Predicting Women’s Recidivism Using the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry: Preliminary Evidence of Predictive Validity With Community-Sentenced Women Using a “Gender-Neutral” Risk Measure
Although men and women share risk factors for offending, some scholars suggest these factors operate differently across gender and that women-specific risk factors are neglected in existing “gender-neutral” risk assessment tools. This article explored the predictive validity of one gender-neutral ri...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Criminal justice and behavior 2020-03, Vol.47 (3), p.251-270 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 270 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 251 |
| container_title | Criminal justice and behavior |
| container_volume | 47 |
| creator | Scanlan, Jessica M. Yesberg, Julia A. Fortune, Clare-Ann Polaschek, Devon L. L. |
| description | Although men and women share risk factors for offending, some scholars suggest these factors operate differently across gender and that women-specific risk factors are neglected in existing “gender-neutral” risk assessment tools. This article explored the predictive validity of one gender-neutral risk assessment tool—the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry (DRAOR)—with matched samples of women and men serving community supervision sentences. Total DRAOR scores had comparative predictive validity across gender. For women and men, the DRAOR predicted reconviction over a static risk measure. The findings support the general premise of gender neutrality, but do not necessarily suggest the DRAOR, or gender-neutral tools more broadly, are the best tools for use with women. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0093854819896387 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2348205664</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0093854819896387</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2348205664</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-471c14c3ecfd3dfd8f5036c34be552b08842801bd3170f12687fe6ca57e983483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU9rFDEUD6LgWr17DHiOJpNkJuOtrGsVqpVq7XHIJi9t6k6mJpmFve3XEPQj-SX2k5hxKoLg6fH4_eU9hJ4y-pyxpnlBacuVFIq1qq25au6hBZOyIly24j5aTDCZ8IfoUUo3lFIhmVygnx8iWG-yD1f4cughHPbfEj4H463f-tTjizRB-Rrwq13QvTf43Kcv-DglSKnwM3ZDxGfOQbAQi5KsQo67l7gYb3zvg447vNp6C8EAHhz-E7gF_FlvSkze4Uufr_Fy6PsxlJV8LLYT3c6V7jpofNh_P_kdQ97DmKPeHPY_5jrvQKcxwmP0wOlNgid38whdvF59Wr4hp2cnb5fHp8Twps1ENMwwYTgYZ7l1VjlJeW24WEM52ZoqJSpF2dpy1lDHqlo1DmqjZQOt4kLxI_Rs9r2Nw9cRUu5uhjGGEtlVBa-orGtRWHRmmTikFMF1t9H35R4do930tO7fpxUJmSVJX8Ff0__yfwHw4Jzv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2348205664</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Women’s Recidivism Using the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry: Preliminary Evidence of Predictive Validity With Community-Sentenced Women Using a “Gender-Neutral” Risk Measure</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Scanlan, Jessica M. ; Yesberg, Julia A. ; Fortune, Clare-Ann ; Polaschek, Devon L. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scanlan, Jessica M. ; Yesberg, Julia A. ; Fortune, Clare-Ann ; Polaschek, Devon L. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Although men and women share risk factors for offending, some scholars suggest these factors operate differently across gender and that women-specific risk factors are neglected in existing “gender-neutral” risk assessment tools. This article explored the predictive validity of one gender-neutral risk assessment tool—the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry (DRAOR)—with matched samples of women and men serving community supervision sentences. Total DRAOR scores had comparative predictive validity across gender. For women and men, the DRAOR predicted reconviction over a static risk measure. The findings support the general premise of gender neutrality, but do not necessarily suggest the DRAOR, or gender-neutral tools more broadly, are the best tools for use with women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0093-8548</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0093854819896387</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Community service ; Criminal sentences ; Dynamic assessment ; Gender ; Neutrality ; Offending ; Parole & probation ; Predictive validity ; Recidivism ; Risk assessment ; Risk factors ; Validity ; Women</subject><ispartof>Criminal justice and behavior, 2020-03, Vol.47 (3), p.251-270</ispartof><rights>2019 International Association for Correctional and Forensic Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-471c14c3ecfd3dfd8f5036c34be552b08842801bd3170f12687fe6ca57e983483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-471c14c3ecfd3dfd8f5036c34be552b08842801bd3170f12687fe6ca57e983483</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6385-3567 ; 0000-0003-4827-0555</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0093854819896387$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0093854819896387$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,30980,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scanlan, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yesberg, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortune, Clare-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polaschek, Devon L. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Women’s Recidivism Using the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry: Preliminary Evidence of Predictive Validity With Community-Sentenced Women Using a “Gender-Neutral” Risk Measure</title><title>Criminal justice and behavior</title><description>Although men and women share risk factors for offending, some scholars suggest these factors operate differently across gender and that women-specific risk factors are neglected in existing “gender-neutral” risk assessment tools. This article explored the predictive validity of one gender-neutral risk assessment tool—the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry (DRAOR)—with matched samples of women and men serving community supervision sentences. Total DRAOR scores had comparative predictive validity across gender. For women and men, the DRAOR predicted reconviction over a static risk measure. The findings support the general premise of gender neutrality, but do not necessarily suggest the DRAOR, or gender-neutral tools more broadly, are the best tools for use with women.</description><subject>Community service</subject><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Dynamic assessment</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Neutrality</subject><subject>Offending</subject><subject>Parole & probation</subject><subject>Predictive validity</subject><subject>Recidivism</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0093-8548</issn><issn>1552-3594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU9rFDEUD6LgWr17DHiOJpNkJuOtrGsVqpVq7XHIJi9t6k6mJpmFve3XEPQj-SX2k5hxKoLg6fH4_eU9hJ4y-pyxpnlBacuVFIq1qq25au6hBZOyIly24j5aTDCZ8IfoUUo3lFIhmVygnx8iWG-yD1f4cughHPbfEj4H463f-tTjizRB-Rrwq13QvTf43Kcv-DglSKnwM3ZDxGfOQbAQi5KsQo67l7gYb3zvg447vNp6C8EAHhz-E7gF_FlvSkze4Uufr_Fy6PsxlJV8LLYT3c6V7jpofNh_P_kdQ97DmKPeHPY_5jrvQKcxwmP0wOlNgid38whdvF59Wr4hp2cnb5fHp8Twps1ENMwwYTgYZ7l1VjlJeW24WEM52ZoqJSpF2dpy1lDHqlo1DmqjZQOt4kLxI_Rs9r2Nw9cRUu5uhjGGEtlVBa-orGtRWHRmmTikFMF1t9H35R4do930tO7fpxUJmSVJX8Ff0__yfwHw4Jzv</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Scanlan, Jessica M.</creator><creator>Yesberg, Julia A.</creator><creator>Fortune, Clare-Ann</creator><creator>Polaschek, Devon L. L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6385-3567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4827-0555</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Predicting Women’s Recidivism Using the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry: Preliminary Evidence of Predictive Validity With Community-Sentenced Women Using a “Gender-Neutral” Risk Measure</title><author>Scanlan, Jessica M. ; Yesberg, Julia A. ; Fortune, Clare-Ann ; Polaschek, Devon L. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-471c14c3ecfd3dfd8f5036c34be552b08842801bd3170f12687fe6ca57e983483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Community service</topic><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Dynamic assessment</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Neutrality</topic><topic>Offending</topic><topic>Parole & probation</topic><topic>Predictive validity</topic><topic>Recidivism</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scanlan, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yesberg, Julia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fortune, Clare-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polaschek, Devon L. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Criminal justice and behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scanlan, Jessica M.</au><au>Yesberg, Julia A.</au><au>Fortune, Clare-Ann</au><au>Polaschek, Devon L. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Women’s Recidivism Using the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry: Preliminary Evidence of Predictive Validity With Community-Sentenced Women Using a “Gender-Neutral” Risk Measure</atitle><jtitle>Criminal justice and behavior</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>270</epage><pages>251-270</pages><issn>0093-8548</issn><eissn>1552-3594</eissn><abstract>Although men and women share risk factors for offending, some scholars suggest these factors operate differently across gender and that women-specific risk factors are neglected in existing “gender-neutral” risk assessment tools. This article explored the predictive validity of one gender-neutral risk assessment tool—the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry (DRAOR)—with matched samples of women and men serving community supervision sentences. Total DRAOR scores had comparative predictive validity across gender. For women and men, the DRAOR predicted reconviction over a static risk measure. The findings support the general premise of gender neutrality, but do not necessarily suggest the DRAOR, or gender-neutral tools more broadly, are the best tools for use with women.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0093854819896387</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6385-3567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4827-0555</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0093-8548 |
| ispartof | Criminal justice and behavior, 2020-03, Vol.47 (3), p.251-270 |
| issn | 0093-8548 1552-3594 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2348205664 |
| source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
| subjects | Community service Criminal sentences Dynamic assessment Gender Neutrality Offending Parole & probation Predictive validity Recidivism Risk assessment Risk factors Validity Women |
| title | Predicting Women’s Recidivism Using the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-Entry: Preliminary Evidence of Predictive Validity With Community-Sentenced Women Using a “Gender-Neutral” Risk Measure |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T04%3A01%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Women%E2%80%99s%20Recidivism%20Using%20the%20Dynamic%20Risk%20Assessment%20for%20Offender%20Re-Entry:%20Preliminary%20Evidence%20of%20Predictive%20Validity%20With%20Community-Sentenced%20Women%20Using%20a%20%E2%80%9CGender-Neutral%E2%80%9D%20Risk%20Measure&rft.jtitle=Criminal%20justice%20and%20behavior&rft.au=Scanlan,%20Jessica%20M.&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=270&rft.pages=251-270&rft.issn=0093-8548&rft.eissn=1552-3594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0093854819896387&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2348205664%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2348205664&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0093854819896387&rfr_iscdi=true |