Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education

Online learning is the fastest growing segment in U.S. higher education and is increasingly adopted in public and private not-for-profit institutions. While the impact of online learning on educational outcomes is becoming more clear, the literature on its connection with student engagement is spars...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational researcher 2020-01, Vol.49 (1), p.20-29
Hauptverfasser: Paulsen, Justin, McCormick, Alexander C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title Educational researcher
container_volume 49
creator Paulsen, Justin
McCormick, Alexander C.
description Online learning is the fastest growing segment in U.S. higher education and is increasingly adopted in public and private not-for-profit institutions. While the impact of online learning on educational outcomes is becoming more clear, the literature on its connection with student engagement is sparse. Student engagement measures identify key aspects of the learning process that can improve learning and outcomes like retention and achievement. The few studies investigating the link between online learning and student engagement found positive benefits for online learners compared to face-to-face learners in terms of perceived academic challenge, learning gains, satisfaction, and better study habits. On the other hand, face-to-face learners reported higher levels of environment support, collaborative learning, and faculty interaction. However, these studies did not effectively account for the differences in background characteristics like age, time spent working or caring for dependents, and enrollment status. Further, they did not consider the increasingly large population of students who enroll in both online and face-to-face courses. In our study, we used propensity score matching on the 2015 National Survey of Student Engagement data to account for the disparities in these groups' demographics variables. After matching, we found that some of the previous literature's differences diminish or disappear entirely. This suggests differences in supportive environments and learning strategies have more to do with online student characteristics than learning mode. However, online learning still falls well below other modes in terms of collaborative learning and interaction with faculty.
doi_str_mv 10.3102/0013189X19898690
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2352016523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1242832</ericid><jstor_id>45280851</jstor_id><sage_id>10.3102_0013189X19898690</sage_id><sourcerecordid>45280851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ddbed98e600a12e7bc4f31e0f982f39ab28ffd78b588831ee92fc939491dacc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3L0JBPFZfknZLjjKrUwYTf8BuJW1fasaWzqQ9-N-bUlHx4Ok9-Hze-8KXkFMKl5wCuwKgnAq5olJIMZGwR0ZU8jQObLVPRj2Oe35IjrxfA0CaMDEij0-ovEfvja2jG-N3ypnWoI-MjZZ2YyxGC1TOooue265C20aZrVWN234N0tzUbwFmVVeq1jT2mBxotfF48jXH5PU2e5nN48Xy7n52vYjLBHgbV1WBlRQ4AVCU4bQoE80pgpaCaS5VwYTW1VQUqRAiAJRMl5LLRNJKleWUj8n58HfnmvcOfZuvm87ZEJkznjKgk5TxYMFgla7x3qHOd85slfvIKeR9b_nf3sLJ2XCCzpTfevZAWSiMs8DjgfvQwk_oP_8uBn_t28b9zmccpnmSMgEipfwTkLiCiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2352016523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Paulsen, Justin ; McCormick, Alexander C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Justin ; McCormick, Alexander C.</creatorcontrib><description>Online learning is the fastest growing segment in U.S. higher education and is increasingly adopted in public and private not-for-profit institutions. While the impact of online learning on educational outcomes is becoming more clear, the literature on its connection with student engagement is sparse. Student engagement measures identify key aspects of the learning process that can improve learning and outcomes like retention and achievement. The few studies investigating the link between online learning and student engagement found positive benefits for online learners compared to face-to-face learners in terms of perceived academic challenge, learning gains, satisfaction, and better study habits. On the other hand, face-to-face learners reported higher levels of environment support, collaborative learning, and faculty interaction. However, these studies did not effectively account for the differences in background characteristics like age, time spent working or caring for dependents, and enrollment status. Further, they did not consider the increasingly large population of students who enroll in both online and face-to-face courses. In our study, we used propensity score matching on the 2015 National Survey of Student Engagement data to account for the disparities in these groups' demographics variables. After matching, we found that some of the previous literature's differences diminish or disappear entirely. This suggests differences in supportive environments and learning strategies have more to do with online student characteristics than learning mode. However, online learning still falls well below other modes in terms of collaborative learning and interaction with faculty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-189X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-102X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3102/0013189X19898690</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publishing</publisher><subject>Blended Learning ; Collaborative learning ; College Freshmen ; College Seniors ; Cooperative Learning ; Demography ; Distance learning ; Educational Environment ; Electronic Learning ; Higher education ; Interaction ; Learner Engagement ; Learning Processes ; Learning Strategies ; National Surveys ; Outcomes of Education ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Student Characteristics ; Student participation ; Student Surveys ; Synchronous Communication ; Teacher Student Relationship</subject><ispartof>Educational researcher, 2020-01, Vol.49 (1), p.20-29</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2020 American Educational Research Association</rights><rights>2020 AERA</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ddbed98e600a12e7bc4f31e0f982f39ab28ffd78b588831ee92fc939491dacc73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ddbed98e600a12e7bc4f31e0f982f39ab28ffd78b588831ee92fc939491dacc73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4200-853X ; 0000-0003-2656-9636</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45280851$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45280851$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1242832$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Alexander C.</creatorcontrib><title>Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education</title><title>Educational researcher</title><description>Online learning is the fastest growing segment in U.S. higher education and is increasingly adopted in public and private not-for-profit institutions. While the impact of online learning on educational outcomes is becoming more clear, the literature on its connection with student engagement is sparse. Student engagement measures identify key aspects of the learning process that can improve learning and outcomes like retention and achievement. The few studies investigating the link between online learning and student engagement found positive benefits for online learners compared to face-to-face learners in terms of perceived academic challenge, learning gains, satisfaction, and better study habits. On the other hand, face-to-face learners reported higher levels of environment support, collaborative learning, and faculty interaction. However, these studies did not effectively account for the differences in background characteristics like age, time spent working or caring for dependents, and enrollment status. Further, they did not consider the increasingly large population of students who enroll in both online and face-to-face courses. In our study, we used propensity score matching on the 2015 National Survey of Student Engagement data to account for the disparities in these groups' demographics variables. After matching, we found that some of the previous literature's differences diminish or disappear entirely. This suggests differences in supportive environments and learning strategies have more to do with online student characteristics than learning mode. However, online learning still falls well below other modes in terms of collaborative learning and interaction with faculty.</description><subject>Blended Learning</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>College Freshmen</subject><subject>College Seniors</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Interaction</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>National Surveys</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Student participation</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Synchronous Communication</subject><subject>Teacher Student Relationship</subject><issn>0013-189X</issn><issn>1935-102X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKd3L0JBPFZfknZLjjKrUwYTf8BuJW1fasaWzqQ9-N-bUlHx4Ok9-Hze-8KXkFMKl5wCuwKgnAq5olJIMZGwR0ZU8jQObLVPRj2Oe35IjrxfA0CaMDEij0-ovEfvja2jG-N3ypnWoI-MjZZ2YyxGC1TOooue265C20aZrVWN234N0tzUbwFmVVeq1jT2mBxotfF48jXH5PU2e5nN48Xy7n52vYjLBHgbV1WBlRQ4AVCU4bQoE80pgpaCaS5VwYTW1VQUqRAiAJRMl5LLRNJKleWUj8n58HfnmvcOfZuvm87ZEJkznjKgk5TxYMFgla7x3qHOd85slfvIKeR9b_nf3sLJ2XCCzpTfevZAWSiMs8DjgfvQwk_oP_8uBn_t28b9zmccpnmSMgEipfwTkLiCiw</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Paulsen, Justin</creator><creator>McCormick, Alexander C.</creator><general>SAGE Publishing</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>American Educational Research Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-853X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-9636</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education</title><author>Paulsen, Justin ; McCormick, Alexander C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c403t-ddbed98e600a12e7bc4f31e0f982f39ab28ffd78b588831ee92fc939491dacc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Blended Learning</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>College Freshmen</topic><topic>College Seniors</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Interaction</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>National Surveys</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Student participation</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Synchronous Communication</topic><topic>Teacher Student Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paulsen, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCormick, Alexander C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational researcher</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paulsen, Justin</au><au>McCormick, Alexander C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1242832</ericid><atitle>Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education</atitle><jtitle>Educational researcher</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>20-29</pages><issn>0013-189X</issn><eissn>1935-102X</eissn><abstract>Online learning is the fastest growing segment in U.S. higher education and is increasingly adopted in public and private not-for-profit institutions. While the impact of online learning on educational outcomes is becoming more clear, the literature on its connection with student engagement is sparse. Student engagement measures identify key aspects of the learning process that can improve learning and outcomes like retention and achievement. The few studies investigating the link between online learning and student engagement found positive benefits for online learners compared to face-to-face learners in terms of perceived academic challenge, learning gains, satisfaction, and better study habits. On the other hand, face-to-face learners reported higher levels of environment support, collaborative learning, and faculty interaction. However, these studies did not effectively account for the differences in background characteristics like age, time spent working or caring for dependents, and enrollment status. Further, they did not consider the increasingly large population of students who enroll in both online and face-to-face courses. In our study, we used propensity score matching on the 2015 National Survey of Student Engagement data to account for the disparities in these groups' demographics variables. After matching, we found that some of the previous literature's differences diminish or disappear entirely. This suggests differences in supportive environments and learning strategies have more to do with online student characteristics than learning mode. However, online learning still falls well below other modes in terms of collaborative learning and interaction with faculty.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publishing</pub><doi>10.3102/0013189X19898690</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-853X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-9636</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-189X
ispartof Educational researcher, 2020-01, Vol.49 (1), p.20-29
issn 0013-189X
1935-102X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2352016523
source Access via SAGE; JSTOR
subjects Blended Learning
Collaborative learning
College Freshmen
College Seniors
Cooperative Learning
Demography
Distance learning
Educational Environment
Electronic Learning
Higher education
Interaction
Learner Engagement
Learning Processes
Learning Strategies
National Surveys
Outcomes of Education
Quasi-experimental methods
Student Characteristics
Student participation
Student Surveys
Synchronous Communication
Teacher Student Relationship
title Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T12%3A03%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reassessing%20Disparities%20in%20Online%20Learner%20Student%20Engagement%20in%20Higher%20Education&rft.jtitle=Educational%20researcher&rft.au=Paulsen,%20Justin&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=20-29&rft.issn=0013-189X&rft.eissn=1935-102X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3102/0013189X19898690&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45280851%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2352016523&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1242832&rft_jstor_id=45280851&rft_sage_id=10.3102_0013189X19898690&rfr_iscdi=true