SYSTEMS FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE

A cornerstone of industrial relations theory is the idea that the potential for conflict is inherent in the employment relationship. Across countries, forms of workplace conflict and methods of conflict resolution take a range of different forms. Yet aside from attempts to understand cross-national...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial & labor relations review 2020-03, Vol.73 (2), p.312-344
Hauptverfasser: BEHRENS, MARTIN, COLVIN, ALEXANDER J. S., DORIGATTI, LISA, PEKAREK, ANDREAS H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 344
container_issue 2
container_start_page 312
container_title Industrial & labor relations review
container_volume 73
creator BEHRENS, MARTIN
COLVIN, ALEXANDER J. S.
DORIGATTI, LISA
PEKAREK, ANDREAS H.
description A cornerstone of industrial relations theory is the idea that the potential for conflict is inherent in the employment relationship. Across countries, forms of workplace conflict and methods of conflict resolution take a range of different forms. Yet aside from attempts to understand cross-national variation in strikes, little research has examined systemic differences in the manifestation and management of workplace conflict. The authors seek to fill this void by analyzing through a comparative lens practices for addressing employment-related conflict in four countries: Germany, the United States, Italy, and Australia. In contrast to the unidimensional varieties of capitalism approach, they analyze workplace conflict resolution systems across two dimensions: collective-individual and regulated-voluntarist. The analysis also emphasizes the importance of within-country variation and interactions between different conflict resolution subsystems.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0019793919870800
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2349166957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26957543</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0019793919870800</sage_id><sourcerecordid>26957543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-6d2c139f27da5d8f66aa7348eb509f2a88de647fc3b6238c176fdcc3708176ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvXoSA5-h-JPvhrYRUA2kTklT0FDabjbRoU3fbg__eDRELHpzLDDPP-87uAHCN4B1CjN1DiAQTRCDBGeQQnoAJRhT7mKGXUzAZxv4wPwcX1m6gi4ChCXgoX8sqXpTePCu8KFvO0ySqvCIus3RVJdnSS5auvchnxaxKnmMvj4syj6OhvgRnnXy3-uonT8FqHlfRk59mj0k0S30VULL3aYsVIqLDrJVhyztKpWQk4LoJoetKzltNA9Yp0lBMuEKMdq1SxP3ClY0kU3A7-u5M_3nQdl9v-oPZupU1JoFAlIqQOQqOlDK9tUZ39c6sP6T5qhGshwvVfy_kJN4o0arfru1RQAXBIuRkQPwRsfJNH_f-Y3kz8hu7782vIx6eGAaEfAPfcXMR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2349166957</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SYSTEMS FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>BEHRENS, MARTIN ; COLVIN, ALEXANDER J. S. ; DORIGATTI, LISA ; PEKAREK, ANDREAS H.</creator><creatorcontrib>BEHRENS, MARTIN ; COLVIN, ALEXANDER J. S. ; DORIGATTI, LISA ; PEKAREK, ANDREAS H.</creatorcontrib><description>A cornerstone of industrial relations theory is the idea that the potential for conflict is inherent in the employment relationship. Across countries, forms of workplace conflict and methods of conflict resolution take a range of different forms. Yet aside from attempts to understand cross-national variation in strikes, little research has examined systemic differences in the manifestation and management of workplace conflict. The authors seek to fill this void by analyzing through a comparative lens practices for addressing employment-related conflict in four countries: Germany, the United States, Italy, and Australia. In contrast to the unidimensional varieties of capitalism approach, they analyze workplace conflict resolution systems across two dimensions: collective-individual and regulated-voluntarist. The analysis also emphasizes the importance of within-country variation and interactions between different conflict resolution subsystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0019-7939</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-271X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0019793919870800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Comparative studies ; Conflict resolution ; Employment ; Labor relations ; Organizational conflict ; Strikes ; Workplaces</subject><ispartof>Industrial &amp; labor relations review, 2020-03, Vol.73 (2), p.312-344</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-6d2c139f27da5d8f66aa7348eb509f2a88de647fc3b6238c176fdcc3708176ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-6d2c139f27da5d8f66aa7348eb509f2a88de647fc3b6238c176fdcc3708176ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26957543$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26957543$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,21802,27907,27908,33757,43604,43605,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BEHRENS, MARTIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLVIN, ALEXANDER J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DORIGATTI, LISA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEKAREK, ANDREAS H.</creatorcontrib><title>SYSTEMS FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE</title><title>Industrial &amp; labor relations review</title><description>A cornerstone of industrial relations theory is the idea that the potential for conflict is inherent in the employment relationship. Across countries, forms of workplace conflict and methods of conflict resolution take a range of different forms. Yet aside from attempts to understand cross-national variation in strikes, little research has examined systemic differences in the manifestation and management of workplace conflict. The authors seek to fill this void by analyzing through a comparative lens practices for addressing employment-related conflict in four countries: Germany, the United States, Italy, and Australia. In contrast to the unidimensional varieties of capitalism approach, they analyze workplace conflict resolution systems across two dimensions: collective-individual and regulated-voluntarist. The analysis also emphasizes the importance of within-country variation and interactions between different conflict resolution subsystems.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Conflict resolution</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Labor relations</subject><subject>Organizational conflict</subject><subject>Strikes</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><issn>0019-7939</issn><issn>2162-271X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvXoSA5-h-JPvhrYRUA2kTklT0FDabjbRoU3fbg__eDRELHpzLDDPP-87uAHCN4B1CjN1DiAQTRCDBGeQQnoAJRhT7mKGXUzAZxv4wPwcX1m6gi4ChCXgoX8sqXpTePCu8KFvO0ySqvCIus3RVJdnSS5auvchnxaxKnmMvj4syj6OhvgRnnXy3-uonT8FqHlfRk59mj0k0S30VULL3aYsVIqLDrJVhyztKpWQk4LoJoetKzltNA9Yp0lBMuEKMdq1SxP3ClY0kU3A7-u5M_3nQdl9v-oPZupU1JoFAlIqQOQqOlDK9tUZ39c6sP6T5qhGshwvVfy_kJN4o0arfru1RQAXBIuRkQPwRsfJNH_f-Y3kz8hu7782vIx6eGAaEfAPfcXMR</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>BEHRENS, MARTIN</creator><creator>COLVIN, ALEXANDER J. S.</creator><creator>DORIGATTI, LISA</creator><creator>PEKAREK, ANDREAS H.</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>SYSTEMS FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE</title><author>BEHRENS, MARTIN ; COLVIN, ALEXANDER J. S. ; DORIGATTI, LISA ; PEKAREK, ANDREAS H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-6d2c139f27da5d8f66aa7348eb509f2a88de647fc3b6238c176fdcc3708176ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Conflict resolution</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Labor relations</topic><topic>Organizational conflict</topic><topic>Strikes</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BEHRENS, MARTIN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COLVIN, ALEXANDER J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DORIGATTI, LISA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PEKAREK, ANDREAS H.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Industrial &amp; labor relations review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BEHRENS, MARTIN</au><au>COLVIN, ALEXANDER J. S.</au><au>DORIGATTI, LISA</au><au>PEKAREK, ANDREAS H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SYSTEMS FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE</atitle><jtitle>Industrial &amp; labor relations review</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>312</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>312-344</pages><issn>0019-7939</issn><eissn>2162-271X</eissn><abstract>A cornerstone of industrial relations theory is the idea that the potential for conflict is inherent in the employment relationship. Across countries, forms of workplace conflict and methods of conflict resolution take a range of different forms. Yet aside from attempts to understand cross-national variation in strikes, little research has examined systemic differences in the manifestation and management of workplace conflict. The authors seek to fill this void by analyzing through a comparative lens practices for addressing employment-related conflict in four countries: Germany, the United States, Italy, and Australia. In contrast to the unidimensional varieties of capitalism approach, they analyze workplace conflict resolution systems across two dimensions: collective-individual and regulated-voluntarist. The analysis also emphasizes the importance of within-country variation and interactions between different conflict resolution subsystems.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/0019793919870800</doi><tpages>33</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0019-7939
ispartof Industrial & labor relations review, 2020-03, Vol.73 (2), p.312-344
issn 0019-7939
2162-271X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2349166957
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Capitalism
Comparative studies
Conflict resolution
Employment
Labor relations
Organizational conflict
Strikes
Workplaces
title SYSTEMS FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A56%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SYSTEMS%20FOR%20CONFLICT%20RESOLUTION%20IN%20COMPARATIVE%20PERSPECTIVE&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20labor%20relations%20review&rft.au=BEHRENS,%20MARTIN&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=312&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=312-344&rft.issn=0019-7939&rft.eissn=2162-271X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0019793919870800&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26957543%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2349166957&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26957543&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0019793919870800&rfr_iscdi=true