Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment
Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cogent engineering 2019-01, Vol.6 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Cogent engineering |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel Lola, Akinyemi Marvel Maxwell, Omeje Sayo, Akinwumi |
description | Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotechnical investigation for site characterization without compromise to standards was the focus of this study. Seismic refraction method; a quick, non-destructive and non-intrusive method of obtaining key subsoil geotechnical properties necessary for foundation design for proposed engineering facilities was suggested. This approach was used to generate some seismic parameters, which are very relevant to geotechnical investigation. The seismic wave velocities generated from near surface refraction method was used to determine the allowable bearing capacity, the ultimate bearing pressure, and the liquefaction potential so as to delineate the most competent layer. The seismic refraction method delineated two layers, with the result of the allowable bearing capacity ranging between 0.092 and 0.593 MPa, the ultimate bearing capacity varied from 0.369 to 2.298 MPa while the result of the liquefaction potential varied between 0.533 and 1.237. In all, it was observed that the second layer is more competent than the first layer. Furthermore, regression equations were derived for both geotechnical parameters in order to directly derive the geotechnical parameters from the compressional wave velocities. The results obtained correlated with the results of standard geotechnical investigations carried out, which implies that the competence of any site having the same geological formation could be determined using the same approach. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2352084722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_82d348aa871a4085953dfe6999ec3685</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2352084722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fae32dba66826bfc7bf2e2f5d86ca63f795ebd50b49230af284ef165d95d5eba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUuLFDEQbkTBZd2fIDR47jGPTia5KYu6C4t60HOoTipjhu5krGSU-ff2OKt48lTF96qCr-tecrbhzLDXQkrOLdcbwbjdcGUMM_xJd3XGhzPx9J_9eXdT654xxuWomGVX3cfPhCH5lvKuD6cMS_L9DktD_y0nD3N_AIIFG1LtU-4zAg31SBE89r5AbasE849EJS-Y24vuWYS54s3jvO6-vn_35fZuePj04f727cPgR8XbEAGlCBNobYSeot9OUaCIKhjtQcu4tQqnoNg0WiEZRGFGjFyrYFVYGZDX3f0lNxTYuwOlBejkCiT3Gyi0c0At-RmdEUGOBsBsOYzMKKtkiKitteilNmrNenXJOlD5fsTa3L4cKa_vOyGVYGbcCrGq1EXlqdRKGP9e5cydm3B_mnDnJtxjE6vvzcWXciy0wM9Cc3ANTnOhSJB9qk7-P-IXJZGP2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352084722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun ; Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel ; Lola, Akinyemi Marvel ; Maxwell, Omeje ; Sayo, Akinwumi</creator><contributor>Villalobos, Felipe</contributor><creatorcontrib>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun ; Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel ; Lola, Akinyemi Marvel ; Maxwell, Omeje ; Sayo, Akinwumi ; Villalobos, Felipe</creatorcontrib><description>Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotechnical investigation for site characterization without compromise to standards was the focus of this study. Seismic refraction method; a quick, non-destructive and non-intrusive method of obtaining key subsoil geotechnical properties necessary for foundation design for proposed engineering facilities was suggested. This approach was used to generate some seismic parameters, which are very relevant to geotechnical investigation. The seismic wave velocities generated from near surface refraction method was used to determine the allowable bearing capacity, the ultimate bearing pressure, and the liquefaction potential so as to delineate the most competent layer. The seismic refraction method delineated two layers, with the result of the allowable bearing capacity ranging between 0.092 and 0.593 MPa, the ultimate bearing capacity varied from 0.369 to 2.298 MPa while the result of the liquefaction potential varied between 0.533 and 1.237. In all, it was observed that the second layer is more competent than the first layer. Furthermore, regression equations were derived for both geotechnical parameters in order to directly derive the geotechnical parameters from the compressional wave velocities. The results obtained correlated with the results of standard geotechnical investigations carried out, which implies that the competence of any site having the same geological formation could be determined using the same approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-1916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-1916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Cogent</publisher><subject>allowable bearing capacity ; Bearing capacity ; Building failures ; Coastal environments ; Collapse ; Conduction ; Earth science ; Engineers ; Environmental engineering ; geotechnical ; Geotechnical engineering ; Heavy metal content ; Liquefaction ; liquefaction potential ; Mechanical properties ; Nondestructive testing ; Order parameters ; Refraction ; Regression analysis ; regression equation ; Seasons ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic properties ; Seismic waves ; Shear strength ; Site characterization ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Cogent engineering, 2019-01, Vol.6 (1)</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. 2019</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fae32dba66826bfc7bf2e2f5d86ca63f795ebd50b49230af284ef165d95d5eba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fae32dba66826bfc7bf2e2f5d86ca63f795ebd50b49230af284ef165d95d5eba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2101,27501,27923,27924,59142,59143</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Villalobos, Felipe</contributor><creatorcontrib>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lola, Akinyemi Marvel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Omeje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayo, Akinwumi</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment</title><title>Cogent engineering</title><description>Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotechnical investigation for site characterization without compromise to standards was the focus of this study. Seismic refraction method; a quick, non-destructive and non-intrusive method of obtaining key subsoil geotechnical properties necessary for foundation design for proposed engineering facilities was suggested. This approach was used to generate some seismic parameters, which are very relevant to geotechnical investigation. The seismic wave velocities generated from near surface refraction method was used to determine the allowable bearing capacity, the ultimate bearing pressure, and the liquefaction potential so as to delineate the most competent layer. The seismic refraction method delineated two layers, with the result of the allowable bearing capacity ranging between 0.092 and 0.593 MPa, the ultimate bearing capacity varied from 0.369 to 2.298 MPa while the result of the liquefaction potential varied between 0.533 and 1.237. In all, it was observed that the second layer is more competent than the first layer. Furthermore, regression equations were derived for both geotechnical parameters in order to directly derive the geotechnical parameters from the compressional wave velocities. The results obtained correlated with the results of standard geotechnical investigations carried out, which implies that the competence of any site having the same geological formation could be determined using the same approach.</description><subject>allowable bearing capacity</subject><subject>Bearing capacity</subject><subject>Building failures</subject><subject>Coastal environments</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Conduction</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>geotechnical</subject><subject>Geotechnical engineering</subject><subject>Heavy metal content</subject><subject>Liquefaction</subject><subject>liquefaction potential</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Order parameters</subject><subject>Refraction</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>regression equation</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic properties</subject><subject>Seismic waves</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Site characterization</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>2331-1916</issn><issn>2331-1916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUuLFDEQbkTBZd2fIDR47jGPTia5KYu6C4t60HOoTipjhu5krGSU-ff2OKt48lTF96qCr-tecrbhzLDXQkrOLdcbwbjdcGUMM_xJd3XGhzPx9J_9eXdT654xxuWomGVX3cfPhCH5lvKuD6cMS_L9DktD_y0nD3N_AIIFG1LtU-4zAg31SBE89r5AbasE849EJS-Y24vuWYS54s3jvO6-vn_35fZuePj04f727cPgR8XbEAGlCBNobYSeot9OUaCIKhjtQcu4tQqnoNg0WiEZRGFGjFyrYFVYGZDX3f0lNxTYuwOlBejkCiT3Gyi0c0At-RmdEUGOBsBsOYzMKKtkiKitteilNmrNenXJOlD5fsTa3L4cKa_vOyGVYGbcCrGq1EXlqdRKGP9e5cydm3B_mnDnJtxjE6vvzcWXciy0wM9Cc3ANTnOhSJB9qk7-P-IXJZGP2A</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun</creator><creator>Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel</creator><creator>Lola, Akinyemi Marvel</creator><creator>Maxwell, Omeje</creator><creator>Sayo, Akinwumi</creator><general>Cogent</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment</title><author>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun ; Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel ; Lola, Akinyemi Marvel ; Maxwell, Omeje ; Sayo, Akinwumi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fae32dba66826bfc7bf2e2f5d86ca63f795ebd50b49230af284ef165d95d5eba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>allowable bearing capacity</topic><topic>Bearing capacity</topic><topic>Building failures</topic><topic>Coastal environments</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Conduction</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>geotechnical</topic><topic>Geotechnical engineering</topic><topic>Heavy metal content</topic><topic>Liquefaction</topic><topic>liquefaction potential</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Order parameters</topic><topic>Refraction</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>regression equation</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic properties</topic><topic>Seismic waves</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Site characterization</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lola, Akinyemi Marvel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Omeje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayo, Akinwumi</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cogent engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun</au><au>Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel</au><au>Lola, Akinyemi Marvel</au><au>Maxwell, Omeje</au><au>Sayo, Akinwumi</au><au>Villalobos, Felipe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment</atitle><jtitle>Cogent engineering</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2331-1916</issn><eissn>2331-1916</eissn><abstract>Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotechnical investigation for site characterization without compromise to standards was the focus of this study. Seismic refraction method; a quick, non-destructive and non-intrusive method of obtaining key subsoil geotechnical properties necessary for foundation design for proposed engineering facilities was suggested. This approach was used to generate some seismic parameters, which are very relevant to geotechnical investigation. The seismic wave velocities generated from near surface refraction method was used to determine the allowable bearing capacity, the ultimate bearing pressure, and the liquefaction potential so as to delineate the most competent layer. The seismic refraction method delineated two layers, with the result of the allowable bearing capacity ranging between 0.092 and 0.593 MPa, the ultimate bearing capacity varied from 0.369 to 2.298 MPa while the result of the liquefaction potential varied between 0.533 and 1.237. In all, it was observed that the second layer is more competent than the first layer. Furthermore, regression equations were derived for both geotechnical parameters in order to directly derive the geotechnical parameters from the compressional wave velocities. The results obtained correlated with the results of standard geotechnical investigations carried out, which implies that the competence of any site having the same geological formation could be determined using the same approach.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Cogent</pub><doi>10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2331-1916 |
ispartof | Cogent engineering, 2019-01, Vol.6 (1) |
issn | 2331-1916 2331-1916 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2352084722 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | allowable bearing capacity Bearing capacity Building failures Coastal environments Collapse Conduction Earth science Engineers Environmental engineering geotechnical Geotechnical engineering Heavy metal content Liquefaction liquefaction potential Mechanical properties Nondestructive testing Order parameters Refraction Regression analysis regression equation Seasons Seismic engineering Seismic properties Seismic waves Shear strength Site characterization Velocity |
title | Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A12%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20dynamic%20geotechnical%20parameters%20in%20near-surface%20coastal%20environment&rft.jtitle=Cogent%20engineering&rft.au=Oladotun,%20Adewoyin%20Olusegun&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2331-1916&rft.eissn=2331-1916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2352084722%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352084722&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_82d348aa871a4085953dfe6999ec3685&rfr_iscdi=true |