STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS

The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Economics & sociology 2019-01, Vol.12 (4), p.278-298
Hauptverfasser: Koziuk, Viktor, Hayda, Yuriy, Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr, Klapkiv, Yuriy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue 4
container_start_page 278
container_title Economics & sociology
container_volume 12
creator Koziuk, Viktor
Hayda, Yuriy
Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr
Klapkiv, Yuriy
description The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and environmental changes in the form of environmental Kuznets curve, as well as environmental policy instruments along with the degree of their stringency. The authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the quality of institutions and the value assessment of environmental goods directly affect the competitiveness of national economies, regardless of environmental stringency. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the perennial indices of global competitiveness, environmental performance and stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states can be internalized and that their global competitiveness remains high against the background of high-quality environmental goods.
doi_str_mv 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/17
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2339143225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>976689</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9d717b901dba413ebd636427ba5ef062</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>976689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-1a83bf20bd580263b73b3c91a93d44e63db881e1d89864e053865c53e5a3f91e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUV1P20AQtFCRQMA_QKqlPju5vb3PvqXRkZ7k2Cg2UXk63dnnKiitqR0e-Pd1CLRPu9qdnR3NJMlnIDNglLM5JRIyqfSPGSWg50AzNgd5llxSJCJDxvWnqf8AXSQ347gLhAotGSPiMtlW9cYWK1MsH9PyLjXF1m7KYm2KepGnG7N6yBe1LYsq3VazdJWX36bxslzfm9rWdmsKU1VfU7O-txu7nFaLYpE_Vra6Ts47vx_jzXu9Sh7uTL38nuXl6gjMGqbkIQOvMHSUhJarSRQGiQEbDV5jy1gU2AalIEKrtBIsEo5K8IZj5B47DRGvEnvibXv_5J6H3S8_vLre79zboB9-Oj8cds0-Ot1KkEETaINngDG0AgWjMngeOyLoxPXlxPU89H9e4nhwT_3L8HuS7yiiBoaU8gklT6hm6MdxiN2_r0DcWybuaLc72u2OmTigjjmQ0-Xt-2WM_f4_uZZCKI1_AY-uf_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2339143225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Koziuk, Viktor ; Hayda, Yuriy ; Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr ; Klapkiv, Yuriy</creator><creatorcontrib>Koziuk, Viktor ; Hayda, Yuriy ; Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr ; Klapkiv, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><description>The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and environmental changes in the form of environmental Kuznets curve, as well as environmental policy instruments along with the degree of their stringency. The authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the quality of institutions and the value assessment of environmental goods directly affect the competitiveness of national economies, regardless of environmental stringency. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the perennial indices of global competitiveness, environmental performance and stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states can be internalized and that their global competitiveness remains high against the background of high-quality environmental goods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-789X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2306-3459</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ternopil: Centre of Sociological Research</publisher><subject>Business Economy / Management ; Carbon ; Climate change ; Competition ; competitiveness ; Consumption ; Developing countries ; ecology ; Economic growth ; Economic models ; Emission standards ; Energy and Environmental Studies ; Environmental and Energy policy ; Environmental impact ; Environmental policy ; Environmental quality ; Environmental regulations ; GDP ; Globalization ; Gross Domestic Product ; Hypotheses ; Income distribution ; Industrial development ; Inequality ; International agreements ; Kyoto Protocol ; LDCs ; Overpopulation ; Per capita ; Pollution ; Population ; Quantitative analysis ; Regulation ; stringency ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Economics &amp; sociology, 2019-01, Vol.12 (4), p.278-298</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-1a83bf20bd580263b73b3c91a93d44e63db881e1d89864e053865c53e5a3f91e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2019_62745.png</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,2096,27325,27847,27905,27906,33755</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koziuk, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayda, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapkiv, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><title>STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS</title><title>Economics &amp; sociology</title><addtitle>Economics and Sociology</addtitle><description>The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and environmental changes in the form of environmental Kuznets curve, as well as environmental policy instruments along with the degree of their stringency. The authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the quality of institutions and the value assessment of environmental goods directly affect the competitiveness of national economies, regardless of environmental stringency. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the perennial indices of global competitiveness, environmental performance and stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states can be internalized and that their global competitiveness remains high against the background of high-quality environmental goods.</description><subject>Business Economy / Management</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>competitiveness</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>ecology</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Energy and Environmental Studies</subject><subject>Environmental and Energy policy</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>Kyoto Protocol</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Overpopulation</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>stringency</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-789X</issn><issn>2306-3459</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUV1P20AQtFCRQMA_QKqlPju5vb3PvqXRkZ7k2Cg2UXk63dnnKiitqR0e-Pd1CLRPu9qdnR3NJMlnIDNglLM5JRIyqfSPGSWg50AzNgd5llxSJCJDxvWnqf8AXSQ347gLhAotGSPiMtlW9cYWK1MsH9PyLjXF1m7KYm2KepGnG7N6yBe1LYsq3VazdJWX36bxslzfm9rWdmsKU1VfU7O-txu7nFaLYpE_Vra6Ts47vx_jzXu9Sh7uTL38nuXl6gjMGqbkIQOvMHSUhJarSRQGiQEbDV5jy1gU2AalIEKrtBIsEo5K8IZj5B47DRGvEnvibXv_5J6H3S8_vLre79zboB9-Oj8cds0-Ot1KkEETaINngDG0AgWjMngeOyLoxPXlxPU89H9e4nhwT_3L8HuS7yiiBoaU8gklT6hm6MdxiN2_r0DcWybuaLc72u2OmTigjjmQ0-Xt-2WM_f4_uZZCKI1_AY-uf_s</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Koziuk, Viktor</creator><creator>Hayda, Yuriy</creator><creator>Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr</creator><creator>Klapkiv, Yuriy</creator><general>Centre of Sociological Research</general><general>Fundacja Centrum Badań Socjologicznych</general><general>Centre of Sociological Research (NGO)</general><general>Centre of Sociological Research, Szczecin, Poland</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS</title><author>Koziuk, Viktor ; Hayda, Yuriy ; Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr ; Klapkiv, Yuriy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-1a83bf20bd580263b73b3c91a93d44e63db881e1d89864e053865c53e5a3f91e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Business Economy / Management</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>competitiveness</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>ecology</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Energy and Environmental Studies</topic><topic>Environmental and Energy policy</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>Kyoto Protocol</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Overpopulation</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>stringency</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koziuk, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayda, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapkiv, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest sociology</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Economics &amp; sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koziuk, Viktor</au><au>Hayda, Yuriy</au><au>Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr</au><au>Klapkiv, Yuriy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS</atitle><jtitle>Economics &amp; sociology</jtitle><addtitle>Economics and Sociology</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>278-298</pages><issn>2071-789X</issn><eissn>2306-3459</eissn><abstract>The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and environmental changes in the form of environmental Kuznets curve, as well as environmental policy instruments along with the degree of their stringency. The authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the quality of institutions and the value assessment of environmental goods directly affect the competitiveness of national economies, regardless of environmental stringency. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the perennial indices of global competitiveness, environmental performance and stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states can be internalized and that their global competitiveness remains high against the background of high-quality environmental goods.</abstract><cop>Ternopil</cop><pub>Centre of Sociological Research</pub><doi>10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/17</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-789X
ispartof Economics & sociology, 2019-01, Vol.12 (4), p.278-298
issn 2071-789X
2306-3459
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2339143225
source PAIS Index; Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Business Economy / Management
Carbon
Climate change
Competition
competitiveness
Consumption
Developing countries
ecology
Economic growth
Economic models
Emission standards
Energy and Environmental Studies
Environmental and Energy policy
Environmental impact
Environmental policy
Environmental quality
Environmental regulations
GDP
Globalization
Gross Domestic Product
Hypotheses
Income distribution
Industrial development
Inequality
International agreements
Kyoto Protocol
LDCs
Overpopulation
Per capita
Pollution
Population
Quantitative analysis
Regulation
stringency
Sustainable development
title STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A16%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=STRINGENCY%20OF%20ENVIRONMENTAL%20REGULATIONS%20VS.%20GLOBAL%20COMPETITIVENESS:%20EMPIRICAL%20ANALYSIS&rft.jtitle=Economics%20&%20sociology&rft.au=Koziuk,%20Viktor&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=278-298&rft.issn=2071-789X&rft.eissn=2306-3459&rft_id=info:doi/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/17&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E976689%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2339143225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=976689&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_9d717b901dba413ebd636427ba5ef062&rfr_iscdi=true