Building supplier innovation triads: The effects of leadership relationships and alliance partner diversity
PurposeThe past decade has seen substantial changes in how organizational leaders work with external stakeholders to improve innovation performance. As leaders have encouraged the extensive involvement of suppliers and customers into the innovation process this has led to the formation of supplier i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of operations & production management 2020-02, Vol.40 (2), p.144-172 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 172 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 144 |
container_title | International journal of operations & production management |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Potter, Antony Paulraj, Antony |
description | PurposeThe past decade has seen substantial changes in how organizational leaders work with external stakeholders to improve innovation performance. As leaders have encouraged the extensive involvement of suppliers and customers into the innovation process this has led to the formation of supplier innovation triads that are often governed by a portfolio of strategic alliances. The purpose of this paper is to explore how leaders’ inter-firm relationships and strategic alliances influence the development of supplier innovation triads.Design/methodology/approachThe sample of firms in the Toyota supplier association is constructed from multiple data sets, including the Japan Patent Office, BoardEx and S&PCapitalIQ. The authors test the hypotheses using multivariate techniques, moderation analysis and endogeneity tests.FindingsThe results indicate that leadership relationships to Toyota and its suppliers have a positive effect on the formation of supplier innovation triads. The authors find that firm–external leadership relationships and alliance partner diversity have differential moderating effects on how customer and supplier leadership relationships could be used to build supplier innovation triads.Research limitations/implicationsThe results focus on the firms within the Toyota supplier association, and this limits the paper’s generalizability. Although patent data provide a detailed information resource, it do not capture all collaborations.Originality/valueThe authors expand the leadership literature by undertaking one of the first studies of inter-firm leadership relationships and their differential effects on innovation triads. The authors contribute to the literature by exploring the antecedents and moderating factors that influence buyer–supplier–supplier triads within an innovation setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IJOPM-07-2018-0418 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2339785255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2339785255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-86d6fc4c4d58ea4b3df69f2af94d85564425f510bdb4ae57829e0b4396276abc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNot0M1KAzEUBeAgCtbqC7gqdB29-blJZqlFa6VSF7oOmUkiKXVmTGYE397WujqbwznwEXLN4IYxMLer583rCwVNOTBDQTJzQiZMo6EKK3FKJsCkpAK1PicXpWwBgAuGEzK_H9POp_ZjVsa-36WQZ6ltu283pK6dDTk5Xy7JWXS7Eq7-c0reHx_eFk90vVmuFndr2nCuBmqUV7GRjfRogpO18FFVkbtYSW8QlZQcIzKofS1dQG14FaCWolJcK1c3Ykrmx90-d19jKIPddmNu95eWC1Fpgxxx3-LHVpO7UnKIts_p0-Ufy8AeMOwfhgVtDxj2gCF-AeBPUXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2339785255</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Building supplier innovation triads: The effects of leadership relationships and alliance partner diversity</title><source>Emerald</source><creator>Potter, Antony ; Paulraj, Antony</creator><creatorcontrib>Potter, Antony ; Paulraj, Antony</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeThe past decade has seen substantial changes in how organizational leaders work with external stakeholders to improve innovation performance. As leaders have encouraged the extensive involvement of suppliers and customers into the innovation process this has led to the formation of supplier innovation triads that are often governed by a portfolio of strategic alliances. The purpose of this paper is to explore how leaders’ inter-firm relationships and strategic alliances influence the development of supplier innovation triads.Design/methodology/approachThe sample of firms in the Toyota supplier association is constructed from multiple data sets, including the Japan Patent Office, BoardEx and S&PCapitalIQ. The authors test the hypotheses using multivariate techniques, moderation analysis and endogeneity tests.FindingsThe results indicate that leadership relationships to Toyota and its suppliers have a positive effect on the formation of supplier innovation triads. The authors find that firm–external leadership relationships and alliance partner diversity have differential moderating effects on how customer and supplier leadership relationships could be used to build supplier innovation triads.Research limitations/implicationsThe results focus on the firms within the Toyota supplier association, and this limits the paper’s generalizability. Although patent data provide a detailed information resource, it do not capture all collaborations.Originality/valueThe authors expand the leadership literature by undertaking one of the first studies of inter-firm leadership relationships and their differential effects on innovation triads. The authors contribute to the literature by exploring the antecedents and moderating factors that influence buyer–supplier–supplier triads within an innovation setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-3577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-07-2018-0418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Alliances ; Customer satisfaction ; Customers ; Executives ; Information resources ; Innovations ; Leadership ; Operations management ; Product development ; Production management ; Strategic management ; Suppliers</subject><ispartof>International journal of operations & production management, 2020-02, Vol.40 (2), p.144-172</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-86d6fc4c4d58ea4b3df69f2af94d85564425f510bdb4ae57829e0b4396276abc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4189-1255 ; 0000-0001-7918-8576</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potter, Antony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulraj, Antony</creatorcontrib><title>Building supplier innovation triads: The effects of leadership relationships and alliance partner diversity</title><title>International journal of operations & production management</title><description>PurposeThe past decade has seen substantial changes in how organizational leaders work with external stakeholders to improve innovation performance. As leaders have encouraged the extensive involvement of suppliers and customers into the innovation process this has led to the formation of supplier innovation triads that are often governed by a portfolio of strategic alliances. The purpose of this paper is to explore how leaders’ inter-firm relationships and strategic alliances influence the development of supplier innovation triads.Design/methodology/approachThe sample of firms in the Toyota supplier association is constructed from multiple data sets, including the Japan Patent Office, BoardEx and S&PCapitalIQ. The authors test the hypotheses using multivariate techniques, moderation analysis and endogeneity tests.FindingsThe results indicate that leadership relationships to Toyota and its suppliers have a positive effect on the formation of supplier innovation triads. The authors find that firm–external leadership relationships and alliance partner diversity have differential moderating effects on how customer and supplier leadership relationships could be used to build supplier innovation triads.Research limitations/implicationsThe results focus on the firms within the Toyota supplier association, and this limits the paper’s generalizability. Although patent data provide a detailed information resource, it do not capture all collaborations.Originality/valueThe authors expand the leadership literature by undertaking one of the first studies of inter-firm leadership relationships and their differential effects on innovation triads. The authors contribute to the literature by exploring the antecedents and moderating factors that influence buyer–supplier–supplier triads within an innovation setting.</description><subject>Alliances</subject><subject>Customer satisfaction</subject><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Executives</subject><subject>Information resources</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>Product development</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Strategic management</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><issn>0144-3577</issn><issn>1758-6593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNot0M1KAzEUBeAgCtbqC7gqdB29-blJZqlFa6VSF7oOmUkiKXVmTGYE397WujqbwznwEXLN4IYxMLer583rCwVNOTBDQTJzQiZMo6EKK3FKJsCkpAK1PicXpWwBgAuGEzK_H9POp_ZjVsa-36WQZ6ltu283pK6dDTk5Xy7JWXS7Eq7-c0reHx_eFk90vVmuFndr2nCuBmqUV7GRjfRogpO18FFVkbtYSW8QlZQcIzKofS1dQG14FaCWolJcK1c3Ykrmx90-d19jKIPddmNu95eWC1Fpgxxx3-LHVpO7UnKIts_p0-Ufy8AeMOwfhgVtDxj2gCF-AeBPUXw</recordid><startdate>20200203</startdate><enddate>20200203</enddate><creator>Potter, Antony</creator><creator>Paulraj, Antony</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4189-1255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-8576</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200203</creationdate><title>Building supplier innovation triads</title><author>Potter, Antony ; Paulraj, Antony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c226t-86d6fc4c4d58ea4b3df69f2af94d85564425f510bdb4ae57829e0b4396276abc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alliances</topic><topic>Customer satisfaction</topic><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Executives</topic><topic>Information resources</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>Product development</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Strategic management</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potter, Antony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paulraj, Antony</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of operations & production management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potter, Antony</au><au>Paulraj, Antony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Building supplier innovation triads: The effects of leadership relationships and alliance partner diversity</atitle><jtitle>International journal of operations & production management</jtitle><date>2020-02-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>144</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>144-172</pages><issn>0144-3577</issn><eissn>1758-6593</eissn><abstract>PurposeThe past decade has seen substantial changes in how organizational leaders work with external stakeholders to improve innovation performance. As leaders have encouraged the extensive involvement of suppliers and customers into the innovation process this has led to the formation of supplier innovation triads that are often governed by a portfolio of strategic alliances. The purpose of this paper is to explore how leaders’ inter-firm relationships and strategic alliances influence the development of supplier innovation triads.Design/methodology/approachThe sample of firms in the Toyota supplier association is constructed from multiple data sets, including the Japan Patent Office, BoardEx and S&PCapitalIQ. The authors test the hypotheses using multivariate techniques, moderation analysis and endogeneity tests.FindingsThe results indicate that leadership relationships to Toyota and its suppliers have a positive effect on the formation of supplier innovation triads. The authors find that firm–external leadership relationships and alliance partner diversity have differential moderating effects on how customer and supplier leadership relationships could be used to build supplier innovation triads.Research limitations/implicationsThe results focus on the firms within the Toyota supplier association, and this limits the paper’s generalizability. Although patent data provide a detailed information resource, it do not capture all collaborations.Originality/valueThe authors expand the leadership literature by undertaking one of the first studies of inter-firm leadership relationships and their differential effects on innovation triads. The authors contribute to the literature by exploring the antecedents and moderating factors that influence buyer–supplier–supplier triads within an innovation setting.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJOPM-07-2018-0418</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4189-1255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7918-8576</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-3577 |
ispartof | International journal of operations & production management, 2020-02, Vol.40 (2), p.144-172 |
issn | 0144-3577 1758-6593 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2339785255 |
source | Emerald |
subjects | Alliances Customer satisfaction Customers Executives Information resources Innovations Leadership Operations management Product development Production management Strategic management Suppliers |
title | Building supplier innovation triads: The effects of leadership relationships and alliance partner diversity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A14%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Building%20supplier%20innovation%20triads:%20The%20effects%20of%20leadership%20relationships%20and%20alliance%20partner%20diversity&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20operations%20&%20production%20management&rft.au=Potter,%20Antony&rft.date=2020-02-03&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=144&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=144-172&rft.issn=0144-3577&rft.eissn=1758-6593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2018-0418&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2339785255%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2339785255&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |