Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development
An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human resource development quarterly 2002-10, Vol.13 (3), p.243 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 243 |
container_title | Human resource development quarterly |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Lohman, Margaret C |
description | An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in the nature of their case problems and training strategies. Specifically, the analysis found that case problems are ill structured in action learning and problem-based learning, are moderately structured in a goal-based scenario, and are fairly well structured in the case study approach. In addition, it was found that prototypical problems are used to a much greater extent in the problem-based learning and goal-based scenario approaches than they are in the other two approaches. Furthermore, the analysis found that the case study approach uses the most expert-oriented training strategy, the goal-based scenario approach uses a more learner-oriented strategy than the case study approach, and the problem-based learning and action learning approaches use strongly learner-oriented strategies. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_234904007</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>200023281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_2349040073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8kOgjAURRujiTj8A3Hf5EEryppo_AD3WOQxWSjyCt9vSXTv6k7nLpgXHEXIA4ijpfMgJT8DyDXbEDUAIEBGHnsko7b1pGzdlX4_mExjy8noac70qrUm31aDGcvqNxPPFGHuq94V6lmhI8w8FkhUm05pP8cJtelb7OyOrQqlCfdf3bLD9XJPbtwd3iOSTRszDu5EaShkDBLgJP6CPm7wR3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234904007</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Lohman, Margaret C</creator><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Margaret C</creatorcontrib><description>An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in the nature of their case problems and training strategies. Specifically, the analysis found that case problems are ill structured in action learning and problem-based learning, are moderately structured in a goal-based scenario, and are fairly well structured in the case study approach. In addition, it was found that prototypical problems are used to a much greater extent in the problem-based learning and goal-based scenario approaches than they are in the other two approaches. Furthermore, the analysis found that the case study approach uses the most expert-oriented training strategy, the goal-based scenario approach uses a more learner-oriented strategy than the case study approach, and the problem-based learning and action learning approaches use strongly learner-oriented strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1044-8004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Action learning ; Case studies ; Cognition & reasoning ; Comparative studies ; Design ; Education ; Experiential Learning ; Independent study ; Learning Strategies ; Literature reviews ; Methods ; Problem based learning ; Problem solving ; Professional development ; Professionals ; Skill Development ; Skills ; Thinking Skills ; Training ; Undergraduate Study</subject><ispartof>Human resource development quarterly, 2002-10, Vol.13 (3), p.243</ispartof><rights>Copyright Jossey-Bass, Incorporated Fall 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Margaret C</creatorcontrib><title>Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development</title><title>Human resource development quarterly</title><description>An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in the nature of their case problems and training strategies. Specifically, the analysis found that case problems are ill structured in action learning and problem-based learning, are moderately structured in a goal-based scenario, and are fairly well structured in the case study approach. In addition, it was found that prototypical problems are used to a much greater extent in the problem-based learning and goal-based scenario approaches than they are in the other two approaches. Furthermore, the analysis found that the case study approach uses the most expert-oriented training strategy, the goal-based scenario approach uses a more learner-oriented strategy than the case study approach, and the problem-based learning and action learning approaches use strongly learner-oriented strategies.</description><subject>Action learning</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Experiential Learning</subject><subject>Independent study</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Problem based learning</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Skill Development</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Undergraduate Study</subject><issn>1044-8004</issn><issn>1532-1096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi8kOgjAURRujiTj8A3Hf5EEryppo_AD3WOQxWSjyCt9vSXTv6k7nLpgXHEXIA4ijpfMgJT8DyDXbEDUAIEBGHnsko7b1pGzdlX4_mExjy8noac70qrUm31aDGcvqNxPPFGHuq94V6lmhI8w8FkhUm05pP8cJtelb7OyOrQqlCfdf3bLD9XJPbtwd3iOSTRszDu5EaShkDBLgJP6CPm7wR3g</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Lohman, Margaret C</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development</title><author>Lohman, Margaret C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_2349040073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Action learning</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Experiential Learning</topic><topic>Independent study</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Problem based learning</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Skill Development</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Undergraduate Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Margaret C</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Human resource development quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lohman, Margaret C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development</atitle><jtitle>Human resource development quarterly</jtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>243</spage><pages>243-</pages><issn>1044-8004</issn><eissn>1532-1096</eissn><abstract>An extensive literature review was conducted of 4 problem-based approaches to professional development: 1. case study, 2. goal-based scenario, 3. problem-based learning, and 4. action learning. The review comparatively analyzed the training designs of these 4 approaches and found key differences in the nature of their case problems and training strategies. Specifically, the analysis found that case problems are ill structured in action learning and problem-based learning, are moderately structured in a goal-based scenario, and are fairly well structured in the case study approach. In addition, it was found that prototypical problems are used to a much greater extent in the problem-based learning and goal-based scenario approaches than they are in the other two approaches. Furthermore, the analysis found that the case study approach uses the most expert-oriented training strategy, the goal-based scenario approach uses a more learner-oriented strategy than the case study approach, and the problem-based learning and action learning approaches use strongly learner-oriented strategies.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1044-8004 |
ispartof | Human resource development quarterly, 2002-10, Vol.13 (3), p.243 |
issn | 1044-8004 1532-1096 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_234904007 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Action learning Case studies Cognition & reasoning Comparative studies Design Education Experiential Learning Independent study Learning Strategies Literature reviews Methods Problem based learning Problem solving Professional development Professionals Skill Development Skills Thinking Skills Training Undergraduate Study |
title | Cultivating problem-solving skills through problems-based approaches to professional development |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T10%3A13%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cultivating%20problem-solving%20skills%20through%20problems-based%20approaches%20to%20professional%20development&rft.jtitle=Human%20resource%20development%20quarterly&rft.au=Lohman,%20Margaret%20C&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=243&rft.pages=243-&rft.issn=1044-8004&rft.eissn=1532-1096&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E200023281%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234904007&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |