Refining the Equation for Interpreting Prey Occurrence in Gray Wolf Scats

The degree to which relative frequencies of large ungulates in wolf scats represent the proportion of prey consumed is unknown. Thus, I fed mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), elk (Cervus elaphus), and moose (Alces alces) carcasses to 3 captive gray wolves (Canis lupis; hereafter referred to as wolves)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 1993-07, Vol.57 (3), p.534-538
1. Verfasser: Weaver, John L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 538
container_issue 3
container_start_page 534
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 57
creator Weaver, John L.
description The degree to which relative frequencies of large ungulates in wolf scats represent the proportion of prey consumed is unknown. Thus, I fed mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), elk (Cervus elaphus), and moose (Alces alces) carcasses to 3 captive gray wolves (Canis lupis; hereafter referred to as wolves) to refine interpretation of prey occurrence in wolf scats. The mass (kg) of prey per collectable scat (Y) increased as the body mass of prey (X) increased (r2=0.96). The slope of the linear regression (b = 0.008) differed (P < 0.001) from that of Floyd et al. (1978) (b = 0.020), but not from that of Traves (1983) (b = 0.011) (P = 0.13). I recommend using an equation (Y = 0.439 + 0.008X) derived from combined studies that spans prey sizes from snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) to adult moose and is robust to variable field conditions. Maximum bias of up to 50% using frequency of occurrence (percentage of scats) occurs when 1 very small (e.g., beaver [Castor canadensis]) and 1 very large (e.g., adult moose) prey make up 20-80% of the scats. Previous studies that have extrapolated from the Floyd et al. (1978) equation for interpreting occurrence of adult elk and moose in wolf scats may have overestimated relative numbers and biomass of these large cervids by up to 18%.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3809278
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_234207832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3809278</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3809278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f1fde4615559214c39af9c44648022e1992aae8ec67b51cbeac7eeb1e4b71d643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv4F4IIrkbzmklmKaXWQqHiA90NmfRGp9RMe5NZ9N87pUVXrs7ifnz3cAi55OxWSKbvpGGl0OaIDHgpdSYM18dkwJgQWa74xyk5i3HJmOTcFAMyfQbfhCZ80vQFdLzpbGraQH2LdBoS4Boh7a5PCFs6d65DhOCANoFO0G7pe7vy9MXZFM_JiberCBeHHJK3h_Hr6DGbzSfT0f0sc1KrlHnuF6AKnud5KbhysrS-dEoVyvQVgZelsBYMuELXOXc1WKcBag6q1nxRKDkkV3vvGttNBzFVy7bD0L-shFSCaSNFD93sIYdtjAi-WmPzbXFbcVbtZqoOM_Xk9UFno7Mrjza4Jv7iUhdacvWHLWNq8V_bDxcqcLk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234207832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Refining the Equation for Interpreting Prey Occurrence in Gray Wolf Scats</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Weaver, John L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weaver, John L.</creatorcontrib><description>The degree to which relative frequencies of large ungulates in wolf scats represent the proportion of prey consumed is unknown. Thus, I fed mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), elk (Cervus elaphus), and moose (Alces alces) carcasses to 3 captive gray wolves (Canis lupis; hereafter referred to as wolves) to refine interpretation of prey occurrence in wolf scats. The mass (kg) of prey per collectable scat (Y) increased as the body mass of prey (X) increased (r2=0.96). The slope of the linear regression (b = 0.008) differed (P &lt; 0.001) from that of Floyd et al. (1978) (b = 0.020), but not from that of Traves (1983) (b = 0.011) (P = 0.13). I recommend using an equation (Y = 0.439 + 0.008X) derived from combined studies that spans prey sizes from snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) to adult moose and is robust to variable field conditions. Maximum bias of up to 50% using frequency of occurrence (percentage of scats) occurs when 1 very small (e.g., beaver [Castor canadensis]) and 1 very large (e.g., adult moose) prey make up 20-80% of the scats. Previous studies that have extrapolated from the Floyd et al. (1978) equation for interpreting occurrence of adult elk and moose in wolf scats may have overestimated relative numbers and biomass of these large cervids by up to 18%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3809278</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Animal physiology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Collecting ; Deer ; Diet ; Elk ; Elks ; Experimentation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Mule deer ; Predation ; Prey ; Ungulates ; Wolves</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 1993-07, Vol.57 (3), p.534-538</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1993 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>1994 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Jul 1993</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f1fde4615559214c39af9c44648022e1992aae8ec67b51cbeac7eeb1e4b71d643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3809278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3809278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3767314$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weaver, John L.</creatorcontrib><title>Refining the Equation for Interpreting Prey Occurrence in Gray Wolf Scats</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>The degree to which relative frequencies of large ungulates in wolf scats represent the proportion of prey consumed is unknown. Thus, I fed mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), elk (Cervus elaphus), and moose (Alces alces) carcasses to 3 captive gray wolves (Canis lupis; hereafter referred to as wolves) to refine interpretation of prey occurrence in wolf scats. The mass (kg) of prey per collectable scat (Y) increased as the body mass of prey (X) increased (r2=0.96). The slope of the linear regression (b = 0.008) differed (P &lt; 0.001) from that of Floyd et al. (1978) (b = 0.020), but not from that of Traves (1983) (b = 0.011) (P = 0.13). I recommend using an equation (Y = 0.439 + 0.008X) derived from combined studies that spans prey sizes from snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) to adult moose and is robust to variable field conditions. Maximum bias of up to 50% using frequency of occurrence (percentage of scats) occurs when 1 very small (e.g., beaver [Castor canadensis]) and 1 very large (e.g., adult moose) prey make up 20-80% of the scats. Previous studies that have extrapolated from the Floyd et al. (1978) equation for interpreting occurrence of adult elk and moose in wolf scats may have overestimated relative numbers and biomass of these large cervids by up to 18%.</description><subject>Animal physiology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Collecting</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Elk</subject><subject>Elks</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Mule deer</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Ungulates</subject><subject>Wolves</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv4F4IIrkbzmklmKaXWQqHiA90NmfRGp9RMe5NZ9N87pUVXrs7ifnz3cAi55OxWSKbvpGGl0OaIDHgpdSYM18dkwJgQWa74xyk5i3HJmOTcFAMyfQbfhCZ80vQFdLzpbGraQH2LdBoS4Boh7a5PCFs6d65DhOCANoFO0G7pe7vy9MXZFM_JiberCBeHHJK3h_Hr6DGbzSfT0f0sc1KrlHnuF6AKnud5KbhysrS-dEoVyvQVgZelsBYMuELXOXc1WKcBag6q1nxRKDkkV3vvGttNBzFVy7bD0L-shFSCaSNFD93sIYdtjAi-WmPzbXFbcVbtZqoOM_Xk9UFno7Mrjza4Jv7iUhdacvWHLWNq8V_bDxcqcLk</recordid><startdate>19930701</startdate><enddate>19930701</enddate><creator>Weaver, John L.</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930701</creationdate><title>Refining the Equation for Interpreting Prey Occurrence in Gray Wolf Scats</title><author>Weaver, John L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-f1fde4615559214c39af9c44648022e1992aae8ec67b51cbeac7eeb1e4b71d643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Animal physiology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Collecting</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Elk</topic><topic>Elks</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Mule deer</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Ungulates</topic><topic>Wolves</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weaver, John L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weaver, John L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Refining the Equation for Interpreting Prey Occurrence in Gray Wolf Scats</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>1993-07-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>534</spage><epage>538</epage><pages>534-538</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>The degree to which relative frequencies of large ungulates in wolf scats represent the proportion of prey consumed is unknown. Thus, I fed mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), elk (Cervus elaphus), and moose (Alces alces) carcasses to 3 captive gray wolves (Canis lupis; hereafter referred to as wolves) to refine interpretation of prey occurrence in wolf scats. The mass (kg) of prey per collectable scat (Y) increased as the body mass of prey (X) increased (r2=0.96). The slope of the linear regression (b = 0.008) differed (P &lt; 0.001) from that of Floyd et al. (1978) (b = 0.020), but not from that of Traves (1983) (b = 0.011) (P = 0.13). I recommend using an equation (Y = 0.439 + 0.008X) derived from combined studies that spans prey sizes from snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) to adult moose and is robust to variable field conditions. Maximum bias of up to 50% using frequency of occurrence (percentage of scats) occurs when 1 very small (e.g., beaver [Castor canadensis]) and 1 very large (e.g., adult moose) prey make up 20-80% of the scats. Previous studies that have extrapolated from the Floyd et al. (1978) equation for interpreting occurrence of adult elk and moose in wolf scats may have overestimated relative numbers and biomass of these large cervids by up to 18%.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3809278</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 1993-07, Vol.57 (3), p.534-538
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_234207832
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Animal physiology
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Collecting
Deer
Diet
Elk
Elks
Experimentation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects. Techniques
Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)
Mule deer
Predation
Prey
Ungulates
Wolves
title Refining the Equation for Interpreting Prey Occurrence in Gray Wolf Scats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T03%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Refining%20the%20Equation%20for%20Interpreting%20Prey%20Occurrence%20in%20Gray%20Wolf%20Scats&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Weaver,%20John%20L.&rft.date=1993-07-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=534&rft.epage=538&rft.pages=534-538&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3809278&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3809278%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234207832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3809278&rfr_iscdi=true