Seismic fragility of buried steel natural gas pipelines due to axial compression at geotechnical discontinuities

This paper presents an extended set of numerical fragility functions for the structural assessment of buried steel natural gas (NG) pipelines subjected to axial compression caused by transient seismic ground deformations. The study focuses on NG pipelines crossing sites with a vertical geotechnical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2020-02, Vol.18 (3), p.837-906
Hauptverfasser: Tsinidis, Grigorios, Di Sarno, Luigi, Sextos, Anastasios, Furtner, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 906
container_issue 3
container_start_page 837
container_title Bulletin of earthquake engineering
container_volume 18
creator Tsinidis, Grigorios
Di Sarno, Luigi
Sextos, Anastasios
Furtner, Peter
description This paper presents an extended set of numerical fragility functions for the structural assessment of buried steel natural gas (NG) pipelines subjected to axial compression caused by transient seismic ground deformations. The study focuses on NG pipelines crossing sites with a vertical geotechnical discontinuity, where high compression straining of a buried pipeline is expected to occur under seismic transient ground deformations. A de-coupled numerical framework is developed for this purpose, which includes a 3D finite element model of the pipe–trench system employed to evaluate rigorously the soil–pipe interaction effects on the pipeline axial response in a quasi-static manner. One-dimensional soil response analyses are used to determine critical ground deformation patterns at the vicinity of the geotechnical discontinuity, caused by the ground shaking. A comprehensive parametric analysis is performed by implementing the proposed analytical framework for an ensemble of 40 recorded earthquake ground motions. Crucial parameters that affect the seismic response and therefore the seismic vulnerability of buried steel NG pipelines namely, the diameter, wall thickness, burial depth and internal pressure of the pipeline, the backfill compaction level, the pipe–soil interface friction characteristics, the soil deposits characteristics, as well as initial geometric imperfections of the walls of the pipeline, are systematically considered. The analytical fragility functions are developed in terms of peak ground velocity at the ground surface, for four performance limit states, considering all the associated uncertainties. The study contributes towards a reliable quantitative risk assessment of buried steel NG pipelines, crossing similar sites, subjected to seismically-induced transient ground deformations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10518-019-00736-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2346264459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2346264459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-d19fd8f7f80ef5247e3beb7c7fed094412ee877b234cac02432fb3a00dbabb663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4souK5-AU8Bz9W82rRHWXzBggcVvIUknaxZuk1NUnC_vXErePM0M_wfA7-iuCT4mmAsbiLBFWlKTNoyn6wum6NiQSrBSsKr-viw41LU5P20OItxizGtRIsXxfgCLu6cQTaojetd2iNvkZ6Cgw7FBNCjQaUpqB5tVESjG6F3A0TUTYCSR-rLZcn43RggRucHpBLagE9gPgZnsta5aPyQ3DC55CCeFydW9REufueyeLu_e109luvnh6fV7bpUrKlT2ZHWdo0VtsFgK8oFMA1aGGGhwy3nhAI0QmjKuFEGU86o1Uxh3GmldV2zZXE1947Bf04Qk9z6KQz5pcyZmtacV2120dllgo8xgJVjcDsV9pJg-UNWzmRlJisPZGWTQ2wOxWweNhD-qv9JfQOlsn7r</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2346264459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic fragility of buried steel natural gas pipelines due to axial compression at geotechnical discontinuities</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tsinidis, Grigorios ; Di Sarno, Luigi ; Sextos, Anastasios ; Furtner, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsinidis, Grigorios ; Di Sarno, Luigi ; Sextos, Anastasios ; Furtner, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an extended set of numerical fragility functions for the structural assessment of buried steel natural gas (NG) pipelines subjected to axial compression caused by transient seismic ground deformations. The study focuses on NG pipelines crossing sites with a vertical geotechnical discontinuity, where high compression straining of a buried pipeline is expected to occur under seismic transient ground deformations. A de-coupled numerical framework is developed for this purpose, which includes a 3D finite element model of the pipe–trench system employed to evaluate rigorously the soil–pipe interaction effects on the pipeline axial response in a quasi-static manner. One-dimensional soil response analyses are used to determine critical ground deformation patterns at the vicinity of the geotechnical discontinuity, caused by the ground shaking. A comprehensive parametric analysis is performed by implementing the proposed analytical framework for an ensemble of 40 recorded earthquake ground motions. Crucial parameters that affect the seismic response and therefore the seismic vulnerability of buried steel NG pipelines namely, the diameter, wall thickness, burial depth and internal pressure of the pipeline, the backfill compaction level, the pipe–soil interface friction characteristics, the soil deposits characteristics, as well as initial geometric imperfections of the walls of the pipeline, are systematically considered. The analytical fragility functions are developed in terms of peak ground velocity at the ground surface, for four performance limit states, considering all the associated uncertainties. The study contributes towards a reliable quantitative risk assessment of buried steel NG pipelines, crossing similar sites, subjected to seismically-induced transient ground deformations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-019-00736-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Axial compression ; Backfill ; Buried pipes ; Civil Engineering ; Compression ; Compression tests ; Deformation ; Diameters ; Dimensional analysis ; Discontinuity ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Finite element method ; Fragility ; Gas pipelines ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical engineering ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground motion ; Hydrogeology ; Initial geometric imperfections ; Internal pressure ; Limit states ; Natural gas ; Original Research ; Parametric analysis ; Pipelines ; Risk assessment ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; Seismic response ; Seismic surveys ; Shaking ; Soil ; Soil analysis ; Soil compaction ; Soil-structure interaction ; Soils ; Steel ; Structural Geology ; Submarine pipelines ; Three dimensional models ; Vulnerability ; Wall thickness</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2020-02, Vol.18 (3), p.837-906</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-d19fd8f7f80ef5247e3beb7c7fed094412ee877b234cac02432fb3a00dbabb663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-d19fd8f7f80ef5247e3beb7c7fed094412ee877b234cac02432fb3a00dbabb663</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6045-1039</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-019-00736-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-019-00736-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsinidis, Grigorios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Sarno, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sextos, Anastasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furtner, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic fragility of buried steel natural gas pipelines due to axial compression at geotechnical discontinuities</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>This paper presents an extended set of numerical fragility functions for the structural assessment of buried steel natural gas (NG) pipelines subjected to axial compression caused by transient seismic ground deformations. The study focuses on NG pipelines crossing sites with a vertical geotechnical discontinuity, where high compression straining of a buried pipeline is expected to occur under seismic transient ground deformations. A de-coupled numerical framework is developed for this purpose, which includes a 3D finite element model of the pipe–trench system employed to evaluate rigorously the soil–pipe interaction effects on the pipeline axial response in a quasi-static manner. One-dimensional soil response analyses are used to determine critical ground deformation patterns at the vicinity of the geotechnical discontinuity, caused by the ground shaking. A comprehensive parametric analysis is performed by implementing the proposed analytical framework for an ensemble of 40 recorded earthquake ground motions. Crucial parameters that affect the seismic response and therefore the seismic vulnerability of buried steel NG pipelines namely, the diameter, wall thickness, burial depth and internal pressure of the pipeline, the backfill compaction level, the pipe–soil interface friction characteristics, the soil deposits characteristics, as well as initial geometric imperfections of the walls of the pipeline, are systematically considered. The analytical fragility functions are developed in terms of peak ground velocity at the ground surface, for four performance limit states, considering all the associated uncertainties. The study contributes towards a reliable quantitative risk assessment of buried steel NG pipelines, crossing similar sites, subjected to seismically-induced transient ground deformations.</description><subject>Axial compression</subject><subject>Backfill</subject><subject>Buried pipes</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Compression tests</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Discontinuity</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Gas pipelines</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical engineering</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Initial geometric imperfections</subject><subject>Internal pressure</subject><subject>Limit states</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Parametric analysis</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismic surveys</subject><subject>Shaking</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil compaction</subject><subject>Soil-structure interaction</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Submarine pipelines</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><subject>Wall thickness</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAQx4souK5-AU8Bz9W82rRHWXzBggcVvIUknaxZuk1NUnC_vXErePM0M_wfA7-iuCT4mmAsbiLBFWlKTNoyn6wum6NiQSrBSsKr-viw41LU5P20OItxizGtRIsXxfgCLu6cQTaojetd2iNvkZ6Cgw7FBNCjQaUpqB5tVESjG6F3A0TUTYCSR-rLZcn43RggRucHpBLagE9gPgZnsta5aPyQ3DC55CCeFydW9REufueyeLu_e109luvnh6fV7bpUrKlT2ZHWdo0VtsFgK8oFMA1aGGGhwy3nhAI0QmjKuFEGU86o1Uxh3GmldV2zZXE1947Bf04Qk9z6KQz5pcyZmtacV2120dllgo8xgJVjcDsV9pJg-UNWzmRlJisPZGWTQ2wOxWweNhD-qv9JfQOlsn7r</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Tsinidis, Grigorios</creator><creator>Di Sarno, Luigi</creator><creator>Sextos, Anastasios</creator><creator>Furtner, Peter</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-1039</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Seismic fragility of buried steel natural gas pipelines due to axial compression at geotechnical discontinuities</title><author>Tsinidis, Grigorios ; Di Sarno, Luigi ; Sextos, Anastasios ; Furtner, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-d19fd8f7f80ef5247e3beb7c7fed094412ee877b234cac02432fb3a00dbabb663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Axial compression</topic><topic>Backfill</topic><topic>Buried pipes</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Compression tests</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Discontinuity</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Gas pipelines</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical engineering</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Initial geometric imperfections</topic><topic>Internal pressure</topic><topic>Limit states</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Parametric analysis</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismic surveys</topic><topic>Shaking</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil compaction</topic><topic>Soil-structure interaction</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Submarine pipelines</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><topic>Wall thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsinidis, Grigorios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Sarno, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sextos, Anastasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furtner, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsinidis, Grigorios</au><au>Di Sarno, Luigi</au><au>Sextos, Anastasios</au><au>Furtner, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic fragility of buried steel natural gas pipelines due to axial compression at geotechnical discontinuities</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>837</spage><epage>906</epage><pages>837-906</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>This paper presents an extended set of numerical fragility functions for the structural assessment of buried steel natural gas (NG) pipelines subjected to axial compression caused by transient seismic ground deformations. The study focuses on NG pipelines crossing sites with a vertical geotechnical discontinuity, where high compression straining of a buried pipeline is expected to occur under seismic transient ground deformations. A de-coupled numerical framework is developed for this purpose, which includes a 3D finite element model of the pipe–trench system employed to evaluate rigorously the soil–pipe interaction effects on the pipeline axial response in a quasi-static manner. One-dimensional soil response analyses are used to determine critical ground deformation patterns at the vicinity of the geotechnical discontinuity, caused by the ground shaking. A comprehensive parametric analysis is performed by implementing the proposed analytical framework for an ensemble of 40 recorded earthquake ground motions. Crucial parameters that affect the seismic response and therefore the seismic vulnerability of buried steel NG pipelines namely, the diameter, wall thickness, burial depth and internal pressure of the pipeline, the backfill compaction level, the pipe–soil interface friction characteristics, the soil deposits characteristics, as well as initial geometric imperfections of the walls of the pipeline, are systematically considered. The analytical fragility functions are developed in terms of peak ground velocity at the ground surface, for four performance limit states, considering all the associated uncertainties. The study contributes towards a reliable quantitative risk assessment of buried steel NG pipelines, crossing similar sites, subjected to seismically-induced transient ground deformations.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-019-00736-8</doi><tpages>70</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-1039</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-761X
ispartof Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2020-02, Vol.18 (3), p.837-906
issn 1570-761X
1573-1456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2346264459
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Axial compression
Backfill
Buried pipes
Civil Engineering
Compression
Compression tests
Deformation
Diameters
Dimensional analysis
Discontinuity
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquakes
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Finite element method
Fragility
Gas pipelines
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical engineering
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Ground motion
Hydrogeology
Initial geometric imperfections
Internal pressure
Limit states
Natural gas
Original Research
Parametric analysis
Pipelines
Risk assessment
Seismic activity
Seismic hazard
Seismic response
Seismic surveys
Shaking
Soil
Soil analysis
Soil compaction
Soil-structure interaction
Soils
Steel
Structural Geology
Submarine pipelines
Three dimensional models
Vulnerability
Wall thickness
title Seismic fragility of buried steel natural gas pipelines due to axial compression at geotechnical discontinuities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T11%3A55%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20fragility%20of%20buried%20steel%20natural%20gas%20pipelines%20due%20to%20axial%20compression%20at%20geotechnical%20discontinuities&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Tsinidis,%20Grigorios&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=837&rft.epage=906&rft.pages=837-906&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-019-00736-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2346264459%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2346264459&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true