Special Section: Conceptualizations of the Holocaust in Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine: Historical Research, Public Debates, and Methodological Disputes. Foreword
This special section examines how debates on local participation in the mass murder of the Jews during the Second World War have evolved in Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine. The comparative approach adopted in this collection has highlighted the common problems in these four countries in comi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | East European politics and societies 2020-02, Vol.34 (1), p.124-128 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 128 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 124 |
container_title | East European politics and societies |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Polonsky, Antony |
description | This special section examines how debates on local participation in the mass murder of the Jews during the Second World War have evolved in Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine. The comparative approach adopted in this collection has highlighted the common problems in these four countries in coming to terms with the “dark past”—those aspects of the national past that provoke shame, guilt, and regret. Like the contributors to this collection I believe it is debate among historians that offers the best chance to move forward and that the intervention of politicians has had a clearly deleterious effect. This debate needs to be conducted in an open and collegial manner although we may differ strongly in our conclusions. We should always remember that the past cannot be altered. We can only accept the tragic and shocking events that have occurred and try to learn from them. This is a process that could begin in northeastern Europe only after the collapse of the communist system—a coming to terms with the many neglected and taboo aspects of the past in all four countries. The first stage of approaching such issues has usually been from a moral point of view—a settlement of long-overdue accounts, often accompanied by apologies for past behaviour. It seemed that we were reaching a second stage, where apologetics would increasingly be replaced by careful and detailed research based on archives and reliable first-hand testimony. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0888325419852671 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2336994714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>901275</ceeol_id><sage_id>10.1177_0888325419852671</sage_id><sourcerecordid>901275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2771-7b3e4caecacbff4ecd08eafe4b7f03769f4f775f840dbaea0b27df5ec1ff35663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EEkvhzoGDJa5JseMkTnqDLe0iLQJRerYmzrjr4sbBdoTKc_GAeNmVKiHEaaT5v2_-wxDykrNTzqV8w7quE1VT875rqlbyR2TFGyHKTkj-mKz2cbnPn5JnMd4yxipetSvy62pGbcHRK9TJ-umMrv2kcU4LOPsT9qtIvaFph3TjndewxETtRC8x3MF0X9DP3sE0FnRr026ByUJB36GDsMSC5oBefwtgJzyjGxuTD1bnsi8YEYLeZXsZnNX0HAdIeDQ-Ytr5MZfd_IHPbZyXHJ7SCx_whw_jc_LEgIv44jhPyPXF-6_rTbn9dPlh_XZb6kpKXspBYK0BNejBmBr1yDoEg_UgDROy7U1tpGxMV7NxAAQ2VHI0DWpujGjaVpyQ14e7c_DfF4xJ3folTLlSVUK0fV9LXmeKHSgdfIwBjZqDvYNwrzhT-9-ov3-TlfKgRLjBh6P_4YtjBaJ3DwKEZLVDNXqtesYr2ah5NBl_9U_8gIjfQyqrXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2336994714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Special Section: Conceptualizations of the Holocaust in Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine: Historical Research, Public Debates, and Methodological Disputes. Foreword</title><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Polonsky, Antony</creator><creatorcontrib>Polonsky, Antony</creatorcontrib><description>This special section examines how debates on local participation in the mass murder of the Jews during the Second World War have evolved in Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine. The comparative approach adopted in this collection has highlighted the common problems in these four countries in coming to terms with the “dark past”—those aspects of the national past that provoke shame, guilt, and regret. Like the contributors to this collection I believe it is debate among historians that offers the best chance to move forward and that the intervention of politicians has had a clearly deleterious effect. This debate needs to be conducted in an open and collegial manner although we may differ strongly in our conclusions. We should always remember that the past cannot be altered. We can only accept the tragic and shocking events that have occurred and try to learn from them. This is a process that could begin in northeastern Europe only after the collapse of the communist system—a coming to terms with the many neglected and taboo aspects of the past in all four countries. The first stage of approaching such issues has usually been from a moral point of view—a settlement of long-overdue accounts, often accompanied by apologies for past behaviour. It seemed that we were reaching a second stage, where apologetics would increasingly be replaced by careful and detailed research based on archives and reliable first-hand testimony.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-3254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8371</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0888325419852671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd</publisher><subject>Communism ; Communist societies ; Communists ; Comparative analysis ; Debates ; Disputes ; Fascism, Nazism and WW II ; Guilt ; Historians ; Historical analysis ; History of Antisemitism ; History of the Holocaust ; Holocaust ; Intervention ; Jewish people ; Mass murders ; Participation ; Politicians ; Politics of History/Memory ; Post World War II period ; Regret ; Shame ; Studies in violence and power ; Taboos ; Testimony ; Victimology ; World War II ; WW II and following years (1940 - 1949)</subject><ispartof>East European politics and societies, 2020-02, Vol.34 (1), p.124-128</ispartof><rights>2019 Sage Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2020_56921.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0888325419852671$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0888325419852671$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21341,21798,27901,27902,33751,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Polonsky, Antony</creatorcontrib><title>Special Section: Conceptualizations of the Holocaust in Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine: Historical Research, Public Debates, and Methodological Disputes. Foreword</title><title>East European politics and societies</title><addtitle>East European Politics and Societies</addtitle><description>This special section examines how debates on local participation in the mass murder of the Jews during the Second World War have evolved in Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine. The comparative approach adopted in this collection has highlighted the common problems in these four countries in coming to terms with the “dark past”—those aspects of the national past that provoke shame, guilt, and regret. Like the contributors to this collection I believe it is debate among historians that offers the best chance to move forward and that the intervention of politicians has had a clearly deleterious effect. This debate needs to be conducted in an open and collegial manner although we may differ strongly in our conclusions. We should always remember that the past cannot be altered. We can only accept the tragic and shocking events that have occurred and try to learn from them. This is a process that could begin in northeastern Europe only after the collapse of the communist system—a coming to terms with the many neglected and taboo aspects of the past in all four countries. The first stage of approaching such issues has usually been from a moral point of view—a settlement of long-overdue accounts, often accompanied by apologies for past behaviour. It seemed that we were reaching a second stage, where apologetics would increasingly be replaced by careful and detailed research based on archives and reliable first-hand testimony.</description><subject>Communism</subject><subject>Communist societies</subject><subject>Communists</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Disputes</subject><subject>Fascism, Nazism and WW II</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Historians</subject><subject>Historical analysis</subject><subject>History of Antisemitism</subject><subject>History of the Holocaust</subject><subject>Holocaust</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Jewish people</subject><subject>Mass murders</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Politicians</subject><subject>Politics of History/Memory</subject><subject>Post World War II period</subject><subject>Regret</subject><subject>Shame</subject><subject>Studies in violence and power</subject><subject>Taboos</subject><subject>Testimony</subject><subject>Victimology</subject><subject>World War II</subject><subject>WW II and following years (1940 - 1949)</subject><issn>0888-3254</issn><issn>1533-8371</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>REL</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAQhi0EEkvhzoGDJa5JseMkTnqDLe0iLQJRerYmzrjr4sbBdoTKc_GAeNmVKiHEaaT5v2_-wxDykrNTzqV8w7quE1VT875rqlbyR2TFGyHKTkj-mKz2cbnPn5JnMd4yxipetSvy62pGbcHRK9TJ-umMrv2kcU4LOPsT9qtIvaFph3TjndewxETtRC8x3MF0X9DP3sE0FnRr026ByUJB36GDsMSC5oBefwtgJzyjGxuTD1bnsi8YEYLeZXsZnNX0HAdIeDQ-Ytr5MZfd_IHPbZyXHJ7SCx_whw_jc_LEgIv44jhPyPXF-6_rTbn9dPlh_XZb6kpKXspBYK0BNejBmBr1yDoEg_UgDROy7U1tpGxMV7NxAAQ2VHI0DWpujGjaVpyQ14e7c_DfF4xJ3folTLlSVUK0fV9LXmeKHSgdfIwBjZqDvYNwrzhT-9-ov3-TlfKgRLjBh6P_4YtjBaJ3DwKEZLVDNXqtesYr2ah5NBl_9U_8gIjfQyqrXw</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>Polonsky, Antony</creator><general>SAGE Publications Ltd</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Special Section: Conceptualizations of the Holocaust in Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine: Historical Research, Public Debates, and Methodological Disputes. Foreword</title><author>Polonsky, Antony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2771-7b3e4caecacbff4ecd08eafe4b7f03769f4f775f840dbaea0b27df5ec1ff35663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Communism</topic><topic>Communist societies</topic><topic>Communists</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Disputes</topic><topic>Fascism, Nazism and WW II</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Historians</topic><topic>Historical analysis</topic><topic>History of Antisemitism</topic><topic>History of the Holocaust</topic><topic>Holocaust</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Jewish people</topic><topic>Mass murders</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Politicians</topic><topic>Politics of History/Memory</topic><topic>Post World War II period</topic><topic>Regret</topic><topic>Shame</topic><topic>Studies in violence and power</topic><topic>Taboos</topic><topic>Testimony</topic><topic>Victimology</topic><topic>World War II</topic><topic>WW II and following years (1940 - 1949)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Polonsky, Antony</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>East European politics and societies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Polonsky, Antony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Special Section: Conceptualizations of the Holocaust in Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine: Historical Research, Public Debates, and Methodological Disputes. Foreword</atitle><jtitle>East European politics and societies</jtitle><addtitle>East European Politics and Societies</addtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>128</epage><pages>124-128</pages><issn>0888-3254</issn><eissn>1533-8371</eissn><abstract>This special section examines how debates on local participation in the mass murder of the Jews during the Second World War have evolved in Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine. The comparative approach adopted in this collection has highlighted the common problems in these four countries in coming to terms with the “dark past”—those aspects of the national past that provoke shame, guilt, and regret. Like the contributors to this collection I believe it is debate among historians that offers the best chance to move forward and that the intervention of politicians has had a clearly deleterious effect. This debate needs to be conducted in an open and collegial manner although we may differ strongly in our conclusions. We should always remember that the past cannot be altered. We can only accept the tragic and shocking events that have occurred and try to learn from them. This is a process that could begin in northeastern Europe only after the collapse of the communist system—a coming to terms with the many neglected and taboo aspects of the past in all four countries. The first stage of approaching such issues has usually been from a moral point of view—a settlement of long-overdue accounts, often accompanied by apologies for past behaviour. It seemed that we were reaching a second stage, where apologetics would increasingly be replaced by careful and detailed research based on archives and reliable first-hand testimony.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications Ltd</pub><doi>10.1177/0888325419852671</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-3254 |
ispartof | East European politics and societies, 2020-02, Vol.34 (1), p.124-128 |
issn | 0888-3254 1533-8371 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2336994714 |
source | Central and Eastern European Online Library; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Communism Communist societies Communists Comparative analysis Debates Disputes Fascism, Nazism and WW II Guilt Historians Historical analysis History of Antisemitism History of the Holocaust Holocaust Intervention Jewish people Mass murders Participation Politicians Politics of History/Memory Post World War II period Regret Shame Studies in violence and power Taboos Testimony Victimology World War II WW II and following years (1940 - 1949) |
title | Special Section: Conceptualizations of the Holocaust in Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Belarus, and Ukraine: Historical Research, Public Debates, and Methodological Disputes. Foreword |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A31%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Special%20Section:%20Conceptualizations%20of%20the%20Holocaust%20in%20Germany,%20Poland,%20Lithuania,%20Belarus,%20and%20Ukraine:%20Historical%20Research,%20Public%20Debates,%20and%20Methodological%20Disputes.%20Foreword&rft.jtitle=East%20European%20politics%20and%20societies&rft.au=Polonsky,%20Antony&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=128&rft.pages=124-128&rft.issn=0888-3254&rft.eissn=1533-8371&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0888325419852671&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E901275%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2336994714&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=901275&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0888325419852671&rfr_iscdi=true |