Examining the effects of frustration on working memory capacity
Summary The present study attempts to expand our understanding of frustration, clinical symptoms, and working memory by examining the unique contribution of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and frustration to working memory capacity (WMC). A factor‐analytic framework was utilized to...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Applied cognitive psychology 2020-01, Vol.34 (1), p.50-63 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 63 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 50 |
| container_title | Applied cognitive psychology |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Fillauer, Jonathan Parks Bolden, Jennifer Jacobson, Melanie Partlow, Brock H. Benavides, Andrea Shultz, Jessica N. |
| description | Summary
The present study attempts to expand our understanding of frustration, clinical symptoms, and working memory by examining the unique contribution of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and frustration to working memory capacity (WMC). A factor‐analytic framework was utilized to isolate and examine WMC based on results from three working memory tasks that were administered in counterbalanced order to control for individual differences in baseline WMC. All participants provided subjective ratings of frustration both prior to and after administration of a frustration induction. Results suggest that although we were able to systematically induce subjective frustration for participants in the experimental group relative to the control group, WMC was not associated with induced frustration in the present study. Results also indicated that inattention symptoms predicted baseline frustration levels. This work highlights the need to examine the extent to which storage/rehearsal WMC and additional process‐oriented working memory‐related performance variables are related to frustration. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acp.3587 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2339333491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1261801</ericid><sourcerecordid>2339333491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3497-138b9ee68e58f0c228c94befa1bb4ae95cbf0e29e3f19a1fa128c40b0a1d5eed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgHxAWvHjZOkl22-QkpdQvCnrQc8imE03tfphsqfvvzbriTRgYmHl4XngJOacwoQDsWptmwnMxOyAjClKmMGNwSEYghEgzEHBMTkLYAICcUjYiN8svXbrKVW9J-44JWoumDUltE-t3ofW6dXWVxNnX_qOnSixr3yVGN9q4tjslR1ZvA5797jF5vV2-LO7T1dPdw2K-Sg3P5CylXBQScSowFxYMY8LIrECraVFkGmVuCgvIJHJLpabxHokMCtB0nSOu-ZhcDt7G1587DK3a1DtfxUjFOJecxxgaqauBMr4OwaNVjXel9p2ioPp6VKxH9fVE9GJA0Tvzhy0fKZtSAb0qHf57t8XuX4-aL55_fN_5n3AP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2339333491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining the effects of frustration on working memory capacity</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Fillauer, Jonathan Parks ; Bolden, Jennifer ; Jacobson, Melanie ; Partlow, Brock H. ; Benavides, Andrea ; Shultz, Jessica N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fillauer, Jonathan Parks ; Bolden, Jennifer ; Jacobson, Melanie ; Partlow, Brock H. ; Benavides, Andrea ; Shultz, Jessica N.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The present study attempts to expand our understanding of frustration, clinical symptoms, and working memory by examining the unique contribution of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and frustration to working memory capacity (WMC). A factor‐analytic framework was utilized to isolate and examine WMC based on results from three working memory tasks that were administered in counterbalanced order to control for individual differences in baseline WMC. All participants provided subjective ratings of frustration both prior to and after administration of a frustration induction. Results suggest that although we were able to systematically induce subjective frustration for participants in the experimental group relative to the control group, WMC was not associated with induced frustration in the present study. Results also indicated that inattention symptoms predicted baseline frustration levels. This work highlights the need to examine the extent to which storage/rehearsal WMC and additional process‐oriented working memory‐related performance variables are related to frustration. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-4080</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acp.3587</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; ADHD ; Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ; Attention deficits ; central executive ; Comparative Analysis ; Correlation ; Factor Analysis ; Frustration ; Hyperactivity ; Individual Differences ; Induction ; Psychological Patterns ; Rehearsal ; Short Term Memory ; Symptoms (Individual Disorders) ; Task Analysis ; working memory</subject><ispartof>Applied cognitive psychology, 2020-01, Vol.34 (1), p.50-63</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3497-138b9ee68e58f0c228c94befa1bb4ae95cbf0e29e3f19a1fa128c40b0a1d5eed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3497-138b9ee68e58f0c228c94befa1bb4ae95cbf0e29e3f19a1fa128c40b0a1d5eed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9386-1093 ; 0000-0002-0768-1836</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facp.3587$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facp.3587$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4009,27902,27903,27904,30978,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1261801$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fillauer, Jonathan Parks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolden, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partlow, Brock H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benavides, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shultz, Jessica N.</creatorcontrib><title>Examining the effects of frustration on working memory capacity</title><title>Applied cognitive psychology</title><description>Summary
The present study attempts to expand our understanding of frustration, clinical symptoms, and working memory by examining the unique contribution of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and frustration to working memory capacity (WMC). A factor‐analytic framework was utilized to isolate and examine WMC based on results from three working memory tasks that were administered in counterbalanced order to control for individual differences in baseline WMC. All participants provided subjective ratings of frustration both prior to and after administration of a frustration induction. Results suggest that although we were able to systematically induce subjective frustration for participants in the experimental group relative to the control group, WMC was not associated with induced frustration in the present study. Results also indicated that inattention symptoms predicted baseline frustration levels. This work highlights the need to examine the extent to which storage/rehearsal WMC and additional process‐oriented working memory‐related performance variables are related to frustration. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>ADHD</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</subject><subject>Attention deficits</subject><subject>central executive</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Frustration</subject><subject>Hyperactivity</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Induction</subject><subject>Psychological Patterns</subject><subject>Rehearsal</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><subject>Symptoms (Individual Disorders)</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>working memory</subject><issn>0888-4080</issn><issn>1099-0720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMoWKvgHxAWvHjZOkl22-QkpdQvCnrQc8imE03tfphsqfvvzbriTRgYmHl4XngJOacwoQDsWptmwnMxOyAjClKmMGNwSEYghEgzEHBMTkLYAICcUjYiN8svXbrKVW9J-44JWoumDUltE-t3ofW6dXWVxNnX_qOnSixr3yVGN9q4tjslR1ZvA5797jF5vV2-LO7T1dPdw2K-Sg3P5CylXBQScSowFxYMY8LIrECraVFkGmVuCgvIJHJLpabxHokMCtB0nSOu-ZhcDt7G1587DK3a1DtfxUjFOJecxxgaqauBMr4OwaNVjXel9p2ioPp6VKxH9fVE9GJA0Tvzhy0fKZtSAb0qHf57t8XuX4-aL55_fN_5n3AP</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Fillauer, Jonathan Parks</creator><creator>Bolden, Jennifer</creator><creator>Jacobson, Melanie</creator><creator>Partlow, Brock H.</creator><creator>Benavides, Andrea</creator><creator>Shultz, Jessica N.</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-1093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-1836</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Examining the effects of frustration on working memory capacity</title><author>Fillauer, Jonathan Parks ; Bolden, Jennifer ; Jacobson, Melanie ; Partlow, Brock H. ; Benavides, Andrea ; Shultz, Jessica N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3497-138b9ee68e58f0c228c94befa1bb4ae95cbf0e29e3f19a1fa128c40b0a1d5eed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>ADHD</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</topic><topic>Attention deficits</topic><topic>central executive</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Frustration</topic><topic>Hyperactivity</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Induction</topic><topic>Psychological Patterns</topic><topic>Rehearsal</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><topic>Symptoms (Individual Disorders)</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>working memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fillauer, Jonathan Parks</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolden, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Partlow, Brock H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benavides, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shultz, Jessica N.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fillauer, Jonathan Parks</au><au>Bolden, Jennifer</au><au>Jacobson, Melanie</au><au>Partlow, Brock H.</au><au>Benavides, Andrea</au><au>Shultz, Jessica N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1261801</ericid><atitle>Examining the effects of frustration on working memory capacity</atitle><jtitle>Applied cognitive psychology</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>50</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>50-63</pages><issn>0888-4080</issn><eissn>1099-0720</eissn><abstract>Summary
The present study attempts to expand our understanding of frustration, clinical symptoms, and working memory by examining the unique contribution of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms and frustration to working memory capacity (WMC). A factor‐analytic framework was utilized to isolate and examine WMC based on results from three working memory tasks that were administered in counterbalanced order to control for individual differences in baseline WMC. All participants provided subjective ratings of frustration both prior to and after administration of a frustration induction. Results suggest that although we were able to systematically induce subjective frustration for participants in the experimental group relative to the control group, WMC was not associated with induced frustration in the present study. Results also indicated that inattention symptoms predicted baseline frustration levels. This work highlights the need to examine the extent to which storage/rehearsal WMC and additional process‐oriented working memory‐related performance variables are related to frustration. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/acp.3587</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-1093</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0768-1836</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0888-4080 |
| ispartof | Applied cognitive psychology, 2020-01, Vol.34 (1), p.50-63 |
| issn | 0888-4080 1099-0720 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2339333491 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Accuracy ADHD Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Attention deficits central executive Comparative Analysis Correlation Factor Analysis Frustration Hyperactivity Individual Differences Induction Psychological Patterns Rehearsal Short Term Memory Symptoms (Individual Disorders) Task Analysis working memory |
| title | Examining the effects of frustration on working memory capacity |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A10%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20the%20effects%20of%20frustration%20on%20working%20memory%20capacity&rft.jtitle=Applied%20cognitive%20psychology&rft.au=Fillauer,%20Jonathan%20Parks&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=50&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=50-63&rft.issn=0888-4080&rft.eissn=1099-0720&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acp.3587&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2339333491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2339333491&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1261801&rfr_iscdi=true |