Pledgeability, Industry Liquidity, and Financing Cycles

Why do firms choose high debt when they anticipate high valuations, and underperform subsequently? We propose a theory of financing cycles where the importance of creditors' control rights over cash flows ("pledgeability") varies with industry liquidity. The market allows firms take o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of finance (New York) 2020-02, Vol.75 (1), p.419-461
Hauptverfasser: DIAMOND, DOUGLAS W., HU, YUNZHI, RAJAN, RAGHURAM G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 461
container_issue 1
container_start_page 419
container_title The Journal of finance (New York)
container_volume 75
creator DIAMOND, DOUGLAS W.
HU, YUNZHI
RAJAN, RAGHURAM G.
description Why do firms choose high debt when they anticipate high valuations, and underperform subsequently? We propose a theory of financing cycles where the importance of creditors' control rights over cash flows ("pledgeability") varies with industry liquidity. The market allows firms take on more debt when they anticipate higher future liquidity. However, both high anticipated liquidity and the resulting high debt limit their incentives to enhance pledgeability. This has prolonged adverse effects in a downturn. Because these effects are hard to contract upon, higher anticipated liquidity can also reduce a firm's current access to finance.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jofi.12831
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2336197248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45277795</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45277795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-3167010e8569545c08e6755ef61078a0fe08a1852162f54d42307114ccdfc0ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFYvfoKAeBFTZzb7r0cpViuFetDzsm42ZUtM6m6C5NubNAqefJeB4fdmHo-QS4QZ9rrb1YWfIVUZHpEJcgapoAKPyQSA0hRB0VNyFuMOBnE-IfKldPnWmXdf-qa7TVZV3sYmdMnaf7Y-P-xMlSdLX5nK-mqbLDpbunhOTgpTRnfxM6fkbfnwunhK15vH1eJ-nVoGgGmGQgKCU1zMOeMWlBOSc1cIBKkMFA6UQcUpClpwljOagURk1uaFBeOyKbka7-5D_dm62Ohd3Yaqf6lplgmcS8pUT92MlA11jMEVeh_8hwmdRtBDMXooRh-K6WEc4S9fuu4fUj9vlqtfz_Xo2cWmDn89Q2DNOJVSznn2DeyubmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2336197248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pledgeability, Industry Liquidity, and Financing Cycles</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>DIAMOND, DOUGLAS W. ; HU, YUNZHI ; RAJAN, RAGHURAM G.</creator><creatorcontrib>DIAMOND, DOUGLAS W. ; HU, YUNZHI ; RAJAN, RAGHURAM G.</creatorcontrib><description>Why do firms choose high debt when they anticipate high valuations, and underperform subsequently? We propose a theory of financing cycles where the importance of creditors' control rights over cash flows ("pledgeability") varies with industry liquidity. The market allows firms take on more debt when they anticipate higher future liquidity. However, both high anticipated liquidity and the resulting high debt limit their incentives to enhance pledgeability. This has prolonged adverse effects in a downturn. Because these effects are hard to contract upon, higher anticipated liquidity can also reduce a firm's current access to finance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Cash flow ; Corporate debt ; Creditors ; Expectations ; Finance ; Financing ; Incentives ; Liquidity ; Side effects</subject><ispartof>The Journal of finance (New York), 2020-02, Vol.75 (1), p.419-461</ispartof><rights>2020 the American Finance Association</rights><rights>2019 the American Finance Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-3167010e8569545c08e6755ef61078a0fe08a1852162f54d42307114ccdfc0ae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-3167010e8569545c08e6755ef61078a0fe08a1852162f54d42307114ccdfc0ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45277795$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45277795$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>DIAMOND, DOUGLAS W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HU, YUNZHI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAJAN, RAGHURAM G.</creatorcontrib><title>Pledgeability, Industry Liquidity, and Financing Cycles</title><title>The Journal of finance (New York)</title><description>Why do firms choose high debt when they anticipate high valuations, and underperform subsequently? We propose a theory of financing cycles where the importance of creditors' control rights over cash flows ("pledgeability") varies with industry liquidity. The market allows firms take on more debt when they anticipate higher future liquidity. However, both high anticipated liquidity and the resulting high debt limit their incentives to enhance pledgeability. This has prolonged adverse effects in a downturn. Because these effects are hard to contract upon, higher anticipated liquidity can also reduce a firm's current access to finance.</description><subject>Cash flow</subject><subject>Corporate debt</subject><subject>Creditors</subject><subject>Expectations</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Liquidity</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><issn>0022-1082</issn><issn>1540-6261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFYvfoKAeBFTZzb7r0cpViuFetDzsm42ZUtM6m6C5NubNAqefJeB4fdmHo-QS4QZ9rrb1YWfIVUZHpEJcgapoAKPyQSA0hRB0VNyFuMOBnE-IfKldPnWmXdf-qa7TVZV3sYmdMnaf7Y-P-xMlSdLX5nK-mqbLDpbunhOTgpTRnfxM6fkbfnwunhK15vH1eJ-nVoGgGmGQgKCU1zMOeMWlBOSc1cIBKkMFA6UQcUpClpwljOagURk1uaFBeOyKbka7-5D_dm62Ohd3Yaqf6lplgmcS8pUT92MlA11jMEVeh_8hwmdRtBDMXooRh-K6WEc4S9fuu4fUj9vlqtfz_Xo2cWmDn89Q2DNOJVSznn2DeyubmA</recordid><startdate>20200201</startdate><enddate>20200201</enddate><creator>DIAMOND, DOUGLAS W.</creator><creator>HU, YUNZHI</creator><creator>RAJAN, RAGHURAM G.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200201</creationdate><title>Pledgeability, Industry Liquidity, and Financing Cycles</title><author>DIAMOND, DOUGLAS W. ; HU, YUNZHI ; RAJAN, RAGHURAM G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4001-3167010e8569545c08e6755ef61078a0fe08a1852162f54d42307114ccdfc0ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cash flow</topic><topic>Corporate debt</topic><topic>Creditors</topic><topic>Expectations</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Liquidity</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DIAMOND, DOUGLAS W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HU, YUNZHI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAJAN, RAGHURAM G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DIAMOND, DOUGLAS W.</au><au>HU, YUNZHI</au><au>RAJAN, RAGHURAM G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pledgeability, Industry Liquidity, and Financing Cycles</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle><date>2020-02-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>461</epage><pages>419-461</pages><issn>0022-1082</issn><eissn>1540-6261</eissn><abstract>Why do firms choose high debt when they anticipate high valuations, and underperform subsequently? We propose a theory of financing cycles where the importance of creditors' control rights over cash flows ("pledgeability") varies with industry liquidity. The market allows firms take on more debt when they anticipate higher future liquidity. However, both high anticipated liquidity and the resulting high debt limit their incentives to enhance pledgeability. This has prolonged adverse effects in a downturn. Because these effects are hard to contract upon, higher anticipated liquidity can also reduce a firm's current access to finance.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/jofi.12831</doi><tpages>43</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1082
ispartof The Journal of finance (New York), 2020-02, Vol.75 (1), p.419-461
issn 0022-1082
1540-6261
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2336197248
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Cash flow
Corporate debt
Creditors
Expectations
Finance
Financing
Incentives
Liquidity
Side effects
title Pledgeability, Industry Liquidity, and Financing Cycles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A17%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pledgeability,%20Industry%20Liquidity,%20and%20Financing%20Cycles&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20finance%20(New%20York)&rft.au=DIAMOND,%20DOUGLAS%20W.&rft.date=2020-02-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=461&rft.pages=419-461&rft.issn=0022-1082&rft.eissn=1540-6261&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jofi.12831&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45277795%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2336197248&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45277795&rfr_iscdi=true