Response of captive snowshoe hares to thiram-treated conifers

The retention time required for snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) to maintain a feeding aversion to thiram has important forestry management implications. Thus, we investigated the forage preferences of captive hares for thiram-treated and untreated white spruce (Picea glauca) with animals having ei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 1993-07, Vol.57 (3), p.648-651
Hauptverfasser: Rangen, S.A, Hawley, A.W.L, Hudson, R.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 651
container_issue 3
container_start_page 648
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 57
creator Rangen, S.A
Hawley, A.W.L
Hudson, R.J
description The retention time required for snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) to maintain a feeding aversion to thiram has important forestry management implications. Thus, we investigated the forage preferences of captive hares for thiram-treated and untreated white spruce (Picea glauca) with animals having either previous exposure or no exposure to treated twigs. Thiram reduced the mean consumption of spruce twigs by previously exposed and naive hares 9-fold and 5-fold, respectively. Previously exposed hares had an untreated spruce intake 2-fold that of naive hares. The decreased consumption of untreated twigs by naive hares in comparison to previously exposed hares suggested that naive animals had developed a generalized aversion to spruce twigs or that previously exposed hares were more adept at differentiating treatment types. The consumption of similar amounts of white spruce treated with thiram by both types of experience groups indicated that a learned food aversion had not been established with previously exposed animals or that extinction of the aversion had occurred. In the wild, even if hares acquired an aversion for treated conifers during autumn through spring, extinction of the aversion would likely occur over the summer months. Consequently, this would not only necessitate the reapplication of thiram more frequently than feasible for foresters, but would also require a reconditioning period for hares during which conifers would be susceptible to browsing damage.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3809295
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_234229731</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3809295</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3809295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-8c274572a9f74bac359dbbfbea8c9c622c88c5e84f2692c65298329d887c68433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M9LwzAYxvEgCs4p3j0VETxVkzdNkxw8yPAXDAR14K2kWeI6tqbmzRT_eysrevP0Xj58X3gIOWb0AjiVl1xRDVrskBHTXOagmNwlI0oBclGw131ygLiklDOmyhG5enLYhRZdFnxmTZeaD5dhGz5xEVy2MNFhlkKWFk006zxFZ5KbZza0jXcRD8meNyt0R8Mdk9ntzcvkPp8-3j1Mrqe5BaFTrizIQkgw2suiNpYLPa9rXzujrLYlgFXKCqcKD6UGWwrQioOeKyVtqQrOx-R02-1ieN84TNUybGLbv6yAFwBactaj8y2yMSBG56suNmsTvypGq59pqmGaXp4NOYPWrHw0rW3wl3NZKsX1H1tiCvGf2smWeRMq8xb70uxZF0AFB_4NS0h0ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234229731</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response of captive snowshoe hares to thiram-treated conifers</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Rangen, S.A ; Hawley, A.W.L ; Hudson, R.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Rangen, S.A ; Hawley, A.W.L ; Hudson, R.J</creatorcontrib><description>The retention time required for snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) to maintain a feeding aversion to thiram has important forestry management implications. Thus, we investigated the forage preferences of captive hares for thiram-treated and untreated white spruce (Picea glauca) with animals having either previous exposure or no exposure to treated twigs. Thiram reduced the mean consumption of spruce twigs by previously exposed and naive hares 9-fold and 5-fold, respectively. Previously exposed hares had an untreated spruce intake 2-fold that of naive hares. The decreased consumption of untreated twigs by naive hares in comparison to previously exposed hares suggested that naive animals had developed a generalized aversion to spruce twigs or that previously exposed hares were more adept at differentiating treatment types. The consumption of similar amounts of white spruce treated with thiram by both types of experience groups indicated that a learned food aversion had not been established with previously exposed animals or that extinction of the aversion had occurred. In the wild, even if hares acquired an aversion for treated conifers during autumn through spring, extinction of the aversion would likely occur over the summer months. Consequently, this would not only necessitate the reapplication of thiram more frequently than feasible for foresters, but would also require a reconditioning period for hares during which conifers would be susceptible to browsing damage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3809295</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; ALBERTA ; Animal behavior ; Animal feeding behavior ; Animal science ; Biological and medical sciences ; Browsing ; BROWSING DAMAGE ; Coniferous forests ; Conifers ; CONTROL DE ROEDORES ; DANOS POR RAMONEO ; DEGAT DU AU BROUTAGE ; Feed intake ; Forage ; Forest management ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; HARES ; Herbivores ; LEPUS AMERICANUS ; LIEBRE ; LIEVRE ; LUTTE ANTIRONGEUR ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; PICEA GLAUCA ; Rabbits ; RODENT CONTROL ; THIRAM ; THIRAME ; TIRAM ; Vertebrates ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 1993-07, Vol.57 (3), p.648-651</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Jul 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-8c274572a9f74bac359dbbfbea8c9c622c88c5e84f2692c65298329d887c68433</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3809295$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3809295$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3768839$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rangen, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawley, A.W.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, R.J</creatorcontrib><title>Response of captive snowshoe hares to thiram-treated conifers</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>The retention time required for snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) to maintain a feeding aversion to thiram has important forestry management implications. Thus, we investigated the forage preferences of captive hares for thiram-treated and untreated white spruce (Picea glauca) with animals having either previous exposure or no exposure to treated twigs. Thiram reduced the mean consumption of spruce twigs by previously exposed and naive hares 9-fold and 5-fold, respectively. Previously exposed hares had an untreated spruce intake 2-fold that of naive hares. The decreased consumption of untreated twigs by naive hares in comparison to previously exposed hares suggested that naive animals had developed a generalized aversion to spruce twigs or that previously exposed hares were more adept at differentiating treatment types. The consumption of similar amounts of white spruce treated with thiram by both types of experience groups indicated that a learned food aversion had not been established with previously exposed animals or that extinction of the aversion had occurred. In the wild, even if hares acquired an aversion for treated conifers during autumn through spring, extinction of the aversion would likely occur over the summer months. Consequently, this would not only necessitate the reapplication of thiram more frequently than feasible for foresters, but would also require a reconditioning period for hares during which conifers would be susceptible to browsing damage.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>ALBERTA</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal feeding behavior</subject><subject>Animal science</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Browsing</subject><subject>BROWSING DAMAGE</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Conifers</subject><subject>CONTROL DE ROEDORES</subject><subject>DANOS POR RAMONEO</subject><subject>DEGAT DU AU BROUTAGE</subject><subject>Feed intake</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>HARES</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>LEPUS AMERICANUS</subject><subject>LIEBRE</subject><subject>LIEVRE</subject><subject>LUTTE ANTIRONGEUR</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>PICEA GLAUCA</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>RODENT CONTROL</subject><subject>THIRAM</subject><subject>THIRAME</subject><subject>TIRAM</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M9LwzAYxvEgCs4p3j0VETxVkzdNkxw8yPAXDAR14K2kWeI6tqbmzRT_eysrevP0Xj58X3gIOWb0AjiVl1xRDVrskBHTXOagmNwlI0oBclGw131ygLiklDOmyhG5enLYhRZdFnxmTZeaD5dhGz5xEVy2MNFhlkKWFk006zxFZ5KbZza0jXcRD8meNyt0R8Mdk9ntzcvkPp8-3j1Mrqe5BaFTrizIQkgw2suiNpYLPa9rXzujrLYlgFXKCqcKD6UGWwrQioOeKyVtqQrOx-R02-1ieN84TNUybGLbv6yAFwBactaj8y2yMSBG56suNmsTvypGq59pqmGaXp4NOYPWrHw0rW3wl3NZKsX1H1tiCvGf2smWeRMq8xb70uxZF0AFB_4NS0h0ng</recordid><startdate>19930701</startdate><enddate>19930701</enddate><creator>Rangen, S.A</creator><creator>Hawley, A.W.L</creator><creator>Hudson, R.J</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930701</creationdate><title>Response of captive snowshoe hares to thiram-treated conifers</title><author>Rangen, S.A ; Hawley, A.W.L ; Hudson, R.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c259t-8c274572a9f74bac359dbbfbea8c9c622c88c5e84f2692c65298329d887c68433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>ALBERTA</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal feeding behavior</topic><topic>Animal science</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Browsing</topic><topic>BROWSING DAMAGE</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Conifers</topic><topic>CONTROL DE ROEDORES</topic><topic>DANOS POR RAMONEO</topic><topic>DEGAT DU AU BROUTAGE</topic><topic>Feed intake</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>HARES</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>LEPUS AMERICANUS</topic><topic>LIEBRE</topic><topic>LIEVRE</topic><topic>LUTTE ANTIRONGEUR</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>PICEA GLAUCA</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>RODENT CONTROL</topic><topic>THIRAM</topic><topic>THIRAME</topic><topic>TIRAM</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rangen, S.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawley, A.W.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hudson, R.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rangen, S.A</au><au>Hawley, A.W.L</au><au>Hudson, R.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response of captive snowshoe hares to thiram-treated conifers</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>1993-07-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>648</spage><epage>651</epage><pages>648-651</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>The retention time required for snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) to maintain a feeding aversion to thiram has important forestry management implications. Thus, we investigated the forage preferences of captive hares for thiram-treated and untreated white spruce (Picea glauca) with animals having either previous exposure or no exposure to treated twigs. Thiram reduced the mean consumption of spruce twigs by previously exposed and naive hares 9-fold and 5-fold, respectively. Previously exposed hares had an untreated spruce intake 2-fold that of naive hares. The decreased consumption of untreated twigs by naive hares in comparison to previously exposed hares suggested that naive animals had developed a generalized aversion to spruce twigs or that previously exposed hares were more adept at differentiating treatment types. The consumption of similar amounts of white spruce treated with thiram by both types of experience groups indicated that a learned food aversion had not been established with previously exposed animals or that extinction of the aversion had occurred. In the wild, even if hares acquired an aversion for treated conifers during autumn through spring, extinction of the aversion would likely occur over the summer months. Consequently, this would not only necessitate the reapplication of thiram more frequently than feasible for foresters, but would also require a reconditioning period for hares during which conifers would be susceptible to browsing damage.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3809295</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 1993-07, Vol.57 (3), p.648-651
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_234229731
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
ALBERTA
Animal behavior
Animal feeding behavior
Animal science
Biological and medical sciences
Browsing
BROWSING DAMAGE
Coniferous forests
Conifers
CONTROL DE ROEDORES
DANOS POR RAMONEO
DEGAT DU AU BROUTAGE
Feed intake
Forage
Forest management
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
HARES
Herbivores
LEPUS AMERICANUS
LIEBRE
LIEVRE
LUTTE ANTIRONGEUR
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
PICEA GLAUCA
Rabbits
RODENT CONTROL
THIRAM
THIRAME
TIRAM
Vertebrates
Wildlife conservation
title Response of captive snowshoe hares to thiram-treated conifers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T07%3A49%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20of%20captive%20snowshoe%20hares%20to%20thiram-treated%20conifers&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Rangen,%20S.A&rft.date=1993-07-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=648&rft.epage=651&rft.pages=648-651&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3809295&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3809295%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234229731&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3809295&rfr_iscdi=true