The neglected millions: the global state of aquaculture workers’ occupational safety, health and well-being

A scoping project was funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2017 on the health and safety of aquaculture workers. This project developed a template covering basic types of aquaculture production, health and safety hazards and risks, and related data on injuries and occupational ill heal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2020-01, Vol.77 (1), p.15-18
Hauptverfasser: Watterson, Andrew, Jeebhay, Mohamed Fareed, Neis, Barbara, Mitchell, Rebecca, Cavalli, Lissandra
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 18
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)
container_volume 77
creator Watterson, Andrew
Jeebhay, Mohamed Fareed
Neis, Barbara
Mitchell, Rebecca
Cavalli, Lissandra
description A scoping project was funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2017 on the health and safety of aquaculture workers. This project developed a template covering basic types of aquaculture production, health and safety hazards and risks, and related data on injuries and occupational ill health, regulations, social welfare conditions, and labour and industry activity in the sector. Profiles using the template were then produced for key aquaculture regions and nations across the globe where information could be obtained. These revealed both the scale and depth of occupational safety and health (OSH) challenges in terms of data gaps, a lack of or poor risk assessment and management, inadequate monitoring and regulation, and limited information generally about aquaculture OSH. Risks are especially high for offshore/marine aquaculture workers. Good practice as well as barriers to improving aquaculture OSH were noted. The findings from the profiles were brought together in an analysis of current knowledge on injury and work-related ill health, standards and regulation, non-work socioeconomic factors affecting aquaculture OSH, and the role of labour and industry in dealing with aquaculture OSH challenges. Some examples of governmental and labour, industry and non-governmental organisation good practice were identified. Some databases on injury and disease in the sector and research initiatives that solved problems were noted. However, there are many challenges especially in rural and remote areas across Asia but also in the northern hemisphere that need to be addressed. Action now is possible based on the knowledge available, with further research an important but secondary objective.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/oemed-2019-105753
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2348239777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2348239777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b404t-ee69af98e49da6dd87af34b147b0e60d635ebb4f68421b019e0dc9222011a6f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtOwzAURS0EouWzACbIEtMa7DiJE2ao4idVYlLGkZ289INTt7ajqjO2wfZYCQ5tYYTEyJZ97tN9B6ELRq8Z4-mNgQYqElGWE0YTkfAD1GexoETkUXoY7jxhhArGeujEuTmljAseHaMeZyKmcZb3UTOeAl7AREPpocLNTOuZWbhb7MP7RBslNXZeesCmxnLVyrLVvrWA18a-gXWf7x_YlGW7lD7kOljW4DcDPAWp_RTLRYXXoDVRMFtMztBRLbWD8915il4f7sfDJzJ6eXwe3o2ICrU8AUhzWecZxHkl06rKhKx5rMJqikJKq5QnoFRcp1kcMRXWB1qVeRQFE0ymdcJP0dV27tKaVQvOF3PT2lDPFRGPs4jnQohAsS1VWuOchbpY2lkj7aZgtOgEF9-Ci05wsRUcMpe7ya3q_vaJvdEADLaAaub_mkd-8Z-Sf_NfD5eVYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2348239777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The neglected millions: the global state of aquaculture workers’ occupational safety, health and well-being</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Watterson, Andrew ; Jeebhay, Mohamed Fareed ; Neis, Barbara ; Mitchell, Rebecca ; Cavalli, Lissandra</creator><creatorcontrib>Watterson, Andrew ; Jeebhay, Mohamed Fareed ; Neis, Barbara ; Mitchell, Rebecca ; Cavalli, Lissandra</creatorcontrib><description>A scoping project was funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2017 on the health and safety of aquaculture workers. This project developed a template covering basic types of aquaculture production, health and safety hazards and risks, and related data on injuries and occupational ill health, regulations, social welfare conditions, and labour and industry activity in the sector. Profiles using the template were then produced for key aquaculture regions and nations across the globe where information could be obtained. These revealed both the scale and depth of occupational safety and health (OSH) challenges in terms of data gaps, a lack of or poor risk assessment and management, inadequate monitoring and regulation, and limited information generally about aquaculture OSH. Risks are especially high for offshore/marine aquaculture workers. Good practice as well as barriers to improving aquaculture OSH were noted. The findings from the profiles were brought together in an analysis of current knowledge on injury and work-related ill health, standards and regulation, non-work socioeconomic factors affecting aquaculture OSH, and the role of labour and industry in dealing with aquaculture OSH challenges. Some examples of governmental and labour, industry and non-governmental organisation good practice were identified. Some databases on injury and disease in the sector and research initiatives that solved problems were noted. However, there are many challenges especially in rural and remote areas across Asia but also in the northern hemisphere that need to be addressed. Action now is possible based on the knowledge available, with further research an important but secondary objective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105753</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31740489</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; Aquaculture ; aquaculture health and safety ; Aquaculture products ; Child labor ; Civil society ; Collective bargaining ; Farming ; Fish ; Food quality ; Food safety ; Health hazards ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Injuries ; Injury analysis ; International occupational health ; Labor contracts ; Labor unions ; Low income groups ; Marine aquaculture ; Northern Hemisphere ; Occupational diseases ; Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Occupational health ; Occupational Health - standards ; Occupational safety ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards ; R&amp;D ; Regulation ; Regulatory agencies ; Research &amp; development ; Researchers ; Risk assessment ; Rural areas ; Safety Management - standards ; Social factors ; Socioeconomic data ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomics ; Surveillance ; Sustainability ; Well being ; Workers ; Workforce ; Workplace</subject><ispartof>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2020-01, Vol.77 (1), p.15-18</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2019 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b404t-ee69af98e49da6dd87af34b147b0e60d635ebb4f68421b019e0dc9222011a6f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b404t-ee69af98e49da6dd87af34b147b0e60d635ebb4f68421b019e0dc9222011a6f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8278-9863 ; 0000-0003-1939-1761 ; 0000-0001-8531-7362 ; 0000-0001-6656-9193</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31740489$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watterson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeebhay, Mohamed Fareed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neis, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalli, Lissandra</creatorcontrib><title>The neglected millions: the global state of aquaculture workers’ occupational safety, health and well-being</title><title>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</title><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>A scoping project was funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2017 on the health and safety of aquaculture workers. This project developed a template covering basic types of aquaculture production, health and safety hazards and risks, and related data on injuries and occupational ill health, regulations, social welfare conditions, and labour and industry activity in the sector. Profiles using the template were then produced for key aquaculture regions and nations across the globe where information could be obtained. These revealed both the scale and depth of occupational safety and health (OSH) challenges in terms of data gaps, a lack of or poor risk assessment and management, inadequate monitoring and regulation, and limited information generally about aquaculture OSH. Risks are especially high for offshore/marine aquaculture workers. Good practice as well as barriers to improving aquaculture OSH were noted. The findings from the profiles were brought together in an analysis of current knowledge on injury and work-related ill health, standards and regulation, non-work socioeconomic factors affecting aquaculture OSH, and the role of labour and industry in dealing with aquaculture OSH challenges. Some examples of governmental and labour, industry and non-governmental organisation good practice were identified. Some databases on injury and disease in the sector and research initiatives that solved problems were noted. However, there are many challenges especially in rural and remote areas across Asia but also in the northern hemisphere that need to be addressed. Action now is possible based on the knowledge available, with further research an important but secondary objective.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>aquaculture health and safety</subject><subject>Aquaculture products</subject><subject>Child labor</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Collective bargaining</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Injury analysis</subject><subject>International occupational health</subject><subject>Labor contracts</subject><subject>Labor unions</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Marine aquaculture</subject><subject>Northern Hemisphere</subject><subject>Occupational diseases</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Occupational Health - standards</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Safety Management - standards</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic data</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Well being</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><subject>Workplace</subject><issn>1351-0711</issn><issn>1470-7926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtOwzAURS0EouWzACbIEtMa7DiJE2ao4idVYlLGkZ289INTt7ajqjO2wfZYCQ5tYYTEyJZ97tN9B6ELRq8Z4-mNgQYqElGWE0YTkfAD1GexoETkUXoY7jxhhArGeujEuTmljAseHaMeZyKmcZb3UTOeAl7AREPpocLNTOuZWbhb7MP7RBslNXZeesCmxnLVyrLVvrWA18a-gXWf7x_YlGW7lD7kOljW4DcDPAWp_RTLRYXXoDVRMFtMztBRLbWD8915il4f7sfDJzJ6eXwe3o2ICrU8AUhzWecZxHkl06rKhKx5rMJqikJKq5QnoFRcp1kcMRXWB1qVeRQFE0ymdcJP0dV27tKaVQvOF3PT2lDPFRGPs4jnQohAsS1VWuOchbpY2lkj7aZgtOgEF9-Ci05wsRUcMpe7ya3q_vaJvdEADLaAaub_mkd-8Z-Sf_NfD5eVYw</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Watterson, Andrew</creator><creator>Jeebhay, Mohamed Fareed</creator><creator>Neis, Barbara</creator><creator>Mitchell, Rebecca</creator><creator>Cavalli, Lissandra</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-9863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-1761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8531-7362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-9193</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>The neglected millions: the global state of aquaculture workers’ occupational safety, health and well-being</title><author>Watterson, Andrew ; Jeebhay, Mohamed Fareed ; Neis, Barbara ; Mitchell, Rebecca ; Cavalli, Lissandra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b404t-ee69af98e49da6dd87af34b147b0e60d635ebb4f68421b019e0dc9222011a6f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>aquaculture health and safety</topic><topic>Aquaculture products</topic><topic>Child labor</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Collective bargaining</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Injury analysis</topic><topic>International occupational health</topic><topic>Labor contracts</topic><topic>Labor unions</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Marine aquaculture</topic><topic>Northern Hemisphere</topic><topic>Occupational diseases</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Occupational Health - standards</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Safety Management - standards</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic data</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Well being</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><topic>Workplace</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watterson, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeebhay, Mohamed Fareed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neis, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalli, Lissandra</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watterson, Andrew</au><au>Jeebhay, Mohamed Fareed</au><au>Neis, Barbara</au><au>Mitchell, Rebecca</au><au>Cavalli, Lissandra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The neglected millions: the global state of aquaculture workers’ occupational safety, health and well-being</atitle><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle><stitle>Occup Environ Med</stitle><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>15-18</pages><issn>1351-0711</issn><eissn>1470-7926</eissn><abstract>A scoping project was funded by the Food and Agriculture Organization in 2017 on the health and safety of aquaculture workers. This project developed a template covering basic types of aquaculture production, health and safety hazards and risks, and related data on injuries and occupational ill health, regulations, social welfare conditions, and labour and industry activity in the sector. Profiles using the template were then produced for key aquaculture regions and nations across the globe where information could be obtained. These revealed both the scale and depth of occupational safety and health (OSH) challenges in terms of data gaps, a lack of or poor risk assessment and management, inadequate monitoring and regulation, and limited information generally about aquaculture OSH. Risks are especially high for offshore/marine aquaculture workers. Good practice as well as barriers to improving aquaculture OSH were noted. The findings from the profiles were brought together in an analysis of current knowledge on injury and work-related ill health, standards and regulation, non-work socioeconomic factors affecting aquaculture OSH, and the role of labour and industry in dealing with aquaculture OSH challenges. Some examples of governmental and labour, industry and non-governmental organisation good practice were identified. Some databases on injury and disease in the sector and research initiatives that solved problems were noted. However, there are many challenges especially in rural and remote areas across Asia but also in the northern hemisphere that need to be addressed. Action now is possible based on the knowledge available, with further research an important but secondary objective.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>31740489</pmid><doi>10.1136/oemed-2019-105753</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8278-9863</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-1761</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8531-7362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6656-9193</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-0711
ispartof Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2020-01, Vol.77 (1), p.15-18
issn 1351-0711
1470-7926
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2348239777
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE
subjects Agricultural management
Aquaculture
aquaculture health and safety
Aquaculture products
Child labor
Civil society
Collective bargaining
Farming
Fish
Food quality
Food safety
Health hazards
Humans
Illnesses
Injuries
Injury analysis
International occupational health
Labor contracts
Labor unions
Low income groups
Marine aquaculture
Northern Hemisphere
Occupational diseases
Occupational Diseases - prevention & control
Occupational health
Occupational Health - standards
Occupational safety
Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards
R&D
Regulation
Regulatory agencies
Research & development
Researchers
Risk assessment
Rural areas
Safety Management - standards
Social factors
Socioeconomic data
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomics
Surveillance
Sustainability
Well being
Workers
Workforce
Workplace
title The neglected millions: the global state of aquaculture workers’ occupational safety, health and well-being
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A36%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20neglected%20millions:%20the%20global%20state%20of%20aquaculture%20workers%E2%80%99%20occupational%20safety,%20health%20and%20well-being&rft.jtitle=Occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Watterson,%20Andrew&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=15-18&rft.issn=1351-0711&rft.eissn=1470-7926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/oemed-2019-105753&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2348239777%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2348239777&rft_id=info:pmid/31740489&rfr_iscdi=true