Impact of image preprocessing methods on reproducibility of radiomic features in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma

To investigate the effect of image preprocessing, in respect to intensity inhomogeneity correction and noise filtering, on the robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features extracted from the Glioblastoma (GBM) tumor in multimodal MR images (mMRI). In this study, for each patient 1461 rad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2020-01, Vol.21 (1), p.179-190
Hauptverfasser: Moradmand, Hajar, Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza, Ghaderi, Reza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 1
container_start_page 179
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 21
creator Moradmand, Hajar
Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza
Ghaderi, Reza
description To investigate the effect of image preprocessing, in respect to intensity inhomogeneity correction and noise filtering, on the robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features extracted from the Glioblastoma (GBM) tumor in multimodal MR images (mMRI). In this study, for each patient 1461 radiomics features were extracted from GBM subregions (i.e., edema, necrosis, enhancement, and tumor) of mMRI (i.e., FLAIR, T1, T1C, and T2) volumes for five preprocessing combinations (in total 116 880 radiomics features). The robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features were assessed under four comparisons: (a) Baseline versus modified bias field; (b) Baseline versus modified bias field followed by noise filtering; (c) Baseline versus modified noise, and (d) Baseline versus modified noise followed bias field correction. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), dynamic range (DR), and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used as metrics. Shape features and subsequently, local binary pattern (LBP) filtered images were highly stable and reproducible against bias field correction and noise filtering in all measurements. In all MRI modalities, necrosis regions (NC: n ̅ ~449/1461, 30%) had the highest number of highly robust features, with CCC and DR >= 0.9, in comparison with edema (ED: n ̅ ~296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n ̅ ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor regions (TM: n ̅ ~254/1461, 17%). The necrosis regions (NC: n¯ ~ 449/1461, 30%) had a higher number of highly robust features (CCC and DR >= 0.9) than edema (ED: n¯ ~ 296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n¯ ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor (TM: n¯ ~ 254/1461, 17%) regions across all modalities. Furthermore, our results identified that the percentage of high reproducible features with ICC >= 0.9 after bias field correction (23.2%), and bias field correction followed by noise filtering (22.4%) were higher in contrast with noise smoothing and also noise smoothing follow by bias correction. These preliminary findings imply that preprocessing sequences can also have a significant impact on the robustness and reproducibility of mMRI‐based radiomics features and identification of generalizable and consistent preprocessing algorithms is a pivotal step before imposing radiomics biomarkers into the clinic for GBM patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.12795
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2338982365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2331249487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5425-9e634d9ed0b3b5dc5b1f7ed147ee921fb0f628b55b80b6a3d0ac7c380aaa627d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqWw4QFQJDYINMW_ibOpVEUFKhWxgbXln5upq8QebAc0L8Bz15kZRoUFYuUr3--ee-xTVS8xOscIkffKTOQck7bjj6pTzEmz6jrMHj-oT6pnKd0hhLGg4ml1QrEQiCF8Wv26njbK5DoMtZvUGupNhE0MBlJyfl1PkG-DTXXw9e7ezsZpN7q8XSaisi5MztQDqDxHSLXz9TSP2U3BqrEugh5y6ZdW8Mob2C1ZhAu4Hl3Qo0o5TOp59WRQY4IXh_Os-vbh6mv_aXXz5eN1f3mzMpwRvuqgocx2YJGmmlvDNR5asJi1AB3Bg0ZDQ4TmXAukG0UtUqY1VCClVENaS8-qi73uZtYTWAM-RzXKTSy-4lYG5eSfHe9u5Tr8kE3XsLbFReDNQSCG7zOkLCeXDIyj8hDmJAmlmLCOibagr_9C78IcfXneQolOENrwQr3dUyaGlCIMRzMYySVeucQrd_EW-NVD-0f0d54FEHvgJ-gwJOOgfPoRQwhxxJhoeKkQ7l1W2QXfh9nnMvru_0cLjQ-0G2H7D8_ysv9M9u7vAcwx1GY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2338982365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of image preprocessing methods on reproducibility of radiomic features in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Moradmand, Hajar ; Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza ; Ghaderi, Reza</creator><creatorcontrib>Moradmand, Hajar ; Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza ; Ghaderi, Reza</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate the effect of image preprocessing, in respect to intensity inhomogeneity correction and noise filtering, on the robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features extracted from the Glioblastoma (GBM) tumor in multimodal MR images (mMRI). In this study, for each patient 1461 radiomics features were extracted from GBM subregions (i.e., edema, necrosis, enhancement, and tumor) of mMRI (i.e., FLAIR, T1, T1C, and T2) volumes for five preprocessing combinations (in total 116 880 radiomics features). The robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features were assessed under four comparisons: (a) Baseline versus modified bias field; (b) Baseline versus modified bias field followed by noise filtering; (c) Baseline versus modified noise, and (d) Baseline versus modified noise followed bias field correction. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), dynamic range (DR), and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used as metrics. Shape features and subsequently, local binary pattern (LBP) filtered images were highly stable and reproducible against bias field correction and noise filtering in all measurements. In all MRI modalities, necrosis regions (NC: n ̅ ~449/1461, 30%) had the highest number of highly robust features, with CCC and DR &gt;= 0.9, in comparison with edema (ED: n ̅ ~296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n ̅ ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor regions (TM: n ̅ ~254/1461, 17%). The necrosis regions (NC: n¯ ~ 449/1461, 30%) had a higher number of highly robust features (CCC and DR &gt;= 0.9) than edema (ED: n¯ ~ 296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n¯ ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor (TM: n¯ ~ 254/1461, 17%) regions across all modalities. Furthermore, our results identified that the percentage of high reproducible features with ICC &gt;= 0.9 after bias field correction (23.2%), and bias field correction followed by noise filtering (22.4%) were higher in contrast with noise smoothing and also noise smoothing follow by bias correction. These preliminary findings imply that preprocessing sequences can also have a significant impact on the robustness and reproducibility of mMRI‐based radiomics features and identification of generalizable and consistent preprocessing algorithms is a pivotal step before imposing radiomics biomarkers into the clinic for GBM patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12795</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31880401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>HOBOKEN: Wiley</publisher><subject>Bias ; Biomarkers ; Brain cancer ; Brain research ; Cancer ; Females ; glioblastoma ; imge preprocessing ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical Imaging ; Medical prognosis ; multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI) ; Noise ; Patients ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine &amp; Medical Imaging ; Radiomics ; Registration ; Reproducibility ; Scanners ; Science &amp; Technology ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2020-01, Vol.21 (1), p.179-190</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>103</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000504486500001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5425-9e634d9ed0b3b5dc5b1f7ed147ee921fb0f628b55b80b6a3d0ac7c380aaa627d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5425-9e634d9ed0b3b5dc5b1f7ed147ee921fb0f628b55b80b6a3d0ac7c380aaa627d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964771/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6964771/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,1418,2115,11567,27929,27930,28253,45579,45580,46057,46481,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31880401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moradmand, Hajar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaderi, Reza</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of image preprocessing methods on reproducibility of radiomic features in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J APPL CLIN MED PHYS</addtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>To investigate the effect of image preprocessing, in respect to intensity inhomogeneity correction and noise filtering, on the robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features extracted from the Glioblastoma (GBM) tumor in multimodal MR images (mMRI). In this study, for each patient 1461 radiomics features were extracted from GBM subregions (i.e., edema, necrosis, enhancement, and tumor) of mMRI (i.e., FLAIR, T1, T1C, and T2) volumes for five preprocessing combinations (in total 116 880 radiomics features). The robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features were assessed under four comparisons: (a) Baseline versus modified bias field; (b) Baseline versus modified bias field followed by noise filtering; (c) Baseline versus modified noise, and (d) Baseline versus modified noise followed bias field correction. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), dynamic range (DR), and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used as metrics. Shape features and subsequently, local binary pattern (LBP) filtered images were highly stable and reproducible against bias field correction and noise filtering in all measurements. In all MRI modalities, necrosis regions (NC: n ̅ ~449/1461, 30%) had the highest number of highly robust features, with CCC and DR &gt;= 0.9, in comparison with edema (ED: n ̅ ~296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n ̅ ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor regions (TM: n ̅ ~254/1461, 17%). The necrosis regions (NC: n¯ ~ 449/1461, 30%) had a higher number of highly robust features (CCC and DR &gt;= 0.9) than edema (ED: n¯ ~ 296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n¯ ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor (TM: n¯ ~ 254/1461, 17%) regions across all modalities. Furthermore, our results identified that the percentage of high reproducible features with ICC &gt;= 0.9 after bias field correction (23.2%), and bias field correction followed by noise filtering (22.4%) were higher in contrast with noise smoothing and also noise smoothing follow by bias correction. These preliminary findings imply that preprocessing sequences can also have a significant impact on the robustness and reproducibility of mMRI‐based radiomics features and identification of generalizable and consistent preprocessing algorithms is a pivotal step before imposing radiomics biomarkers into the clinic for GBM patients.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Brain cancer</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>glioblastoma</subject><subject>imge preprocessing</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI)</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine &amp; Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Radiomics</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhSMEoqWw4QFQJDYINMW_ibOpVEUFKhWxgbXln5upq8QebAc0L8Bz15kZRoUFYuUr3--ee-xTVS8xOscIkffKTOQck7bjj6pTzEmz6jrMHj-oT6pnKd0hhLGg4ml1QrEQiCF8Wv26njbK5DoMtZvUGupNhE0MBlJyfl1PkG-DTXXw9e7ezsZpN7q8XSaisi5MztQDqDxHSLXz9TSP2U3BqrEugh5y6ZdW8Mob2C1ZhAu4Hl3Qo0o5TOp59WRQY4IXh_Os-vbh6mv_aXXz5eN1f3mzMpwRvuqgocx2YJGmmlvDNR5asJi1AB3Bg0ZDQ4TmXAukG0UtUqY1VCClVENaS8-qi73uZtYTWAM-RzXKTSy-4lYG5eSfHe9u5Tr8kE3XsLbFReDNQSCG7zOkLCeXDIyj8hDmJAmlmLCOibagr_9C78IcfXneQolOENrwQr3dUyaGlCIMRzMYySVeucQrd_EW-NVD-0f0d54FEHvgJ-gwJOOgfPoRQwhxxJhoeKkQ7l1W2QXfh9nnMvru_0cLjQ-0G2H7D8_ysv9M9u7vAcwx1GY</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Moradmand, Hajar</creator><creator>Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza</creator><creator>Ghaderi, Reza</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Impact of image preprocessing methods on reproducibility of radiomic features in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma</title><author>Moradmand, Hajar ; Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza ; Ghaderi, Reza</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5425-9e634d9ed0b3b5dc5b1f7ed147ee921fb0f628b55b80b6a3d0ac7c380aaa627d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Brain cancer</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>glioblastoma</topic><topic>imge preprocessing</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI)</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiology, Nuclear Medicine &amp; Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Radiomics</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moradmand, Hajar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghaderi, Reza</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moradmand, Hajar</au><au>Aghamiri, Seyed Mahmoud Reza</au><au>Ghaderi, Reza</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of image preprocessing methods on reproducibility of radiomic features in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><stitle>J APPL CLIN MED PHYS</stitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>179-190</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>To investigate the effect of image preprocessing, in respect to intensity inhomogeneity correction and noise filtering, on the robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features extracted from the Glioblastoma (GBM) tumor in multimodal MR images (mMRI). In this study, for each patient 1461 radiomics features were extracted from GBM subregions (i.e., edema, necrosis, enhancement, and tumor) of mMRI (i.e., FLAIR, T1, T1C, and T2) volumes for five preprocessing combinations (in total 116 880 radiomics features). The robustness and reproducibility of the radiomics features were assessed under four comparisons: (a) Baseline versus modified bias field; (b) Baseline versus modified bias field followed by noise filtering; (c) Baseline versus modified noise, and (d) Baseline versus modified noise followed bias field correction. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), dynamic range (DR), and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used as metrics. Shape features and subsequently, local binary pattern (LBP) filtered images were highly stable and reproducible against bias field correction and noise filtering in all measurements. In all MRI modalities, necrosis regions (NC: n ̅ ~449/1461, 30%) had the highest number of highly robust features, with CCC and DR &gt;= 0.9, in comparison with edema (ED: n ̅ ~296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n ̅ ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor regions (TM: n ̅ ~254/1461, 17%). The necrosis regions (NC: n¯ ~ 449/1461, 30%) had a higher number of highly robust features (CCC and DR &gt;= 0.9) than edema (ED: n¯ ~ 296/1461, 20%), enhanced (EN: n¯ ~ 281/1461, 19%) and active‐tumor (TM: n¯ ~ 254/1461, 17%) regions across all modalities. Furthermore, our results identified that the percentage of high reproducible features with ICC &gt;= 0.9 after bias field correction (23.2%), and bias field correction followed by noise filtering (22.4%) were higher in contrast with noise smoothing and also noise smoothing follow by bias correction. These preliminary findings imply that preprocessing sequences can also have a significant impact on the robustness and reproducibility of mMRI‐based radiomics features and identification of generalizable and consistent preprocessing algorithms is a pivotal step before imposing radiomics biomarkers into the clinic for GBM patients.</abstract><cop>HOBOKEN</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>31880401</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.12795</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2020-01, Vol.21 (1), p.179-190
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2338982365
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central
subjects Bias
Biomarkers
Brain cancer
Brain research
Cancer
Females
glioblastoma
imge preprocessing
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Magnetic fields
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical Imaging
Medical prognosis
multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (mMRI)
Noise
Patients
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Radiomics
Registration
Reproducibility
Scanners
Science & Technology
Studies
title Impact of image preprocessing methods on reproducibility of radiomic features in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T22%3A36%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20image%20preprocessing%20methods%20on%20reproducibility%20of%20radiomic%20features%20in%20multimodal%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20glioblastoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Moradmand,%20Hajar&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=179-190&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.12795&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2331249487%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2338982365&rft_id=info:pmid/31880401&rfr_iscdi=true