Investigation of Object-Based Attention in Pigeons (Columba livia) and Hill Mynas (Gracula religiosa) Using a Spatial Cueing Task

In previous research, pigeons and hill mynas that performed differently on an object permanence task were presumed to attend to objects in different ways (Plowright, Reid, & Kilian, 1998). In the current study, we conducted 4 experiments to investigate if the attention of hill mynas and pigeons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of comparative psychology (1983) 2020-02, Vol.134 (1), p.42-51
Hauptverfasser: Fujii, Kazuki, Ushitani, Tomokazu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue 1
container_start_page 42
container_title Journal of comparative psychology (1983)
container_volume 134
creator Fujii, Kazuki
Ushitani, Tomokazu
description In previous research, pigeons and hill mynas that performed differently on an object permanence task were presumed to attend to objects in different ways (Plowright, Reid, & Kilian, 1998). In the current study, we conducted 4 experiments to investigate if the attention of hill mynas and pigeons is object-based and if there are species differences in their visual-attentional processes. In Experiment 1, pigeons were tested in a spatial cueing task requiring them to respond sequentially to a cue and a target that appeared at 1 of the 4 ends of two rectangles. Both when the response to a fixation stimulus was required before target presentation (Experiment 1A) and when such a response was not required (Experiment 1B), there were no significant differences in reaction times to the targets appearing at cued and noncued rectangles; these results provided no evidence of object-based attention in pigeons. In Experiment 2, for 2 of the 3 hill mynas tested in a procedure similar to that for the pigeons in Experiment 1B, reaction times were shorter to the target appearing on the cued rectangle than to the target appearing on noncued rectangle, suggesting the operation of object-based attention, as in humans. In Experiment 3, we tested naive pigeons by means of the procedure used for hill mynas in Experiment 2. However, again pigeons showed no evidence of object-based attention, suggesting a species difference in attentional processes. The generality of the current results and evolution of the possible species differences were discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/com0000196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2352359211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259596443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-2e9d8ec2964bfa68b75f6db01e022a784ae31c1a1b1f4ad58d6f7791b0ca6d4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq2--AEk4It_GM1NMpOZx7poW6hUsH0OdzKZJWs2mSYzhX30m5t1q74ZAoF7fpzDzSHkJbAPwIT6aOKOlQNd84isoBNdxVmrHpMVU6KuFBPNCXmW87YwDUj1lJwIENByLlfk52W4t3l2G5xdDDSO9LrfWjNXnzDbgZ7Nsw2_FRfoN7exMWT6Zh39suuRenfv8C3FMNAL5z39ug9Y5POEZvFIk_Vu42IuyG12YUORfp9KDnq6XuxhcIP5x3PyZESf7YuH95Tcfvl8s76orq7PL9dnVxUK0c4Vt93QWsO7RvYjNm2v6rEZegaWcY6qlWgFGEDoYZQ41O3QjEp10DODzSB7cUpeH32nFO-WsrPexiWFEqm5qMvtOMB_KV53dYmXolDvjpRJMedkRz0lt8O018D0oRP9r5MCv3qwXPqdHf6if0oowPsjgBPqKe8NptkZb7NZUirffzDTIKQGLbn4BRhvlbo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259596443</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of Object-Based Attention in Pigeons (Columba livia) and Hill Mynas (Gracula religiosa) Using a Spatial Cueing Task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Fujii, Kazuki ; Ushitani, Tomokazu</creator><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Kazuki ; Ushitani, Tomokazu ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M</creatorcontrib><description>In previous research, pigeons and hill mynas that performed differently on an object permanence task were presumed to attend to objects in different ways (Plowright, Reid, &amp; Kilian, 1998). In the current study, we conducted 4 experiments to investigate if the attention of hill mynas and pigeons is object-based and if there are species differences in their visual-attentional processes. In Experiment 1, pigeons were tested in a spatial cueing task requiring them to respond sequentially to a cue and a target that appeared at 1 of the 4 ends of two rectangles. Both when the response to a fixation stimulus was required before target presentation (Experiment 1A) and when such a response was not required (Experiment 1B), there were no significant differences in reaction times to the targets appearing at cued and noncued rectangles; these results provided no evidence of object-based attention in pigeons. In Experiment 2, for 2 of the 3 hill mynas tested in a procedure similar to that for the pigeons in Experiment 1B, reaction times were shorter to the target appearing on the cued rectangle than to the target appearing on noncued rectangle, suggesting the operation of object-based attention, as in humans. In Experiment 3, we tested naive pigeons by means of the procedure used for hill mynas in Experiment 2. However, again pigeons showed no evidence of object-based attention, suggesting a species difference in attentional processes. The generality of the current results and evolution of the possible species differences were discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/com0000196</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31318224</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animals ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Columbidae - physiology ; Cues ; Experiments ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Monkeys &amp; apes ; Object Permanence ; Orientation - physiology ; Pigeons ; Reaction Time ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Space Perception - physiology ; Spatial Learning ; Species Differences ; Starlings - physiology ; Studies ; Visual Attention ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Visual task performance</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2020-02, Vol.134 (1), p.42-51</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-1659-1784</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31318224$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ushitani, Tomokazu</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of Object-Based Attention in Pigeons (Columba livia) and Hill Mynas (Gracula religiosa) Using a Spatial Cueing Task</title><title>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</title><addtitle>J Comp Psychol</addtitle><description>In previous research, pigeons and hill mynas that performed differently on an object permanence task were presumed to attend to objects in different ways (Plowright, Reid, &amp; Kilian, 1998). In the current study, we conducted 4 experiments to investigate if the attention of hill mynas and pigeons is object-based and if there are species differences in their visual-attentional processes. In Experiment 1, pigeons were tested in a spatial cueing task requiring them to respond sequentially to a cue and a target that appeared at 1 of the 4 ends of two rectangles. Both when the response to a fixation stimulus was required before target presentation (Experiment 1A) and when such a response was not required (Experiment 1B), there were no significant differences in reaction times to the targets appearing at cued and noncued rectangles; these results provided no evidence of object-based attention in pigeons. In Experiment 2, for 2 of the 3 hill mynas tested in a procedure similar to that for the pigeons in Experiment 1B, reaction times were shorter to the target appearing on the cued rectangle than to the target appearing on noncued rectangle, suggesting the operation of object-based attention, as in humans. In Experiment 3, we tested naive pigeons by means of the procedure used for hill mynas in Experiment 2. However, again pigeons showed no evidence of object-based attention, suggesting a species difference in attentional processes. The generality of the current results and evolution of the possible species differences were discussed.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Columbidae - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monkeys &amp; apes</subject><subject>Object Permanence</subject><subject>Orientation - physiology</subject><subject>Pigeons</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial Learning</subject><subject>Species Differences</subject><subject>Starlings - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Visual Attention</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><issn>0735-7036</issn><issn>1939-2087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYModq2--AEk4It_GM1NMpOZx7poW6hUsH0OdzKZJWs2mSYzhX30m5t1q74ZAoF7fpzDzSHkJbAPwIT6aOKOlQNd84isoBNdxVmrHpMVU6KuFBPNCXmW87YwDUj1lJwIENByLlfk52W4t3l2G5xdDDSO9LrfWjNXnzDbgZ7Nsw2_FRfoN7exMWT6Zh39suuRenfv8C3FMNAL5z39ug9Y5POEZvFIk_Vu42IuyG12YUORfp9KDnq6XuxhcIP5x3PyZESf7YuH95Tcfvl8s76orq7PL9dnVxUK0c4Vt93QWsO7RvYjNm2v6rEZegaWcY6qlWgFGEDoYZQ41O3QjEp10DODzSB7cUpeH32nFO-WsrPexiWFEqm5qMvtOMB_KV53dYmXolDvjpRJMedkRz0lt8O018D0oRP9r5MCv3qwXPqdHf6if0oowPsjgBPqKe8NptkZb7NZUirffzDTIKQGLbn4BRhvlbo</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Fujii, Kazuki</creator><creator>Ushitani, Tomokazu</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1659-1784</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Investigation of Object-Based Attention in Pigeons (Columba livia) and Hill Mynas (Gracula religiosa) Using a Spatial Cueing Task</title><author>Fujii, Kazuki ; Ushitani, Tomokazu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a338t-2e9d8ec2964bfa68b75f6db01e022a784ae31c1a1b1f4ad58d6f7791b0ca6d4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Columbidae - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monkeys &amp; apes</topic><topic>Object Permanence</topic><topic>Orientation - physiology</topic><topic>Pigeons</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial Learning</topic><topic>Species Differences</topic><topic>Starlings - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Visual Attention</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ushitani, Tomokazu</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujii, Kazuki</au><au>Ushitani, Tomokazu</au><au>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of Object-Based Attention in Pigeons (Columba livia) and Hill Mynas (Gracula religiosa) Using a Spatial Cueing Task</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle><addtitle>J Comp Psychol</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>42-51</pages><issn>0735-7036</issn><eissn>1939-2087</eissn><abstract>In previous research, pigeons and hill mynas that performed differently on an object permanence task were presumed to attend to objects in different ways (Plowright, Reid, &amp; Kilian, 1998). In the current study, we conducted 4 experiments to investigate if the attention of hill mynas and pigeons is object-based and if there are species differences in their visual-attentional processes. In Experiment 1, pigeons were tested in a spatial cueing task requiring them to respond sequentially to a cue and a target that appeared at 1 of the 4 ends of two rectangles. Both when the response to a fixation stimulus was required before target presentation (Experiment 1A) and when such a response was not required (Experiment 1B), there were no significant differences in reaction times to the targets appearing at cued and noncued rectangles; these results provided no evidence of object-based attention in pigeons. In Experiment 2, for 2 of the 3 hill mynas tested in a procedure similar to that for the pigeons in Experiment 1B, reaction times were shorter to the target appearing on the cued rectangle than to the target appearing on noncued rectangle, suggesting the operation of object-based attention, as in humans. In Experiment 3, we tested naive pigeons by means of the procedure used for hill mynas in Experiment 2. However, again pigeons showed no evidence of object-based attention, suggesting a species difference in attentional processes. The generality of the current results and evolution of the possible species differences were discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31318224</pmid><doi>10.1037/com0000196</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1659-1784</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0735-7036
ispartof Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2020-02, Vol.134 (1), p.42-51
issn 0735-7036
1939-2087
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2352359211
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Animal
Animals
Attention
Attention - physiology
Columbidae - physiology
Cues
Experiments
Female
Humans
Male
Monkeys & apes
Object Permanence
Orientation - physiology
Pigeons
Reaction Time
Reaction Time - physiology
Space Perception - physiology
Spatial Learning
Species Differences
Starlings - physiology
Studies
Visual Attention
Visual Perception - physiology
Visual task performance
title Investigation of Object-Based Attention in Pigeons (Columba livia) and Hill Mynas (Gracula religiosa) Using a Spatial Cueing Task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A35%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20Object-Based%20Attention%20in%20Pigeons%20(Columba%20livia)%20and%20Hill%20Mynas%20(Gracula%20religiosa)%20Using%20a%20Spatial%20Cueing%20Task&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20psychology%20(1983)&rft.au=Fujii,%20Kazuki&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=42-51&rft.issn=0735-7036&rft.eissn=1939-2087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/com0000196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259596443%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259596443&rft_id=info:pmid/31318224&rfr_iscdi=true