Mating failure shapes the patterns of sperm precedence in an insect
Estimates of last male sperm precedence (P 2) are often used to infer mechanisms of sperm competition, a form of post-copulatory sexual selection. However, high levels of mating failure (i. e. copulations resulting in no offspring) in a population can lead to misinterpretations of sperm competition...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2020-02, Vol.74 (2), p.1-14, Article 25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Balfour, Vicki L. Black, Daniella Shuker, David M. |
description | Estimates of last male sperm precedence (P 2) are often used to infer mechanisms of sperm competition, a form of post-copulatory sexual selection. However, high levels of mating failure (i. e. copulations resulting in no offspring) in a population can lead to misinterpretations of sperm competition mechanisms. Through simulations, García-González (2004) illustrated how mating failure could cause bimodal distributions of paternity with peaks at P 2 = 0 and 1, under a random sperm mixing mechanism. Here, we demonstrate this effect empirically with the seed bug Lygaeus simulans, a species known to exhibit high levels of mating failure (40–60 %), using a morphological marker to estimate paternity. Contrary to previous findings in a sister species, we did not find strong evidence for last male sperm precedence. There was a tendency towards last male precedence (P 2 = 0.58) but within the expected range for random sperm mixing. Instead, P 2 was highly variable, with a bimodal distribution, as predicted by García-González (2004). After taking mating failure into account, the strongest driver of paternity outcome was copulation duration. Furthermore, we found evidence that mating failure could partly be a female-associated trait. Some doubly-mated females were more likely to produce no offspring or produce offspring from two different sires than expected by chance. Therefore, some females are more prone to experience mating failure than others, a result that mirrors an earlier result in male L. simulans. Our results confirm that mating failure needs to be considered when interrogating mechanisms of post-copulatory sexual selection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00265-020-2801-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2346270662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48727641</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48727641</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-31032bde5547c4bc4697193e1554ec8b92b8374e1b42f6ce22853079324135aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwIMQ8Lw6mWST7VGK_0DxoueQTWfbLe3umqRQv70pK3rzMgPD-703PMYuBdwIAHMbAVCXBSAUWIEo9kdsIpTEAozGYzYBqaAolZKn7CzGNQBoUVUTNn91qe2WvHHtZheIx5UbKPK0Ij64lCh0kfcNjwOFLR8CeVpQ54m3HXddnpF8OmcnjdtEuvjZU_bxcP8-fype3h6f53cvhVfKpEIKkFgvqCyV8ar2Ss-MmEkS-UC-qmdYV9IoErXCRntCrEoJZiZRCVk6J6fsevQdQv-5o5jsut-FLkdalEqjAa0xq8So8qGPMVBjh9BuXfiyAuyhKzt2ZXNX9tCV3WcGRyZmbbek8Of8H3Q1QuuY-vCboiqDRueXvwFnbnQ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2346270662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mating failure shapes the patterns of sperm precedence in an insect</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Balfour, Vicki L. ; Black, Daniella ; Shuker, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Balfour, Vicki L. ; Black, Daniella ; Shuker, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>Estimates of last male sperm precedence (P 2) are often used to infer mechanisms of sperm competition, a form of post-copulatory sexual selection. However, high levels of mating failure (i. e. copulations resulting in no offspring) in a population can lead to misinterpretations of sperm competition mechanisms. Through simulations, García-González (2004) illustrated how mating failure could cause bimodal distributions of paternity with peaks at P 2 = 0 and 1, under a random sperm mixing mechanism. Here, we demonstrate this effect empirically with the seed bug Lygaeus simulans, a species known to exhibit high levels of mating failure (40–60 %), using a morphological marker to estimate paternity. Contrary to previous findings in a sister species, we did not find strong evidence for last male sperm precedence. There was a tendency towards last male precedence (P 2 = 0.58) but within the expected range for random sperm mixing. Instead, P 2 was highly variable, with a bimodal distribution, as predicted by García-González (2004). After taking mating failure into account, the strongest driver of paternity outcome was copulation duration. Furthermore, we found evidence that mating failure could partly be a female-associated trait. Some doubly-mated females were more likely to produce no offspring or produce offspring from two different sires than expected by chance. Therefore, some females are more prone to experience mating failure than others, a result that mirrors an earlier result in male L. simulans. Our results confirm that mating failure needs to be considered when interrogating mechanisms of post-copulatory sexual selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-020-2801-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science + Business Media</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Animal reproduction ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Competition ; Copulation ; Disruption ; Eggs ; Females ; Insects ; Levels ; Life Sciences ; Lygaeus ; Markers ; Mating ; Morphology ; Offspring ; ORIGINAL ARTICLE ; Paternity ; Sexual selection ; Sibling species ; Sperm ; Sperm competition ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2020-02, Vol.74 (2), p.1-14, Article 25</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology is a copyright of Springer, (2020). All Rights Reserved. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-31032bde5547c4bc4697193e1554ec8b92b8374e1b42f6ce22853079324135aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-31032bde5547c4bc4697193e1554ec8b92b8374e1b42f6ce22853079324135aa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4203-3057</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48727641$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48727641$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balfour, Vicki L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Daniella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuker, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>Mating failure shapes the patterns of sperm precedence in an insect</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Estimates of last male sperm precedence (P 2) are often used to infer mechanisms of sperm competition, a form of post-copulatory sexual selection. However, high levels of mating failure (i. e. copulations resulting in no offspring) in a population can lead to misinterpretations of sperm competition mechanisms. Through simulations, García-González (2004) illustrated how mating failure could cause bimodal distributions of paternity with peaks at P 2 = 0 and 1, under a random sperm mixing mechanism. Here, we demonstrate this effect empirically with the seed bug Lygaeus simulans, a species known to exhibit high levels of mating failure (40–60 %), using a morphological marker to estimate paternity. Contrary to previous findings in a sister species, we did not find strong evidence for last male sperm precedence. There was a tendency towards last male precedence (P 2 = 0.58) but within the expected range for random sperm mixing. Instead, P 2 was highly variable, with a bimodal distribution, as predicted by García-González (2004). After taking mating failure into account, the strongest driver of paternity outcome was copulation duration. Furthermore, we found evidence that mating failure could partly be a female-associated trait. Some doubly-mated females were more likely to produce no offspring or produce offspring from two different sires than expected by chance. Therefore, some females are more prone to experience mating failure than others, a result that mirrors an earlier result in male L. simulans. Our results confirm that mating failure needs to be considered when interrogating mechanisms of post-copulatory sexual selection.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Copulation</subject><subject>Disruption</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Levels</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lygaeus</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Mating</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</subject><subject>Paternity</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><subject>Sibling species</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Sperm competition</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfwIMQ8Lw6mWST7VGK_0DxoueQTWfbLe3umqRQv70pK3rzMgPD-703PMYuBdwIAHMbAVCXBSAUWIEo9kdsIpTEAozGYzYBqaAolZKn7CzGNQBoUVUTNn91qe2WvHHtZheIx5UbKPK0Ij64lCh0kfcNjwOFLR8CeVpQ54m3HXddnpF8OmcnjdtEuvjZU_bxcP8-fype3h6f53cvhVfKpEIKkFgvqCyV8ar2Ss-MmEkS-UC-qmdYV9IoErXCRntCrEoJZiZRCVk6J6fsevQdQv-5o5jsut-FLkdalEqjAa0xq8So8qGPMVBjh9BuXfiyAuyhKzt2ZXNX9tCV3WcGRyZmbbek8Of8H3Q1QuuY-vCboiqDRueXvwFnbnQ8</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Balfour, Vicki L.</creator><creator>Black, Daniella</creator><creator>Shuker, David M.</creator><general>Springer Science + Business Media</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4203-3057</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Mating failure shapes the patterns of sperm precedence in an insect</title><author>Balfour, Vicki L. ; Black, Daniella ; Shuker, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-31032bde5547c4bc4697193e1554ec8b92b8374e1b42f6ce22853079324135aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Copulation</topic><topic>Disruption</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Levels</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lygaeus</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Mating</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>ORIGINAL ARTICLE</topic><topic>Paternity</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><topic>Sibling species</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Sperm competition</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balfour, Vicki L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Daniella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuker, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balfour, Vicki L.</au><au>Black, Daniella</au><au>Shuker, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mating failure shapes the patterns of sperm precedence in an insect</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><artnum>25</artnum><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Estimates of last male sperm precedence (P 2) are often used to infer mechanisms of sperm competition, a form of post-copulatory sexual selection. However, high levels of mating failure (i. e. copulations resulting in no offspring) in a population can lead to misinterpretations of sperm competition mechanisms. Through simulations, García-González (2004) illustrated how mating failure could cause bimodal distributions of paternity with peaks at P 2 = 0 and 1, under a random sperm mixing mechanism. Here, we demonstrate this effect empirically with the seed bug Lygaeus simulans, a species known to exhibit high levels of mating failure (40–60 %), using a morphological marker to estimate paternity. Contrary to previous findings in a sister species, we did not find strong evidence for last male sperm precedence. There was a tendency towards last male precedence (P 2 = 0.58) but within the expected range for random sperm mixing. Instead, P 2 was highly variable, with a bimodal distribution, as predicted by García-González (2004). After taking mating failure into account, the strongest driver of paternity outcome was copulation duration. Furthermore, we found evidence that mating failure could partly be a female-associated trait. Some doubly-mated females were more likely to produce no offspring or produce offspring from two different sires than expected by chance. Therefore, some females are more prone to experience mating failure than others, a result that mirrors an earlier result in male L. simulans. Our results confirm that mating failure needs to be considered when interrogating mechanisms of post-copulatory sexual selection.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Science + Business Media</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-020-2801-x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4203-3057</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2020-02, Vol.74 (2), p.1-14, Article 25 |
issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2346270662 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animal Ecology Animal reproduction Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Competition Copulation Disruption Eggs Females Insects Levels Life Sciences Lygaeus Markers Mating Morphology Offspring ORIGINAL ARTICLE Paternity Sexual selection Sibling species Sperm Sperm competition Zoology |
title | Mating failure shapes the patterns of sperm precedence in an insect |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A13%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mating%20failure%20shapes%20the%20patterns%20of%20sperm%20precedence%20in%20an%20insect&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Balfour,%20Vicki%20L.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.artnum=25&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-020-2801-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48727641%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2346270662&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48727641&rfr_iscdi=true |