Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development

An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human resource development quarterly 2002-10, Vol.13 (3), p.243
1. Verfasser: Lohman, Margaret C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 243
container_title Human resource development quarterly
container_volume 13
creator Lohman, Margaret C
description An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in the nature of their case problems and training strategies. Specifically, the analysis found that case problems are ill structured in action learning and problem-based learning, are moderately structured in a goal-based scenario, and are fairly well structured in the case study approach. In addition, it was found that prototypical problems are used to a much greater extent in the problem-based learning and goal-based scenario approaches than they are in the other two approaches. Furthermore, the analysis found that the case study approach uses the most expert-oriented training strategy, the goal-based scenario approach uses a more learner-oriented strategy than the case study approach, and the problem-based learning and action learning approaches use strongly learner-oriented strategies.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_234904007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>200023281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2349040073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8kOgjAURRujiTj8A3Hf5EEryppo_AD3WOQxWSjyCt9vSXTv6k7nLpgXHEXIA4ijpfMgJT8DyDXbEDUAIEBGHnsko7b1pGzdlX4_mExjy8noac70qrUm31aDGcvqNxPPFGHuq94V6lmhI8w8FkhUm05pP8cJtelb7OyOrQqlCfdf3bLD9XJPbtwd3iOSTRszDu5EaShkDBLgJP6CPm7wR3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234904007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lohman, Margaret C</creator><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Margaret C</creatorcontrib><description>An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in the nature of their case problems and training strategies. Specifically, the analysis found that case problems are ill structured in action learning and problem-based learning, are moderately structured in a goal-based scenario, and are fairly well structured in the case study approach. In addition, it was found that prototypical problems are used to a much greater extent in the problem-based learning and goal-based scenario approaches than they are in the other two approaches. Furthermore, the analysis found that the case study approach uses the most expert-oriented training strategy, the goal-based scenario approach uses a more learner-oriented strategy than the case study approach, and the problem-based learning and action learning approaches use strongly learner-oriented strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-8004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Action learning ; Case studies ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Comparative studies ; Design ; Education ; Experiential Learning ; Independent study ; Learning Strategies ; Literature reviews ; Methods ; Problem based learning ; Problem solving ; Professional development ; Professionals ; Skill Development ; Skills ; Thinking Skills ; Training ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Human resource development quarterly, 2002-10, Vol.13 (3), p.243</ispartof><rights>Copyright Jossey-Bass, Incorporated Fall 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Margaret C</creatorcontrib><title>Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development</title><title>Human resource development quarterly</title><description>An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in the nature of their case problems and training strategies. Specifically, the analysis found that case problems are ill structured in action learning and problem-based learning, are moderately structured in a goal-based scenario, and are fairly well structured in the case study approach. In addition, it was found that prototypical problems are used to a much greater extent in the problem-based learning and goal-based scenario approaches than they are in the other two approaches. Furthermore, the analysis found that the case study approach uses the most expert-oriented training strategy, the goal-based scenario approach uses a more learner-oriented strategy than the case study approach, and the problem-based learning and action learning approaches use strongly learner-oriented strategies.</description><subject>Action learning</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Independent study</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Problem based learning</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>1044-8004</issn><issn>1532-1096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi8kOgjAURRujiTj8A3Hf5EEryppo_AD3WOQxWSjyCt9vSXTv6k7nLpgXHEXIA4ijpfMgJT8DyDXbEDUAIEBGHnsko7b1pGzdlX4_mExjy8noac70qrUm31aDGcvqNxPPFGHuq94V6lmhI8w8FkhUm05pP8cJtelb7OyOrQqlCfdf3bLD9XJPbtwd3iOSTRszDu5EaShkDBLgJP6CPm7wR3g</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Lohman, Margaret C</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development</title><author>Lohman, Margaret C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2349040073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Action learning</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Independent study</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Problem based learning</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Margaret C</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Human resource development quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lohman, Margaret C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development</atitle><jtitle>Human resource development quarterly</jtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>243</spage><pages>243-</pages><issn>1044-8004</issn><eissn>1532-1096</eissn><abstract>An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in the nature of their case problems and training strategies. Specifically, the analysis found that case problems are ill structured in action learning and problem-based learning, are moderately structured in a goal-based scenario, and are fairly well structured in the case study approach. In addition, it was found that prototypical problems are used to a much greater extent in the problem-based learning and goal-based scenario approaches than they are in the other two approaches. Furthermore, the analysis found that the case study approach uses the most expert-oriented training strategy, the goal-based scenario approach uses a more learner-oriented strategy than the case study approach, and the problem-based learning and action learning approaches use strongly learner-oriented strategies.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1044-8004
ispartof Human resource development quarterly, 2002-10, Vol.13 (3), p.243
issn 1044-8004
1532-1096
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_234904007
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete
subjects Action learning
Case studies
Cognition & reasoning
Comparative studies
Design
Education
Experiential Learning
Independent study
Learning Strategies
Literature reviews
Methods
Problem based learning
Problem solving
Professional development
Professionals
Skill Development
Skills
Thinking Skills
Training
Undergraduate Study
title Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A13%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultivating%20problem-solving%20skills%20through%20problems-based%20approaches%20to%20professional%20development&rft.jtitle=Human%20resource%20development%20quarterly&rft.au=Lohman,%20Margaret%20C&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=243&rft.pages=243-&rft.issn=1044-8004&rft.eissn=1532-1096&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E200023281%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234904007&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true