STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS
The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Economics & sociology 2019-01, Vol.12 (4), p.278-298 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 298 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 278 |
container_title | Economics & sociology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Koziuk, Viktor Hayda, Yuriy Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr Klapkiv, Yuriy |
description | The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and environmental changes in the form of environmental Kuznets curve, as well as environmental policy instruments along with the degree of their stringency. The authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the quality of institutions and the value assessment of environmental goods directly affect the competitiveness of national economies, regardless of environmental stringency. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the perennial indices of global competitiveness, environmental performance and stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states can be internalized and that their global competitiveness remains high against the background of high-quality environmental goods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/17 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2339143225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>976689</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9d717b901dba413ebd636427ba5ef062</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>976689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-1a83bf20bd580263b73b3c91a93d44e63db881e1d89864e053865c53e5a3f91e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUV1P20AQtFCRQMA_QKqlPju5vb3PvqXRkZ7k2Cg2UXk63dnnKiitqR0e-Pd1CLRPu9qdnR3NJMlnIDNglLM5JRIyqfSPGSWg50AzNgd5llxSJCJDxvWnqf8AXSQ347gLhAotGSPiMtlW9cYWK1MsH9PyLjXF1m7KYm2KepGnG7N6yBe1LYsq3VazdJWX36bxslzfm9rWdmsKU1VfU7O-txu7nFaLYpE_Vra6Ts47vx_jzXu9Sh7uTL38nuXl6gjMGqbkIQOvMHSUhJarSRQGiQEbDV5jy1gU2AalIEKrtBIsEo5K8IZj5B47DRGvEnvibXv_5J6H3S8_vLre79zboB9-Oj8cds0-Ot1KkEETaINngDG0AgWjMngeOyLoxPXlxPU89H9e4nhwT_3L8HuS7yiiBoaU8gklT6hm6MdxiN2_r0DcWybuaLc72u2OmTigjjmQ0-Xt-2WM_f4_uZZCKI1_AY-uf_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2339143225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Koziuk, Viktor ; Hayda, Yuriy ; Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr ; Klapkiv, Yuriy</creator><creatorcontrib>Koziuk, Viktor ; Hayda, Yuriy ; Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr ; Klapkiv, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><description>The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and environmental changes in the form of environmental Kuznets curve, as well as environmental policy instruments along with the degree of their stringency. The authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the quality of institutions and the value assessment of environmental goods directly affect the competitiveness of national economies, regardless of environmental stringency. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the perennial indices of global competitiveness, environmental performance and stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states can be internalized and that their global competitiveness remains high against the background of high-quality environmental goods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-789X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2306-3459</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/17</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ternopil: Centre of Sociological Research</publisher><subject>Business Economy / Management ; Carbon ; Climate change ; Competition ; competitiveness ; Consumption ; Developing countries ; ecology ; Economic growth ; Economic models ; Emission standards ; Energy and Environmental Studies ; Environmental and Energy policy ; Environmental impact ; Environmental policy ; Environmental quality ; Environmental regulations ; GDP ; Globalization ; Gross Domestic Product ; Hypotheses ; Income distribution ; Industrial development ; Inequality ; International agreements ; Kyoto Protocol ; LDCs ; Overpopulation ; Per capita ; Pollution ; Population ; Quantitative analysis ; Regulation ; stringency ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Economics & sociology, 2019-01, Vol.12 (4), p.278-298</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-1a83bf20bd580263b73b3c91a93d44e63db881e1d89864e053865c53e5a3f91e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2019_62745.png</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,2096,27325,27847,27905,27906,33755</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koziuk, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayda, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapkiv, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><title>STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS</title><title>Economics & sociology</title><addtitle>Economics and Sociology</addtitle><description>The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and environmental changes in the form of environmental Kuznets curve, as well as environmental policy instruments along with the degree of their stringency. The authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the quality of institutions and the value assessment of environmental goods directly affect the competitiveness of national economies, regardless of environmental stringency. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the perennial indices of global competitiveness, environmental performance and stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states can be internalized and that their global competitiveness remains high against the background of high-quality environmental goods.</description><subject>Business Economy / Management</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>competitiveness</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>ecology</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Emission standards</subject><subject>Energy and Environmental Studies</subject><subject>Environmental and Energy policy</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental quality</subject><subject>Environmental regulations</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Globalization</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>Kyoto Protocol</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Overpopulation</subject><subject>Per capita</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>stringency</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2071-789X</issn><issn>2306-3459</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUV1P20AQtFCRQMA_QKqlPju5vb3PvqXRkZ7k2Cg2UXk63dnnKiitqR0e-Pd1CLRPu9qdnR3NJMlnIDNglLM5JRIyqfSPGSWg50AzNgd5llxSJCJDxvWnqf8AXSQ347gLhAotGSPiMtlW9cYWK1MsH9PyLjXF1m7KYm2KepGnG7N6yBe1LYsq3VazdJWX36bxslzfm9rWdmsKU1VfU7O-txu7nFaLYpE_Vra6Ts47vx_jzXu9Sh7uTL38nuXl6gjMGqbkIQOvMHSUhJarSRQGiQEbDV5jy1gU2AalIEKrtBIsEo5K8IZj5B47DRGvEnvibXv_5J6H3S8_vLre79zboB9-Oj8cds0-Ot1KkEETaINngDG0AgWjMngeOyLoxPXlxPU89H9e4nhwT_3L8HuS7yiiBoaU8gklT6hm6MdxiN2_r0DcWybuaLc72u2OmTigjjmQ0-Xt-2WM_f4_uZZCKI1_AY-uf_s</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Koziuk, Viktor</creator><creator>Hayda, Yuriy</creator><creator>Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr</creator><creator>Klapkiv, Yuriy</creator><general>Centre of Sociological Research</general><general>Fundacja Centrum Badań Socjologicznych</general><general>Centre of Sociological Research (NGO)</general><general>Centre of Sociological Research, Szczecin, Poland</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS</title><author>Koziuk, Viktor ; Hayda, Yuriy ; Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr ; Klapkiv, Yuriy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-1a83bf20bd580263b73b3c91a93d44e63db881e1d89864e053865c53e5a3f91e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Business Economy / Management</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>competitiveness</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>ecology</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Emission standards</topic><topic>Energy and Environmental Studies</topic><topic>Environmental and Energy policy</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental quality</topic><topic>Environmental regulations</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Globalization</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>Kyoto Protocol</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Overpopulation</topic><topic>Per capita</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>stringency</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koziuk, Viktor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayda, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klapkiv, Yuriy</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest sociology</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Economics & sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koziuk, Viktor</au><au>Hayda, Yuriy</au><au>Dluhopolskyi, Oleksandr</au><au>Klapkiv, Yuriy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS</atitle><jtitle>Economics & sociology</jtitle><addtitle>Economics and Sociology</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>278-298</pages><issn>2071-789X</issn><eissn>2306-3459</eissn><abstract>The article focuses on assessing the global competitiveness of countries in the context of their environmental regulatory stringency. The article analyzes the views of scientists on the need to slow down economic growth and transition to stable economy, the relationship between economic growth and environmental changes in the form of environmental Kuznets curve, as well as environmental policy instruments along with the degree of their stringency. The authors put forward and confirm the hypothesis that the quality of institutions and the value assessment of environmental goods directly affect the competitiveness of national economies, regardless of environmental stringency. A comprehensive statistical analysis of the perennial indices of global competitiveness, environmental performance and stringency of environmental regulations on a large sample of countries confirms the hypothesis that significant stringency of environmental regulations in welfare states can be internalized and that their global competitiveness remains high against the background of high-quality environmental goods.</abstract><cop>Ternopil</cop><pub>Centre of Sociological Research</pub><doi>10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/17</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-789X |
ispartof | Economics & sociology, 2019-01, Vol.12 (4), p.278-298 |
issn | 2071-789X 2306-3459 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2339143225 |
source | PAIS Index; Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Business Economy / Management Carbon Climate change Competition competitiveness Consumption Developing countries ecology Economic growth Economic models Emission standards Energy and Environmental Studies Environmental and Energy policy Environmental impact Environmental policy Environmental quality Environmental regulations GDP Globalization Gross Domestic Product Hypotheses Income distribution Industrial development Inequality International agreements Kyoto Protocol LDCs Overpopulation Per capita Pollution Population Quantitative analysis Regulation stringency Sustainable development |
title | STRINGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS VS. GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T18%3A16%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=STRINGENCY%20OF%20ENVIRONMENTAL%20REGULATIONS%20VS.%20GLOBAL%20COMPETITIVENESS:%20EMPIRICAL%20ANALYSIS&rft.jtitle=Economics%20&%20sociology&rft.au=Koziuk,%20Viktor&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=278-298&rft.issn=2071-789X&rft.eissn=2306-3459&rft_id=info:doi/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/17&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E976689%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2339143225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=976689&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_9d717b901dba413ebd636427ba5ef062&rfr_iscdi=true |