Herbicide options for glyphosate-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) management in the Great Plains
Kochia is one of the most problematic weeds in the United States. Field studies were conducted in five states (Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota) over 2 yr (2010 and 2011) to evaluate kochia control with selected herbicides registered in five common crop scenarios: winter wheat,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 2019-10, Vol.33 (5), p.658-663 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 663 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 658 |
| container_title | Weed technology |
| container_volume | 33 |
| creator | Sbatella, Gustavo M Adjesiwor, Albert T Kniss, Andrew R Stahlman, Phillip W Westra, Phil Moechnig, Michael Wilson, Robert G |
| description | Kochia is one of the most problematic weeds in the United States. Field studies were conducted in five states (Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota) over 2 yr (2010 and 2011) to evaluate kochia control with selected herbicides registered in five common crop scenarios: winter wheat, fallow, corn, soybean, and sugar beet to provide insight for diversifying kochia management in crop rotations. Kochia control varied by experimental site such that more variation in kochia control and biomass production was explained by experimental site than herbicide choice within a crop. Kochia control with herbicides currently labeled for use in sugar beet averaged 32% across locations. Kochia control was greatest and most consistent from corn herbicide programs (99%), followed by soybean (96%) and fallow (97%) herbicide programs. Kochia control from wheat herbicide programs was 93%. With respect to the availability of effective herbicide options, glyphosate-resistant kochia control was easiest in corn, soybean, and fallow, followed by wheat; and difficult to manage with herbicides in sugar beet. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; kochia, Bassia scoparia (L.) A. J. Scott, KCHSC; corn, Zea mays L. ZEAMX; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. GLXMA; sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. BEAVX; wheat, Triticum aestivum L. TRZAX |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wet.2019.48 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2338544368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26803429</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26803429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-414738946148d5b243f2ad62f82377773adea063b684d7122744ddef2672bec13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWKsnz0LAi0W25muz2aMWbYWCHhS8hezu2za13axJivS_N6Xi0XeZw_yY4Q1Cl5SMKaHF3TfEMSO0HAt1hAY0z0nGCkGO0YCokmSEFx-n6CyEFSFUMkYGqJqBr2xtG8Cuj9Z1AbfO48V61y9dMBEyD8GGaLqIP129tAbfPJgQkoba9cZbM8Ib05kFbCAxtsNxCXjqwUT8uja2C-fopDXrABe_OkTvT49vk1k2f5k-T-7nWcVzETNBRcFVKSQVqskrJnjLTCNZqxgv0nHTgCGSV1KJpqAsPSaaBlomC1ZBTfkQXR9ye---thCiXrmt71KlZpyrXAguVaJuD1TtXQgeWt17uzF-pynR-xF1GlHvR9RiT18d6FWIzv-hTCrCBSuTPzr4lXWug3-zfgDnDnuo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2338544368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Herbicide options for glyphosate-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) management in the Great Plains</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Sbatella, Gustavo M ; Adjesiwor, Albert T ; Kniss, Andrew R ; Stahlman, Phillip W ; Westra, Phil ; Moechnig, Michael ; Wilson, Robert G</creator><creatorcontrib>Sbatella, Gustavo M ; Adjesiwor, Albert T ; Kniss, Andrew R ; Stahlman, Phillip W ; Westra, Phil ; Moechnig, Michael ; Wilson, Robert G</creatorcontrib><description>Kochia is one of the most problematic weeds in the United States. Field studies were conducted in five states (Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota) over 2 yr (2010 and 2011) to evaluate kochia control with selected herbicides registered in five common crop scenarios: winter wheat, fallow, corn, soybean, and sugar beet to provide insight for diversifying kochia management in crop rotations. Kochia control varied by experimental site such that more variation in kochia control and biomass production was explained by experimental site than herbicide choice within a crop. Kochia control with herbicides currently labeled for use in sugar beet averaged 32% across locations. Kochia control was greatest and most consistent from corn herbicide programs (99%), followed by soybean (96%) and fallow (97%) herbicide programs. Kochia control from wheat herbicide programs was 93%. With respect to the availability of effective herbicide options, glyphosate-resistant kochia control was easiest in corn, soybean, and fallow, followed by wheat; and difficult to manage with herbicides in sugar beet. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; kochia, Bassia scoparia (L.) A. J. Scott, KCHSC; corn, Zea mays L. ZEAMX; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. GLXMA; sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. BEAVX; wheat, Triticum aestivum L. TRZAX</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2019.48</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Biomass ; Cereal crops ; Corn ; Crop rotation ; Crops ; environment ; Glyphosate ; herbicide variability ; Herbicides ; Sorghum ; Soybeans ; Sugar ; Wheat ; Winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2019-10, Vol.33 (5), p.658-663</ispartof><rights>Weed Science Society of America 2019. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</rights><rights>Weed Science Society of America, 2019</rights><rights>2019 This article is published under (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-414738946148d5b243f2ad62f82377773adea063b684d7122744ddef2672bec13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-414738946148d5b243f2ad62f82377773adea063b684d7122744ddef2672bec13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2551-4959 ; 0000-0002-0047-8771</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26803429$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26803429$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27923,27924,58016,58249</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sbatella, Gustavo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjesiwor, Albert T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kniss, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlman, Phillip W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westra, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moechnig, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Robert G</creatorcontrib><title>Herbicide options for glyphosate-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) management in the Great Plains</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Kochia is one of the most problematic weeds in the United States. Field studies were conducted in five states (Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota) over 2 yr (2010 and 2011) to evaluate kochia control with selected herbicides registered in five common crop scenarios: winter wheat, fallow, corn, soybean, and sugar beet to provide insight for diversifying kochia management in crop rotations. Kochia control varied by experimental site such that more variation in kochia control and biomass production was explained by experimental site than herbicide choice within a crop. Kochia control with herbicides currently labeled for use in sugar beet averaged 32% across locations. Kochia control was greatest and most consistent from corn herbicide programs (99%), followed by soybean (96%) and fallow (97%) herbicide programs. Kochia control from wheat herbicide programs was 93%. With respect to the availability of effective herbicide options, glyphosate-resistant kochia control was easiest in corn, soybean, and fallow, followed by wheat; and difficult to manage with herbicides in sugar beet. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; kochia, Bassia scoparia (L.) A. J. Scott, KCHSC; corn, Zea mays L. ZEAMX; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. GLXMA; sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. BEAVX; wheat, Triticum aestivum L. TRZAX</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Cereal crops</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>herbicide variability</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Sorghum</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Winter wheat</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEUxIMoWKsnz0LAi0W25muz2aMWbYWCHhS8hezu2za13axJivS_N6Xi0XeZw_yY4Q1Cl5SMKaHF3TfEMSO0HAt1hAY0z0nGCkGO0YCokmSEFx-n6CyEFSFUMkYGqJqBr2xtG8Cuj9Z1AbfO48V61y9dMBEyD8GGaLqIP129tAbfPJgQkoba9cZbM8Ib05kFbCAxtsNxCXjqwUT8uja2C-fopDXrABe_OkTvT49vk1k2f5k-T-7nWcVzETNBRcFVKSQVqskrJnjLTCNZqxgv0nHTgCGSV1KJpqAsPSaaBlomC1ZBTfkQXR9ye---thCiXrmt71KlZpyrXAguVaJuD1TtXQgeWt17uzF-pynR-xF1GlHvR9RiT18d6FWIzv-hTCrCBSuTPzr4lXWug3-zfgDnDnuo</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Sbatella, Gustavo M</creator><creator>Adjesiwor, Albert T</creator><creator>Kniss, Andrew R</creator><creator>Stahlman, Phillip W</creator><creator>Westra, Phil</creator><creator>Moechnig, Michael</creator><creator>Wilson, Robert G</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-4959</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-8771</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Herbicide options for glyphosate-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) management in the Great Plains</title><author>Sbatella, Gustavo M ; Adjesiwor, Albert T ; Kniss, Andrew R ; Stahlman, Phillip W ; Westra, Phil ; Moechnig, Michael ; Wilson, Robert G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b354t-414738946148d5b243f2ad62f82377773adea063b684d7122744ddef2672bec13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Cereal crops</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>herbicide variability</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Sorghum</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sbatella, Gustavo M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adjesiwor, Albert T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kniss, Andrew R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahlman, Phillip W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westra, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moechnig, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Robert G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sbatella, Gustavo M</au><au>Adjesiwor, Albert T</au><au>Kniss, Andrew R</au><au>Stahlman, Phillip W</au><au>Westra, Phil</au><au>Moechnig, Michael</au><au>Wilson, Robert G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Herbicide options for glyphosate-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) management in the Great Plains</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>658</spage><epage>663</epage><pages>658-663</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Kochia is one of the most problematic weeds in the United States. Field studies were conducted in five states (Wyoming, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, and South Dakota) over 2 yr (2010 and 2011) to evaluate kochia control with selected herbicides registered in five common crop scenarios: winter wheat, fallow, corn, soybean, and sugar beet to provide insight for diversifying kochia management in crop rotations. Kochia control varied by experimental site such that more variation in kochia control and biomass production was explained by experimental site than herbicide choice within a crop. Kochia control with herbicides currently labeled for use in sugar beet averaged 32% across locations. Kochia control was greatest and most consistent from corn herbicide programs (99%), followed by soybean (96%) and fallow (97%) herbicide programs. Kochia control from wheat herbicide programs was 93%. With respect to the availability of effective herbicide options, glyphosate-resistant kochia control was easiest in corn, soybean, and fallow, followed by wheat; and difficult to manage with herbicides in sugar beet. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; kochia, Bassia scoparia (L.) A. J. Scott, KCHSC; corn, Zea mays L. ZEAMX; soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. GLXMA; sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. BEAVX; wheat, Triticum aestivum L. TRZAX</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2019.48</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2551-4959</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-8771</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
| ispartof | Weed technology, 2019-10, Vol.33 (5), p.658-663 |
| issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2338544368 |
| source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Agricultural practices Biomass Cereal crops Corn Crop rotation Crops environment Glyphosate herbicide variability Herbicides Sorghum Soybeans Sugar Wheat Winter wheat |
| title | Herbicide options for glyphosate-resistant kochia (Bassia scoparia) management in the Great Plains |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T13%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Herbicide%20options%20for%20glyphosate-resistant%20kochia%20(Bassia%20scoparia)%20management%20in%20the%20Great%20Plains&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Sbatella,%20Gustavo%20M&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=658&rft.epage=663&rft.pages=658-663&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2019.48&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26803429%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2338544368&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26803429&rfr_iscdi=true |