0140 In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors and improves knowledge: Multi centre, multispecialty study project
Introduction In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors (potential hazards in workplace)1 and improves knowledge. At present no reliable method could help identify and grade the latent errors across different specialties.By conducting cross specialty, multi site study we aim to esta...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning 2015-11, Vol.1 (Suppl 2), p.A22 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Suppl 2 |
container_start_page | A22 |
container_title | BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Farooq, Omer Quayle, Alexandra Fent, Graham Blythe, James Purva, Makani |
description | Introduction In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors (potential hazards in workplace)1 and improves knowledge. At present no reliable method could help identify and grade the latent errors across different specialties.By conducting cross specialty, multi site study we aim to establish efficiency of in situ simulation in identifying latent errors, grading risk using NPSA risk matrix2 across different specialties and improve knowledge.MethodsSo far 47 participants have participated in this prospective study. Participants had paediatrics, anaesthesia, obstetrics, A&E, midwifery and nursing background. Acute scenarios targeting individual specialty needs were delivered with multidisciplinary team participating in the exercise. Latent errors highlighted were graded according to NPSA risk matrix and respective departments were informed with recommendations to resolve the issues. Immediate pre and post simulation questionnaire were completed and a follow up 6 weeks questionnaire will be sent to the participants. Qualitative and quantitative methods are employed.ResultsOur results demonstrate that 19 latent errors (Equipment 2, Environment 2, Medicine 2, Training 13) have been highlighted, graded according to NPSA risk matrix and subsequent recommendations have been made to parent departments. 65% participants felt considerably confident in management of unwell patient, 87% were able to positively able to identify changes required to improve individual and team performance. 80% had knowledge gaps sufficiently highlighted by in situ simulation exercise. More than 60% of the participants rated feedback as very constructive. About 80% highly recommended regular in situ simulation sessions.Impact on practiceUse of in situ simulation across different specialties has helped us identify latent errors and improve participants’ knowledge. We are able to apply NPSA risk matrix across various specialties with relative ease and found it useful in risk gradation. As it is an on going project, we hope to have further data to strengthen our findings.ReferencesPatterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, et al. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(6):468–77National Patient Safety Agency. A risk matrix for risk managers. NHS 2008 |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.54 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2338038763</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2338038763</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b703-adf00b1ecd5c9463120b2ad9b7e5ecc50b3f67a3388f5cddcf4850a801d0a4943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1PwzAMhiMkJKaxv4AicaXDaZp-cEMTsElDXHaP0iSFlH6RpKDduOyP8ktI1flgy_b72tKD0A2BNSE0vS_b2nndRDEQFkGIjK1ZcoEWMbA0StMiu0Ir5-qwIdm0pwt0ApLA3-9p12Fn_BhSOzbCm77DH7oZHDYdNkp33lRGzvO-wkERRlhb21uHRaewaQfbf2uHP7v-p9HqXT_g17HxBsugtPoOt1PnBi2NaPwROz-qIw6mWkt_jS4r0Ti9OtclOjw_HTbbaP_2sts87qMyAxoJVQGUREvFZJGklMRQxkIVZaaZlpJBSas0E5TmecWkUrJKcgYiB6JAJEVCl-h2Phvefo3aeV73o-3CRx4HF9A8S2lQkVkVePLBmlbYIyfAJ8b8zJhPjPnMmLOE_gMvrnbO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2338038763</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>0140 In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors and improves knowledge: Multi centre, multispecialty study project</title><source>Portico (Triggered Content) Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Farooq, Omer ; Quayle, Alexandra ; Fent, Graham ; Blythe, James ; Purva, Makani</creator><creatorcontrib>Farooq, Omer ; Quayle, Alexandra ; Fent, Graham ; Blythe, James ; Purva, Makani</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors (potential hazards in workplace)1 and improves knowledge. At present no reliable method could help identify and grade the latent errors across different specialties.By conducting cross specialty, multi site study we aim to establish efficiency of in situ simulation in identifying latent errors, grading risk using NPSA risk matrix2 across different specialties and improve knowledge.MethodsSo far 47 participants have participated in this prospective study. Participants had paediatrics, anaesthesia, obstetrics, A&E, midwifery and nursing background. Acute scenarios targeting individual specialty needs were delivered with multidisciplinary team participating in the exercise. Latent errors highlighted were graded according to NPSA risk matrix and respective departments were informed with recommendations to resolve the issues. Immediate pre and post simulation questionnaire were completed and a follow up 6 weeks questionnaire will be sent to the participants. Qualitative and quantitative methods are employed.ResultsOur results demonstrate that 19 latent errors (Equipment 2, Environment 2, Medicine 2, Training 13) have been highlighted, graded according to NPSA risk matrix and subsequent recommendations have been made to parent departments. 65% participants felt considerably confident in management of unwell patient, 87% were able to positively able to identify changes required to improve individual and team performance. 80% had knowledge gaps sufficiently highlighted by in situ simulation exercise. More than 60% of the participants rated feedback as very constructive. About 80% highly recommended regular in situ simulation sessions.Impact on practiceUse of in situ simulation across different specialties has helped us identify latent errors and improve participants’ knowledge. We are able to apply NPSA risk matrix across various specialties with relative ease and found it useful in risk gradation. As it is an on going project, we hope to have further data to strengthen our findings.ReferencesPatterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, et al. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(6):468–77National Patient Safety Agency. A risk matrix for risk managers. NHS 2008</description><identifier>EISSN: 2056-6697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.54</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group LTD</publisher><subject>Patient safety ; Questionnaires ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2015-11, Vol.1 (Suppl 2), p.A22</ispartof><rights>2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><rights>2015 2015, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farooq, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quayle, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fent, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blythe, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purva, Makani</creatorcontrib><title>0140 In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors and improves knowledge: Multi centre, multispecialty study project</title><title>BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning</title><description>Introduction In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors (potential hazards in workplace)1 and improves knowledge. At present no reliable method could help identify and grade the latent errors across different specialties.By conducting cross specialty, multi site study we aim to establish efficiency of in situ simulation in identifying latent errors, grading risk using NPSA risk matrix2 across different specialties and improve knowledge.MethodsSo far 47 participants have participated in this prospective study. Participants had paediatrics, anaesthesia, obstetrics, A&E, midwifery and nursing background. Acute scenarios targeting individual specialty needs were delivered with multidisciplinary team participating in the exercise. Latent errors highlighted were graded according to NPSA risk matrix and respective departments were informed with recommendations to resolve the issues. Immediate pre and post simulation questionnaire were completed and a follow up 6 weeks questionnaire will be sent to the participants. Qualitative and quantitative methods are employed.ResultsOur results demonstrate that 19 latent errors (Equipment 2, Environment 2, Medicine 2, Training 13) have been highlighted, graded according to NPSA risk matrix and subsequent recommendations have been made to parent departments. 65% participants felt considerably confident in management of unwell patient, 87% were able to positively able to identify changes required to improve individual and team performance. 80% had knowledge gaps sufficiently highlighted by in situ simulation exercise. More than 60% of the participants rated feedback as very constructive. About 80% highly recommended regular in situ simulation sessions.Impact on practiceUse of in situ simulation across different specialties has helped us identify latent errors and improve participants’ knowledge. We are able to apply NPSA risk matrix across various specialties with relative ease and found it useful in risk gradation. As it is an on going project, we hope to have further data to strengthen our findings.ReferencesPatterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, et al. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(6):468–77National Patient Safety Agency. A risk matrix for risk managers. NHS 2008</description><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>2056-6697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1PwzAMhiMkJKaxv4AicaXDaZp-cEMTsElDXHaP0iSFlH6RpKDduOyP8ktI1flgy_b72tKD0A2BNSE0vS_b2nndRDEQFkGIjK1ZcoEWMbA0StMiu0Ir5-qwIdm0pwt0ApLA3-9p12Fn_BhSOzbCm77DH7oZHDYdNkp33lRGzvO-wkERRlhb21uHRaewaQfbf2uHP7v-p9HqXT_g17HxBsugtPoOt1PnBi2NaPwROz-qIw6mWkt_jS4r0Ti9OtclOjw_HTbbaP_2sts87qMyAxoJVQGUREvFZJGklMRQxkIVZaaZlpJBSas0E5TmecWkUrJKcgYiB6JAJEVCl-h2Phvefo3aeV73o-3CRx4HF9A8S2lQkVkVePLBmlbYIyfAJ8b8zJhPjPnMmLOE_gMvrnbO</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Farooq, Omer</creator><creator>Quayle, Alexandra</creator><creator>Fent, Graham</creator><creator>Blythe, James</creator><creator>Purva, Makani</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>0140 In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors and improves knowledge: Multi centre, multispecialty study project</title><author>Farooq, Omer ; Quayle, Alexandra ; Fent, Graham ; Blythe, James ; Purva, Makani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b703-adf00b1ecd5c9463120b2ad9b7e5ecc50b3f67a3388f5cddcf4850a801d0a4943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farooq, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quayle, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fent, Graham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blythe, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purva, Makani</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farooq, Omer</au><au>Quayle, Alexandra</au><au>Fent, Graham</au><au>Blythe, James</au><au>Purva, Makani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>0140 In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors and improves knowledge: Multi centre, multispecialty study project</atitle><jtitle>BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning</jtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>Suppl 2</issue><spage>A22</spage><pages>A22-</pages><eissn>2056-6697</eissn><abstract>Introduction In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors (potential hazards in workplace)1 and improves knowledge. At present no reliable method could help identify and grade the latent errors across different specialties.By conducting cross specialty, multi site study we aim to establish efficiency of in situ simulation in identifying latent errors, grading risk using NPSA risk matrix2 across different specialties and improve knowledge.MethodsSo far 47 participants have participated in this prospective study. Participants had paediatrics, anaesthesia, obstetrics, A&E, midwifery and nursing background. Acute scenarios targeting individual specialty needs were delivered with multidisciplinary team participating in the exercise. Latent errors highlighted were graded according to NPSA risk matrix and respective departments were informed with recommendations to resolve the issues. Immediate pre and post simulation questionnaire were completed and a follow up 6 weeks questionnaire will be sent to the participants. Qualitative and quantitative methods are employed.ResultsOur results demonstrate that 19 latent errors (Equipment 2, Environment 2, Medicine 2, Training 13) have been highlighted, graded according to NPSA risk matrix and subsequent recommendations have been made to parent departments. 65% participants felt considerably confident in management of unwell patient, 87% were able to positively able to identify changes required to improve individual and team performance. 80% had knowledge gaps sufficiently highlighted by in situ simulation exercise. More than 60% of the participants rated feedback as very constructive. About 80% highly recommended regular in situ simulation sessions.Impact on practiceUse of in situ simulation across different specialties has helped us identify latent errors and improve participants’ knowledge. We are able to apply NPSA risk matrix across various specialties with relative ease and found it useful in risk gradation. As it is an on going project, we hope to have further data to strengthen our findings.ReferencesPatterson MD, Geis GL, Falcone RA, et al. In situ simulation: detection of safety threats and teamwork training in a high risk emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(6):468–77National Patient Safety Agency. A risk matrix for risk managers. NHS 2008</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</pub><doi>10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.54</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2056-6697 |
ispartof | BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning, 2015-11, Vol.1 (Suppl 2), p.A22 |
issn | 2056-6697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2338038763 |
source | Portico (Triggered Content) Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Patient safety Questionnaires Simulation |
title | 0140 In situ simulation helps in identification of latent errors and improves knowledge: Multi centre, multispecialty study project |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T00%3A24%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=0140%E2%80%85In%20situ%20simulation%20helps%20in%20identification%20of%20latent%20errors%20and%20improves%20knowledge:%20Multi%20centre,%20multispecialty%20study%20project&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20simulation%20&%20technology%20enhanced%20learning&rft.au=Farooq,%20Omer&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=Suppl%202&rft.spage=A22&rft.pages=A22-&rft.eissn=2056-6697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.54&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_p%3E2338038763%3C/proquest_bmj_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2338038763&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |