The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success
This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework empl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sociological quarterly 2006-09, Vol.47 (4), p.521-542 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 542 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 521 |
container_title | Sociological quarterly |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin |
description | This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework employed in this article is constructed by importing two concepts from political process models of social movement action into culturalist accounts, historical environment (or context), and opportunity. This framework allows me to look at how historical environments offer transient openings for the effective construction of counterhegemonic or subversive collective action frames. I argue that opportunity for framing has to do with the intersection between the signification requisites of framing practices, and the systemic features of cultural environments. I find that the nature of this opportunity in the years between 1885 and 1887 helps explain why movement practice within the Knights of Labour diverged so significantly from the practices advocated by its leadership. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00057.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_234971548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4121181</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4121181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5507-272c0d587ad1ba454e4b4074d02756f1af3dbe61f6919abe8f06b8cc8f52a0b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9u0zAYxSMEEmXwBlxYSHC1FDv-W8TNVNFuUDFgRUjcWE7ibC6u3dmO1r4LD4tDS5G4GblIbJ3fOdL3nRQFQHCM8vN6NUYU41LQio4rCNkYQkj5ePugGB2Fh8UIQixKWFH8uHgS4ypDiBIyKn4ubzT44Mz1TYrAd2Chat8HoFwLUlZmytg-6EEZrmehNimoZLwDn6xKnQ_rU4CEYGV-8TfgotXe-uvdKTjX13rtXT4NWVPvkt6mXlm7A3PtdA7RLbjcbHxIvTPJ6AhyGpgFtdbgqm8aHePT4lGnbNTPDt-T4uvs3XJ6Xi4u5xfTs0XZUAp5WfGqgS0VXLWoVoQSTWoCOWlhxSnrkOpwW2uGOjZBE1Vr0UFWi6YRHa0UrDk-KV7tczfB3_Y6Jrk2sdHWKqd9HyVDjCIk8L0gZhRPIIYZfPEPuMprdXkIWWEy4Xn5IkNiDzXBxxh0JzfBrFXYSQTlUK5cyaFDOXQoh3Ll73LlNltfHvJVbJTtgnKNiX_9oiIQIZK5t3vuzli9--98ubz6nA_Z_nxvX8Xkw9FOUJXXgbJc7mUTc7tHWYUfknHMqfz2cS7JFwLfs-9QDuubHng3_DnqzgfbyqR21oc_I-B7Z_8Fgubkgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234971548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creator><creatorcontrib>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework employed in this article is constructed by importing two concepts from political process models of social movement action into culturalist accounts, historical environment (or context), and opportunity. This framework allows me to look at how historical environments offer transient openings for the effective construction of counterhegemonic or subversive collective action frames. I argue that opportunity for framing has to do with the intersection between the signification requisites of framing practices, and the systemic features of cultural environments. I find that the nature of this opportunity in the years between 1885 and 1887 helps explain why movement practice within the Knights of Labour diverged so significantly from the practices advocated by its leadership.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00057.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOLQAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>19th century ; Arbitration ; Collective action ; Cultural factors ; Cultural hegemony ; Culture ; Dental articulators ; Framing ; Habitus ; Hegemony ; Ideology ; Labor Movements ; Labor strikes ; Labour movements ; Leadership ; Men ; Natural environment ; Opportunities ; Politics ; Social activism ; Social History ; Social movements ; Social Movements Past and Present ; Sociology ; Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration ; Sociology of work and sociology of organizations ; Trade unions</subject><ispartof>Sociological quarterly, 2006-09, Vol.47 (4), p.521-542</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 Midwest Sociological Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5507-272c0d587ad1ba454e4b4074d02756f1af3dbe61f6919abe8f06b8cc8f52a0b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5507-272c0d587ad1ba454e4b4074d02756f1af3dbe61f6919abe8f06b8cc8f52a0b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4121181$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4121181$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,33765,33766,58008,58241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18240114$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creatorcontrib><title>The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success</title><title>Sociological quarterly</title><description>This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework employed in this article is constructed by importing two concepts from political process models of social movement action into culturalist accounts, historical environment (or context), and opportunity. This framework allows me to look at how historical environments offer transient openings for the effective construction of counterhegemonic or subversive collective action frames. I argue that opportunity for framing has to do with the intersection between the signification requisites of framing practices, and the systemic features of cultural environments. I find that the nature of this opportunity in the years between 1885 and 1887 helps explain why movement practice within the Knights of Labour diverged so significantly from the practices advocated by its leadership.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Cultural hegemony</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Dental articulators</subject><subject>Framing</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Labor Movements</subject><subject>Labor strikes</subject><subject>Labour movements</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Natural environment</subject><subject>Opportunities</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social History</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Social Movements Past and Present</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</subject><subject>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Trade unions</subject><issn>0038-0253</issn><issn>1533-8525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt9u0zAYxSMEEmXwBlxYSHC1FDv-W8TNVNFuUDFgRUjcWE7ibC6u3dmO1r4LD4tDS5G4GblIbJ3fOdL3nRQFQHCM8vN6NUYU41LQio4rCNkYQkj5ePugGB2Fh8UIQixKWFH8uHgS4ypDiBIyKn4ubzT44Mz1TYrAd2Chat8HoFwLUlZmytg-6EEZrmehNimoZLwDn6xKnQ_rU4CEYGV-8TfgotXe-uvdKTjX13rtXT4NWVPvkt6mXlm7A3PtdA7RLbjcbHxIvTPJ6AhyGpgFtdbgqm8aHePT4lGnbNTPDt-T4uvs3XJ6Xi4u5xfTs0XZUAp5WfGqgS0VXLWoVoQSTWoCOWlhxSnrkOpwW2uGOjZBE1Vr0UFWi6YRHa0UrDk-KV7tczfB3_Y6Jrk2sdHWKqd9HyVDjCIk8L0gZhRPIIYZfPEPuMprdXkIWWEy4Xn5IkNiDzXBxxh0JzfBrFXYSQTlUK5cyaFDOXQoh3Ll73LlNltfHvJVbJTtgnKNiX_9oiIQIZK5t3vuzli9--98ubz6nA_Z_nxvX8Xkw9FOUJXXgbJc7mUTc7tHWYUfknHMqfz2cS7JFwLfs-9QDuubHng3_DnqzgfbyqR21oc_I-B7Z_8Fgubkgw</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success</title><author>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5507-272c0d587ad1ba454e4b4074d02756f1af3dbe61f6919abe8f06b8cc8f52a0b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Cultural hegemony</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Dental articulators</topic><topic>Framing</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Labor Movements</topic><topic>Labor strikes</topic><topic>Labour movements</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Natural environment</topic><topic>Opportunities</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social History</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Social Movements Past and Present</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</topic><topic>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Trade unions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success</atitle><jtitle>Sociological quarterly</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>521-542</pages><issn>0038-0253</issn><eissn>1533-8525</eissn><coden>SOLQAR</coden><abstract>This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework employed in this article is constructed by importing two concepts from political process models of social movement action into culturalist accounts, historical environment (or context), and opportunity. This framework allows me to look at how historical environments offer transient openings for the effective construction of counterhegemonic or subversive collective action frames. I argue that opportunity for framing has to do with the intersection between the signification requisites of framing practices, and the systemic features of cultural environments. I find that the nature of this opportunity in the years between 1885 and 1887 helps explain why movement practice within the Knights of Labour diverged so significantly from the practices advocated by its leadership.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00057.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0253 |
ispartof | Sociological quarterly, 2006-09, Vol.47 (4), p.521-542 |
issn | 0038-0253 1533-8525 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_234971548 |
source | Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | 19th century Arbitration Collective action Cultural factors Cultural hegemony Culture Dental articulators Framing Habitus Hegemony Ideology Labor Movements Labor strikes Labour movements Leadership Men Natural environment Opportunities Politics Social activism Social History Social movements Social Movements Past and Present Sociology Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration Sociology of work and sociology of organizations Trade unions |
title | The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T07%3A37%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Knights%20of%20Labour%20and%20the%20Failure%20of%20the%20Arbitration%20Platform,%201886-1887:%20Ideology,%20Hegemony,%20and%20Contextually%20Generated%20Opportunities%20for%20Frame%20Success&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20quarterly&rft.au=HALIGRIMSDOTTIR,%20Helga%20Kristin&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=521-542&rft.issn=0038-0253&rft.eissn=1533-8525&rft.coden=SOLQAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00057.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4121181%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234971548&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4121181&rfr_iscdi=true |