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9075-8450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0826-2844</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-2421
ispartof Surface and interface analysis, 2020-03, Vol.52 (3), p.84-90
issn 0142-2421
1096-9918
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2352536642
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects alkaline earth metal oxides
Alkaline earth metals
Aluminum oxide
Aluminum titanates
Barium oxides
Calcium oxide
Ceramic coatings
Computer simulation
Erosion resistance
erosion yield
ion beam
Ion beam sputtering
Ion bombardment
Magnesium oxide
Metal oxides
Phosphors
plasma display panel
Plasma erosion
Rare gases
Reinforced reaction injection molding
Strontium oxides
Substrates
surface binding energy
Titanium
Titanium dioxide
α‐Al2O3, TiO2, and Al2TiO5 thin coatings
title Monte Carlo simulations of noble gas ion beam sputtering yield of MgO, CaO, SrO, and BaO with various thin coatings in AC‐PDP cells
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A23%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monte%20Carlo%20simulations%20of%20noble%20gas%20ion%20beam%20sputtering%20yield%20of%20MgO,%20CaO,%20SrO,%20and%20BaO%20with%20various%20thin%20coatings%20in%20AC%E2%80%90PDP%20cells&rft.jtitle=Surface%20and%20interface%20analysis&rft.au=Elhaitamy,%20Ouafae&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=84&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=84-90&rft.issn=0142-2421&rft.eissn=1096-9918&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sia.6721&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2352536642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352536642&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true