Numerical simulation of multistage fracturing optimization and application in coalbed methane horizontal wells

•The effects of crack lengths and spacing on the induced stress are calculated with the analytical model.•The mechanism of multiple fracture simultaneous and sequential propagation are studied with (XFEM).•The crack extending model and CBM productivity model are proposed and combined to optimize fra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Engineering fracture mechanics 2020-01, Vol.223, p.106738, Article 106738
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Jin, Zhao, Jinzhou, Hu, Yongquan, Zhang, Suian, Huang, Ting, Liu, Xinjia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106738
container_title Engineering fracture mechanics
container_volume 223
creator Zhao, Jin
Zhao, Jinzhou
Hu, Yongquan
Zhang, Suian
Huang, Ting
Liu, Xinjia
description •The effects of crack lengths and spacing on the induced stress are calculated with the analytical model.•The mechanism of multiple fracture simultaneous and sequential propagation are studied with (XFEM).•The crack extending model and CBM productivity model are proposed and combined to optimize fracture parameters.•The simulation results have been applied in CBM horizontal well of Jixian block . Multistage fracturing technology is critical to coalbed methane (CBM) production from horizontal wells. Further, optimizing the fracture parameters has a crucial influence on the stimulated reservoir volume and gas production. To investigate fracture parameter optimization, a stress interference model, hydraulic fracture propagation model, and a CBM productivity model are proposed. The effects of crack length and spacing for one to three fractures on the induced stress are calculated by implementing a static analysis MATLAB-developed program. The extended finite-element method is used to study the mechanism of simultaneous fracturing and sequential fracturing. In addition, the influences of cluster spacing and stage spacing on the stress field, formation pressure, fracture geometry, gas production, and reservoir pressure drop are comprehensively investigated by using Abaqus and COMET3 software. The simulation results indicate that with multiple fractures, fracture spacing of 80 m and fracture length of 160 m are conducive for dilating the secondary fracture system and producing a broader contact area in the coal seam. Moreover, an optimal cluster spacing of 15 m, a fracture interval of 80 m, and two cluster numbers per stage are better at forming a uniform fracture geometry with low injection pressure; within a given horizontal well section length of 500 m, fracture parameters with cluster spacing of 30 m, fracture spacing of 80 m, and two clusters per stage offer the best production performance. The simulation results are applied in well TP-07, and microseismic monitoring was conducted to monitor fracture propagation. The microseismic monitoring results are consistent with the numerical simulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106738
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2352068896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0013794419304114</els_id><sourcerecordid>2352068896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-82045f2b3acf8d4ad639d0115c30459c13b187791aca72c86d432d3c9d85f6853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUEtPxCAYJEYT19X_gPHcFUpL4Wg2vpKNXvRMWKC7NC1UoBr99bLWg0dP32tmvswAcInRCiNMr7uVcbs2SDUYtV-VCPO8pw1hR2CBWUOKhuD6GCwQwrnnVXUKzmLsEEINZWgB3NM0mGCV7GG0w9TLZL2DvoW5TzYmuTPwIJ-mYN0O-jHZwX7NKOk0lOPYZ_bPbB1UXvZbo-Fg0l46A_c-2C_vUpb_MH0fz8FJK_toLn7rErze3b6sH4rN8_3j-mZTKFLxVLASVXVbbolULdOV1JRwjTCuFckHrjDZZnMNx1LJplSM6oqUmiiuWd1SVpMluJp1x-DfJhOT6PwUXH4pSlKXiDLGaUbxGaWCjzGYVozBDjJ8CozEIV7RiT_xikO8Yo43c9cz12Qb79YEEZU1Thltg1FJaG__ofIN79GLmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352068896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical simulation of multistage fracturing optimization and application in coalbed methane horizontal wells</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhao, Jin ; Zhao, Jinzhou ; Hu, Yongquan ; Zhang, Suian ; Huang, Ting ; Liu, Xinjia</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jin ; Zhao, Jinzhou ; Hu, Yongquan ; Zhang, Suian ; Huang, Ting ; Liu, Xinjia</creatorcontrib><description>•The effects of crack lengths and spacing on the induced stress are calculated with the analytical model.•The mechanism of multiple fracture simultaneous and sequential propagation are studied with (XFEM).•The crack extending model and CBM productivity model are proposed and combined to optimize fracture parameters.•The simulation results have been applied in CBM horizontal well of Jixian block . Multistage fracturing technology is critical to coalbed methane (CBM) production from horizontal wells. Further, optimizing the fracture parameters has a crucial influence on the stimulated reservoir volume and gas production. To investigate fracture parameter optimization, a stress interference model, hydraulic fracture propagation model, and a CBM productivity model are proposed. The effects of crack length and spacing for one to three fractures on the induced stress are calculated by implementing a static analysis MATLAB-developed program. The extended finite-element method is used to study the mechanism of simultaneous fracturing and sequential fracturing. In addition, the influences of cluster spacing and stage spacing on the stress field, formation pressure, fracture geometry, gas production, and reservoir pressure drop are comprehensively investigated by using Abaqus and COMET3 software. The simulation results indicate that with multiple fractures, fracture spacing of 80 m and fracture length of 160 m are conducive for dilating the secondary fracture system and producing a broader contact area in the coal seam. Moreover, an optimal cluster spacing of 15 m, a fracture interval of 80 m, and two cluster numbers per stage are better at forming a uniform fracture geometry with low injection pressure; within a given horizontal well section length of 500 m, fracture parameters with cluster spacing of 30 m, fracture spacing of 80 m, and two clusters per stage offer the best production performance. The simulation results are applied in well TP-07, and microseismic monitoring was conducted to monitor fracture propagation. The microseismic monitoring results are consistent with the numerical simulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-7944</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106738</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>CBM ; Cluster spacing ; Clusters ; Coalbed methane ; Computer simulation ; Crack propagation ; Finite element method ; Fracture interval ; Fracture mechanics ; Horizontal well ; Horizontal wells ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Mathematical models ; Methane ; Microseisms ; Monitoring ; Multistage ; Optimization ; Parameters ; Pressure drop ; Reservoirs ; Simulation ; Staged fracturing ; Static code analysis ; Stress distribution ; Stress propagation ; Stress shadow</subject><ispartof>Engineering fracture mechanics, 2020-01, Vol.223, p.106738, Article 106738</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-82045f2b3acf8d4ad639d0115c30459c13b187791aca72c86d432d3c9d85f6853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-82045f2b3acf8d4ad639d0115c30459c13b187791aca72c86d432d3c9d85f6853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013794419304114$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jinzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yongquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Suian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinjia</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical simulation of multistage fracturing optimization and application in coalbed methane horizontal wells</title><title>Engineering fracture mechanics</title><description>•The effects of crack lengths and spacing on the induced stress are calculated with the analytical model.•The mechanism of multiple fracture simultaneous and sequential propagation are studied with (XFEM).•The crack extending model and CBM productivity model are proposed and combined to optimize fracture parameters.•The simulation results have been applied in CBM horizontal well of Jixian block . Multistage fracturing technology is critical to coalbed methane (CBM) production from horizontal wells. Further, optimizing the fracture parameters has a crucial influence on the stimulated reservoir volume and gas production. To investigate fracture parameter optimization, a stress interference model, hydraulic fracture propagation model, and a CBM productivity model are proposed. The effects of crack length and spacing for one to three fractures on the induced stress are calculated by implementing a static analysis MATLAB-developed program. The extended finite-element method is used to study the mechanism of simultaneous fracturing and sequential fracturing. In addition, the influences of cluster spacing and stage spacing on the stress field, formation pressure, fracture geometry, gas production, and reservoir pressure drop are comprehensively investigated by using Abaqus and COMET3 software. The simulation results indicate that with multiple fractures, fracture spacing of 80 m and fracture length of 160 m are conducive for dilating the secondary fracture system and producing a broader contact area in the coal seam. Moreover, an optimal cluster spacing of 15 m, a fracture interval of 80 m, and two cluster numbers per stage are better at forming a uniform fracture geometry with low injection pressure; within a given horizontal well section length of 500 m, fracture parameters with cluster spacing of 30 m, fracture spacing of 80 m, and two clusters per stage offer the best production performance. The simulation results are applied in well TP-07, and microseismic monitoring was conducted to monitor fracture propagation. The microseismic monitoring results are consistent with the numerical simulation.</description><subject>CBM</subject><subject>Cluster spacing</subject><subject>Clusters</subject><subject>Coalbed methane</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Crack propagation</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fracture interval</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Horizontal well</subject><subject>Horizontal wells</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Microseisms</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Multistage</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Pressure drop</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Staged fracturing</subject><subject>Static code analysis</subject><subject>Stress distribution</subject><subject>Stress propagation</subject><subject>Stress shadow</subject><issn>0013-7944</issn><issn>1873-7315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUEtPxCAYJEYT19X_gPHcFUpL4Wg2vpKNXvRMWKC7NC1UoBr99bLWg0dP32tmvswAcInRCiNMr7uVcbs2SDUYtV-VCPO8pw1hR2CBWUOKhuD6GCwQwrnnVXUKzmLsEEINZWgB3NM0mGCV7GG0w9TLZL2DvoW5TzYmuTPwIJ-mYN0O-jHZwX7NKOk0lOPYZ_bPbB1UXvZbo-Fg0l46A_c-2C_vUpb_MH0fz8FJK_toLn7rErze3b6sH4rN8_3j-mZTKFLxVLASVXVbbolULdOV1JRwjTCuFckHrjDZZnMNx1LJplSM6oqUmiiuWd1SVpMluJp1x-DfJhOT6PwUXH4pSlKXiDLGaUbxGaWCjzGYVozBDjJ8CozEIV7RiT_xikO8Yo43c9cz12Qb79YEEZU1Thltg1FJaG__ofIN79GLmQ</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Zhao, Jin</creator><creator>Zhao, Jinzhou</creator><creator>Hu, Yongquan</creator><creator>Zhang, Suian</creator><creator>Huang, Ting</creator><creator>Liu, Xinjia</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Numerical simulation of multistage fracturing optimization and application in coalbed methane horizontal wells</title><author>Zhao, Jin ; Zhao, Jinzhou ; Hu, Yongquan ; Zhang, Suian ; Huang, Ting ; Liu, Xinjia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-82045f2b3acf8d4ad639d0115c30459c13b187791aca72c86d432d3c9d85f6853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>CBM</topic><topic>Cluster spacing</topic><topic>Clusters</topic><topic>Coalbed methane</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Crack propagation</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fracture interval</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Horizontal well</topic><topic>Horizontal wells</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Microseisms</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Multistage</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Pressure drop</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Staged fracturing</topic><topic>Static code analysis</topic><topic>Stress distribution</topic><topic>Stress propagation</topic><topic>Stress shadow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jinzhou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Yongquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Suian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xinjia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Engineering fracture mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Jin</au><au>Zhao, Jinzhou</au><au>Hu, Yongquan</au><au>Zhang, Suian</au><au>Huang, Ting</au><au>Liu, Xinjia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical simulation of multistage fracturing optimization and application in coalbed methane horizontal wells</atitle><jtitle>Engineering fracture mechanics</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>223</volume><spage>106738</spage><pages>106738-</pages><artnum>106738</artnum><issn>0013-7944</issn><eissn>1873-7315</eissn><abstract>•The effects of crack lengths and spacing on the induced stress are calculated with the analytical model.•The mechanism of multiple fracture simultaneous and sequential propagation are studied with (XFEM).•The crack extending model and CBM productivity model are proposed and combined to optimize fracture parameters.•The simulation results have been applied in CBM horizontal well of Jixian block . Multistage fracturing technology is critical to coalbed methane (CBM) production from horizontal wells. Further, optimizing the fracture parameters has a crucial influence on the stimulated reservoir volume and gas production. To investigate fracture parameter optimization, a stress interference model, hydraulic fracture propagation model, and a CBM productivity model are proposed. The effects of crack length and spacing for one to three fractures on the induced stress are calculated by implementing a static analysis MATLAB-developed program. The extended finite-element method is used to study the mechanism of simultaneous fracturing and sequential fracturing. In addition, the influences of cluster spacing and stage spacing on the stress field, formation pressure, fracture geometry, gas production, and reservoir pressure drop are comprehensively investigated by using Abaqus and COMET3 software. The simulation results indicate that with multiple fractures, fracture spacing of 80 m and fracture length of 160 m are conducive for dilating the secondary fracture system and producing a broader contact area in the coal seam. Moreover, an optimal cluster spacing of 15 m, a fracture interval of 80 m, and two cluster numbers per stage are better at forming a uniform fracture geometry with low injection pressure; within a given horizontal well section length of 500 m, fracture parameters with cluster spacing of 30 m, fracture spacing of 80 m, and two clusters per stage offer the best production performance. The simulation results are applied in well TP-07, and microseismic monitoring was conducted to monitor fracture propagation. The microseismic monitoring results are consistent with the numerical simulation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106738</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-7944
ispartof Engineering fracture mechanics, 2020-01, Vol.223, p.106738, Article 106738
issn 0013-7944
1873-7315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2352068896
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects CBM
Cluster spacing
Clusters
Coalbed methane
Computer simulation
Crack propagation
Finite element method
Fracture interval
Fracture mechanics
Horizontal well
Horizontal wells
Hydraulic fracturing
Mathematical models
Methane
Microseisms
Monitoring
Multistage
Optimization
Parameters
Pressure drop
Reservoirs
Simulation
Staged fracturing
Static code analysis
Stress distribution
Stress propagation
Stress shadow
title Numerical simulation of multistage fracturing optimization and application in coalbed methane horizontal wells
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A06%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20simulation%20of%20multistage%20fracturing%20optimization%20and%20application%20in%20coalbed%20methane%20horizontal%20wells&rft.jtitle=Engineering%20fracture%20mechanics&rft.au=Zhao,%20Jin&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=223&rft.spage=106738&rft.pages=106738-&rft.artnum=106738&rft.issn=0013-7944&rft.eissn=1873-7315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106738&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2352068896%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352068896&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0013794419304114&rfr_iscdi=true