Quantifying terrain controls on runoff retention and routing in the Northern Prairies

The role of hummocky terrain in governing runoff routing and focussing groundwater recharge in the Northern Prairies of North America is widely recognised. However, most hydrological studies in the region have not effectively utilised information on the surficial geology and associated landforms in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological processes 2020-01, Vol.34 (2), p.473-484
Hauptverfasser: Pavlovskii, Igor, Noorduijn, Saskia L., Liggett, Jessica E., Klassen, Jeanette, Hayashi, Masaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 484
container_issue 2
container_start_page 473
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 34
creator Pavlovskii, Igor
Noorduijn, Saskia L.
Liggett, Jessica E.
Klassen, Jeanette
Hayashi, Masaki
description The role of hummocky terrain in governing runoff routing and focussing groundwater recharge in the Northern Prairies of North America is widely recognised. However, most hydrological studies in the region have not effectively utilised information on the surficial geology and associated landforms in large‐scale hydrological characterization. The present study uses an automated digital elevation model (DEM) analysis of a 6500‐km2 area in the Northern Prairies to quantify hydrologically relevant terrain parameters for the common types of terrains in the prairies with different surficial deposits widespread in the prairies, namely, moraines and glaciolacustrine deposits. Runoff retention (and storage) capacity within depressions varies greatly between different surficial deposits and is comparable in magnitude with a typical amount of seasonal snowmelt runoff generation. The terrain constraint on potential runoff retention varies from a few millimetres in areas classified as moraine to tens of millimetres in areas classified as stagnant ice moraine deposits. Fluted moraine and glaciolacustrine deposits have intermediate storage capacity values. The study also identified the probability density function describing a number of immediate upstream neighbours for each depression in a fill‐and‐spill network. A relationship between depression parameters and surficial deposits, as well as identified depression network structure, allows parametrisation of hydrologic models outside of the high‐resolution DEM coverage, which can still account for terrain variation in the Prairies. Hydrologically relevant terrain parameters were extracted from high‐resolution DEM covering over 2000 km2 and were linked to the types of surficial deposits.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.13599
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2341386135</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2341386135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3209-aba75c9e516f7f142cd918d015c958731f5cf432f0cc3e1a7870a1a29c49d3893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLwzAUgIMoOKcH_0HAk0i3l6ZZk6MMdcLQCe7gqWRp4jpmMpMU6b83s8Ob4OnB4_uSx4fQJYERAcjH6243IpQJcYQGBITICHB2jAbAOcsmwMtTdBbCBgAK4DBAy5dW2tiYrrHvOGrvZWOxcjZ6tw3YWexb64zBXkeduLSQtsbetXEvJDauNX5yPg1v8SLpvtHhHJ0YuQ364jCHaHl_9zqdZfPnh8fp7TyTNAeRyZUsmRKakYkpDSlyVQvCayBpyXhJiWHKFDQ3oBTVRJa8BElkLlQhasoFHaKr_t2dd5-tDrHauNbb9GWV04JQPkktEnXdU8q7ELw21c43H9J3FYFqX61K1aqfaonlPfulV84E1Wir9C-fsjEQrODJgjyfNlHum0xda2NSb_6vJnp8oJut7v6-qJq9LfrTvgFlBo-n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2341386135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantifying terrain controls on runoff retention and routing in the Northern Prairies</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Pavlovskii, Igor ; Noorduijn, Saskia L. ; Liggett, Jessica E. ; Klassen, Jeanette ; Hayashi, Masaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Pavlovskii, Igor ; Noorduijn, Saskia L. ; Liggett, Jessica E. ; Klassen, Jeanette ; Hayashi, Masaki</creatorcontrib><description>The role of hummocky terrain in governing runoff routing and focussing groundwater recharge in the Northern Prairies of North America is widely recognised. However, most hydrological studies in the region have not effectively utilised information on the surficial geology and associated landforms in large‐scale hydrological characterization. The present study uses an automated digital elevation model (DEM) analysis of a 6500‐km2 area in the Northern Prairies to quantify hydrologically relevant terrain parameters for the common types of terrains in the prairies with different surficial deposits widespread in the prairies, namely, moraines and glaciolacustrine deposits. Runoff retention (and storage) capacity within depressions varies greatly between different surficial deposits and is comparable in magnitude with a typical amount of seasonal snowmelt runoff generation. The terrain constraint on potential runoff retention varies from a few millimetres in areas classified as moraine to tens of millimetres in areas classified as stagnant ice moraine deposits. Fluted moraine and glaciolacustrine deposits have intermediate storage capacity values. The study also identified the probability density function describing a number of immediate upstream neighbours for each depression in a fill‐and‐spill network. A relationship between depression parameters and surficial deposits, as well as identified depression network structure, allows parametrisation of hydrologic models outside of the high‐resolution DEM coverage, which can still account for terrain variation in the Prairies. Hydrologically relevant terrain parameters were extracted from high‐resolution DEM covering over 2000 km2 and were linked to the types of surficial deposits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.13599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>DEM analysis ; Deposits ; Digital Elevation Models ; Geology ; Groundwater ; Groundwater recharge ; Groundwater runoff ; hummocky ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrologic studies ; Hydrology ; Identification ; Lake deposits ; Landforms ; LiDAR ; Moraines ; Parameter identification ; Parameterization ; Parameters ; Physical Sciences ; Prairies ; Probability density function ; Probability density functions ; Probability theory ; recharge ; Retention ; Routing ; Runoff ; runoff retention ; runoff routing ; Science &amp; Technology ; Snowmelt ; Snowmelt runoff ; Storage capacity ; Storage conditions ; Terrain ; Water Resources</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2020-01, Vol.34 (2), p.473-484</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>6</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000509548100022</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3209-aba75c9e516f7f142cd918d015c958731f5cf432f0cc3e1a7870a1a29c49d3893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3209-aba75c9e516f7f142cd918d015c958731f5cf432f0cc3e1a7870a1a29c49d3893</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7232-0351 ; 0000-0002-2898-6102 ; 0000-0003-4890-3113</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.13599$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.13599$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,28255,45581,45582</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pavlovskii, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorduijn, Saskia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liggett, Jessica E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Jeanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Masaki</creatorcontrib><title>Quantifying terrain controls on runoff retention and routing in the Northern Prairies</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>HYDROL PROCESS</addtitle><description>The role of hummocky terrain in governing runoff routing and focussing groundwater recharge in the Northern Prairies of North America is widely recognised. However, most hydrological studies in the region have not effectively utilised information on the surficial geology and associated landforms in large‐scale hydrological characterization. The present study uses an automated digital elevation model (DEM) analysis of a 6500‐km2 area in the Northern Prairies to quantify hydrologically relevant terrain parameters for the common types of terrains in the prairies with different surficial deposits widespread in the prairies, namely, moraines and glaciolacustrine deposits. Runoff retention (and storage) capacity within depressions varies greatly between different surficial deposits and is comparable in magnitude with a typical amount of seasonal snowmelt runoff generation. The terrain constraint on potential runoff retention varies from a few millimetres in areas classified as moraine to tens of millimetres in areas classified as stagnant ice moraine deposits. Fluted moraine and glaciolacustrine deposits have intermediate storage capacity values. The study also identified the probability density function describing a number of immediate upstream neighbours for each depression in a fill‐and‐spill network. A relationship between depression parameters and surficial deposits, as well as identified depression network structure, allows parametrisation of hydrologic models outside of the high‐resolution DEM coverage, which can still account for terrain variation in the Prairies. Hydrologically relevant terrain parameters were extracted from high‐resolution DEM covering over 2000 km2 and were linked to the types of surficial deposits.</description><subject>DEM analysis</subject><subject>Deposits</subject><subject>Digital Elevation Models</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater recharge</subject><subject>Groundwater runoff</subject><subject>hummocky</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrologic studies</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Lake deposits</subject><subject>Landforms</subject><subject>LiDAR</subject><subject>Moraines</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Probability density function</subject><subject>Probability density functions</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>recharge</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Routing</subject><subject>Runoff</subject><subject>runoff retention</subject><subject>runoff routing</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Snowmelt</subject><subject>Snowmelt runoff</subject><subject>Storage capacity</subject><subject>Storage conditions</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Water Resources</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFLwzAUgIMoOKcH_0HAk0i3l6ZZk6MMdcLQCe7gqWRp4jpmMpMU6b83s8Ob4OnB4_uSx4fQJYERAcjH6243IpQJcYQGBITICHB2jAbAOcsmwMtTdBbCBgAK4DBAy5dW2tiYrrHvOGrvZWOxcjZ6tw3YWexb64zBXkeduLSQtsbetXEvJDauNX5yPg1v8SLpvtHhHJ0YuQ364jCHaHl_9zqdZfPnh8fp7TyTNAeRyZUsmRKakYkpDSlyVQvCayBpyXhJiWHKFDQ3oBTVRJa8BElkLlQhasoFHaKr_t2dd5-tDrHauNbb9GWV04JQPkktEnXdU8q7ELw21c43H9J3FYFqX61K1aqfaonlPfulV84E1Wir9C-fsjEQrODJgjyfNlHum0xda2NSb_6vJnp8oJut7v6-qJq9LfrTvgFlBo-n</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Pavlovskii, Igor</creator><creator>Noorduijn, Saskia L.</creator><creator>Liggett, Jessica E.</creator><creator>Klassen, Jeanette</creator><creator>Hayashi, Masaki</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-0351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2898-6102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-3113</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Quantifying terrain controls on runoff retention and routing in the Northern Prairies</title><author>Pavlovskii, Igor ; Noorduijn, Saskia L. ; Liggett, Jessica E. ; Klassen, Jeanette ; Hayashi, Masaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3209-aba75c9e516f7f142cd918d015c958731f5cf432f0cc3e1a7870a1a29c49d3893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>DEM analysis</topic><topic>Deposits</topic><topic>Digital Elevation Models</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater recharge</topic><topic>Groundwater runoff</topic><topic>hummocky</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrologic studies</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Lake deposits</topic><topic>Landforms</topic><topic>LiDAR</topic><topic>Moraines</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Probability density function</topic><topic>Probability density functions</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>recharge</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Routing</topic><topic>Runoff</topic><topic>runoff retention</topic><topic>runoff routing</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Snowmelt</topic><topic>Snowmelt runoff</topic><topic>Storage capacity</topic><topic>Storage conditions</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Water Resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pavlovskii, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorduijn, Saskia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liggett, Jessica E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klassen, Jeanette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayashi, Masaki</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pavlovskii, Igor</au><au>Noorduijn, Saskia L.</au><au>Liggett, Jessica E.</au><au>Klassen, Jeanette</au><au>Hayashi, Masaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantifying terrain controls on runoff retention and routing in the Northern Prairies</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><stitle>HYDROL PROCESS</stitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>484</epage><pages>473-484</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>The role of hummocky terrain in governing runoff routing and focussing groundwater recharge in the Northern Prairies of North America is widely recognised. However, most hydrological studies in the region have not effectively utilised information on the surficial geology and associated landforms in large‐scale hydrological characterization. The present study uses an automated digital elevation model (DEM) analysis of a 6500‐km2 area in the Northern Prairies to quantify hydrologically relevant terrain parameters for the common types of terrains in the prairies with different surficial deposits widespread in the prairies, namely, moraines and glaciolacustrine deposits. Runoff retention (and storage) capacity within depressions varies greatly between different surficial deposits and is comparable in magnitude with a typical amount of seasonal snowmelt runoff generation. The terrain constraint on potential runoff retention varies from a few millimetres in areas classified as moraine to tens of millimetres in areas classified as stagnant ice moraine deposits. Fluted moraine and glaciolacustrine deposits have intermediate storage capacity values. The study also identified the probability density function describing a number of immediate upstream neighbours for each depression in a fill‐and‐spill network. A relationship between depression parameters and surficial deposits, as well as identified depression network structure, allows parametrisation of hydrologic models outside of the high‐resolution DEM coverage, which can still account for terrain variation in the Prairies. Hydrologically relevant terrain parameters were extracted from high‐resolution DEM covering over 2000 km2 and were linked to the types of surficial deposits.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.13599</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7232-0351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2898-6102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4890-3113</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2020-01, Vol.34 (2), p.473-484
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2341386135
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects DEM analysis
Deposits
Digital Elevation Models
Geology
Groundwater
Groundwater recharge
Groundwater runoff
hummocky
Hydrologic models
Hydrologic studies
Hydrology
Identification
Lake deposits
Landforms
LiDAR
Moraines
Parameter identification
Parameterization
Parameters
Physical Sciences
Prairies
Probability density function
Probability density functions
Probability theory
recharge
Retention
Routing
Runoff
runoff retention
runoff routing
Science & Technology
Snowmelt
Snowmelt runoff
Storage capacity
Storage conditions
Terrain
Water Resources
title Quantifying terrain controls on runoff retention and routing in the Northern Prairies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T03%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantifying%20terrain%20controls%20on%20runoff%20retention%20and%20routing%20in%20the%20Northern%20Prairies&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Pavlovskii,%20Igor&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=484&rft.pages=473-484&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.13599&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2341386135%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2341386135&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true