Effects of marine protected areas on coastal fishes across the Azores archipelago, mid-North Atlantic

Marine reserves across different eco-regions and habitats have proven to benefit exploited fish populations within their borders. There is also mounting evidence, mostly from continental shelf regions, that such positive effects will depend on the species ecological traits (e.g. mobility) and on the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sea research 2018-08, Vol.138, p.34-47
Hauptverfasser: Afonso, Pedro, Schmiing, Mara, Fontes, Jorge, Tempera, Fernando, Morato, Telmo, S. Santos, Ricardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 47
container_issue
container_start_page 34
container_title Journal of sea research
container_volume 138
creator Afonso, Pedro
Schmiing, Mara
Fontes, Jorge
Tempera, Fernando
Morato, Telmo
S. Santos, Ricardo
description Marine reserves across different eco-regions and habitats have proven to benefit exploited fish populations within their borders. There is also mounting evidence, mostly from continental shelf regions, that such positive effects will depend on the species ecological traits (e.g. mobility) and on the characteristics of the reserves (e.g. design, age and enforcement). This study examines the effects of protection on commercial coastal fishes with different ecological traits from three marine reserves with distinct habitats (coastal vs. offshore reefs), protection regime (legal vs. voluntary, partial vs. total protection) and age (8, 15 and 26 years old) across the oceanic archipelago of the Azores, mid North Atlantic. Overall, positive effects of protection on fish abundance or individual size were limited to species of larger maximum size and lower mobility in reserves with higher compliance levels. This result agrees with many studies elsewhere showing that reserves of small size and/or insufficient compliance do not provide adequate protection to the entire fish community, limiting their contribution to manage fisheries and conserve biodiversity. That might very well be the case of Azorean marine reserves but a more conclusive result will require testing the effects of protection on larger, well enforced reserves, which still do not exist in the region. There was also a clear influence of depth in commercial fish distribution and a common preference for substrates of higher complexity across ecological traits. Combined, these results highlight the need to include complex reef structures, diverse coastal habitats and larger areas when designing multispecies marine reserves and stress that an appropriate management regime is crucial for the success of the reserve, in particular to promote compliance. •This is the first study on ecological effects of MPAs in the Azores archipelago.•Positive effects were limited to resident, large bodied fishes in well complied MPAs.•Deeper, complex habitat also promoted higher fish abundance across ecological traits.•The Azorean MPA network needs better designed and complied multispecies MPAs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.seares.2018.04.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2342488921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1385110116303562</els_id><sourcerecordid>2342488921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7ec770287e3f2c740397c311cf7bbecd95ee0688fe76c948ad11bc2bc8b4018e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PxCAURYnRxPHjH7ggcWsrFGagG5PJZPxIJrrRNaH0YWk6ZQTGRH-9jHXtCvK475JzELqipKSELm77MoIOEMuKUFkSXhLCjtCMSsEKyik_zncm5wXN6VN0FmNPCBWkZjMEa2vBpIi9xVsd3Ah4F3zKI2hx7tT5ZcTG65j0gK2LHUSsTfAx4tQBXn77cJgE07kdDPrd3-Cta4tnH1KHl2nQY3LmAp1YPUS4_DvP0dv9-nX1WGxeHp5Wy01hGOOpEGCEIJUUwGxlBCesFoZRaqxoGjBtPQcgCyktiIWpudQtpY2pGiMbnsmBnaPrqTczfOwhJtX7fRjzl6pivOJS1hXNKT6lfjECWLULLsN_KUrUQajq1SRUHYQqwlUWmtfupjXIBJ8OgorGwWigdSH7Uq13_xf8ANCsgYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2342488921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of marine protected areas on coastal fishes across the Azores archipelago, mid-North Atlantic</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Afonso, Pedro ; Schmiing, Mara ; Fontes, Jorge ; Tempera, Fernando ; Morato, Telmo ; S. Santos, Ricardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Afonso, Pedro ; Schmiing, Mara ; Fontes, Jorge ; Tempera, Fernando ; Morato, Telmo ; S. Santos, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><description>Marine reserves across different eco-regions and habitats have proven to benefit exploited fish populations within their borders. There is also mounting evidence, mostly from continental shelf regions, that such positive effects will depend on the species ecological traits (e.g. mobility) and on the characteristics of the reserves (e.g. design, age and enforcement). This study examines the effects of protection on commercial coastal fishes with different ecological traits from three marine reserves with distinct habitats (coastal vs. offshore reefs), protection regime (legal vs. voluntary, partial vs. total protection) and age (8, 15 and 26 years old) across the oceanic archipelago of the Azores, mid North Atlantic. Overall, positive effects of protection on fish abundance or individual size were limited to species of larger maximum size and lower mobility in reserves with higher compliance levels. This result agrees with many studies elsewhere showing that reserves of small size and/or insufficient compliance do not provide adequate protection to the entire fish community, limiting their contribution to manage fisheries and conserve biodiversity. That might very well be the case of Azorean marine reserves but a more conclusive result will require testing the effects of protection on larger, well enforced reserves, which still do not exist in the region. There was also a clear influence of depth in commercial fish distribution and a common preference for substrates of higher complexity across ecological traits. Combined, these results highlight the need to include complex reef structures, diverse coastal habitats and larger areas when designing multispecies marine reserves and stress that an appropriate management regime is crucial for the success of the reserve, in particular to promote compliance. •This is the first study on ecological effects of MPAs in the Azores archipelago.•Positive effects were limited to resident, large bodied fishes in well complied MPAs.•Deeper, complex habitat also promoted higher fish abundance across ecological traits.•The Azorean MPA network needs better designed and complied multispecies MPAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1385-1101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1414</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2018.04.003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aquatic habitats ; Archipelagoes ; Azores ; Biodiversity ; Coastal ecology ; Coastal structures ; Commercial fishing ; Complexity ; Compliance ; Continental shelves ; Ecological effects ; Ecological trait ; Enforcement ; Fish ; Fish populations ; Fisheries ; Fishing ; Habitats ; Life history ; Marine parks ; Marine protected areas ; Marine reserves ; Mobility ; Nature reserves ; Offshore ; Potential resources ; Protected areas ; Protection ; Regions ; Reserve effect ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of sea research, 2018-08, Vol.138, p.34-47</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7ec770287e3f2c740397c311cf7bbecd95ee0688fe76c948ad11bc2bc8b4018e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7ec770287e3f2c740397c311cf7bbecd95ee0688fe76c948ad11bc2bc8b4018e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8451-5532</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1385110116303562$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Afonso, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmiing, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontes, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tempera, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morato, Telmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S. Santos, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of marine protected areas on coastal fishes across the Azores archipelago, mid-North Atlantic</title><title>Journal of sea research</title><description>Marine reserves across different eco-regions and habitats have proven to benefit exploited fish populations within their borders. There is also mounting evidence, mostly from continental shelf regions, that such positive effects will depend on the species ecological traits (e.g. mobility) and on the characteristics of the reserves (e.g. design, age and enforcement). This study examines the effects of protection on commercial coastal fishes with different ecological traits from three marine reserves with distinct habitats (coastal vs. offshore reefs), protection regime (legal vs. voluntary, partial vs. total protection) and age (8, 15 and 26 years old) across the oceanic archipelago of the Azores, mid North Atlantic. Overall, positive effects of protection on fish abundance or individual size were limited to species of larger maximum size and lower mobility in reserves with higher compliance levels. This result agrees with many studies elsewhere showing that reserves of small size and/or insufficient compliance do not provide adequate protection to the entire fish community, limiting their contribution to manage fisheries and conserve biodiversity. That might very well be the case of Azorean marine reserves but a more conclusive result will require testing the effects of protection on larger, well enforced reserves, which still do not exist in the region. There was also a clear influence of depth in commercial fish distribution and a common preference for substrates of higher complexity across ecological traits. Combined, these results highlight the need to include complex reef structures, diverse coastal habitats and larger areas when designing multispecies marine reserves and stress that an appropriate management regime is crucial for the success of the reserve, in particular to promote compliance. •This is the first study on ecological effects of MPAs in the Azores archipelago.•Positive effects were limited to resident, large bodied fishes in well complied MPAs.•Deeper, complex habitat also promoted higher fish abundance across ecological traits.•The Azorean MPA network needs better designed and complied multispecies MPAs.</description><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Archipelagoes</subject><subject>Azores</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Coastal ecology</subject><subject>Coastal structures</subject><subject>Commercial fishing</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Compliance</subject><subject>Continental shelves</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecological trait</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish populations</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>Marine parks</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Marine reserves</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Nature reserves</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Potential resources</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Protection</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Reserve effect</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>1385-1101</issn><issn>1873-1414</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PxCAURYnRxPHjH7ggcWsrFGagG5PJZPxIJrrRNaH0YWk6ZQTGRH-9jHXtCvK475JzELqipKSELm77MoIOEMuKUFkSXhLCjtCMSsEKyik_zncm5wXN6VN0FmNPCBWkZjMEa2vBpIi9xVsd3Ah4F3zKI2hx7tT5ZcTG65j0gK2LHUSsTfAx4tQBXn77cJgE07kdDPrd3-Cta4tnH1KHl2nQY3LmAp1YPUS4_DvP0dv9-nX1WGxeHp5Wy01hGOOpEGCEIJUUwGxlBCesFoZRaqxoGjBtPQcgCyktiIWpudQtpY2pGiMbnsmBnaPrqTczfOwhJtX7fRjzl6pivOJS1hXNKT6lfjECWLULLsN_KUrUQajq1SRUHYQqwlUWmtfupjXIBJ8OgorGwWigdSH7Uq13_xf8ANCsgYA</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Afonso, Pedro</creator><creator>Schmiing, Mara</creator><creator>Fontes, Jorge</creator><creator>Tempera, Fernando</creator><creator>Morato, Telmo</creator><creator>S. Santos, Ricardo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-5532</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>Effects of marine protected areas on coastal fishes across the Azores archipelago, mid-North Atlantic</title><author>Afonso, Pedro ; Schmiing, Mara ; Fontes, Jorge ; Tempera, Fernando ; Morato, Telmo ; S. Santos, Ricardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7ec770287e3f2c740397c311cf7bbecd95ee0688fe76c948ad11bc2bc8b4018e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Archipelagoes</topic><topic>Azores</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Coastal ecology</topic><topic>Coastal structures</topic><topic>Commercial fishing</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Compliance</topic><topic>Continental shelves</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecological trait</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish populations</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>Marine parks</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Marine reserves</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Nature reserves</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Potential resources</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Protection</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Reserve effect</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Afonso, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmiing, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontes, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tempera, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morato, Telmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S. Santos, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of sea research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Afonso, Pedro</au><au>Schmiing, Mara</au><au>Fontes, Jorge</au><au>Tempera, Fernando</au><au>Morato, Telmo</au><au>S. Santos, Ricardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of marine protected areas on coastal fishes across the Azores archipelago, mid-North Atlantic</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sea research</jtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>138</volume><spage>34</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>34-47</pages><issn>1385-1101</issn><eissn>1873-1414</eissn><abstract>Marine reserves across different eco-regions and habitats have proven to benefit exploited fish populations within their borders. There is also mounting evidence, mostly from continental shelf regions, that such positive effects will depend on the species ecological traits (e.g. mobility) and on the characteristics of the reserves (e.g. design, age and enforcement). This study examines the effects of protection on commercial coastal fishes with different ecological traits from three marine reserves with distinct habitats (coastal vs. offshore reefs), protection regime (legal vs. voluntary, partial vs. total protection) and age (8, 15 and 26 years old) across the oceanic archipelago of the Azores, mid North Atlantic. Overall, positive effects of protection on fish abundance or individual size were limited to species of larger maximum size and lower mobility in reserves with higher compliance levels. This result agrees with many studies elsewhere showing that reserves of small size and/or insufficient compliance do not provide adequate protection to the entire fish community, limiting their contribution to manage fisheries and conserve biodiversity. That might very well be the case of Azorean marine reserves but a more conclusive result will require testing the effects of protection on larger, well enforced reserves, which still do not exist in the region. There was also a clear influence of depth in commercial fish distribution and a common preference for substrates of higher complexity across ecological traits. Combined, these results highlight the need to include complex reef structures, diverse coastal habitats and larger areas when designing multispecies marine reserves and stress that an appropriate management regime is crucial for the success of the reserve, in particular to promote compliance. •This is the first study on ecological effects of MPAs in the Azores archipelago.•Positive effects were limited to resident, large bodied fishes in well complied MPAs.•Deeper, complex habitat also promoted higher fish abundance across ecological traits.•The Azorean MPA network needs better designed and complied multispecies MPAs.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.seares.2018.04.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8451-5532</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1385-1101
ispartof Journal of sea research, 2018-08, Vol.138, p.34-47
issn 1385-1101
1873-1414
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2342488921
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aquatic habitats
Archipelagoes
Azores
Biodiversity
Coastal ecology
Coastal structures
Commercial fishing
Complexity
Compliance
Continental shelves
Ecological effects
Ecological trait
Enforcement
Fish
Fish populations
Fisheries
Fishing
Habitats
Life history
Marine parks
Marine protected areas
Marine reserves
Mobility
Nature reserves
Offshore
Potential resources
Protected areas
Protection
Regions
Reserve effect
Substrates
title Effects of marine protected areas on coastal fishes across the Azores archipelago, mid-North Atlantic
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T02%3A59%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20marine%20protected%20areas%20on%20coastal%20fishes%20across%20the%20Azores%20archipelago,%20mid-North%20Atlantic&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sea%20research&rft.au=Afonso,%20Pedro&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=138&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=34-47&rft.issn=1385-1101&rft.eissn=1873-1414&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.seares.2018.04.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2342488921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2342488921&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1385110116303562&rfr_iscdi=true