Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment

Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cogent engineering 2019-01, Vol.6 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun, Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel, Lola, Akinyemi Marvel, Maxwell, Omeje, Sayo, Akinwumi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Cogent engineering
container_volume 6
creator Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun
Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel
Lola, Akinyemi Marvel
Maxwell, Omeje
Sayo, Akinwumi
description Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotechnical investigation for site characterization without compromise to standards was the focus of this study. Seismic refraction method; a quick, non-destructive and non-intrusive method of obtaining key subsoil geotechnical properties necessary for foundation design for proposed engineering facilities was suggested. This approach was used to generate some seismic parameters, which are very relevant to geotechnical investigation. The seismic wave velocities generated from near surface refraction method was used to determine the allowable bearing capacity, the ultimate bearing pressure, and the liquefaction potential so as to delineate the most competent layer. The seismic refraction method delineated two layers, with the result of the allowable bearing capacity ranging between 0.092 and 0.593 MPa, the ultimate bearing capacity varied from 0.369 to 2.298 MPa while the result of the liquefaction potential varied between 0.533 and 1.237. In all, it was observed that the second layer is more competent than the first layer. Furthermore, regression equations were derived for both geotechnical parameters in order to directly derive the geotechnical parameters from the compressional wave velocities. The results obtained correlated with the results of standard geotechnical investigations carried out, which implies that the competence of any site having the same geological formation could be determined using the same approach.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2352084722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_82d348aa871a4085953dfe6999ec3685</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2352084722</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fae32dba66826bfc7bf2e2f5d86ca63f795ebd50b49230af284ef165d95d5eba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUuLFDEQbkTBZd2fIDR47jGPTia5KYu6C4t60HOoTipjhu5krGSU-ff2OKt48lTF96qCr-tecrbhzLDXQkrOLdcbwbjdcGUMM_xJd3XGhzPx9J_9eXdT654xxuWomGVX3cfPhCH5lvKuD6cMS_L9DktD_y0nD3N_AIIFG1LtU-4zAg31SBE89r5AbasE849EJS-Y24vuWYS54s3jvO6-vn_35fZuePj04f727cPgR8XbEAGlCBNobYSeot9OUaCIKhjtQcu4tQqnoNg0WiEZRGFGjFyrYFVYGZDX3f0lNxTYuwOlBejkCiT3Gyi0c0At-RmdEUGOBsBsOYzMKKtkiKitteilNmrNenXJOlD5fsTa3L4cKa_vOyGVYGbcCrGq1EXlqdRKGP9e5cydm3B_mnDnJtxjE6vvzcWXciy0wM9Cc3ANTnOhSJB9qk7-P-IXJZGP2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352084722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment</title><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun ; Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel ; Lola, Akinyemi Marvel ; Maxwell, Omeje ; Sayo, Akinwumi</creator><contributor>Villalobos, Felipe</contributor><creatorcontrib>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun ; Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel ; Lola, Akinyemi Marvel ; Maxwell, Omeje ; Sayo, Akinwumi ; Villalobos, Felipe</creatorcontrib><description>Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotechnical investigation for site characterization without compromise to standards was the focus of this study. Seismic refraction method; a quick, non-destructive and non-intrusive method of obtaining key subsoil geotechnical properties necessary for foundation design for proposed engineering facilities was suggested. This approach was used to generate some seismic parameters, which are very relevant to geotechnical investigation. The seismic wave velocities generated from near surface refraction method was used to determine the allowable bearing capacity, the ultimate bearing pressure, and the liquefaction potential so as to delineate the most competent layer. The seismic refraction method delineated two layers, with the result of the allowable bearing capacity ranging between 0.092 and 0.593 MPa, the ultimate bearing capacity varied from 0.369 to 2.298 MPa while the result of the liquefaction potential varied between 0.533 and 1.237. In all, it was observed that the second layer is more competent than the first layer. Furthermore, regression equations were derived for both geotechnical parameters in order to directly derive the geotechnical parameters from the compressional wave velocities. The results obtained correlated with the results of standard geotechnical investigations carried out, which implies that the competence of any site having the same geological formation could be determined using the same approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-1916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-1916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Cogent</publisher><subject>allowable bearing capacity ; Bearing capacity ; Building failures ; Coastal environments ; Collapse ; Conduction ; Earth science ; Engineers ; Environmental engineering ; geotechnical ; Geotechnical engineering ; Heavy metal content ; Liquefaction ; liquefaction potential ; Mechanical properties ; Nondestructive testing ; Order parameters ; Refraction ; Regression analysis ; regression equation ; Seasons ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic properties ; Seismic waves ; Shear strength ; Site characterization ; Velocity</subject><ispartof>Cogent engineering, 2019-01, Vol.6 (1)</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. 2019</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fae32dba66826bfc7bf2e2f5d86ca63f795ebd50b49230af284ef165d95d5eba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fae32dba66826bfc7bf2e2f5d86ca63f795ebd50b49230af284ef165d95d5eba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2101,27501,27923,27924,59142,59143</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Villalobos, Felipe</contributor><creatorcontrib>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lola, Akinyemi Marvel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Omeje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayo, Akinwumi</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment</title><title>Cogent engineering</title><description>Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotechnical investigation for site characterization without compromise to standards was the focus of this study. Seismic refraction method; a quick, non-destructive and non-intrusive method of obtaining key subsoil geotechnical properties necessary for foundation design for proposed engineering facilities was suggested. This approach was used to generate some seismic parameters, which are very relevant to geotechnical investigation. The seismic wave velocities generated from near surface refraction method was used to determine the allowable bearing capacity, the ultimate bearing pressure, and the liquefaction potential so as to delineate the most competent layer. The seismic refraction method delineated two layers, with the result of the allowable bearing capacity ranging between 0.092 and 0.593 MPa, the ultimate bearing capacity varied from 0.369 to 2.298 MPa while the result of the liquefaction potential varied between 0.533 and 1.237. In all, it was observed that the second layer is more competent than the first layer. Furthermore, regression equations were derived for both geotechnical parameters in order to directly derive the geotechnical parameters from the compressional wave velocities. The results obtained correlated with the results of standard geotechnical investigations carried out, which implies that the competence of any site having the same geological formation could be determined using the same approach.</description><subject>allowable bearing capacity</subject><subject>Bearing capacity</subject><subject>Building failures</subject><subject>Coastal environments</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Conduction</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Engineers</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>geotechnical</subject><subject>Geotechnical engineering</subject><subject>Heavy metal content</subject><subject>Liquefaction</subject><subject>liquefaction potential</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Nondestructive testing</subject><subject>Order parameters</subject><subject>Refraction</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>regression equation</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic properties</subject><subject>Seismic waves</subject><subject>Shear strength</subject><subject>Site characterization</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><issn>2331-1916</issn><issn>2331-1916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUuLFDEQbkTBZd2fIDR47jGPTia5KYu6C4t60HOoTipjhu5krGSU-ff2OKt48lTF96qCr-tecrbhzLDXQkrOLdcbwbjdcGUMM_xJd3XGhzPx9J_9eXdT654xxuWomGVX3cfPhCH5lvKuD6cMS_L9DktD_y0nD3N_AIIFG1LtU-4zAg31SBE89r5AbasE849EJS-Y24vuWYS54s3jvO6-vn_35fZuePj04f727cPgR8XbEAGlCBNobYSeot9OUaCIKhjtQcu4tQqnoNg0WiEZRGFGjFyrYFVYGZDX3f0lNxTYuwOlBejkCiT3Gyi0c0At-RmdEUGOBsBsOYzMKKtkiKitteilNmrNenXJOlD5fsTa3L4cKa_vOyGVYGbcCrGq1EXlqdRKGP9e5cydm3B_mnDnJtxjE6vvzcWXciy0wM9Cc3ANTnOhSJB9qk7-P-IXJZGP2A</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun</creator><creator>Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel</creator><creator>Lola, Akinyemi Marvel</creator><creator>Maxwell, Omeje</creator><creator>Sayo, Akinwumi</creator><general>Cogent</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment</title><author>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun ; Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel ; Lola, Akinyemi Marvel ; Maxwell, Omeje ; Sayo, Akinwumi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-fae32dba66826bfc7bf2e2f5d86ca63f795ebd50b49230af284ef165d95d5eba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>allowable bearing capacity</topic><topic>Bearing capacity</topic><topic>Building failures</topic><topic>Coastal environments</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Conduction</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Engineers</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>geotechnical</topic><topic>Geotechnical engineering</topic><topic>Heavy metal content</topic><topic>Liquefaction</topic><topic>liquefaction potential</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Nondestructive testing</topic><topic>Order parameters</topic><topic>Refraction</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>regression equation</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic properties</topic><topic>Seismic waves</topic><topic>Shear strength</topic><topic>Site characterization</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lola, Akinyemi Marvel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maxwell, Omeje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayo, Akinwumi</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cogent engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oladotun, Adewoyin Olusegun</au><au>Oluwagbemi, Joshua Emmanuel</au><au>Lola, Akinyemi Marvel</au><au>Maxwell, Omeje</au><au>Sayo, Akinwumi</au><au>Villalobos, Felipe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment</atitle><jtitle>Cogent engineering</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2331-1916</issn><eissn>2331-1916</eissn><abstract>Conduction of geotechnical survey prior construction is a non-negotiable requirement before the erection of any engineering structure so as to avoid building collapse which has been rampant in our country of late. An easier, faster and relatively cheaper approach to conducting a comprehensive geotechnical investigation for site characterization without compromise to standards was the focus of this study. Seismic refraction method; a quick, non-destructive and non-intrusive method of obtaining key subsoil geotechnical properties necessary for foundation design for proposed engineering facilities was suggested. This approach was used to generate some seismic parameters, which are very relevant to geotechnical investigation. The seismic wave velocities generated from near surface refraction method was used to determine the allowable bearing capacity, the ultimate bearing pressure, and the liquefaction potential so as to delineate the most competent layer. The seismic refraction method delineated two layers, with the result of the allowable bearing capacity ranging between 0.092 and 0.593 MPa, the ultimate bearing capacity varied from 0.369 to 2.298 MPa while the result of the liquefaction potential varied between 0.533 and 1.237. In all, it was observed that the second layer is more competent than the first layer. Furthermore, regression equations were derived for both geotechnical parameters in order to directly derive the geotechnical parameters from the compressional wave velocities. The results obtained correlated with the results of standard geotechnical investigations carried out, which implies that the competence of any site having the same geological formation could be determined using the same approach.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Cogent</pub><doi>10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2331-1916
ispartof Cogent engineering, 2019-01, Vol.6 (1)
issn 2331-1916
2331-1916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2352084722
source Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects allowable bearing capacity
Bearing capacity
Building failures
Coastal environments
Collapse
Conduction
Earth science
Engineers
Environmental engineering
geotechnical
Geotechnical engineering
Heavy metal content
Liquefaction
liquefaction potential
Mechanical properties
Nondestructive testing
Order parameters
Refraction
Regression analysis
regression equation
Seasons
Seismic engineering
Seismic properties
Seismic waves
Shear strength
Site characterization
Velocity
title Predicting dynamic geotechnical parameters in near-surface coastal environment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A12%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20dynamic%20geotechnical%20parameters%20in%20near-surface%20coastal%20environment&rft.jtitle=Cogent%20engineering&rft.au=Oladotun,%20Adewoyin%20Olusegun&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2331-1916&rft.eissn=2331-1916&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/23311916.2019.1588081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2352084722%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352084722&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_82d348aa871a4085953dfe6999ec3685&rfr_iscdi=true