Discriminating maize inbred lines using molecular and DUS data
Growing numbers of candidate varieties, decrease of their variability for morphological traits, and internationalization of the national list all contribute to excessive increase of the trial costs, thus creating the need for the improvement of current variety evaluation procedures, especially regar...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Euphytica 2008-05, Vol.161 (1-2), p.165-172 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 172 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1-2 |
| container_start_page | 165 |
| container_title | Euphytica |
| container_volume | 161 |
| creator | Gunjaca, Jerko Buhinicek, Ivica Jukic, Mirko Sarcevic, Hrvoje Vragolovic, Antun Kozic, Zdravko Jambrovic, Antun Pejic, Ivan |
| description | Growing numbers of candidate varieties, decrease of their variability for morphological traits, and internationalization of the national list all contribute to excessive increase of the trial costs, thus creating the need for the improvement of current variety evaluation procedures, especially regards their distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability (DUS) component. Due to rapid advancement in molecular techniques, the use of molecular markers in DUS testing as a complement to, or replacement of, morphological observations became the subject of great interest in scientific studies, and consequently topic for discussion within International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). In order to explore the potential of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for distinctness tests, present study involved set of 41 maize inbred lines that were scored for 32 DUS characters prescribed by UPOV and genotyped at 28 SSR loci. Results were largely in favor of the use of molecular markers, revealing or confirming their already known advantages over morphological markers like better consistency with the pedigree, and relatively higher discriminative power. However, their integration into DUS testing protocols still depends upon resolving of several important issues. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10681-007-9518-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_235142336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1898442701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3396c597ad0291e9cc47bb55e7948ac1f5a7b65860fa3c36118324bbb5d3872d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAThRIXEsOEnTJBckxPgnTeIwdo7cNJ06de1IugP79KR0ghsnW_J7P9uPkEsKtxRA3gUKuaJpbFMtqEr3R2RCheSpgByOyQSAZinjPD8lZyGsAUBLARNyP6uD9fWmbrGv21WywXrvkrotvCuTpm5dSHbhZ9A1zu4a9Am2ZTJbLpISezwnJxU2wV0c6pQsn58-Hl_T-fvL2-PDPLU8133Kuc6t0BJLYJo6bW0mi0IIJ3Wm0NJKoCxyoXKokEcLpYqzrIiSkivJSj4l1yN367vPnQu9WXc738aVhnFBs-GzKKKjyPouBO8qs42fof8yFMyQkhlTMkM7pGT20XNzAGOw2FQeW1uHXyMDLjMe6VPCRl2Io3bl_N8B_8GvRlOFncGVj-DlggHlAEpxRTP-DSFzf0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235142336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discriminating maize inbred lines using molecular and DUS data</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Gunjaca, Jerko ; Buhinicek, Ivica ; Jukic, Mirko ; Sarcevic, Hrvoje ; Vragolovic, Antun ; Kozic, Zdravko ; Jambrovic, Antun ; Pejic, Ivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gunjaca, Jerko ; Buhinicek, Ivica ; Jukic, Mirko ; Sarcevic, Hrvoje ; Vragolovic, Antun ; Kozic, Zdravko ; Jambrovic, Antun ; Pejic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><description>Growing numbers of candidate varieties, decrease of their variability for morphological traits, and internationalization of the national list all contribute to excessive increase of the trial costs, thus creating the need for the improvement of current variety evaluation procedures, especially regards their distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability (DUS) component. Due to rapid advancement in molecular techniques, the use of molecular markers in DUS testing as a complement to, or replacement of, morphological observations became the subject of great interest in scientific studies, and consequently topic for discussion within International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). In order to explore the potential of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for distinctness tests, present study involved set of 41 maize inbred lines that were scored for 32 DUS characters prescribed by UPOV and genotyped at 28 SSR loci. Results were largely in favor of the use of molecular markers, revealing or confirming their already known advantages over morphological markers like better consistency with the pedigree, and relatively higher discriminative power. However, their integration into DUS testing protocols still depends upon resolving of several important issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2336</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10681-007-9518-z</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EUPHAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agronomy ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biometrics ; Biotechnology ; Corn ; Distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genetic markers ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; genotype ; germplasm evaluation ; inbred lines ; Inbreeding ; Life Sciences ; loci ; microsatellite repeats ; Molecular biology ; Plant breeding ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant reproduction ; Plant Sciences ; plant variety protection ; Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants ; varieties ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Euphytica, 2008-05, Vol.161 (1-2), p.165-172</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3396c597ad0291e9cc47bb55e7948ac1f5a7b65860fa3c36118324bbb5d3872d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3396c597ad0291e9cc47bb55e7948ac1f5a7b65860fa3c36118324bbb5d3872d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10681-007-9518-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10681-007-9518-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23921,23922,25131,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20374323$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gunjaca, Jerko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhinicek, Ivica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jukic, Mirko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarcevic, Hrvoje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vragolovic, Antun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozic, Zdravko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jambrovic, Antun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pejic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><title>Discriminating maize inbred lines using molecular and DUS data</title><title>Euphytica</title><addtitle>Euphytica</addtitle><description>Growing numbers of candidate varieties, decrease of their variability for morphological traits, and internationalization of the national list all contribute to excessive increase of the trial costs, thus creating the need for the improvement of current variety evaluation procedures, especially regards their distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability (DUS) component. Due to rapid advancement in molecular techniques, the use of molecular markers in DUS testing as a complement to, or replacement of, morphological observations became the subject of great interest in scientific studies, and consequently topic for discussion within International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). In order to explore the potential of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for distinctness tests, present study involved set of 41 maize inbred lines that were scored for 32 DUS characters prescribed by UPOV and genotyped at 28 SSR loci. Results were largely in favor of the use of molecular markers, revealing or confirming their already known advantages over morphological markers like better consistency with the pedigree, and relatively higher discriminative power. However, their integration into DUS testing protocols still depends upon resolving of several important issues.</description><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genetic markers</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>germplasm evaluation</subject><subject>inbred lines</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>loci</subject><subject>microsatellite repeats</subject><subject>Molecular biology</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>plant variety protection</subject><subject>Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants</subject><subject>varieties</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0014-2336</issn><issn>1573-5060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9PwzAMxSMEEmPwAThRIXEsOEnTJBckxPgnTeIwdo7cNJ06de1IugP79KR0ghsnW_J7P9uPkEsKtxRA3gUKuaJpbFMtqEr3R2RCheSpgByOyQSAZinjPD8lZyGsAUBLARNyP6uD9fWmbrGv21WywXrvkrotvCuTpm5dSHbhZ9A1zu4a9Am2ZTJbLpISezwnJxU2wV0c6pQsn58-Hl_T-fvL2-PDPLU8133Kuc6t0BJLYJo6bW0mi0IIJ3Wm0NJKoCxyoXKokEcLpYqzrIiSkivJSj4l1yN367vPnQu9WXc738aVhnFBs-GzKKKjyPouBO8qs42fof8yFMyQkhlTMkM7pGT20XNzAGOw2FQeW1uHXyMDLjMe6VPCRl2Io3bl_N8B_8GvRlOFncGVj-DlggHlAEpxRTP-DSFzf0Q</recordid><startdate>20080501</startdate><enddate>20080501</enddate><creator>Gunjaca, Jerko</creator><creator>Buhinicek, Ivica</creator><creator>Jukic, Mirko</creator><creator>Sarcevic, Hrvoje</creator><creator>Vragolovic, Antun</creator><creator>Kozic, Zdravko</creator><creator>Jambrovic, Antun</creator><creator>Pejic, Ivan</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080501</creationdate><title>Discriminating maize inbred lines using molecular and DUS data</title><author>Gunjaca, Jerko ; Buhinicek, Ivica ; Jukic, Mirko ; Sarcevic, Hrvoje ; Vragolovic, Antun ; Kozic, Zdravko ; Jambrovic, Antun ; Pejic, Ivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-3396c597ad0291e9cc47bb55e7948ac1f5a7b65860fa3c36118324bbb5d3872d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genetic markers</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>germplasm evaluation</topic><topic>inbred lines</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>loci</topic><topic>microsatellite repeats</topic><topic>Molecular biology</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>plant variety protection</topic><topic>Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants</topic><topic>varieties</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gunjaca, Jerko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buhinicek, Ivica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jukic, Mirko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarcevic, Hrvoje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vragolovic, Antun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kozic, Zdravko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jambrovic, Antun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pejic, Ivan</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Euphytica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gunjaca, Jerko</au><au>Buhinicek, Ivica</au><au>Jukic, Mirko</au><au>Sarcevic, Hrvoje</au><au>Vragolovic, Antun</au><au>Kozic, Zdravko</au><au>Jambrovic, Antun</au><au>Pejic, Ivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discriminating maize inbred lines using molecular and DUS data</atitle><jtitle>Euphytica</jtitle><stitle>Euphytica</stitle><date>2008-05-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>161</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>165</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>165-172</pages><issn>0014-2336</issn><eissn>1573-5060</eissn><coden>EUPHAA</coden><abstract>Growing numbers of candidate varieties, decrease of their variability for morphological traits, and internationalization of the national list all contribute to excessive increase of the trial costs, thus creating the need for the improvement of current variety evaluation procedures, especially regards their distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability (DUS) component. Due to rapid advancement in molecular techniques, the use of molecular markers in DUS testing as a complement to, or replacement of, morphological observations became the subject of great interest in scientific studies, and consequently topic for discussion within International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV). In order to explore the potential of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers for distinctness tests, present study involved set of 41 maize inbred lines that were scored for 32 DUS characters prescribed by UPOV and genotyped at 28 SSR loci. Results were largely in favor of the use of molecular markers, revealing or confirming their already known advantages over morphological markers like better consistency with the pedigree, and relatively higher discriminative power. However, their integration into DUS testing protocols still depends upon resolving of several important issues.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10681-007-9518-z</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-2336 |
| ispartof | Euphytica, 2008-05, Vol.161 (1-2), p.165-172 |
| issn | 0014-2336 1573-5060 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_235142336 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Agronomy Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Biometrics Biotechnology Corn Distinctness, Uniformity, and Stability Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology genetic markers Genetics and breeding of economic plants genotype germplasm evaluation inbred lines Inbreeding Life Sciences loci microsatellite repeats Molecular biology Plant breeding Plant Genetics and Genomics Plant Pathology Plant Physiology Plant reproduction Plant Sciences plant variety protection Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants varieties Zea mays |
| title | Discriminating maize inbred lines using molecular and DUS data |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T05%3A11%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discriminating%20maize%20inbred%20lines%20using%20molecular%20and%20DUS%20data&rft.jtitle=Euphytica&rft.au=Gunjaca,%20Jerko&rft.date=2008-05-01&rft.volume=161&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=165&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=165-172&rft.issn=0014-2336&rft.eissn=1573-5060&rft.coden=EUPHAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10681-007-9518-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1898442701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235142336&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |