Contribution of green infrastructure to the implementation of green economy in the context of sustainable development
The green term, as the concurrence of opinion between infrastructure and economy, has the ability to integrate natural resources and environmental services into the national income and wealth account. However, the mutual effects of green infrastructure (GI) and green economy (GE) are not always clea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) West Yorkshire, England), 2020-01, Vol.28 (1), p.320-342 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 342 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 320 |
container_title | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England) |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Khoshnava, Seyed Meysam Rostami, Raheleh Zin, Rosli Mohamad Štreimikiene, Dalia Yousefpour, Alireza Mardani, Abbas Alrasheedi, Melfi |
description | The green term, as the concurrence of opinion between infrastructure and economy, has the ability to integrate natural resources and environmental services into the national income and wealth account. However, the mutual effects of green infrastructure (GI) and green economy (GE) are not always clear. This study aims to develop the influences of GI criteria into the implementation of GE in the context of sustainable development (SD) through using novel hybrid methods: the decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method was used to examine the efficiency and interrelationship among GI criteria; the analytical network process (ANP) was used to prioritize GI criteria based on their influences on three GE indicators; and the remaining two stages applied the hybridization and integration methods, with MATLAB software, to finalize the results. Results from the hybridization method showed that the weights of the GI criteria differed based on three GE indicators. Affordability is a prime GI criteria at 61% based on the socio‐economic indicator. However, this prime weight was at 43% based on the eco‐environment indicator, and at 32% based on resource efficiency plus 31% based on socio‐environment indicator. The final results were finalized with integration method, which demonstrated the contribution GI criteria made to GE implementation. The highest weight percentages appertained to affordability (61%) and resource efficiency (21%), while the minority weight of 18% went to the rest of the GI criteria. Primarily, the affordability and resource efficiency categories were found to empower green infrastructure for the implementation of green economy in the SD context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sd.2017 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2350907416</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2350907416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2897-5981f15478cc3e69b9fbed48318676a1be611f52177ee94b240dac443e7303e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LxDAQBuAgCq6r-BcKHjxI10yaNslR1k8QPKjnkLZT7dIma5Kq--9td7148DQM88wMvIScAl0Apewy1AtGQeyRGVClUhCg9smMqkKmVFJ2SI5CWFFKJQM-I8PS2ejbcoits4lrkjePaJPWNt6E6IcqDh6T6JL4jknbrzvs0UbzV2PlrOs349aWjV3E7zjNwxCiaa0pO0xq_MTOraf9Y3LQmC7gyW-dk9fbm5flffr4dPewvHpMKyaVSHMloYGcC1lVGRaqVE2JNZcZyEIUBkosAJqcgRCIipeM09pUnGcoMpohy-bkbHd37d3HgCHqlRu8HV9qluVUUcGhGNX5TlXeheCx0Wvf9sZvNFA9ZapDradMR3mxk19th5v_mH6-3uofLQF4cA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2350907416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contribution of green infrastructure to the implementation of green economy in the context of sustainable development</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Khoshnava, Seyed Meysam ; Rostami, Raheleh ; Zin, Rosli Mohamad ; Štreimikiene, Dalia ; Yousefpour, Alireza ; Mardani, Abbas ; Alrasheedi, Melfi</creator><creatorcontrib>Khoshnava, Seyed Meysam ; Rostami, Raheleh ; Zin, Rosli Mohamad ; Štreimikiene, Dalia ; Yousefpour, Alireza ; Mardani, Abbas ; Alrasheedi, Melfi</creatorcontrib><description>The green term, as the concurrence of opinion between infrastructure and economy, has the ability to integrate natural resources and environmental services into the national income and wealth account. However, the mutual effects of green infrastructure (GI) and green economy (GE) are not always clear. This study aims to develop the influences of GI criteria into the implementation of GE in the context of sustainable development (SD) through using novel hybrid methods: the decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method was used to examine the efficiency and interrelationship among GI criteria; the analytical network process (ANP) was used to prioritize GI criteria based on their influences on three GE indicators; and the remaining two stages applied the hybridization and integration methods, with MATLAB software, to finalize the results. Results from the hybridization method showed that the weights of the GI criteria differed based on three GE indicators. Affordability is a prime GI criteria at 61% based on the socio‐economic indicator. However, this prime weight was at 43% based on the eco‐environment indicator, and at 32% based on resource efficiency plus 31% based on socio‐environment indicator. The final results were finalized with integration method, which demonstrated the contribution GI criteria made to GE implementation. The highest weight percentages appertained to affordability (61%) and resource efficiency (21%), while the minority weight of 18% went to the rest of the GI criteria. Primarily, the affordability and resource efficiency categories were found to empower green infrastructure for the implementation of green economy in the SD context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0968-0802</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1719</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sd.2017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Affordability ; Criteria ; Decision making ; Economics ; Efficiency ; Environmental services ; Green economy ; Green infrastructure ; Hybridization ; Implementation ; Indicators ; Infrastructure ; Integration ; National income ; Natural resources ; Resource efficiency ; Software ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Wealth ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2020-01, Vol.28 (1), p.320-342</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2897-5981f15478cc3e69b9fbed48318676a1be611f52177ee94b240dac443e7303e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2897-5981f15478cc3e69b9fbed48318676a1be611f52177ee94b240dac443e7303e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3247-9912 ; 0000-0002-4025-0771</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsd.2017$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsd.2017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khoshnava, Seyed Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rostami, Raheleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zin, Rosli Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Štreimikiene, Dalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefpour, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mardani, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alrasheedi, Melfi</creatorcontrib><title>Contribution of green infrastructure to the implementation of green economy in the context of sustainable development</title><title>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</title><description>The green term, as the concurrence of opinion between infrastructure and economy, has the ability to integrate natural resources and environmental services into the national income and wealth account. However, the mutual effects of green infrastructure (GI) and green economy (GE) are not always clear. This study aims to develop the influences of GI criteria into the implementation of GE in the context of sustainable development (SD) through using novel hybrid methods: the decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method was used to examine the efficiency and interrelationship among GI criteria; the analytical network process (ANP) was used to prioritize GI criteria based on their influences on three GE indicators; and the remaining two stages applied the hybridization and integration methods, with MATLAB software, to finalize the results. Results from the hybridization method showed that the weights of the GI criteria differed based on three GE indicators. Affordability is a prime GI criteria at 61% based on the socio‐economic indicator. However, this prime weight was at 43% based on the eco‐environment indicator, and at 32% based on resource efficiency plus 31% based on socio‐environment indicator. The final results were finalized with integration method, which demonstrated the contribution GI criteria made to GE implementation. The highest weight percentages appertained to affordability (61%) and resource efficiency (21%), while the minority weight of 18% went to the rest of the GI criteria. Primarily, the affordability and resource efficiency categories were found to empower green infrastructure for the implementation of green economy in the SD context.</description><subject>Affordability</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental services</subject><subject>Green economy</subject><subject>Green infrastructure</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Indicators</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Integration</subject><subject>National income</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Resource efficiency</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>0968-0802</issn><issn>1099-1719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LxDAQBuAgCq6r-BcKHjxI10yaNslR1k8QPKjnkLZT7dIma5Kq--9td7148DQM88wMvIScAl0Apewy1AtGQeyRGVClUhCg9smMqkKmVFJ2SI5CWFFKJQM-I8PS2ejbcoits4lrkjePaJPWNt6E6IcqDh6T6JL4jknbrzvs0UbzV2PlrOs349aWjV3E7zjNwxCiaa0pO0xq_MTOraf9Y3LQmC7gyW-dk9fbm5flffr4dPewvHpMKyaVSHMloYGcC1lVGRaqVE2JNZcZyEIUBkosAJqcgRCIipeM09pUnGcoMpohy-bkbHd37d3HgCHqlRu8HV9qluVUUcGhGNX5TlXeheCx0Wvf9sZvNFA9ZapDradMR3mxk19th5v_mH6-3uofLQF4cA</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Khoshnava, Seyed Meysam</creator><creator>Rostami, Raheleh</creator><creator>Zin, Rosli Mohamad</creator><creator>Štreimikiene, Dalia</creator><creator>Yousefpour, Alireza</creator><creator>Mardani, Abbas</creator><creator>Alrasheedi, Melfi</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3247-9912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4025-0771</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Contribution of green infrastructure to the implementation of green economy in the context of sustainable development</title><author>Khoshnava, Seyed Meysam ; Rostami, Raheleh ; Zin, Rosli Mohamad ; Štreimikiene, Dalia ; Yousefpour, Alireza ; Mardani, Abbas ; Alrasheedi, Melfi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2897-5981f15478cc3e69b9fbed48318676a1be611f52177ee94b240dac443e7303e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Affordability</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental services</topic><topic>Green economy</topic><topic>Green infrastructure</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Indicators</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Integration</topic><topic>National income</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Resource efficiency</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khoshnava, Seyed Meysam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rostami, Raheleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zin, Rosli Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Štreimikiene, Dalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefpour, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mardani, Abbas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alrasheedi, Melfi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khoshnava, Seyed Meysam</au><au>Rostami, Raheleh</au><au>Zin, Rosli Mohamad</au><au>Štreimikiene, Dalia</au><au>Yousefpour, Alireza</au><au>Mardani, Abbas</au><au>Alrasheedi, Melfi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contribution of green infrastructure to the implementation of green economy in the context of sustainable development</atitle><jtitle>Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England)</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>320</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>320-342</pages><issn>0968-0802</issn><eissn>1099-1719</eissn><abstract>The green term, as the concurrence of opinion between infrastructure and economy, has the ability to integrate natural resources and environmental services into the national income and wealth account. However, the mutual effects of green infrastructure (GI) and green economy (GE) are not always clear. This study aims to develop the influences of GI criteria into the implementation of GE in the context of sustainable development (SD) through using novel hybrid methods: the decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method was used to examine the efficiency and interrelationship among GI criteria; the analytical network process (ANP) was used to prioritize GI criteria based on their influences on three GE indicators; and the remaining two stages applied the hybridization and integration methods, with MATLAB software, to finalize the results. Results from the hybridization method showed that the weights of the GI criteria differed based on three GE indicators. Affordability is a prime GI criteria at 61% based on the socio‐economic indicator. However, this prime weight was at 43% based on the eco‐environment indicator, and at 32% based on resource efficiency plus 31% based on socio‐environment indicator. The final results were finalized with integration method, which demonstrated the contribution GI criteria made to GE implementation. The highest weight percentages appertained to affordability (61%) and resource efficiency (21%), while the minority weight of 18% went to the rest of the GI criteria. Primarily, the affordability and resource efficiency categories were found to empower green infrastructure for the implementation of green economy in the SD context.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/sd.2017</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3247-9912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4025-0771</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0968-0802 |
ispartof | Sustainable development (Bradford, West Yorkshire, England), 2020-01, Vol.28 (1), p.320-342 |
issn | 0968-0802 1099-1719 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2350907416 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Affordability Criteria Decision making Economics Efficiency Environmental services Green economy Green infrastructure Hybridization Implementation Indicators Infrastructure Integration National income Natural resources Resource efficiency Software Sustainability Sustainable development Wealth Weight |
title | Contribution of green infrastructure to the implementation of green economy in the context of sustainable development |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T11%3A57%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution%20of%20green%20infrastructure%20to%20the%20implementation%20of%20green%20economy%20in%20the%20context%20of%20sustainable%20development&rft.jtitle=Sustainable%20development%20(Bradford,%20West%20Yorkshire,%20England)&rft.au=Khoshnava,%20Seyed%20Meysam&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=320&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=320-342&rft.issn=0968-0802&rft.eissn=1099-1719&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sd.2017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2350907416%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2350907416&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |