Optimum layout of weep holes in concrete irrigation canals to control uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient
In this study, the effect of weep holes on controlling uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient under concrete canals was investigated in different groundwater levels. For this purpose, three weep holes were embedded in different locations and combinations on the bottom and the sidewall of a laborator...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arabian journal of geosciences 2020, Vol.13 (2), Article 88 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Arabian journal of geosciences |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Taran, Farshid Mahtabi, Ghorban |
description | In this study, the effect of weep holes on controlling uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient under concrete canals was investigated in different groundwater levels. For this purpose, three weep holes were embedded in different locations and combinations on the bottom and the sidewall of a laboratory canal. The amounts of seepage discharge were measured from these weep holes in single and combined modes. The corresponding values of seepage discharge, uplift pressure, and exit hydraulic gradient were calculated through simulation with the Seep/W model. The comparison of the observed and the simulated seepage values was indicative of the model’s high accuracy with a mean error of 6.23%. The results showed that uplift pressure values in the single modes of weep holes in three different groundwater levels are similar. Uplift pressure in the binary combinations had a significant reduction compared to the single modes (an average of 73%). The maximum exit hydraulic gradient occurred at the weep hole located at the corner of the canal bottom. In general, the binary combinations of the weep holes were the best choice in terms of the minimum uplift pressure and the suitable exit hydraulic gradient. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12517-020-5108-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2343270290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2343270290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1432871ea717b78b3887fb29d35cbfa31ae4bf26a2ff3bf5b18731fb79b5d4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA82om6W7SoxS_oNBL7yHZTdqU7WadZJH-e3ep6MnThMn7vAwPIffAHoEx-ZSAlyALxllRAlOFuCAzUFVVyFKoy983wDW5SenAWKWYVDPSbvocjsORtuYUh0yjp1_O9XQfW5do6GgduxpddjQghp3JIY4705k20Ryn34yxpUPfBp9pjy6lAR01XUP3pwbN0Iaa7tA0wXX5llz5EXR3P3NOtq8v29V7sd68faye10UtoMoFLARXEpyRIK1UViglveXLRpS19UaAcQvreWW498L60oKSAryVS1s2i1rMycO5tsf4ObiU9SEOOJ2suRi7JeNLNqbgnKoxpoTO6x7D0eBJA9OTU312qkenenKqxcjwM5PGbLdz-Nf8P_QN2ZV7qg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2343270290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimum layout of weep holes in concrete irrigation canals to control uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Taran, Farshid ; Mahtabi, Ghorban</creator><creatorcontrib>Taran, Farshid ; Mahtabi, Ghorban</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the effect of weep holes on controlling uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient under concrete canals was investigated in different groundwater levels. For this purpose, three weep holes were embedded in different locations and combinations on the bottom and the sidewall of a laboratory canal. The amounts of seepage discharge were measured from these weep holes in single and combined modes. The corresponding values of seepage discharge, uplift pressure, and exit hydraulic gradient were calculated through simulation with the Seep/W model. The comparison of the observed and the simulated seepage values was indicative of the model’s high accuracy with a mean error of 6.23%. The results showed that uplift pressure values in the single modes of weep holes in three different groundwater levels are similar. Uplift pressure in the binary combinations had a significant reduction compared to the single modes (an average of 73%). The maximum exit hydraulic gradient occurred at the weep hole located at the corner of the canal bottom. In general, the binary combinations of the weep holes were the best choice in terms of the minimum uplift pressure and the suitable exit hydraulic gradient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-5108-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Canals ; Computer simulation ; Concrete ; Discharge ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Groundwater ; Groundwater levels ; Hydraulic gradient ; Hydraulics ; Irrigation canals ; Model accuracy ; Modes ; Original Paper ; Pressure ; Repair & maintenance ; Seepage ; Uplift ; Uplift pressure ; Water table</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2020, Vol.13 (2), Article 88</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020</rights><rights>2020© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1432871ea717b78b3887fb29d35cbfa31ae4bf26a2ff3bf5b18731fb79b5d4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1432871ea717b78b3887fb29d35cbfa31ae4bf26a2ff3bf5b18731fb79b5d4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-020-5108-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-020-5108-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taran, Farshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahtabi, Ghorban</creatorcontrib><title>Optimum layout of weep holes in concrete irrigation canals to control uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>In this study, the effect of weep holes on controlling uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient under concrete canals was investigated in different groundwater levels. For this purpose, three weep holes were embedded in different locations and combinations on the bottom and the sidewall of a laboratory canal. The amounts of seepage discharge were measured from these weep holes in single and combined modes. The corresponding values of seepage discharge, uplift pressure, and exit hydraulic gradient were calculated through simulation with the Seep/W model. The comparison of the observed and the simulated seepage values was indicative of the model’s high accuracy with a mean error of 6.23%. The results showed that uplift pressure values in the single modes of weep holes in three different groundwater levels are similar. Uplift pressure in the binary combinations had a significant reduction compared to the single modes (an average of 73%). The maximum exit hydraulic gradient occurred at the weep hole located at the corner of the canal bottom. In general, the binary combinations of the weep holes were the best choice in terms of the minimum uplift pressure and the suitable exit hydraulic gradient.</description><subject>Canals</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater levels</subject><subject>Hydraulic gradient</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Irrigation canals</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Modes</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Repair & maintenance</subject><subject>Seepage</subject><subject>Uplift</subject><subject>Uplift pressure</subject><subject>Water table</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFvA82om6W7SoxS_oNBL7yHZTdqU7WadZJH-e3ep6MnThMn7vAwPIffAHoEx-ZSAlyALxllRAlOFuCAzUFVVyFKoy983wDW5SenAWKWYVDPSbvocjsORtuYUh0yjp1_O9XQfW5do6GgduxpddjQghp3JIY4705k20Ryn34yxpUPfBp9pjy6lAR01XUP3pwbN0Iaa7tA0wXX5llz5EXR3P3NOtq8v29V7sd68faye10UtoMoFLARXEpyRIK1UViglveXLRpS19UaAcQvreWW498L60oKSAryVS1s2i1rMycO5tsf4ObiU9SEOOJ2suRi7JeNLNqbgnKoxpoTO6x7D0eBJA9OTU312qkenenKqxcjwM5PGbLdz-Nf8P_QN2ZV7qg</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Taran, Farshid</creator><creator>Mahtabi, Ghorban</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Optimum layout of weep holes in concrete irrigation canals to control uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient</title><author>Taran, Farshid ; Mahtabi, Ghorban</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-1432871ea717b78b3887fb29d35cbfa31ae4bf26a2ff3bf5b18731fb79b5d4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Canals</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater levels</topic><topic>Hydraulic gradient</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Irrigation canals</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Modes</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Repair & maintenance</topic><topic>Seepage</topic><topic>Uplift</topic><topic>Uplift pressure</topic><topic>Water table</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taran, Farshid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahtabi, Ghorban</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taran, Farshid</au><au>Mahtabi, Ghorban</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimum layout of weep holes in concrete irrigation canals to control uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><artnum>88</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>In this study, the effect of weep holes on controlling uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient under concrete canals was investigated in different groundwater levels. For this purpose, three weep holes were embedded in different locations and combinations on the bottom and the sidewall of a laboratory canal. The amounts of seepage discharge were measured from these weep holes in single and combined modes. The corresponding values of seepage discharge, uplift pressure, and exit hydraulic gradient were calculated through simulation with the Seep/W model. The comparison of the observed and the simulated seepage values was indicative of the model’s high accuracy with a mean error of 6.23%. The results showed that uplift pressure values in the single modes of weep holes in three different groundwater levels are similar. Uplift pressure in the binary combinations had a significant reduction compared to the single modes (an average of 73%). The maximum exit hydraulic gradient occurred at the weep hole located at the corner of the canal bottom. In general, the binary combinations of the weep holes were the best choice in terms of the minimum uplift pressure and the suitable exit hydraulic gradient.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-020-5108-3</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1866-7511 |
ispartof | Arabian journal of geosciences, 2020, Vol.13 (2), Article 88 |
issn | 1866-7511 1866-7538 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2343270290 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Canals Computer simulation Concrete Discharge Earth and Environmental Science Earth science Earth Sciences Groundwater Groundwater levels Hydraulic gradient Hydraulics Irrigation canals Model accuracy Modes Original Paper Pressure Repair & maintenance Seepage Uplift Uplift pressure Water table |
title | Optimum layout of weep holes in concrete irrigation canals to control uplift pressure and hydraulic gradient |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T08%3A15%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimum%20layout%20of%20weep%20holes%20in%20concrete%20irrigation%20canals%20to%20control%20uplift%20pressure%20and%20hydraulic%20gradient&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Taran,%20Farshid&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.artnum=88&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-020-5108-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2343270290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2343270290&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |