Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States
Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2019-12, Vol.55 (12), p.10319-10339 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10339 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 10319 |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 55 |
creator | Tang, Jinyu Castañeda, Pablo Marchesin, Dan Rossen, William R. |
description | Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing foam apparent viscosity as a function of fractional flows folds backwards on itself. Thus, there are multiple steady states fitting the same injection condition J defined by the injected fractional flows. Numerical simulations suggest the stable injection state among multiple possible states but do not explain the reason. We address the issue of multiple steady states from the perspective of wave propagation, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory. The wave‐curve method is applied to solve the two conservation equations for composition paths and wave speeds in 1‐D foam‐oil flow. There is a composition path from each possible injection state J to the initial state I satisfying the conservation equations. The stable displacement is the one with wave speeds (characteristic velocities) all positive along the path from J to I. In all cases presented, two of the paths feature negative wave velocity at J; such a solution does not correspond to the physical injection conditions. A stable displacement is achieved by either the upper, strong‐foam state, or lower, collapsed‐foam state but never the intermediate, unstable state. Which state makes the displacement depends on the initial state of a reservoir. The dependence of the choice of the displacing state on initial state is captured by a boundary curve.
Plain Language Summary
Foam has unique microstructure and reduces gas mobility significantly. Foam injection into geological formations has broad engineering applications: removal of nonaqueous phase liquid contaminants in aquifers and soils, oil displacement in reservoirs, and carbon storage. Key to the success of foam is foam stability in the presence of oil or nonaqueous phase liquid. An experimentally validated foam model describes foam properties as a function of water, oil, and gas saturations. This model predicts that some injected fractional flows of phases correspond to multiple possible injection states with different saturations: strong‐foam state with low mobility, intermediate state, and collapsed‐foam state with high mobility. We show how to determine the unique displacing state, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory and the wave‐curve method. A physi |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019WR025264 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2346596476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2346596476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3686-40313cecbbf567ecb523d5858c3f371e777204a46f690dcfec3e49263d2fbf553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFZ3PsCAW6Pzl5lmKdWoUGmplS7DNLkhU5JOnEko2fkIPqNP4khduHJ14PCdy7kHoUtKbihhyS0jNFkvCYuZFEdoRBMhIpUofoxGhAgeUZ6oU3Tm_ZYQKmKpRqhZVQ7g6-NzUWkPOHU674zd6TpYaW33eFWBdQO2JU6tboI7NzW-N76tdQ4N7Dpsdnhhne09foHCaLw2XYVf-rozbQ34tQNdDEF0B_4cnZS69nDxq2P0lj6spk_RbP74PL2bRZrLiYwE4ZTnkG82ZSgZNGa8iCfxJOclVxSUUowILWQpE1LkJeQcRMIkL1gZIjEfo6vD3dbZ9x58l21t78JXPmNcyDiRQslAXR-o3FnvHZRZ60yj3ZBRkv0Mmv0dNOD8gO9NDcO_bLZeTpdMsFDpG9mDejg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2346596476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Tang, Jinyu ; Castañeda, Pablo ; Marchesin, Dan ; Rossen, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jinyu ; Castañeda, Pablo ; Marchesin, Dan ; Rossen, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing foam apparent viscosity as a function of fractional flows folds backwards on itself. Thus, there are multiple steady states fitting the same injection condition J defined by the injected fractional flows. Numerical simulations suggest the stable injection state among multiple possible states but do not explain the reason. We address the issue of multiple steady states from the perspective of wave propagation, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory. The wave‐curve method is applied to solve the two conservation equations for composition paths and wave speeds in 1‐D foam‐oil flow. There is a composition path from each possible injection state J to the initial state I satisfying the conservation equations. The stable displacement is the one with wave speeds (characteristic velocities) all positive along the path from J to I. In all cases presented, two of the paths feature negative wave velocity at J; such a solution does not correspond to the physical injection conditions. A stable displacement is achieved by either the upper, strong‐foam state, or lower, collapsed‐foam state but never the intermediate, unstable state. Which state makes the displacement depends on the initial state of a reservoir. The dependence of the choice of the displacing state on initial state is captured by a boundary curve.
Plain Language Summary
Foam has unique microstructure and reduces gas mobility significantly. Foam injection into geological formations has broad engineering applications: removal of nonaqueous phase liquid contaminants in aquifers and soils, oil displacement in reservoirs, and carbon storage. Key to the success of foam is foam stability in the presence of oil or nonaqueous phase liquid. An experimentally validated foam model describes foam properties as a function of water, oil, and gas saturations. This model predicts that some injected fractional flows of phases correspond to multiple possible injection states with different saturations: strong‐foam state with low mobility, intermediate state, and collapsed‐foam state with high mobility. We show how to determine the unique displacing state, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory and the wave‐curve method. A physically acceptable displacing state is the one that gives only positive wave velocities. The choice of the displacing state depends on the initial state; the nature of the dependence is captured by a boundary curve. If the collapsed‐foam state makes a displacement, that means ineffective gas‐mobility control and, even in the absence of viscous instability, very slow oil displacement. Our findings and approach presented can help to predict the displacing state for a given initial state in geological formations.
Key Points
Foam flow in media with oil corresponds to multiple steady states: which steady state occurs is key to success of gas mobility control
The wave curve method, combined with the constraint of positive wave velocities, is capable of identifying the unique displacing state
The choice of the displacing state depends on initial state; this dependence is captured by a boundary curve in ternary saturation space</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019WR025264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquifers ; Carbon capture and storage ; Carbon sequestration ; Catastrophe theory ; Composition ; Computer simulation ; Conservation ; Conservation equations ; Contaminants ; Control stability ; Dependence ; Displacement ; Enhanced oil recovery ; Flow theory ; foam flow with oil ; Foams ; fractional‐flow theory ; Geology ; Injection ; Mathematical models ; Microstructure ; Mobility ; multiple steady states ; Nonaqueous phase liquids ; Numerical simulations ; Oil recovery ; Porous media ; Reservoirs ; Soil ; Soil contamination ; Soil remediation ; Soils ; Steady state ; Theories ; Viscosity ; Wave propagation ; Wave velocity ; wave‐curve method</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2019-12, Vol.55 (12), p.10319-10339</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3686-40313cecbbf567ecb523d5858c3f371e777204a46f690dcfec3e49263d2fbf553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3686-40313cecbbf567ecb523d5858c3f371e777204a46f690dcfec3e49263d2fbf553</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1877-7665 ; 0000-0002-7157-7961 ; 0000-0002-6381-0014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019WR025264$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019WR025264$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,11519,27929,27930,45579,45580,46473,46897</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañeda, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesin, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossen, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing foam apparent viscosity as a function of fractional flows folds backwards on itself. Thus, there are multiple steady states fitting the same injection condition J defined by the injected fractional flows. Numerical simulations suggest the stable injection state among multiple possible states but do not explain the reason. We address the issue of multiple steady states from the perspective of wave propagation, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory. The wave‐curve method is applied to solve the two conservation equations for composition paths and wave speeds in 1‐D foam‐oil flow. There is a composition path from each possible injection state J to the initial state I satisfying the conservation equations. The stable displacement is the one with wave speeds (characteristic velocities) all positive along the path from J to I. In all cases presented, two of the paths feature negative wave velocity at J; such a solution does not correspond to the physical injection conditions. A stable displacement is achieved by either the upper, strong‐foam state, or lower, collapsed‐foam state but never the intermediate, unstable state. Which state makes the displacement depends on the initial state of a reservoir. The dependence of the choice of the displacing state on initial state is captured by a boundary curve.
Plain Language Summary
Foam has unique microstructure and reduces gas mobility significantly. Foam injection into geological formations has broad engineering applications: removal of nonaqueous phase liquid contaminants in aquifers and soils, oil displacement in reservoirs, and carbon storage. Key to the success of foam is foam stability in the presence of oil or nonaqueous phase liquid. An experimentally validated foam model describes foam properties as a function of water, oil, and gas saturations. This model predicts that some injected fractional flows of phases correspond to multiple possible injection states with different saturations: strong‐foam state with low mobility, intermediate state, and collapsed‐foam state with high mobility. We show how to determine the unique displacing state, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory and the wave‐curve method. A physically acceptable displacing state is the one that gives only positive wave velocities. The choice of the displacing state depends on the initial state; the nature of the dependence is captured by a boundary curve. If the collapsed‐foam state makes a displacement, that means ineffective gas‐mobility control and, even in the absence of viscous instability, very slow oil displacement. Our findings and approach presented can help to predict the displacing state for a given initial state in geological formations.
Key Points
Foam flow in media with oil corresponds to multiple steady states: which steady state occurs is key to success of gas mobility control
The wave curve method, combined with the constraint of positive wave velocities, is capable of identifying the unique displacing state
The choice of the displacing state depends on initial state; this dependence is captured by a boundary curve in ternary saturation space</description><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Carbon capture and storage</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Catastrophe theory</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation equations</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Control stability</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Enhanced oil recovery</subject><subject>Flow theory</subject><subject>foam flow with oil</subject><subject>Foams</subject><subject>fractional‐flow theory</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>multiple steady states</subject><subject>Nonaqueous phase liquids</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Oil recovery</subject><subject>Porous media</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil remediation</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Steady state</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><subject>Wave propagation</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><subject>wave‐curve method</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFZ3PsCAW6Pzl5lmKdWoUGmplS7DNLkhU5JOnEko2fkIPqNP4khduHJ14PCdy7kHoUtKbihhyS0jNFkvCYuZFEdoRBMhIpUofoxGhAgeUZ6oU3Tm_ZYQKmKpRqhZVQ7g6-NzUWkPOHU674zd6TpYaW33eFWBdQO2JU6tboI7NzW-N76tdQ4N7Dpsdnhhne09foHCaLw2XYVf-rozbQ34tQNdDEF0B_4cnZS69nDxq2P0lj6spk_RbP74PL2bRZrLiYwE4ZTnkG82ZSgZNGa8iCfxJOclVxSUUowILWQpE1LkJeQcRMIkL1gZIjEfo6vD3dbZ9x58l21t78JXPmNcyDiRQslAXR-o3FnvHZRZ60yj3ZBRkv0Mmv0dNOD8gO9NDcO_bLZeTpdMsFDpG9mDejg</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Tang, Jinyu</creator><creator>Castañeda, Pablo</creator><creator>Marchesin, Dan</creator><creator>Rossen, William R.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-7665</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7157-7961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6381-0014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States</title><author>Tang, Jinyu ; Castañeda, Pablo ; Marchesin, Dan ; Rossen, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3686-40313cecbbf567ecb523d5858c3f371e777204a46f690dcfec3e49263d2fbf553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Carbon capture and storage</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Catastrophe theory</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation equations</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Control stability</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Enhanced oil recovery</topic><topic>Flow theory</topic><topic>foam flow with oil</topic><topic>Foams</topic><topic>fractional‐flow theory</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>multiple steady states</topic><topic>Nonaqueous phase liquids</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Oil recovery</topic><topic>Porous media</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil remediation</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Steady state</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><topic>Wave propagation</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><topic>wave‐curve method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañeda, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesin, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossen, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Jinyu</au><au>Castañeda, Pablo</au><au>Marchesin, Dan</au><au>Rossen, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>10319</spage><epage>10339</epage><pages>10319-10339</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing foam apparent viscosity as a function of fractional flows folds backwards on itself. Thus, there are multiple steady states fitting the same injection condition J defined by the injected fractional flows. Numerical simulations suggest the stable injection state among multiple possible states but do not explain the reason. We address the issue of multiple steady states from the perspective of wave propagation, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory. The wave‐curve method is applied to solve the two conservation equations for composition paths and wave speeds in 1‐D foam‐oil flow. There is a composition path from each possible injection state J to the initial state I satisfying the conservation equations. The stable displacement is the one with wave speeds (characteristic velocities) all positive along the path from J to I. In all cases presented, two of the paths feature negative wave velocity at J; such a solution does not correspond to the physical injection conditions. A stable displacement is achieved by either the upper, strong‐foam state, or lower, collapsed‐foam state but never the intermediate, unstable state. Which state makes the displacement depends on the initial state of a reservoir. The dependence of the choice of the displacing state on initial state is captured by a boundary curve.
Plain Language Summary
Foam has unique microstructure and reduces gas mobility significantly. Foam injection into geological formations has broad engineering applications: removal of nonaqueous phase liquid contaminants in aquifers and soils, oil displacement in reservoirs, and carbon storage. Key to the success of foam is foam stability in the presence of oil or nonaqueous phase liquid. An experimentally validated foam model describes foam properties as a function of water, oil, and gas saturations. This model predicts that some injected fractional flows of phases correspond to multiple possible injection states with different saturations: strong‐foam state with low mobility, intermediate state, and collapsed‐foam state with high mobility. We show how to determine the unique displacing state, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory and the wave‐curve method. A physically acceptable displacing state is the one that gives only positive wave velocities. The choice of the displacing state depends on the initial state; the nature of the dependence is captured by a boundary curve. If the collapsed‐foam state makes a displacement, that means ineffective gas‐mobility control and, even in the absence of viscous instability, very slow oil displacement. Our findings and approach presented can help to predict the displacing state for a given initial state in geological formations.
Key Points
Foam flow in media with oil corresponds to multiple steady states: which steady state occurs is key to success of gas mobility control
The wave curve method, combined with the constraint of positive wave velocities, is capable of identifying the unique displacing state
The choice of the displacing state depends on initial state; this dependence is captured by a boundary curve in ternary saturation space</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2019WR025264</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-7665</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7157-7961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6381-0014</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2019-12, Vol.55 (12), p.10319-10339 |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2346596476 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aquifers Carbon capture and storage Carbon sequestration Catastrophe theory Composition Computer simulation Conservation Conservation equations Contaminants Control stability Dependence Displacement Enhanced oil recovery Flow theory foam flow with oil Foams fractional‐flow theory Geology Injection Mathematical models Microstructure Mobility multiple steady states Nonaqueous phase liquids Numerical simulations Oil recovery Porous media Reservoirs Soil Soil contamination Soil remediation Soils Steady state Theories Viscosity Wave propagation Wave velocity wave‐curve method |
title | Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T16%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%E2%80%90Phase%20Fractional%E2%80%90Flow%20Theory%20of%20Foam%E2%80%90Oil%20Displacement%20in%20Porous%20Media%20With%20Multiple%20Steady%20States&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Tang,%20Jinyu&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=10319&rft.epage=10339&rft.pages=10319-10339&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019WR025264&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2346596476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2346596476&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |