Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States

Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 2019-12, Vol.55 (12), p.10319-10339
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Jinyu, Castañeda, Pablo, Marchesin, Dan, Rossen, William R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10339
container_issue 12
container_start_page 10319
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 55
creator Tang, Jinyu
Castañeda, Pablo
Marchesin, Dan
Rossen, William R.
description Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing foam apparent viscosity as a function of fractional flows folds backwards on itself. Thus, there are multiple steady states fitting the same injection condition J defined by the injected fractional flows. Numerical simulations suggest the stable injection state among multiple possible states but do not explain the reason. We address the issue of multiple steady states from the perspective of wave propagation, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory. The wave‐curve method is applied to solve the two conservation equations for composition paths and wave speeds in 1‐D foam‐oil flow. There is a composition path from each possible injection state J to the initial state I satisfying the conservation equations. The stable displacement is the one with wave speeds (characteristic velocities) all positive along the path from J to I. In all cases presented, two of the paths feature negative wave velocity at J; such a solution does not correspond to the physical injection conditions. A stable displacement is achieved by either the upper, strong‐foam state, or lower, collapsed‐foam state but never the intermediate, unstable state. Which state makes the displacement depends on the initial state of a reservoir. The dependence of the choice of the displacing state on initial state is captured by a boundary curve. Plain Language Summary Foam has unique microstructure and reduces gas mobility significantly. Foam injection into geological formations has broad engineering applications: removal of nonaqueous phase liquid contaminants in aquifers and soils, oil displacement in reservoirs, and carbon storage. Key to the success of foam is foam stability in the presence of oil or nonaqueous phase liquid. An experimentally validated foam model describes foam properties as a function of water, oil, and gas saturations. This model predicts that some injected fractional flows of phases correspond to multiple possible injection states with different saturations: strong‐foam state with low mobility, intermediate state, and collapsed‐foam state with high mobility. We show how to determine the unique displacing state, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory and the wave‐curve method. A physi
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019WR025264
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2346596476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2346596476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3686-40313cecbbf567ecb523d5858c3f371e777204a46f690dcfec3e49263d2fbf553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFZ3PsCAW6Pzl5lmKdWoUGmplS7DNLkhU5JOnEko2fkIPqNP4khduHJ14PCdy7kHoUtKbihhyS0jNFkvCYuZFEdoRBMhIpUofoxGhAgeUZ6oU3Tm_ZYQKmKpRqhZVQ7g6-NzUWkPOHU674zd6TpYaW33eFWBdQO2JU6tboI7NzW-N76tdQ4N7Dpsdnhhne09foHCaLw2XYVf-rozbQ34tQNdDEF0B_4cnZS69nDxq2P0lj6spk_RbP74PL2bRZrLiYwE4ZTnkG82ZSgZNGa8iCfxJOclVxSUUowILWQpE1LkJeQcRMIkL1gZIjEfo6vD3dbZ9x58l21t78JXPmNcyDiRQslAXR-o3FnvHZRZ60yj3ZBRkv0Mmv0dNOD8gO9NDcO_bLZeTpdMsFDpG9mDejg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2346596476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Tang, Jinyu ; Castañeda, Pablo ; Marchesin, Dan ; Rossen, William R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jinyu ; Castañeda, Pablo ; Marchesin, Dan ; Rossen, William R.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing foam apparent viscosity as a function of fractional flows folds backwards on itself. Thus, there are multiple steady states fitting the same injection condition J defined by the injected fractional flows. Numerical simulations suggest the stable injection state among multiple possible states but do not explain the reason. We address the issue of multiple steady states from the perspective of wave propagation, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory. The wave‐curve method is applied to solve the two conservation equations for composition paths and wave speeds in 1‐D foam‐oil flow. There is a composition path from each possible injection state J to the initial state I satisfying the conservation equations. The stable displacement is the one with wave speeds (characteristic velocities) all positive along the path from J to I. In all cases presented, two of the paths feature negative wave velocity at J; such a solution does not correspond to the physical injection conditions. A stable displacement is achieved by either the upper, strong‐foam state, or lower, collapsed‐foam state but never the intermediate, unstable state. Which state makes the displacement depends on the initial state of a reservoir. The dependence of the choice of the displacing state on initial state is captured by a boundary curve. Plain Language Summary Foam has unique microstructure and reduces gas mobility significantly. Foam injection into geological formations has broad engineering applications: removal of nonaqueous phase liquid contaminants in aquifers and soils, oil displacement in reservoirs, and carbon storage. Key to the success of foam is foam stability in the presence of oil or nonaqueous phase liquid. An experimentally validated foam model describes foam properties as a function of water, oil, and gas saturations. This model predicts that some injected fractional flows of phases correspond to multiple possible injection states with different saturations: strong‐foam state with low mobility, intermediate state, and collapsed‐foam state with high mobility. We show how to determine the unique displacing state, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory and the wave‐curve method. A physically acceptable displacing state is the one that gives only positive wave velocities. The choice of the displacing state depends on the initial state; the nature of the dependence is captured by a boundary curve. If the collapsed‐foam state makes a displacement, that means ineffective gas‐mobility control and, even in the absence of viscous instability, very slow oil displacement. Our findings and approach presented can help to predict the displacing state for a given initial state in geological formations. Key Points Foam flow in media with oil corresponds to multiple steady states: which steady state occurs is key to success of gas mobility control The wave curve method, combined with the constraint of positive wave velocities, is capable of identifying the unique displacing state The choice of the displacing state depends on initial state; this dependence is captured by a boundary curve in ternary saturation space</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019WR025264</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquifers ; Carbon capture and storage ; Carbon sequestration ; Catastrophe theory ; Composition ; Computer simulation ; Conservation ; Conservation equations ; Contaminants ; Control stability ; Dependence ; Displacement ; Enhanced oil recovery ; Flow theory ; foam flow with oil ; Foams ; fractional‐flow theory ; Geology ; Injection ; Mathematical models ; Microstructure ; Mobility ; multiple steady states ; Nonaqueous phase liquids ; Numerical simulations ; Oil recovery ; Porous media ; Reservoirs ; Soil ; Soil contamination ; Soil remediation ; Soils ; Steady state ; Theories ; Viscosity ; Wave propagation ; Wave velocity ; wave‐curve method</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2019-12, Vol.55 (12), p.10319-10339</ispartof><rights>2019. The Authors.</rights><rights>2019. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3686-40313cecbbf567ecb523d5858c3f371e777204a46f690dcfec3e49263d2fbf553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3686-40313cecbbf567ecb523d5858c3f371e777204a46f690dcfec3e49263d2fbf553</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1877-7665 ; 0000-0002-7157-7961 ; 0000-0002-6381-0014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019WR025264$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019WR025264$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,11519,27929,27930,45579,45580,46473,46897</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañeda, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesin, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossen, William R.</creatorcontrib><title>Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing foam apparent viscosity as a function of fractional flows folds backwards on itself. Thus, there are multiple steady states fitting the same injection condition J defined by the injected fractional flows. Numerical simulations suggest the stable injection state among multiple possible states but do not explain the reason. We address the issue of multiple steady states from the perspective of wave propagation, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory. The wave‐curve method is applied to solve the two conservation equations for composition paths and wave speeds in 1‐D foam‐oil flow. There is a composition path from each possible injection state J to the initial state I satisfying the conservation equations. The stable displacement is the one with wave speeds (characteristic velocities) all positive along the path from J to I. In all cases presented, two of the paths feature negative wave velocity at J; such a solution does not correspond to the physical injection conditions. A stable displacement is achieved by either the upper, strong‐foam state, or lower, collapsed‐foam state but never the intermediate, unstable state. Which state makes the displacement depends on the initial state of a reservoir. The dependence of the choice of the displacing state on initial state is captured by a boundary curve. Plain Language Summary Foam has unique microstructure and reduces gas mobility significantly. Foam injection into geological formations has broad engineering applications: removal of nonaqueous phase liquid contaminants in aquifers and soils, oil displacement in reservoirs, and carbon storage. Key to the success of foam is foam stability in the presence of oil or nonaqueous phase liquid. An experimentally validated foam model describes foam properties as a function of water, oil, and gas saturations. This model predicts that some injected fractional flows of phases correspond to multiple possible injection states with different saturations: strong‐foam state with low mobility, intermediate state, and collapsed‐foam state with high mobility. We show how to determine the unique displacing state, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory and the wave‐curve method. A physically acceptable displacing state is the one that gives only positive wave velocities. The choice of the displacing state depends on the initial state; the nature of the dependence is captured by a boundary curve. If the collapsed‐foam state makes a displacement, that means ineffective gas‐mobility control and, even in the absence of viscous instability, very slow oil displacement. Our findings and approach presented can help to predict the displacing state for a given initial state in geological formations. Key Points Foam flow in media with oil corresponds to multiple steady states: which steady state occurs is key to success of gas mobility control The wave curve method, combined with the constraint of positive wave velocities, is capable of identifying the unique displacing state The choice of the displacing state depends on initial state; this dependence is captured by a boundary curve in ternary saturation space</description><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Carbon capture and storage</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Catastrophe theory</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation equations</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Control stability</subject><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Enhanced oil recovery</subject><subject>Flow theory</subject><subject>foam flow with oil</subject><subject>Foams</subject><subject>fractional‐flow theory</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microstructure</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>multiple steady states</subject><subject>Nonaqueous phase liquids</subject><subject>Numerical simulations</subject><subject>Oil recovery</subject><subject>Porous media</subject><subject>Reservoirs</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil contamination</subject><subject>Soil remediation</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Steady state</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><subject>Wave propagation</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><subject>wave‐curve method</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRsFZ3PsCAW6Pzl5lmKdWoUGmplS7DNLkhU5JOnEko2fkIPqNP4khduHJ14PCdy7kHoUtKbihhyS0jNFkvCYuZFEdoRBMhIpUofoxGhAgeUZ6oU3Tm_ZYQKmKpRqhZVQ7g6-NzUWkPOHU674zd6TpYaW33eFWBdQO2JU6tboI7NzW-N76tdQ4N7Dpsdnhhne09foHCaLw2XYVf-rozbQ34tQNdDEF0B_4cnZS69nDxq2P0lj6spk_RbP74PL2bRZrLiYwE4ZTnkG82ZSgZNGa8iCfxJOclVxSUUowILWQpE1LkJeQcRMIkL1gZIjEfo6vD3dbZ9x58l21t78JXPmNcyDiRQslAXR-o3FnvHZRZ60yj3ZBRkv0Mmv0dNOD8gO9NDcO_bLZeTpdMsFDpG9mDejg</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Tang, Jinyu</creator><creator>Castañeda, Pablo</creator><creator>Marchesin, Dan</creator><creator>Rossen, William R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-7665</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7157-7961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6381-0014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States</title><author>Tang, Jinyu ; Castañeda, Pablo ; Marchesin, Dan ; Rossen, William R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3686-40313cecbbf567ecb523d5858c3f371e777204a46f690dcfec3e49263d2fbf553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Carbon capture and storage</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Catastrophe theory</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation equations</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Control stability</topic><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Enhanced oil recovery</topic><topic>Flow theory</topic><topic>foam flow with oil</topic><topic>Foams</topic><topic>fractional‐flow theory</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microstructure</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>multiple steady states</topic><topic>Nonaqueous phase liquids</topic><topic>Numerical simulations</topic><topic>Oil recovery</topic><topic>Porous media</topic><topic>Reservoirs</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil contamination</topic><topic>Soil remediation</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Steady state</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><topic>Wave propagation</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><topic>wave‐curve method</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Jinyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañeda, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesin, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossen, William R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Jinyu</au><au>Castañeda, Pablo</au><au>Marchesin, Dan</au><au>Rossen, William R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>10319</spage><epage>10339</epage><pages>10319-10339</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Understanding the interplay of foam and nonaqueous phases in porous media is key to improving the design of foam for enhanced oil recovery and remediation of aquifers and soils. A widely used implicit‐texture foam model predicts phenomena analogous to cusp catastrophe theory: The surface describing foam apparent viscosity as a function of fractional flows folds backwards on itself. Thus, there are multiple steady states fitting the same injection condition J defined by the injected fractional flows. Numerical simulations suggest the stable injection state among multiple possible states but do not explain the reason. We address the issue of multiple steady states from the perspective of wave propagation, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory. The wave‐curve method is applied to solve the two conservation equations for composition paths and wave speeds in 1‐D foam‐oil flow. There is a composition path from each possible injection state J to the initial state I satisfying the conservation equations. The stable displacement is the one with wave speeds (characteristic velocities) all positive along the path from J to I. In all cases presented, two of the paths feature negative wave velocity at J; such a solution does not correspond to the physical injection conditions. A stable displacement is achieved by either the upper, strong‐foam state, or lower, collapsed‐foam state but never the intermediate, unstable state. Which state makes the displacement depends on the initial state of a reservoir. The dependence of the choice of the displacing state on initial state is captured by a boundary curve. Plain Language Summary Foam has unique microstructure and reduces gas mobility significantly. Foam injection into geological formations has broad engineering applications: removal of nonaqueous phase liquid contaminants in aquifers and soils, oil displacement in reservoirs, and carbon storage. Key to the success of foam is foam stability in the presence of oil or nonaqueous phase liquid. An experimentally validated foam model describes foam properties as a function of water, oil, and gas saturations. This model predicts that some injected fractional flows of phases correspond to multiple possible injection states with different saturations: strong‐foam state with low mobility, intermediate state, and collapsed‐foam state with high mobility. We show how to determine the unique displacing state, using three‐phase fractional‐flow theory and the wave‐curve method. A physically acceptable displacing state is the one that gives only positive wave velocities. The choice of the displacing state depends on the initial state; the nature of the dependence is captured by a boundary curve. If the collapsed‐foam state makes a displacement, that means ineffective gas‐mobility control and, even in the absence of viscous instability, very slow oil displacement. Our findings and approach presented can help to predict the displacing state for a given initial state in geological formations. Key Points Foam flow in media with oil corresponds to multiple steady states: which steady state occurs is key to success of gas mobility control The wave curve method, combined with the constraint of positive wave velocities, is capable of identifying the unique displacing state The choice of the displacing state depends on initial state; this dependence is captured by a boundary curve in ternary saturation space</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2019WR025264</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1877-7665</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7157-7961</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6381-0014</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 2019-12, Vol.55 (12), p.10319-10339
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2346596476
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aquifers
Carbon capture and storage
Carbon sequestration
Catastrophe theory
Composition
Computer simulation
Conservation
Conservation equations
Contaminants
Control stability
Dependence
Displacement
Enhanced oil recovery
Flow theory
foam flow with oil
Foams
fractional‐flow theory
Geology
Injection
Mathematical models
Microstructure
Mobility
multiple steady states
Nonaqueous phase liquids
Numerical simulations
Oil recovery
Porous media
Reservoirs
Soil
Soil contamination
Soil remediation
Soils
Steady state
Theories
Viscosity
Wave propagation
Wave velocity
wave‐curve method
title Three‐Phase Fractional‐Flow Theory of Foam‐Oil Displacement in Porous Media With Multiple Steady States
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T16%3A06%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Three%E2%80%90Phase%20Fractional%E2%80%90Flow%20Theory%20of%20Foam%E2%80%90Oil%20Displacement%20in%20Porous%20Media%20With%20Multiple%20Steady%20States&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Tang,%20Jinyu&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=10319&rft.epage=10339&rft.pages=10319-10339&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019WR025264&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2346596476%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2346596476&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true