Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests
Functional responses describe how changing resource availability affects consumer resource use, thus providing a mechanistic approach to prediction of the invasibility and potential damage of invasive alien species (IAS). However, functional responses can be context dependent, varying with resource...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.1-14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 14 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Wilber, Mark Q. Chinn, Sarah M. Beasley, James C. Boughton, Raoul K. Brook, Ryan K. Ditchkoff, Stephen S. Fischer, Justin W. Hartley, Steve B. Holmstrom, Lindsey K. Kilgo, John C. Lewis, Jesse S. Miller, Ryan S. Snow, Nathan P. VerCauteren, Kurt C. Wisely, Samantha M. Webb, Colleen T. Pepin, Kim M. |
description | Functional responses describe how changing resource availability affects consumer resource use, thus providing a mechanistic approach to prediction of the invasibility and potential damage of invasive alien species (IAS). However, functional responses can be context dependent, varying with resource characteristics and availability, consumer attributes, and environmental variables. Identifying context dependencies can allow invasion and damage risk to be predicted across different ecoregions. Understanding how ecological factors shape the functional response in agro-ecosystems can improve predictions of hotspots of highest impact and inform strategies to mitigate damage across locations with varying crop types and availability. We linked heterogeneous movement data across different agro-ecosystems to predict ecologically driven variability in the functional responses. We applied our approach to wild pigs (Sus scrofa), one of the most successful and detrimental IAS worldwide where agricultural resource depredation is an important driver of spread and establishment. We used continentalscale movement data within agro-ecosystems to quantify the functional response of agricultural resources relative to availability of crops and natural forage. We hypothesized that wild pigs would selectively use crops more often when natural forage resources were low. We also examined how individual attributes such as sex, crop type, and resource stimulus such as distance to crops altered the magnitude of the functional response. There was a strong agricultural functional response where crop use was an accelerating function of crop availability at low density (Type III) and was highly context dependent. As hypothesized, there was a reduced response of crop use with increasing crop availability when non-agricultural resources were more available, emphasizing that crop damage levels are likely to be highly heterogeneous depending on surrounding natural resources and temporal availability of crops. We found significant effects of crop type and sex, with males spending 20% more time and visiting crops 58% more often than females, and both sexes showing different functional responses depending on crop type. Our application demonstrates how commonly collected animal movement data can be used to understand context dependencies in resource use to improve our understanding of pest foraging behavior, with implications for prioritizing spatiotemporal hotspots of potential economic loss in |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eap.2015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2339810241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26870838</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26870838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-d4d25d441e7fbce876540dfbe05a9fafd156ab365c9e4115e4790ba4ea2c6f663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpaT5a6B9oEfSSixNJlmTpGEKSFgLNoTkb2R4tXizJ1dgJ---rZbcpFKqLhtHDM2JeQj5xdskZE1fg5kvBuHpDTrmtbaWUEW9LzRSvWKP5CTlD3LJyhBDvyUnNldXWyFOyPGYYxn4Z44b6NZYiRTfRDDiniIB0jNRtcqqgT7jDBQJSn1OgLo6hgCE9Q4C40MEtji6JjmHOpUeDi25zeEq-WJ4djqU9Ay74gbzzbkL4eLzPydPd7c-bb9XDj_vvN9cPVS-ZVNUgB6EGKTk0vuvBNFpJNvgOmHLWOz9wpV1Xa9VbkJwrkI1lnZPgRK-91vU5uTh4y5d-rWVyG0bsYZpchLRiK2pjmsZKu0e__oNu05rLKvZUbQ1nQvK_wj4nxAy-nXNZQ961nLX7JNqSRLtPoqBfjsK1CzC8gn9WX4DqALyME-z-K2pvrx-Pws8HfotLyq-80KZhpjb1byYtnXY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2339810241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wilber, Mark Q. ; Chinn, Sarah M. ; Beasley, James C. ; Boughton, Raoul K. ; Brook, Ryan K. ; Ditchkoff, Stephen S. ; Fischer, Justin W. ; Hartley, Steve B. ; Holmstrom, Lindsey K. ; Kilgo, John C. ; Lewis, Jesse S. ; Miller, Ryan S. ; Snow, Nathan P. ; VerCauteren, Kurt C. ; Wisely, Samantha M. ; Webb, Colleen T. ; Pepin, Kim M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilber, Mark Q. ; Chinn, Sarah M. ; Beasley, James C. ; Boughton, Raoul K. ; Brook, Ryan K. ; Ditchkoff, Stephen S. ; Fischer, Justin W. ; Hartley, Steve B. ; Holmstrom, Lindsey K. ; Kilgo, John C. ; Lewis, Jesse S. ; Miller, Ryan S. ; Snow, Nathan P. ; VerCauteren, Kurt C. ; Wisely, Samantha M. ; Webb, Colleen T. ; Pepin, Kim M.</creatorcontrib><description>Functional responses describe how changing resource availability affects consumer resource use, thus providing a mechanistic approach to prediction of the invasibility and potential damage of invasive alien species (IAS). However, functional responses can be context dependent, varying with resource characteristics and availability, consumer attributes, and environmental variables. Identifying context dependencies can allow invasion and damage risk to be predicted across different ecoregions. Understanding how ecological factors shape the functional response in agro-ecosystems can improve predictions of hotspots of highest impact and inform strategies to mitigate damage across locations with varying crop types and availability. We linked heterogeneous movement data across different agro-ecosystems to predict ecologically driven variability in the functional responses. We applied our approach to wild pigs (Sus scrofa), one of the most successful and detrimental IAS worldwide where agricultural resource depredation is an important driver of spread and establishment. We used continentalscale movement data within agro-ecosystems to quantify the functional response of agricultural resources relative to availability of crops and natural forage. We hypothesized that wild pigs would selectively use crops more often when natural forage resources were low. We also examined how individual attributes such as sex, crop type, and resource stimulus such as distance to crops altered the magnitude of the functional response. There was a strong agricultural functional response where crop use was an accelerating function of crop availability at low density (Type III) and was highly context dependent. As hypothesized, there was a reduced response of crop use with increasing crop availability when non-agricultural resources were more available, emphasizing that crop damage levels are likely to be highly heterogeneous depending on surrounding natural resources and temporal availability of crops. We found significant effects of crop type and sex, with males spending 20% more time and visiting crops 58% more often than females, and both sexes showing different functional responses depending on crop type. Our application demonstrates how commonly collected animal movement data can be used to understand context dependencies in resource use to improve our understanding of pest foraging behavior, with implications for prioritizing spatiotemporal hotspots of potential economic loss in agro-ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eap.2015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31596984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agricultural management ; Agricultural resources ; agroecosystems ; agro‐ecosystems ; Availability ; continuous‐time functional movement models ; Crop damage ; Crops ; Economic impact ; ecoregions ; Ecosystems ; Environmental changes ; environmental factors ; Females ; financial economics ; Forage ; foraging ; Foraging behavior ; functional response ; habitat ; Impact damage ; invasive alien species ; invasive species ; Males ; movement ecology ; Natural resources ; Pests ; predation ; prediction ; Predictions ; Resource availability ; Resource management ; resource selection ; risk ; Sex ; Strategic management ; Sus scrofa ; Swine ; wild pigs (Sus scrofa)</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.1-14</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2019 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-d4d25d441e7fbce876540dfbe05a9fafd156ab365c9e4115e4790ba4ea2c6f663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-d4d25d441e7fbce876540dfbe05a9fafd156ab365c9e4115e4790ba4ea2c6f663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9931-8312 ; 0000-0002-8274-8025 ; 0000-0003-1748-4518 ; 0000-0001-9707-3713 ; 0000-0001-9155-5359</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26870838$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26870838$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31596984$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilber, Mark Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinn, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beasley, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boughton, Raoul K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, Ryan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ditchkoff, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Justin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, Steve B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmstrom, Lindsey K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgo, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Jesse S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ryan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, Nathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VerCauteren, Kurt C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisely, Samantha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Colleen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepin, Kim M.</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Functional responses describe how changing resource availability affects consumer resource use, thus providing a mechanistic approach to prediction of the invasibility and potential damage of invasive alien species (IAS). However, functional responses can be context dependent, varying with resource characteristics and availability, consumer attributes, and environmental variables. Identifying context dependencies can allow invasion and damage risk to be predicted across different ecoregions. Understanding how ecological factors shape the functional response in agro-ecosystems can improve predictions of hotspots of highest impact and inform strategies to mitigate damage across locations with varying crop types and availability. We linked heterogeneous movement data across different agro-ecosystems to predict ecologically driven variability in the functional responses. We applied our approach to wild pigs (Sus scrofa), one of the most successful and detrimental IAS worldwide where agricultural resource depredation is an important driver of spread and establishment. We used continentalscale movement data within agro-ecosystems to quantify the functional response of agricultural resources relative to availability of crops and natural forage. We hypothesized that wild pigs would selectively use crops more often when natural forage resources were low. We also examined how individual attributes such as sex, crop type, and resource stimulus such as distance to crops altered the magnitude of the functional response. There was a strong agricultural functional response where crop use was an accelerating function of crop availability at low density (Type III) and was highly context dependent. As hypothesized, there was a reduced response of crop use with increasing crop availability when non-agricultural resources were more available, emphasizing that crop damage levels are likely to be highly heterogeneous depending on surrounding natural resources and temporal availability of crops. We found significant effects of crop type and sex, with males spending 20% more time and visiting crops 58% more often than females, and both sexes showing different functional responses depending on crop type. Our application demonstrates how commonly collected animal movement data can be used to understand context dependencies in resource use to improve our understanding of pest foraging behavior, with implications for prioritizing spatiotemporal hotspots of potential economic loss in agro-ecosystems.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>Agricultural resources</subject><subject>agroecosystems</subject><subject>agro‐ecosystems</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>continuous‐time functional movement models</subject><subject>Crop damage</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>ecoregions</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>environmental factors</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>financial economics</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>foraging</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>functional response</subject><subject>habitat</subject><subject>Impact damage</subject><subject>invasive alien species</subject><subject>invasive species</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>movement ecology</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>predation</subject><subject>prediction</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>resource selection</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Sus scrofa</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>wild pigs (Sus scrofa)</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1r3DAQhkVpaT5a6B9oEfSSixNJlmTpGEKSFgLNoTkb2R4tXizJ1dgJ---rZbcpFKqLhtHDM2JeQj5xdskZE1fg5kvBuHpDTrmtbaWUEW9LzRSvWKP5CTlD3LJyhBDvyUnNldXWyFOyPGYYxn4Z44b6NZYiRTfRDDiniIB0jNRtcqqgT7jDBQJSn1OgLo6hgCE9Q4C40MEtji6JjmHOpUeDi25zeEq-WJ4djqU9Ay74gbzzbkL4eLzPydPd7c-bb9XDj_vvN9cPVS-ZVNUgB6EGKTk0vuvBNFpJNvgOmHLWOz9wpV1Xa9VbkJwrkI1lnZPgRK-91vU5uTh4y5d-rWVyG0bsYZpchLRiK2pjmsZKu0e__oNu05rLKvZUbQ1nQvK_wj4nxAy-nXNZQ961nLX7JNqSRLtPoqBfjsK1CzC8gn9WX4DqALyME-z-K2pvrx-Pws8HfotLyq-80KZhpjb1byYtnXY</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Wilber, Mark Q.</creator><creator>Chinn, Sarah M.</creator><creator>Beasley, James C.</creator><creator>Boughton, Raoul K.</creator><creator>Brook, Ryan K.</creator><creator>Ditchkoff, Stephen S.</creator><creator>Fischer, Justin W.</creator><creator>Hartley, Steve B.</creator><creator>Holmstrom, Lindsey K.</creator><creator>Kilgo, John C.</creator><creator>Lewis, Jesse S.</creator><creator>Miller, Ryan S.</creator><creator>Snow, Nathan P.</creator><creator>VerCauteren, Kurt C.</creator><creator>Wisely, Samantha M.</creator><creator>Webb, Colleen T.</creator><creator>Pepin, Kim M.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9931-8312</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8274-8025</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1748-4518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9707-3713</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9155-5359</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests</title><author>Wilber, Mark Q. ; Chinn, Sarah M. ; Beasley, James C. ; Boughton, Raoul K. ; Brook, Ryan K. ; Ditchkoff, Stephen S. ; Fischer, Justin W. ; Hartley, Steve B. ; Holmstrom, Lindsey K. ; Kilgo, John C. ; Lewis, Jesse S. ; Miller, Ryan S. ; Snow, Nathan P. ; VerCauteren, Kurt C. ; Wisely, Samantha M. ; Webb, Colleen T. ; Pepin, Kim M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4045-d4d25d441e7fbce876540dfbe05a9fafd156ab365c9e4115e4790ba4ea2c6f663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>Agricultural resources</topic><topic>agroecosystems</topic><topic>agro‐ecosystems</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>continuous‐time functional movement models</topic><topic>Crop damage</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>ecoregions</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>environmental factors</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>financial economics</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>foraging</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>functional response</topic><topic>habitat</topic><topic>Impact damage</topic><topic>invasive alien species</topic><topic>invasive species</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>movement ecology</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>predation</topic><topic>prediction</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>resource selection</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Sus scrofa</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>wild pigs (Sus scrofa)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilber, Mark Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chinn, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beasley, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boughton, Raoul K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brook, Ryan K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ditchkoff, Stephen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Justin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartley, Steve B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmstrom, Lindsey K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kilgo, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Jesse S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, Ryan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snow, Nathan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VerCauteren, Kurt C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisely, Samantha M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Colleen T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepin, Kim M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilber, Mark Q.</au><au>Chinn, Sarah M.</au><au>Beasley, James C.</au><au>Boughton, Raoul K.</au><au>Brook, Ryan K.</au><au>Ditchkoff, Stephen S.</au><au>Fischer, Justin W.</au><au>Hartley, Steve B.</au><au>Holmstrom, Lindsey K.</au><au>Kilgo, John C.</au><au>Lewis, Jesse S.</au><au>Miller, Ryan S.</au><au>Snow, Nathan P.</au><au>VerCauteren, Kurt C.</au><au>Wisely, Samantha M.</au><au>Webb, Colleen T.</au><au>Pepin, Kim M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>1-14</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Functional responses describe how changing resource availability affects consumer resource use, thus providing a mechanistic approach to prediction of the invasibility and potential damage of invasive alien species (IAS). However, functional responses can be context dependent, varying with resource characteristics and availability, consumer attributes, and environmental variables. Identifying context dependencies can allow invasion and damage risk to be predicted across different ecoregions. Understanding how ecological factors shape the functional response in agro-ecosystems can improve predictions of hotspots of highest impact and inform strategies to mitigate damage across locations with varying crop types and availability. We linked heterogeneous movement data across different agro-ecosystems to predict ecologically driven variability in the functional responses. We applied our approach to wild pigs (Sus scrofa), one of the most successful and detrimental IAS worldwide where agricultural resource depredation is an important driver of spread and establishment. We used continentalscale movement data within agro-ecosystems to quantify the functional response of agricultural resources relative to availability of crops and natural forage. We hypothesized that wild pigs would selectively use crops more often when natural forage resources were low. We also examined how individual attributes such as sex, crop type, and resource stimulus such as distance to crops altered the magnitude of the functional response. There was a strong agricultural functional response where crop use was an accelerating function of crop availability at low density (Type III) and was highly context dependent. As hypothesized, there was a reduced response of crop use with increasing crop availability when non-agricultural resources were more available, emphasizing that crop damage levels are likely to be highly heterogeneous depending on surrounding natural resources and temporal availability of crops. We found significant effects of crop type and sex, with males spending 20% more time and visiting crops 58% more often than females, and both sexes showing different functional responses depending on crop type. Our application demonstrates how commonly collected animal movement data can be used to understand context dependencies in resource use to improve our understanding of pest foraging behavior, with implications for prioritizing spatiotemporal hotspots of potential economic loss in agro-ecosystems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31596984</pmid><doi>10.1002/eap.2015</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9931-8312</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8274-8025</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1748-4518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9707-3713</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9155-5359</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2020-01, Vol.30 (1), p.1-14 |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2339810241 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agricultural ecosystems Agricultural management Agricultural resources agroecosystems agro‐ecosystems Availability continuous‐time functional movement models Crop damage Crops Economic impact ecoregions Ecosystems Environmental changes environmental factors Females financial economics Forage foraging Foraging behavior functional response habitat Impact damage invasive alien species invasive species Males movement ecology Natural resources Pests predation prediction Predictions Resource availability Resource management resource selection risk Sex Strategic management Sus scrofa Swine wild pigs (Sus scrofa) |
title | Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A24%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20functional%20responses%20in%20agro-ecosystems%20from%20animal%20movement%20data%20to%20improve%20management%20of%20invasive%20pests&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Wilber,%20Mark%20Q.&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=1-14&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eap.2015&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26870838%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2339810241&rft_id=info:pmid/31596984&rft_jstor_id=26870838&rfr_iscdi=true |