The expansion wave of an invasive predator leaves declining waterbird populations behind

Aim Theory predicts that the evolutionary adaptations of prey to reduce predator pressure often fail in confrontation with non‐native predators; thus, their predation usually leads to sharp declines of prey populations. However, over time, prey can develop anti‐predator adaptations, reduce predator...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diversity & distributions 2020-01, Vol.26 (1), p.138-150
Hauptverfasser: Brzeziński, Marcin, Żmihorski, Michał, Nieoczym, Marek, Wilniewczyc, Piotr, Zalewski, Andrzej
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 150
container_issue 1
container_start_page 138
container_title Diversity & distributions
container_volume 26
creator Brzeziński, Marcin
Żmihorski, Michał
Nieoczym, Marek
Wilniewczyc, Piotr
Zalewski, Andrzej
description Aim Theory predicts that the evolutionary adaptations of prey to reduce predator pressure often fail in confrontation with non‐native predators; thus, their predation usually leads to sharp declines of prey populations. However, over time, prey can develop anti‐predator adaptations, reduce predator impact and recover its population. We analyse the numerical response of multiple prey species to the impact of a non‐native predator on a large spatiotemporal scale. Location Poland. Methods Long‐term population dynamics of 13 waterbird species breeding in 123 sites were analysed with reference to the present and historical distribution of mink over 40 years. We rescaled the temporal waterbird dynamics to the time elapsed since the mink colonized each site. Results The steepest waterbird declines were recorded up to 15 years after establishment of the mink population, and in that period, waterbird abundance averaged across the 13 studied species declined by 50% but certain species showed different patterns: the abundance of eight species declined linearly or nonlinearly, whereas the breeding populations of five other species did not change significantly. Over time, the abundance of some declining species increased slightly and tended to stabilize at a lower level. The temporal pattern of waterbird dynamics averaged across species correlated closely with temporal changes of mink density with a 4‐year time‐lag. A projection of the observed patterns shows that waterbird decline following the expansion of mink has the shape of a wave travelling from the north to the south of Poland. Main conclusions We conclude that the impact of the invasive American mink should be considered an important factor affecting waterbird populations at a large geographical scale. The waterbird vulnerability to mink predation is species‐specific, and over time the negative impact grows weak as mink population densities decline.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ddi.13003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2346398578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A710753449</galeid><jstor_id>26828519</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A710753449</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-efaa3a42c7511e9fcc95ff2b87761cd0d5f3efbcd9f9f7f4d9afba4b32fbde273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kElLxDAYhosoOC4Hf4AQ8OShY7O0aY6DOwx4UfAW0uSLZugkNem4_HujVW8mh2zP8wbeojjC1RzncWaMm2NaVXSrmGHGSckaRrbznjZNKWrc7BZ7Ka2qTNCazIrH-2dA8D4on1zw6E29AgoWKY-cf1XJ5eMQwagxRNRDfk3IgO6dd_4p0yPEzkWDhjBsejXmiIQ6eHbeHBQ7VvUJDn_W_eLh6vL-_KZc3l3fni-WpaaC0hKsUlQxonmNMQirtaitJV3LeYO1qUxtKdhOG2GF5ZYZoWynWEeJ7QwQTveLkyl3iOFlA2mUq7CJPn8pCWUNFW3N20zNJ-pJ9SCdt2GMSudpYO108GBdvl9wXPGaMiaycDoJOoaUIlg5RLdW8UPiSn41LXPT8rvpzJ5N7FsO-fgflBcXt7_G8WSsUi72zyBNS9oaC_oJqwmLDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2346398578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The expansion wave of an invasive predator leaves declining waterbird populations behind</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Brzeziński, Marcin ; Żmihorski, Michał ; Nieoczym, Marek ; Wilniewczyc, Piotr ; Zalewski, Andrzej</creator><contributor>Santini, Lucas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brzeziński, Marcin ; Żmihorski, Michał ; Nieoczym, Marek ; Wilniewczyc, Piotr ; Zalewski, Andrzej ; Santini, Lucas</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Theory predicts that the evolutionary adaptations of prey to reduce predator pressure often fail in confrontation with non‐native predators; thus, their predation usually leads to sharp declines of prey populations. However, over time, prey can develop anti‐predator adaptations, reduce predator impact and recover its population. We analyse the numerical response of multiple prey species to the impact of a non‐native predator on a large spatiotemporal scale. Location Poland. Methods Long‐term population dynamics of 13 waterbird species breeding in 123 sites were analysed with reference to the present and historical distribution of mink over 40 years. We rescaled the temporal waterbird dynamics to the time elapsed since the mink colonized each site. Results The steepest waterbird declines were recorded up to 15 years after establishment of the mink population, and in that period, waterbird abundance averaged across the 13 studied species declined by 50% but certain species showed different patterns: the abundance of eight species declined linearly or nonlinearly, whereas the breeding populations of five other species did not change significantly. Over time, the abundance of some declining species increased slightly and tended to stabilize at a lower level. The temporal pattern of waterbird dynamics averaged across species correlated closely with temporal changes of mink density with a 4‐year time‐lag. A projection of the observed patterns shows that waterbird decline following the expansion of mink has the shape of a wave travelling from the north to the south of Poland. Main conclusions We conclude that the impact of the invasive American mink should be considered an important factor affecting waterbird populations at a large geographical scale. The waterbird vulnerability to mink predation is species‐specific, and over time the negative impact grows weak as mink population densities decline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-9516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-4642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Adaptation ; American mink ; Animal behavior ; Animal populations ; Aquatic birds ; BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH ; biological invasion ; Birds ; Breeding ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Hypotheses ; Native species ; Neovison vison ; Nonnative species ; Population biology ; Population decline ; Population dynamics ; Populations ; Predation ; Predators ; Prey ; spatiotemporal scale ; Species ; Statistics ; Trends ; Waterfowl</subject><ispartof>Diversity &amp; distributions, 2020-01, Vol.26 (1), p.138-150</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-efaa3a42c7511e9fcc95ff2b87761cd0d5f3efbcd9f9f7f4d9afba4b32fbde273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-efaa3a42c7511e9fcc95ff2b87761cd0d5f3efbcd9f9f7f4d9afba4b32fbde273</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6300-0425 ; 0000-0003-1670-358X ; 0000-0001-5137-1635 ; 0000-0003-4518-2787</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26828519$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26828519$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,1417,11562,25354,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,54524,54530</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26828519$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Santini, Lucas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brzeziński, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żmihorski, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieoczym, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilniewczyc, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalewski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><title>The expansion wave of an invasive predator leaves declining waterbird populations behind</title><title>Diversity &amp; distributions</title><description>Aim Theory predicts that the evolutionary adaptations of prey to reduce predator pressure often fail in confrontation with non‐native predators; thus, their predation usually leads to sharp declines of prey populations. However, over time, prey can develop anti‐predator adaptations, reduce predator impact and recover its population. We analyse the numerical response of multiple prey species to the impact of a non‐native predator on a large spatiotemporal scale. Location Poland. Methods Long‐term population dynamics of 13 waterbird species breeding in 123 sites were analysed with reference to the present and historical distribution of mink over 40 years. We rescaled the temporal waterbird dynamics to the time elapsed since the mink colonized each site. Results The steepest waterbird declines were recorded up to 15 years after establishment of the mink population, and in that period, waterbird abundance averaged across the 13 studied species declined by 50% but certain species showed different patterns: the abundance of eight species declined linearly or nonlinearly, whereas the breeding populations of five other species did not change significantly. Over time, the abundance of some declining species increased slightly and tended to stabilize at a lower level. The temporal pattern of waterbird dynamics averaged across species correlated closely with temporal changes of mink density with a 4‐year time‐lag. A projection of the observed patterns shows that waterbird decline following the expansion of mink has the shape of a wave travelling from the north to the south of Poland. Main conclusions We conclude that the impact of the invasive American mink should be considered an important factor affecting waterbird populations at a large geographical scale. The waterbird vulnerability to mink predation is species‐specific, and over time the negative impact grows weak as mink population densities decline.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>American mink</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</subject><subject>biological invasion</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Neovison vison</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Population biology</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>spatiotemporal scale</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><issn>1366-9516</issn><issn>1472-4642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kElLxDAYhosoOC4Hf4AQ8OShY7O0aY6DOwx4UfAW0uSLZugkNem4_HujVW8mh2zP8wbeojjC1RzncWaMm2NaVXSrmGHGSckaRrbznjZNKWrc7BZ7Ka2qTNCazIrH-2dA8D4on1zw6E29AgoWKY-cf1XJ5eMQwagxRNRDfk3IgO6dd_4p0yPEzkWDhjBsejXmiIQ6eHbeHBQ7VvUJDn_W_eLh6vL-_KZc3l3fni-WpaaC0hKsUlQxonmNMQirtaitJV3LeYO1qUxtKdhOG2GF5ZYZoWynWEeJ7QwQTveLkyl3iOFlA2mUq7CJPn8pCWUNFW3N20zNJ-pJ9SCdt2GMSudpYO108GBdvl9wXPGaMiaycDoJOoaUIlg5RLdW8UPiSn41LXPT8rvpzJ5N7FsO-fgflBcXt7_G8WSsUi72zyBNS9oaC_oJqwmLDg</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Brzeziński, Marcin</creator><creator>Żmihorski, Michał</creator><creator>Nieoczym, Marek</creator><creator>Wilniewczyc, Piotr</creator><creator>Zalewski, Andrzej</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-0425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-358X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-1635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4518-2787</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>The expansion wave of an invasive predator leaves declining waterbird populations behind</title><author>Brzeziński, Marcin ; Żmihorski, Michał ; Nieoczym, Marek ; Wilniewczyc, Piotr ; Zalewski, Andrzej</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3933-efaa3a42c7511e9fcc95ff2b87761cd0d5f3efbcd9f9f7f4d9afba4b32fbde273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>American mink</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH</topic><topic>biological invasion</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Neovison vison</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Population biology</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>spatiotemporal scale</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brzeziński, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żmihorski, Michał</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nieoczym, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilniewczyc, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zalewski, Andrzej</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brzeziński, Marcin</au><au>Żmihorski, Michał</au><au>Nieoczym, Marek</au><au>Wilniewczyc, Piotr</au><au>Zalewski, Andrzej</au><au>Santini, Lucas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The expansion wave of an invasive predator leaves declining waterbird populations behind</atitle><jtitle>Diversity &amp; distributions</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>138-150</pages><issn>1366-9516</issn><eissn>1472-4642</eissn><abstract>Aim Theory predicts that the evolutionary adaptations of prey to reduce predator pressure often fail in confrontation with non‐native predators; thus, their predation usually leads to sharp declines of prey populations. However, over time, prey can develop anti‐predator adaptations, reduce predator impact and recover its population. We analyse the numerical response of multiple prey species to the impact of a non‐native predator on a large spatiotemporal scale. Location Poland. Methods Long‐term population dynamics of 13 waterbird species breeding in 123 sites were analysed with reference to the present and historical distribution of mink over 40 years. We rescaled the temporal waterbird dynamics to the time elapsed since the mink colonized each site. Results The steepest waterbird declines were recorded up to 15 years after establishment of the mink population, and in that period, waterbird abundance averaged across the 13 studied species declined by 50% but certain species showed different patterns: the abundance of eight species declined linearly or nonlinearly, whereas the breeding populations of five other species did not change significantly. Over time, the abundance of some declining species increased slightly and tended to stabilize at a lower level. The temporal pattern of waterbird dynamics averaged across species correlated closely with temporal changes of mink density with a 4‐year time‐lag. A projection of the observed patterns shows that waterbird decline following the expansion of mink has the shape of a wave travelling from the north to the south of Poland. Main conclusions We conclude that the impact of the invasive American mink should be considered an important factor affecting waterbird populations at a large geographical scale. The waterbird vulnerability to mink predation is species‐specific, and over time the negative impact grows weak as mink population densities decline.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/ddi.13003</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-0425</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1670-358X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5137-1635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4518-2787</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1366-9516
ispartof Diversity & distributions, 2020-01, Vol.26 (1), p.138-150
issn 1366-9516
1472-4642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2346398578
source Jstor Journals Open Access
subjects Abundance
Adaptation
American mink
Animal behavior
Animal populations
Aquatic birds
BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH
biological invasion
Birds
Breeding
Endangered & extinct species
Hypotheses
Native species
Neovison vison
Nonnative species
Population biology
Population decline
Population dynamics
Populations
Predation
Predators
Prey
spatiotemporal scale
Species
Statistics
Trends
Waterfowl
title The expansion wave of an invasive predator leaves declining waterbird populations behind
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A53%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20expansion%20wave%20of%20an%20invasive%20predator%20leaves%20declining%20waterbird%20populations%20behind&rft.jtitle=Diversity%20&%20distributions&rft.au=Brzezi%C5%84ski,%20Marcin&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=138-150&rft.issn=1366-9516&rft.eissn=1472-4642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ddi.13003&rft_dat=%3Cgale_JFNAL%3EA710753449%3C/gale_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2346398578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A710753449&rft_jstor_id=26828519&rfr_iscdi=true