WHAT EPISTEMIC VALUES SHOULD WE RECLAIM FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE? A RESPONSE TO J. WESLEY ROBBINS
. Postmodernism in science rejects and deconstructs the cultural dominance of especially the natural sciences in our time. Although it presents the debate between religion and science with a promising epistemological holism, it also seriously challenges attempts to develop a meaningful relationship...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Zygon 1993-09, Vol.28 (3), p.371-376 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 376 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 371 |
| container_title | Zygon |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel |
| description | . Postmodernism in science rejects and deconstructs the cultural dominance of especially the natural sciences in our time. Although it presents the debate between religion and science with a promising epistemological holism, it also seriously challenges attempts to develop a meaningful relationship between science and religion. A neopragmatist perspective on religion and science is part of this important challenge and eminently reveals the problems and reduction that arise when pragmatist criteria alone are used to construct a holism that renounces any demarcation between different areas of rationality. In this pragmatist vision for a holist culture, the cognitive resources of rationality are bypassed in such a way that a meaningful interaction between theology and science becomes impossible. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01041.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_234234811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1297949374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-dc3f8d21dd2db10c16c5b11a27a34e1c5c23d66613e8439fe685b5960ba35ba83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1v0zAUhi0EEmXwH6zBbYK_YsfcTFnqpYE0mZqUaruxnC-ppVtH3Gndv5-jVr3jAutIto6f8772C8AlRj526_vGx4wLTwrGfCwl9fc1wohh__AOTM5X78EEBRJ7hIbBR_DJ2g1CiAvBJ8CsZlEF1W1aVmqexvB3lC1VCctZscymcKXgQsVZlM7hTbFw5yxN0iKHUT6FZZyqPFZXMHL98rbISwWrAv703VSZqTu4KK6v07z8DD70Zmu7L6f9AixvVBXPvKxI0jjKvIZI97a2oX3YEty2pK0xajBvghpjQ4ShrMNN0BDacs4x7UJGZd_xMKgDyVFtaFCbkF6Ay6Pu07D7-9zZvd7snodHZ6kJZa5CjB309V8QJlJIJqlgjvpxpJphZ-3Q9fppWD-Y4VVjpMfc9UaP4eoxXD3mrk-564Mb_nayMLYx234wj83anhUYCUmAhMOujtjLetu9_oeBvr9LCirGv3hHhbXdd4ezghn-aC6oCPQqT_T8vkroNJnpX_QN6ROcYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1297949374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>WHAT EPISTEMIC VALUES SHOULD WE RECLAIM FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE? A RESPONSE TO J. WESLEY ROBBINS</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel</creator><creatorcontrib>van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel</creatorcontrib><description>. Postmodernism in science rejects and deconstructs the cultural dominance of especially the natural sciences in our time. Although it presents the debate between religion and science with a promising epistemological holism, it also seriously challenges attempts to develop a meaningful relationship between science and religion. A neopragmatist perspective on religion and science is part of this important challenge and eminently reveals the problems and reduction that arise when pragmatist criteria alone are used to construct a holism that renounces any demarcation between different areas of rationality. In this pragmatist vision for a holist culture, the cognitive resources of rationality are bypassed in such a way that a meaningful interaction between theology and science becomes impossible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0591-2385</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9744</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01041.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ZYGOA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>cognitive ; epistemic values ; General points ; History of science and technology ; History of science in relation to other disciplinary fields ; holism ; intelligibility ; Philosophy ; postmodern culture ; rationality ; Religion ; Robbins, J Wesley ; Science ; Theology ; theory-acceptance</subject><ispartof>Zygon, 1993-09, Vol.28 (3), p.371-376</ispartof><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Sep 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-dc3f8d21dd2db10c16c5b11a27a34e1c5c23d66613e8439fe685b5960ba35ba83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27848,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4282507$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel</creatorcontrib><title>WHAT EPISTEMIC VALUES SHOULD WE RECLAIM FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE? A RESPONSE TO J. WESLEY ROBBINS</title><title>Zygon</title><description>. Postmodernism in science rejects and deconstructs the cultural dominance of especially the natural sciences in our time. Although it presents the debate between religion and science with a promising epistemological holism, it also seriously challenges attempts to develop a meaningful relationship between science and religion. A neopragmatist perspective on religion and science is part of this important challenge and eminently reveals the problems and reduction that arise when pragmatist criteria alone are used to construct a holism that renounces any demarcation between different areas of rationality. In this pragmatist vision for a holist culture, the cognitive resources of rationality are bypassed in such a way that a meaningful interaction between theology and science becomes impossible.</description><subject>cognitive</subject><subject>epistemic values</subject><subject>General points</subject><subject>History of science and technology</subject><subject>History of science in relation to other disciplinary fields</subject><subject>holism</subject><subject>intelligibility</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>postmodern culture</subject><subject>rationality</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Robbins, J Wesley</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Theology</subject><subject>theory-acceptance</subject><issn>0591-2385</issn><issn>1467-9744</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1v0zAUhi0EEmXwH6zBbYK_YsfcTFnqpYE0mZqUaruxnC-ppVtH3Gndv5-jVr3jAutIto6f8772C8AlRj526_vGx4wLTwrGfCwl9fc1wohh__AOTM5X78EEBRJ7hIbBR_DJ2g1CiAvBJ8CsZlEF1W1aVmqexvB3lC1VCctZscymcKXgQsVZlM7hTbFw5yxN0iKHUT6FZZyqPFZXMHL98rbISwWrAv703VSZqTu4KK6v07z8DD70Zmu7L6f9AixvVBXPvKxI0jjKvIZI97a2oX3YEty2pK0xajBvghpjQ4ShrMNN0BDacs4x7UJGZd_xMKgDyVFtaFCbkF6Ay6Pu07D7-9zZvd7snodHZ6kJZa5CjB309V8QJlJIJqlgjvpxpJphZ-3Q9fppWD-Y4VVjpMfc9UaP4eoxXD3mrk-564Mb_nayMLYx234wj83anhUYCUmAhMOujtjLetu9_oeBvr9LCirGv3hHhbXdd4ezghn-aC6oCPQqT_T8vkroNJnpX_QN6ROcYg</recordid><startdate>199309</startdate><enddate>199309</enddate><creator>van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Institute on Religion in an Age of Science and Meadville Theological Seminary of Lombard College, Joint Publication Board</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GPCCI</scope><scope>HOKLE</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199309</creationdate><title>WHAT EPISTEMIC VALUES SHOULD WE RECLAIM FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE? A RESPONSE TO J. WESLEY ROBBINS</title><author>van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2991-dc3f8d21dd2db10c16c5b11a27a34e1c5c23d66613e8439fe685b5960ba35ba83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>cognitive</topic><topic>epistemic values</topic><topic>General points</topic><topic>History of science and technology</topic><topic>History of science in relation to other disciplinary fields</topic><topic>holism</topic><topic>intelligibility</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>postmodern culture</topic><topic>rationality</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Robbins, J Wesley</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Theology</topic><topic>theory-acceptance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 10</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 22</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><jtitle>Zygon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Huyssteen, J. Wentzel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>WHAT EPISTEMIC VALUES SHOULD WE RECLAIM FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE? A RESPONSE TO J. WESLEY ROBBINS</atitle><jtitle>Zygon</jtitle><date>1993-09</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>371-376</pages><issn>0591-2385</issn><eissn>1467-9744</eissn><coden>ZYGOA7</coden><abstract>. Postmodernism in science rejects and deconstructs the cultural dominance of especially the natural sciences in our time. Although it presents the debate between religion and science with a promising epistemological holism, it also seriously challenges attempts to develop a meaningful relationship between science and religion. A neopragmatist perspective on religion and science is part of this important challenge and eminently reveals the problems and reduction that arise when pragmatist criteria alone are used to construct a holism that renounces any demarcation between different areas of rationality. In this pragmatist vision for a holist culture, the cognitive resources of rationality are bypassed in such a way that a meaningful interaction between theology and science becomes impossible.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01041.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0591-2385 |
| ispartof | Zygon, 1993-09, Vol.28 (3), p.371-376 |
| issn | 0591-2385 1467-9744 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_234234811 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | cognitive epistemic values General points History of science and technology History of science in relation to other disciplinary fields holism intelligibility Philosophy postmodern culture rationality Religion Robbins, J Wesley Science Theology theory-acceptance |
| title | WHAT EPISTEMIC VALUES SHOULD WE RECLAIM FOR RELIGION AND SCIENCE? A RESPONSE TO J. WESLEY ROBBINS |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T18%3A10%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=WHAT%20EPISTEMIC%20VALUES%20SHOULD%20WE%20RECLAIM%20FOR%20RELIGION%20AND%20SCIENCE?%20A%20RESPONSE%20TO%20J.%20WESLEY%20ROBBINS&rft.jtitle=Zygon&rft.au=van%20Huyssteen,%20J.%20Wentzel&rft.date=1993-09&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=371-376&rft.issn=0591-2385&rft.eissn=1467-9744&rft.coden=ZYGOA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1993.tb01041.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1297949374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1297949374&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |