OP166 How Responsive Is Industry To Value Based Procurement?
Introduction:The European Union (EU) directive (2014/24) on public procurement strives to stimulate innovation and seeks for methodologies to implement a quality/cost based approach to search for the most economically advantageous tendering (MEAT). MedTech Europe launched the MEAT value-based-procur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of technology assessment in health care 2018, Vol.34 (S1), p.60-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | S1 |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | International journal of technology assessment in health care |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Restovic, Gabriela Cuenca, Nuria Rodriguez, Ferran Verboven, Yves Sampietro-Colom, Laura |
description | Introduction:The European Union (EU) directive (2014/24) on public procurement strives to stimulate innovation and seeks for methodologies to implement a quality/cost based approach to search for the most economically advantageous tendering (MEAT). MedTech Europe launched the MEAT value-based-procurement (VBP) framework and tool which considers product's value from different perspectives/dimensions. Results from the first EU pilot, testing the feasibility to use the MEAT framework at a university hospital, are presented.Methods:The framework and tool were tested using two types of technologies: high volume (underpads, diapers) and highly specialized (transcatheter aortic valve implantation). Companies were invited to participate following standard procurement rules. For each dimension, criteria, metrics and weights were defined, using multidisciplinary hospital teams. In parallel, companies were asked to do the same. Product performance scores were obtained from companies’ information. Challenges to implement MEAT in real life were identified through face-to-face meetings.Results:The process was well perceived by companies and hospital. Nevertheless, the level of information provided by companies was heterogeneous (quantity and quality). A match in the cost and outcome criteria was observed between hospital and companies; but relative weights assigned differed. Value propositions and robustness of information provided by companies varied across technologies and size of companies. Implementing the MEAT VBP framework and tool need extra time and knowledge.Conclusions:MEAT VBP value technologies ahead of price, leading to the most economic advantageous purchasing. Nevertheless its implementation in real life is limited. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0266462318001708 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2338908877</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462318001708</cupid><sourcerecordid>2338908877</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1147-86c8cfb7baeb17e52502b48a49317ab55332e7a5a85f0c593d0d8c091936a353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gLcFz9GZTPZPQBAt1RYKLVq8hs1mIy1ttu42Sr-9KS14EE_D8H7vzfAYu0a4RUB19waplJlMCTV0O-gT1sNMYSIp06est5eTvX7OLmJcdgxBDj12P52hlHzkv_mrixvfxMWX4-PIx03Vxm3Y8bnn72bVOv5koqv4LHjbBrd2zfbhkp3VZhXd1XH22fx5OB-Mksn0ZTx4nCQWux8SLa22dalK40pUTqQC0jLTJssJlSmFIEqdMsJoUYMVOVVQaQs55iQNCeqzm0PsJvjP1sVtsfRtaLqLRUqkc9BaqY7CA2WDjzG4utiExdqEXYFQ7Dsq_nTUeejoMesyLKoP9xv9v-sHZnFlfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2338908877</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OP166 How Responsive Is Industry To Value Based Procurement?</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Restovic, Gabriela ; Cuenca, Nuria ; Rodriguez, Ferran ; Verboven, Yves ; Sampietro-Colom, Laura</creator><creatorcontrib>Restovic, Gabriela ; Cuenca, Nuria ; Rodriguez, Ferran ; Verboven, Yves ; Sampietro-Colom, Laura</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction:The European Union (EU) directive (2014/24) on public procurement strives to stimulate innovation and seeks for methodologies to implement a quality/cost based approach to search for the most economically advantageous tendering (MEAT). MedTech Europe launched the MEAT value-based-procurement (VBP) framework and tool which considers product's value from different perspectives/dimensions. Results from the first EU pilot, testing the feasibility to use the MEAT framework at a university hospital, are presented.Methods:The framework and tool were tested using two types of technologies: high volume (underpads, diapers) and highly specialized (transcatheter aortic valve implantation). Companies were invited to participate following standard procurement rules. For each dimension, criteria, metrics and weights were defined, using multidisciplinary hospital teams. In parallel, companies were asked to do the same. Product performance scores were obtained from companies’ information. Challenges to implement MEAT in real life were identified through face-to-face meetings.Results:The process was well perceived by companies and hospital. Nevertheless, the level of information provided by companies was heterogeneous (quantity and quality). A match in the cost and outcome criteria was observed between hospital and companies; but relative weights assigned differed. Value propositions and robustness of information provided by companies varied across technologies and size of companies. Implementing the MEAT VBP framework and tool need extra time and knowledge.Conclusions:MEAT VBP value technologies ahead of price, leading to the most economic advantageous purchasing. Nevertheless its implementation in real life is limited.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462318001708</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Alzheimer's disease ; Aortic valve ; Cellular telephones ; Collaboration ; Electrocardiography ; Electrodes ; Implantation ; Meat ; Oral Presentations ; Procurement ; Tendering ; Usability</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2018, Vol.34 (S1), p.60-61</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266462318001708/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Restovic, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuenca, Nuria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verboven, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampietro-Colom, Laura</creatorcontrib><title>OP166 How Responsive Is Industry To Value Based Procurement?</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Introduction:The European Union (EU) directive (2014/24) on public procurement strives to stimulate innovation and seeks for methodologies to implement a quality/cost based approach to search for the most economically advantageous tendering (MEAT). MedTech Europe launched the MEAT value-based-procurement (VBP) framework and tool which considers product's value from different perspectives/dimensions. Results from the first EU pilot, testing the feasibility to use the MEAT framework at a university hospital, are presented.Methods:The framework and tool were tested using two types of technologies: high volume (underpads, diapers) and highly specialized (transcatheter aortic valve implantation). Companies were invited to participate following standard procurement rules. For each dimension, criteria, metrics and weights were defined, using multidisciplinary hospital teams. In parallel, companies were asked to do the same. Product performance scores were obtained from companies’ information. Challenges to implement MEAT in real life were identified through face-to-face meetings.Results:The process was well perceived by companies and hospital. Nevertheless, the level of information provided by companies was heterogeneous (quantity and quality). A match in the cost and outcome criteria was observed between hospital and companies; but relative weights assigned differed. Value propositions and robustness of information provided by companies varied across technologies and size of companies. Implementing the MEAT VBP framework and tool need extra time and knowledge.Conclusions:MEAT VBP value technologies ahead of price, leading to the most economic advantageous purchasing. Nevertheless its implementation in real life is limited.</description><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>Aortic valve</subject><subject>Cellular telephones</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><subject>Procurement</subject><subject>Tendering</subject><subject>Usability</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gLcFz9GZTPZPQBAt1RYKLVq8hs1mIy1ttu42Sr-9KS14EE_D8H7vzfAYu0a4RUB19waplJlMCTV0O-gT1sNMYSIp06est5eTvX7OLmJcdgxBDj12P52hlHzkv_mrixvfxMWX4-PIx03Vxm3Y8bnn72bVOv5koqv4LHjbBrd2zfbhkp3VZhXd1XH22fx5OB-Mksn0ZTx4nCQWux8SLa22dalK40pUTqQC0jLTJssJlSmFIEqdMsJoUYMVOVVQaQs55iQNCeqzm0PsJvjP1sVtsfRtaLqLRUqkc9BaqY7CA2WDjzG4utiExdqEXYFQ7Dsq_nTUeejoMesyLKoP9xv9v-sHZnFlfQ</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Restovic, Gabriela</creator><creator>Cuenca, Nuria</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Ferran</creator><creator>Verboven, Yves</creator><creator>Sampietro-Colom, Laura</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>OP166 How Responsive Is Industry To Value Based Procurement?</title><author>Restovic, Gabriela ; Cuenca, Nuria ; Rodriguez, Ferran ; Verboven, Yves ; Sampietro-Colom, Laura</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1147-86c8cfb7baeb17e52502b48a49317ab55332e7a5a85f0c593d0d8c091936a353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>Aortic valve</topic><topic>Cellular telephones</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Oral Presentations</topic><topic>Procurement</topic><topic>Tendering</topic><topic>Usability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Restovic, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuenca, Nuria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Ferran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verboven, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sampietro-Colom, Laura</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Restovic, Gabriela</au><au>Cuenca, Nuria</au><au>Rodriguez, Ferran</au><au>Verboven, Yves</au><au>Sampietro-Colom, Laura</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OP166 How Responsive Is Industry To Value Based Procurement?</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>S1</issue><spage>60</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>60-61</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>Introduction:The European Union (EU) directive (2014/24) on public procurement strives to stimulate innovation and seeks for methodologies to implement a quality/cost based approach to search for the most economically advantageous tendering (MEAT). MedTech Europe launched the MEAT value-based-procurement (VBP) framework and tool which considers product's value from different perspectives/dimensions. Results from the first EU pilot, testing the feasibility to use the MEAT framework at a university hospital, are presented.Methods:The framework and tool were tested using two types of technologies: high volume (underpads, diapers) and highly specialized (transcatheter aortic valve implantation). Companies were invited to participate following standard procurement rules. For each dimension, criteria, metrics and weights were defined, using multidisciplinary hospital teams. In parallel, companies were asked to do the same. Product performance scores were obtained from companies’ information. Challenges to implement MEAT in real life were identified through face-to-face meetings.Results:The process was well perceived by companies and hospital. Nevertheless, the level of information provided by companies was heterogeneous (quantity and quality). A match in the cost and outcome criteria was observed between hospital and companies; but relative weights assigned differed. Value propositions and robustness of information provided by companies varied across technologies and size of companies. Implementing the MEAT VBP framework and tool need extra time and knowledge.Conclusions:MEAT VBP value technologies ahead of price, leading to the most economic advantageous purchasing. Nevertheless its implementation in real life is limited.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0266462318001708</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4623 |
ispartof | International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2018, Vol.34 (S1), p.60-61 |
issn | 0266-4623 1471-6348 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2338908877 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Alzheimer's disease Aortic valve Cellular telephones Collaboration Electrocardiography Electrodes Implantation Meat Oral Presentations Procurement Tendering Usability |
title | OP166 How Responsive Is Industry To Value Based Procurement? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A25%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OP166%20How%20Responsive%20Is%20Industry%20To%20Value%20Based%20Procurement?&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Restovic,%20Gabriela&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=S1&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=60-61&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462318001708&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2338908877%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2338908877&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462318001708&rfr_iscdi=true |