The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success

This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework empl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociological quarterly 2006-09, Vol.47 (4), p.521-542
1. Verfasser: HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 542
container_issue 4
container_start_page 521
container_title Sociological quarterly
container_volume 47
creator HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin
description This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework employed in this article is constructed by importing two concepts from political process models of social movement action into culturalist accounts, historical environment (or context), and opportunity. This framework allows me to look at how historical environments offer transient openings for the effective construction of counterhegemonic or subversive collective action frames. I argue that opportunity for framing has to do with the intersection between the signification requisites of framing practices, and the systemic features of cultural environments. I find that the nature of this opportunity in the years between 1885 and 1887 helps explain why movement practice within the Knights of Labour diverged so significantly from the practices advocated by its leadership.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00057.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_234971548</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4121181</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4121181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5507-272c0d587ad1ba454e4b4074d02756f1af3dbe61f6919abe8f06b8cc8f52a0b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9u0zAYxSMEEmXwBlxYSHC1FDv-W8TNVNFuUDFgRUjcWE7ibC6u3dmO1r4LD4tDS5G4GblIbJ3fOdL3nRQFQHCM8vN6NUYU41LQio4rCNkYQkj5ePugGB2Fh8UIQixKWFH8uHgS4ypDiBIyKn4ubzT44Mz1TYrAd2Chat8HoFwLUlZmytg-6EEZrmehNimoZLwDn6xKnQ_rU4CEYGV-8TfgotXe-uvdKTjX13rtXT4NWVPvkt6mXlm7A3PtdA7RLbjcbHxIvTPJ6AhyGpgFtdbgqm8aHePT4lGnbNTPDt-T4uvs3XJ6Xi4u5xfTs0XZUAp5WfGqgS0VXLWoVoQSTWoCOWlhxSnrkOpwW2uGOjZBE1Vr0UFWi6YRHa0UrDk-KV7tczfB3_Y6Jrk2sdHWKqd9HyVDjCIk8L0gZhRPIIYZfPEPuMprdXkIWWEy4Xn5IkNiDzXBxxh0JzfBrFXYSQTlUK5cyaFDOXQoh3Ll73LlNltfHvJVbJTtgnKNiX_9oiIQIZK5t3vuzli9--98ubz6nA_Z_nxvX8Xkw9FOUJXXgbJc7mUTc7tHWYUfknHMqfz2cS7JFwLfs-9QDuubHng3_DnqzgfbyqR21oc_I-B7Z_8Fgubkgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234971548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creator><creatorcontrib>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework employed in this article is constructed by importing two concepts from political process models of social movement action into culturalist accounts, historical environment (or context), and opportunity. This framework allows me to look at how historical environments offer transient openings for the effective construction of counterhegemonic or subversive collective action frames. I argue that opportunity for framing has to do with the intersection between the signification requisites of framing practices, and the systemic features of cultural environments. I find that the nature of this opportunity in the years between 1885 and 1887 helps explain why movement practice within the Knights of Labour diverged so significantly from the practices advocated by its leadership.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00057.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOLQAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>19th century ; Arbitration ; Collective action ; Cultural factors ; Cultural hegemony ; Culture ; Dental articulators ; Framing ; Habitus ; Hegemony ; Ideology ; Labor Movements ; Labor strikes ; Labour movements ; Leadership ; Men ; Natural environment ; Opportunities ; Politics ; Social activism ; Social History ; Social movements ; Social Movements Past and Present ; Sociology ; Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration ; Sociology of work and sociology of organizations ; Trade unions</subject><ispartof>Sociological quarterly, 2006-09, Vol.47 (4), p.521-542</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 Midwest Sociological Society</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Fall 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5507-272c0d587ad1ba454e4b4074d02756f1af3dbe61f6919abe8f06b8cc8f52a0b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5507-272c0d587ad1ba454e4b4074d02756f1af3dbe61f6919abe8f06b8cc8f52a0b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4121181$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4121181$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,33765,33766,58008,58241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18240114$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creatorcontrib><title>The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success</title><title>Sociological quarterly</title><description>This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework employed in this article is constructed by importing two concepts from political process models of social movement action into culturalist accounts, historical environment (or context), and opportunity. This framework allows me to look at how historical environments offer transient openings for the effective construction of counterhegemonic or subversive collective action frames. I argue that opportunity for framing has to do with the intersection between the signification requisites of framing practices, and the systemic features of cultural environments. I find that the nature of this opportunity in the years between 1885 and 1887 helps explain why movement practice within the Knights of Labour diverged so significantly from the practices advocated by its leadership.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>Arbitration</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Cultural hegemony</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Dental articulators</subject><subject>Framing</subject><subject>Habitus</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Labor Movements</subject><subject>Labor strikes</subject><subject>Labour movements</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Natural environment</subject><subject>Opportunities</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Social activism</subject><subject>Social History</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Social Movements Past and Present</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</subject><subject>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</subject><subject>Trade unions</subject><issn>0038-0253</issn><issn>1533-8525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt9u0zAYxSMEEmXwBlxYSHC1FDv-W8TNVNFuUDFgRUjcWE7ibC6u3dmO1r4LD4tDS5G4GblIbJ3fOdL3nRQFQHCM8vN6NUYU41LQio4rCNkYQkj5ePugGB2Fh8UIQixKWFH8uHgS4ypDiBIyKn4ubzT44Mz1TYrAd2Chat8HoFwLUlZmytg-6EEZrmehNimoZLwDn6xKnQ_rU4CEYGV-8TfgotXe-uvdKTjX13rtXT4NWVPvkt6mXlm7A3PtdA7RLbjcbHxIvTPJ6AhyGpgFtdbgqm8aHePT4lGnbNTPDt-T4uvs3XJ6Xi4u5xfTs0XZUAp5WfGqgS0VXLWoVoQSTWoCOWlhxSnrkOpwW2uGOjZBE1Vr0UFWi6YRHa0UrDk-KV7tczfB3_Y6Jrk2sdHWKqd9HyVDjCIk8L0gZhRPIIYZfPEPuMprdXkIWWEy4Xn5IkNiDzXBxxh0JzfBrFXYSQTlUK5cyaFDOXQoh3Ll73LlNltfHvJVbJTtgnKNiX_9oiIQIZK5t3vuzli9--98ubz6nA_Z_nxvX8Xkw9FOUJXXgbJc7mUTc7tHWYUfknHMqfz2cS7JFwLfs-9QDuubHng3_DnqzgfbyqR21oc_I-B7Z_8Fgubkgw</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success</title><author>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5507-272c0d587ad1ba454e4b4074d02756f1af3dbe61f6919abe8f06b8cc8f52a0b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>Arbitration</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Cultural hegemony</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Dental articulators</topic><topic>Framing</topic><topic>Habitus</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Labor Movements</topic><topic>Labor strikes</topic><topic>Labour movements</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Natural environment</topic><topic>Opportunities</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Social activism</topic><topic>Social History</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Social Movements Past and Present</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration</topic><topic>Sociology of work and sociology of organizations</topic><topic>Trade unions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HALIGRIMSDOTTIR, Helga Kristin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success</atitle><jtitle>Sociological quarterly</jtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>542</epage><pages>521-542</pages><issn>0038-0253</issn><eissn>1533-8525</eissn><coden>SOLQAR</coden><abstract>This article examines the reasons why the Knights of Labour, a labor movement that enjoyed enormous popularity and success during the penultimate decade of the 19th century, were unable to construct a resonant cultural frame in support of their platform of arbitration. The theoretical framework employed in this article is constructed by importing two concepts from political process models of social movement action into culturalist accounts, historical environment (or context), and opportunity. This framework allows me to look at how historical environments offer transient openings for the effective construction of counterhegemonic or subversive collective action frames. I argue that opportunity for framing has to do with the intersection between the signification requisites of framing practices, and the systemic features of cultural environments. I find that the nature of this opportunity in the years between 1885 and 1887 helps explain why movement practice within the Knights of Labour diverged so significantly from the practices advocated by its leadership.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00057.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0253
ispartof Sociological quarterly, 2006-09, Vol.47 (4), p.521-542
issn 0038-0253
1533-8525
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_234971548
source Sociological Abstracts; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects 19th century
Arbitration
Collective action
Cultural factors
Cultural hegemony
Culture
Dental articulators
Framing
Habitus
Hegemony
Ideology
Labor Movements
Labor strikes
Labour movements
Leadership
Men
Natural environment
Opportunities
Politics
Social activism
Social History
Social movements
Social Movements Past and Present
Sociology
Sociology of organizations and enterprises. Bureaucracy and administration
Sociology of work and sociology of organizations
Trade unions
title The Knights of Labour and the Failure of the Arbitration Platform, 1886-1887: Ideology, Hegemony, and Contextually Generated Opportunities for Frame Success
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T07%3A37%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Knights%20of%20Labour%20and%20the%20Failure%20of%20the%20Arbitration%20Platform,%201886-1887:%20Ideology,%20Hegemony,%20and%20Contextually%20Generated%20Opportunities%20for%20Frame%20Success&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20quarterly&rft.au=HALIGRIMSDOTTIR,%20Helga%20Kristin&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=542&rft.pages=521-542&rft.issn=0038-0253&rft.eissn=1533-8525&rft.coden=SOLQAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2006.00057.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4121181%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234971548&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4121181&rfr_iscdi=true