Three‐Dimensional Surface Displacements During the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake (New Zealand) From Photogrammetry‐Derived Point Clouds

High‐resolution, three‐dimensional (3‐D) measurements of surface displacements during earthquakes can provide constraints on fault geometry and near‐surface slip and also quantify on‐fault and off‐fault deformation. However, measurements of surface displacements are often hampered by a lack of high‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Howell, A., Nissen, E., Stahl, T., Clark, K., Kearse, J., Van Dissen, R., Villamor, P., Langridge, R., Jones, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 125
creator Howell, A.
Nissen, E.
Stahl, T.
Clark, K.
Kearse, J.
Van Dissen, R.
Villamor, P.
Langridge, R.
Jones, K.
description High‐resolution, three‐dimensional (3‐D) measurements of surface displacements during earthquakes can provide constraints on fault geometry and near‐surface slip and also quantify on‐fault and off‐fault deformation. However, measurements of surface displacements are often hampered by a lack of high‐resolution preearthquake elevation data, such as lidar. For example, preearthquake lidar for the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura, New Zealand, earthquake only covers ≲10% of ~180 km of mapped surface ruptures. To overcome a lack of preearthquake lidar, we measure 3‐D coseismic displacements during the Kaikōura earthquake using point clouds generated from aerial photographs. From these point clouds, which cover the whole area of the 2016 surface ruptures, it is possible to measure 3‐D displacements to within ±0.2 m. We measure coseismic slip and estimate the geometries of faults in the steep, inaccessible Seaward Kaikōura mountains, where postearthquake field observations are very sparse. The Jordan Fault (previously the Jordan Thrust) ruptured in 2016 as a moderate‐to‐steeply dipping (~50–80°), predominantly strike‐slip fault. Slip on this fault in 2016—which included a normal‐sense component in some areas—contrasts with field observations that indicate significant longer‐term shortening across the Jordan Fault during the Holocene. It is therefore likely that different earthquakes on the Jordan Fault have very different slip vectors and that the fault does not exhibit “characteristic” slip behavior. For faults like the Jordan Fault, long‐term time‐averaged estimates of slip rate may not be reliable indicators of the sense and magnitude of slip in individual earthquakes. Key Points High‐resolution, three‐dimensional surface displacements during earthquakes can be measured from aerial photographs The Jordan Fault did not accommodate significant shortening in an earthquake in 2016 but probably does in the long term
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019JB018739
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2348237561</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2348237561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2235-783ea982c4ef9cb4a1424217c4f4f653c2659518ccb288834ecce04d0415bb943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtOwzAQhiMEElXpjgNYYgOLlviRxF7SJ5QCFRQhsYkcd9K6zaO1E6ruuACIS3ERTkIqEGI282vm1_yaz3GOsdvCLhHnxMVi2HYxD6jYc2oE-6IpqOfv_2lMD52GtQu3Kl6NMKs575O5Afh6_ejqFDKr80wm6KE0sVSAutqukkpUm8Kibml0NkPFHFCV5aObJxS0OLqWevn5VhqJetIU83Upl4BOb2GDnkEmMpueob7JUzSe50U-MzJNoTDbXSIY_QJTNM51VqBOkpdTe-QcxDKx0Pjtdeex35t0Lpuju8FV52LUVIRQrxlwClJwohjEQkVMYkYYwYFiMYt9jyrie8LDXKmIcM4pA6XAZVOXYS-KBKN15-Tn7srk6xJsES7y0lS_25BQxgkNPB9XLvrj2ugEtuHK6FSabYjdcEc8_E88HA7u2x6tgNNv3JJ2sQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2348237561</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three‐Dimensional Surface Displacements During the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake (New Zealand) From Photogrammetry‐Derived Point Clouds</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Howell, A. ; Nissen, E. ; Stahl, T. ; Clark, K. ; Kearse, J. ; Van Dissen, R. ; Villamor, P. ; Langridge, R. ; Jones, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Howell, A. ; Nissen, E. ; Stahl, T. ; Clark, K. ; Kearse, J. ; Van Dissen, R. ; Villamor, P. ; Langridge, R. ; Jones, K.</creatorcontrib><description>High‐resolution, three‐dimensional (3‐D) measurements of surface displacements during earthquakes can provide constraints on fault geometry and near‐surface slip and also quantify on‐fault and off‐fault deformation. However, measurements of surface displacements are often hampered by a lack of high‐resolution preearthquake elevation data, such as lidar. For example, preearthquake lidar for the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura, New Zealand, earthquake only covers ≲10% of ~180 km of mapped surface ruptures. To overcome a lack of preearthquake lidar, we measure 3‐D coseismic displacements during the Kaikōura earthquake using point clouds generated from aerial photographs. From these point clouds, which cover the whole area of the 2016 surface ruptures, it is possible to measure 3‐D displacements to within ±0.2 m. We measure coseismic slip and estimate the geometries of faults in the steep, inaccessible Seaward Kaikōura mountains, where postearthquake field observations are very sparse. The Jordan Fault (previously the Jordan Thrust) ruptured in 2016 as a moderate‐to‐steeply dipping (~50–80°), predominantly strike‐slip fault. Slip on this fault in 2016—which included a normal‐sense component in some areas—contrasts with field observations that indicate significant longer‐term shortening across the Jordan Fault during the Holocene. It is therefore likely that different earthquakes on the Jordan Fault have very different slip vectors and that the fault does not exhibit “characteristic” slip behavior. For faults like the Jordan Fault, long‐term time‐averaged estimates of slip rate may not be reliable indicators of the sense and magnitude of slip in individual earthquakes. Key Points High‐resolution, three‐dimensional surface displacements during earthquakes can be measured from aerial photographs The Jordan Fault did not accommodate significant shortening in an earthquake in 2016 but probably does in the long term</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JB018739</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerial photographs ; Aerial photography ; Co‐seismic deformation ; Deformation ; Displacement ; Earthquakes ; Elevation ; Fault lines ; Geological faults ; Geophysics ; Holocene ; Lidar ; Mountains ; New Zealand ; Photogrammetry ; Point‐cloud differencing ; Resolution ; Seismic activity ; Seismic response ; Slip ; Vectors</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2235-783ea982c4ef9cb4a1424217c4f4f653c2659518ccb288834ecce04d0415bb943</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JB018739$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JB018739$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,1435,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46840</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howell, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissen, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahl, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearse, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dissen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villamor, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langridge, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Three‐Dimensional Surface Displacements During the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake (New Zealand) From Photogrammetry‐Derived Point Clouds</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>High‐resolution, three‐dimensional (3‐D) measurements of surface displacements during earthquakes can provide constraints on fault geometry and near‐surface slip and also quantify on‐fault and off‐fault deformation. However, measurements of surface displacements are often hampered by a lack of high‐resolution preearthquake elevation data, such as lidar. For example, preearthquake lidar for the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura, New Zealand, earthquake only covers ≲10% of ~180 km of mapped surface ruptures. To overcome a lack of preearthquake lidar, we measure 3‐D coseismic displacements during the Kaikōura earthquake using point clouds generated from aerial photographs. From these point clouds, which cover the whole area of the 2016 surface ruptures, it is possible to measure 3‐D displacements to within ±0.2 m. We measure coseismic slip and estimate the geometries of faults in the steep, inaccessible Seaward Kaikōura mountains, where postearthquake field observations are very sparse. The Jordan Fault (previously the Jordan Thrust) ruptured in 2016 as a moderate‐to‐steeply dipping (~50–80°), predominantly strike‐slip fault. Slip on this fault in 2016—which included a normal‐sense component in some areas—contrasts with field observations that indicate significant longer‐term shortening across the Jordan Fault during the Holocene. It is therefore likely that different earthquakes on the Jordan Fault have very different slip vectors and that the fault does not exhibit “characteristic” slip behavior. For faults like the Jordan Fault, long‐term time‐averaged estimates of slip rate may not be reliable indicators of the sense and magnitude of slip in individual earthquakes. Key Points High‐resolution, three‐dimensional surface displacements during earthquakes can be measured from aerial photographs The Jordan Fault did not accommodate significant shortening in an earthquake in 2016 but probably does in the long term</description><subject>Aerial photographs</subject><subject>Aerial photography</subject><subject>Co‐seismic deformation</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Holocene</subject><subject>Lidar</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>New Zealand</subject><subject>Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Point‐cloud differencing</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkEtOwzAQhiMEElXpjgNYYgOLlviRxF7SJ5QCFRQhsYkcd9K6zaO1E6ruuACIS3ERTkIqEGI282vm1_yaz3GOsdvCLhHnxMVi2HYxD6jYc2oE-6IpqOfv_2lMD52GtQu3Kl6NMKs575O5Afh6_ejqFDKr80wm6KE0sVSAutqukkpUm8Kibml0NkPFHFCV5aObJxS0OLqWevn5VhqJetIU83Upl4BOb2GDnkEmMpueob7JUzSe50U-MzJNoTDbXSIY_QJTNM51VqBOkpdTe-QcxDKx0Pjtdeex35t0Lpuju8FV52LUVIRQrxlwClJwohjEQkVMYkYYwYFiMYt9jyrie8LDXKmIcM4pA6XAZVOXYS-KBKN15-Tn7srk6xJsES7y0lS_25BQxgkNPB9XLvrj2ugEtuHK6FSabYjdcEc8_E88HA7u2x6tgNNv3JJ2sQ</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Howell, A.</creator><creator>Nissen, E.</creator><creator>Stahl, T.</creator><creator>Clark, K.</creator><creator>Kearse, J.</creator><creator>Van Dissen, R.</creator><creator>Villamor, P.</creator><creator>Langridge, R.</creator><creator>Jones, K.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Three‐Dimensional Surface Displacements During the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake (New Zealand) From Photogrammetry‐Derived Point Clouds</title><author>Howell, A. ; Nissen, E. ; Stahl, T. ; Clark, K. ; Kearse, J. ; Van Dissen, R. ; Villamor, P. ; Langridge, R. ; Jones, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2235-783ea982c4ef9cb4a1424217c4f4f653c2659518ccb288834ecce04d0415bb943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerial photographs</topic><topic>Aerial photography</topic><topic>Co‐seismic deformation</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Holocene</topic><topic>Lidar</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>New Zealand</topic><topic>Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Point‐cloud differencing</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howell, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nissen, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahl, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearse, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Dissen, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villamor, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langridge, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howell, A.</au><au>Nissen, E.</au><au>Stahl, T.</au><au>Clark, K.</au><au>Kearse, J.</au><au>Van Dissen, R.</au><au>Villamor, P.</au><au>Langridge, R.</au><au>Jones, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three‐Dimensional Surface Displacements During the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake (New Zealand) From Photogrammetry‐Derived Point Clouds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>High‐resolution, three‐dimensional (3‐D) measurements of surface displacements during earthquakes can provide constraints on fault geometry and near‐surface slip and also quantify on‐fault and off‐fault deformation. However, measurements of surface displacements are often hampered by a lack of high‐resolution preearthquake elevation data, such as lidar. For example, preearthquake lidar for the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura, New Zealand, earthquake only covers ≲10% of ~180 km of mapped surface ruptures. To overcome a lack of preearthquake lidar, we measure 3‐D coseismic displacements during the Kaikōura earthquake using point clouds generated from aerial photographs. From these point clouds, which cover the whole area of the 2016 surface ruptures, it is possible to measure 3‐D displacements to within ±0.2 m. We measure coseismic slip and estimate the geometries of faults in the steep, inaccessible Seaward Kaikōura mountains, where postearthquake field observations are very sparse. The Jordan Fault (previously the Jordan Thrust) ruptured in 2016 as a moderate‐to‐steeply dipping (~50–80°), predominantly strike‐slip fault. Slip on this fault in 2016—which included a normal‐sense component in some areas—contrasts with field observations that indicate significant longer‐term shortening across the Jordan Fault during the Holocene. It is therefore likely that different earthquakes on the Jordan Fault have very different slip vectors and that the fault does not exhibit “characteristic” slip behavior. For faults like the Jordan Fault, long‐term time‐averaged estimates of slip rate may not be reliable indicators of the sense and magnitude of slip in individual earthquakes. Key Points High‐resolution, three‐dimensional surface displacements during earthquakes can be measured from aerial photographs The Jordan Fault did not accommodate significant shortening in an earthquake in 2016 but probably does in the long term</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JB018739</doi><tpages>25</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2020-01, Vol.125 (1), p.n/a
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2348237561
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects Aerial photographs
Aerial photography
Co‐seismic deformation
Deformation
Displacement
Earthquakes
Elevation
Fault lines
Geological faults
Geophysics
Holocene
Lidar
Mountains
New Zealand
Photogrammetry
Point‐cloud differencing
Resolution
Seismic activity
Seismic response
Slip
Vectors
title Three‐Dimensional Surface Displacements During the 2016 MW 7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake (New Zealand) From Photogrammetry‐Derived Point Clouds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T03%3A05%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%E2%80%90Dimensional%20Surface%20Displacements%20During%20the%202016%20MW%207.8%20Kaik%C5%8Dura%20Earthquake%20(New%20Zealand)%20From%20Photogrammetry%E2%80%90Derived%20Point%20Clouds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Howell,%20A.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JB018739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2348237561%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2348237561&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true