Voter uncertainty, political institutions, and legislative turnover

The level of legislative turnover in a polity can have significant political consequences. Low turnover may increase the number of legislators who are out of touch with constituents, while high turnover can limit a legislature’s ability to fulfill its duties. Focusing on separation of powers arrange...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political science research and methods 2020-01, Vol.8 (1), p.14-29
Hauptverfasser: Krupnikov, Yanna, Shipan, Charles R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue 1
container_start_page 14
container_title Political science research and methods
container_volume 8
creator Krupnikov, Yanna
Shipan, Charles R.
description The level of legislative turnover in a polity can have significant political consequences. Low turnover may increase the number of legislators who are out of touch with constituents, while high turnover can limit a legislature’s ability to fulfill its duties. Focusing on separation of powers arrangements, a factor overlooked by previous studies, we identify institutional conditions that affect turnover. When the executive and legislature are equally responsible for budgetary outcomes, we argue, this creates ambiguous contexts, leaving voters more likely to re-elect incumbents, thereby lowering turnover. We test our predictions using US state-level data.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/psrm.2018.32
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2341450365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2341450365</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-bcff180ce0f04ad2f1faf1429afd5f95365e40385c3fea63f29c3feed4dbf0e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9Lw0AUxBdRsNTe_AABr018-ydp9ihBrVDwol6X7eatbEmzcXdT6Lc3oeJc3hyGecOPkHsKBQW6eRxiOBYMaF1wdkUWDITMa1HL63-_gVuyivEAkySUlRQL0nz5hCEbe4Mhaden8zobfOeSM7rLXB-TS2Nyvo_rTPdt1uG3i51O7oRZGkPvTxjuyI3VXcTV312Sz5fnj2ab795f35qnXW5YxVO-N9bSGgyCBaFbZqnVlgomtW1LK0telSiA16XhFnXFLZOzw1a0ewtY8SV5uPQOwf-MGJM6-GnC9FIxLqgoYaqYUutLygQfY0CrhuCOOpwVBTWTUjMpNZNSnPFfpxleIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2341450365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voter uncertainty, political institutions, and legislative turnover</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Krupnikov, Yanna ; Shipan, Charles R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Krupnikov, Yanna ; Shipan, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><description>The level of legislative turnover in a polity can have significant political consequences. Low turnover may increase the number of legislators who are out of touch with constituents, while high turnover can limit a legislature’s ability to fulfill its duties. Focusing on separation of powers arrangements, a factor overlooked by previous studies, we identify institutional conditions that affect turnover. When the executive and legislature are equally responsible for budgetary outcomes, we argue, this creates ambiguous contexts, leaving voters more likely to re-elect incumbents, thereby lowering turnover. We test our predictions using US state-level data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-8470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2018.32</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Constituents ; Legislators ; Legislatures ; Political institutions ; Political systems ; Politics ; Separation of powers ; States ; Studies ; Term limitations ; Voter behavior ; Voters</subject><ispartof>Political science research and methods, 2020-01, Vol.8 (1), p.14-29</ispartof><rights>Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-bcff180ce0f04ad2f1faf1429afd5f95365e40385c3fea63f29c3feed4dbf0e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-bcff180ce0f04ad2f1faf1429afd5f95365e40385c3fea63f29c3feed4dbf0e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12824,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krupnikov, Yanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipan, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><title>Voter uncertainty, political institutions, and legislative turnover</title><title>Political science research and methods</title><description>The level of legislative turnover in a polity can have significant political consequences. Low turnover may increase the number of legislators who are out of touch with constituents, while high turnover can limit a legislature’s ability to fulfill its duties. Focusing on separation of powers arrangements, a factor overlooked by previous studies, we identify institutional conditions that affect turnover. When the executive and legislature are equally responsible for budgetary outcomes, we argue, this creates ambiguous contexts, leaving voters more likely to re-elect incumbents, thereby lowering turnover. We test our predictions using US state-level data.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Constituents</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Political systems</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Separation of powers</subject><subject>States</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Term limitations</subject><subject>Voter behavior</subject><subject>Voters</subject><issn>2049-8470</issn><issn>2049-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9Lw0AUxBdRsNTe_AABr018-ydp9ihBrVDwol6X7eatbEmzcXdT6Lc3oeJc3hyGecOPkHsKBQW6eRxiOBYMaF1wdkUWDITMa1HL63-_gVuyivEAkySUlRQL0nz5hCEbe4Mhaden8zobfOeSM7rLXB-TS2Nyvo_rTPdt1uG3i51O7oRZGkPvTxjuyI3VXcTV312Sz5fnj2ab795f35qnXW5YxVO-N9bSGgyCBaFbZqnVlgomtW1LK0telSiA16XhFnXFLZOzw1a0ewtY8SV5uPQOwf-MGJM6-GnC9FIxLqgoYaqYUutLygQfY0CrhuCOOpwVBTWTUjMpNZNSnPFfpxleIA</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Krupnikov, Yanna</creator><creator>Shipan, Charles R.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Voter uncertainty, political institutions, and legislative turnover</title><author>Krupnikov, Yanna ; Shipan, Charles R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-bcff180ce0f04ad2f1faf1429afd5f95365e40385c3fea63f29c3feed4dbf0e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Constituents</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Political systems</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Separation of powers</topic><topic>States</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Term limitations</topic><topic>Voter behavior</topic><topic>Voters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krupnikov, Yanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipan, Charles R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krupnikov, Yanna</au><au>Shipan, Charles R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Voter uncertainty, political institutions, and legislative turnover</atitle><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>14-29</pages><issn>2049-8470</issn><eissn>2049-8489</eissn><abstract>The level of legislative turnover in a polity can have significant political consequences. Low turnover may increase the number of legislators who are out of touch with constituents, while high turnover can limit a legislature’s ability to fulfill its duties. Focusing on separation of powers arrangements, a factor overlooked by previous studies, we identify institutional conditions that affect turnover. When the executive and legislature are equally responsible for budgetary outcomes, we argue, this creates ambiguous contexts, leaving voters more likely to re-elect incumbents, thereby lowering turnover. We test our predictions using US state-level data.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/psrm.2018.32</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-8470
ispartof Political science research and methods, 2020-01, Vol.8 (1), p.14-29
issn 2049-8470
2049-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2341450365
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Ambiguity
Constituents
Legislators
Legislatures
Political institutions
Political systems
Politics
Separation of powers
States
Studies
Term limitations
Voter behavior
Voters
title Voter uncertainty, political institutions, and legislative turnover
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A20%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voter%20uncertainty,%20political%20institutions,%20and%20legislative%20turnover&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20research%20and%20methods&rft.au=Krupnikov,%20Yanna&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=14-29&rft.issn=2049-8470&rft.eissn=2049-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/psrm.2018.32&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2341450365%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2341450365&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true