Forest Protection in the Philippines: Policy Evolution and Sector Outcomes
The Philippines has a total land mass of 30 million hectares, 52.7 percent of which is classified as forestlands. Various management strategies have been laid in place through policies and laws to protect the forestlands, but forest degradation and extractive industry-focused legislations have signi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Research paper series (Philippine Institute for Development Studies) 2019-07 (3), p.I-61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 61 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | I |
container_title | Research paper series (Philippine Institute for Development Studies) |
container_volume | |
creator | Domingo, Sonny N Manejar, Arvie Joy A |
description | The Philippines has a total land mass of 30 million hectares, 52.7 percent of which is classified as forestlands. Various management strategies have been laid in place through policies and laws to protect the forestlands, but forest degradation and extractive industry-focused legislations have significantly contributed to the loss of forest cover. To address these problems, three forest protection initiatives were looked into across three case study areas, namely, tenurial arrangements, apprehension and enforcement mechanisms, and the National Greening Program (NGP). Lapses in the implementation process characterized by the absence of site-species matching and failure to incorporate site demographics and topographical issues, and weak institutionalization of the legal support, particularly at the subnational level, remained present. In response, best practices were identified from each area and recommendations were drawn to improve the current policy landscape. These included the use of controlled use zones as management tool, stronger interface with local stakeholders, strengthening of legal support for City Environment and Natural Resources Office, use of Electronic Filing and Monitoring System portal, institutionalization of the Lawin Program, practice of sitespecies matching, and stronger stakeholder participation in the NGP. Reforms in the structure of oversight agencies and an update in the national baseline policy were sought in the form of an Environmental Protection and Enforcement Bureau proposal and the persistent lobbying for the Sustainable Forest Management Bill. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2335163761</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2335163761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_23351637613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjYOAqLs4yMDA2M7Ew4WTwcssvSi0uUQgoyi9JTS7JzM9TyMxTKMlIVQjIyMzJLCjIzEsttlIIyM_JTK5UcC3LzykFK0rMS1EIBmrIL1LwLy1Jzs9NLeZhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haVAS-Kz8kuL8oBS8UbGxqaGZsbmZobGxKkCAAuPOmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2335163761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forest Protection in the Philippines: Policy Evolution and Sector Outcomes</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Domingo, Sonny N ; Manejar, Arvie Joy A</creator><creatorcontrib>Domingo, Sonny N ; Manejar, Arvie Joy A</creatorcontrib><description>The Philippines has a total land mass of 30 million hectares, 52.7 percent of which is classified as forestlands. Various management strategies have been laid in place through policies and laws to protect the forestlands, but forest degradation and extractive industry-focused legislations have significantly contributed to the loss of forest cover. To address these problems, three forest protection initiatives were looked into across three case study areas, namely, tenurial arrangements, apprehension and enforcement mechanisms, and the National Greening Program (NGP). Lapses in the implementation process characterized by the absence of site-species matching and failure to incorporate site demographics and topographical issues, and weak institutionalization of the legal support, particularly at the subnational level, remained present. In response, best practices were identified from each area and recommendations were drawn to improve the current policy landscape. These included the use of controlled use zones as management tool, stronger interface with local stakeholders, strengthening of legal support for City Environment and Natural Resources Office, use of Electronic Filing and Monitoring System portal, institutionalization of the Lawin Program, practice of sitespecies matching, and stronger stakeholder participation in the NGP. Reforms in the structure of oversight agencies and an update in the national baseline policy were sought in the form of an Environmental Protection and Enforcement Bureau proposal and the persistent lobbying for the Sustainable Forest Management Bill.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Makati City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Deforestation ; Electronic filing ; Environmental policy ; Evolution ; Forest management ; Institutionalization ; International agreements ; Monitoring systems ; Natural resources ; Participation ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Research paper series (Philippine Institute for Development Studies), 2019-07 (3), p.I-61</ispartof><rights>Copyright Philippine Institute for Development Studies 2019</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Domingo, Sonny N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manejar, Arvie Joy A</creatorcontrib><title>Forest Protection in the Philippines: Policy Evolution and Sector Outcomes</title><title>Research paper series (Philippine Institute for Development Studies)</title><description>The Philippines has a total land mass of 30 million hectares, 52.7 percent of which is classified as forestlands. Various management strategies have been laid in place through policies and laws to protect the forestlands, but forest degradation and extractive industry-focused legislations have significantly contributed to the loss of forest cover. To address these problems, three forest protection initiatives were looked into across three case study areas, namely, tenurial arrangements, apprehension and enforcement mechanisms, and the National Greening Program (NGP). Lapses in the implementation process characterized by the absence of site-species matching and failure to incorporate site demographics and topographical issues, and weak institutionalization of the legal support, particularly at the subnational level, remained present. In response, best practices were identified from each area and recommendations were drawn to improve the current policy landscape. These included the use of controlled use zones as management tool, stronger interface with local stakeholders, strengthening of legal support for City Environment and Natural Resources Office, use of Electronic Filing and Monitoring System portal, institutionalization of the Lawin Program, practice of sitespecies matching, and stronger stakeholder participation in the NGP. Reforms in the structure of oversight agencies and an update in the national baseline policy were sought in the form of an Environmental Protection and Enforcement Bureau proposal and the persistent lobbying for the Sustainable Forest Management Bill.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Deforestation</subject><subject>Electronic filing</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>International agreements</subject><subject>Monitoring systems</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>PQCXX</sourceid><recordid>eNrjYOAqLs4yMDA2M7Ew4WTwcssvSi0uUQgoyi9JTS7JzM9TyMxTKMlIVQjIyMzJLCjIzEsttlIIyM_JTK5UcC3LzykFK0rMS1EIBmrIL1LwLy1Jzs9NLeZhYE1LzClO5YXS3AzKbq4hzh66BUX5haVAS-Kz8kuL8oBS8UbGxqaGZsbmZobGxKkCAAuPOmg</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Domingo, Sonny N</creator><creator>Manejar, Arvie Joy A</creator><general>Philippine Institute for Development Studies</general><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>AAFGM</scope><scope>ABAVU</scope><scope>ABGXD</scope><scope>ABLUL</scope><scope>ABPUF</scope><scope>ABSSA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>ACIOU</scope><scope>ADZZV</scope><scope>AFEKT</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AGAJT</scope><scope>AGSBL</scope><scope>AJNOY</scope><scope>AQTIP</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BOUDT</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CBHQV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQCXX</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Forest Protection in the Philippines: Policy Evolution and Sector Outcomes</title><author>Domingo, Sonny N ; Manejar, Arvie Joy A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_23351637613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Deforestation</topic><topic>Electronic filing</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>International agreements</topic><topic>Monitoring systems</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Domingo, Sonny N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manejar, Arvie Joy A</creatorcontrib><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Research paper series (Philippine Institute for Development Studies)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Domingo, Sonny N</au><au>Manejar, Arvie Joy A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forest Protection in the Philippines: Policy Evolution and Sector Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Research paper series (Philippine Institute for Development Studies)</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><issue>3</issue><spage>I</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>I-61</pages><abstract>The Philippines has a total land mass of 30 million hectares, 52.7 percent of which is classified as forestlands. Various management strategies have been laid in place through policies and laws to protect the forestlands, but forest degradation and extractive industry-focused legislations have significantly contributed to the loss of forest cover. To address these problems, three forest protection initiatives were looked into across three case study areas, namely, tenurial arrangements, apprehension and enforcement mechanisms, and the National Greening Program (NGP). Lapses in the implementation process characterized by the absence of site-species matching and failure to incorporate site demographics and topographical issues, and weak institutionalization of the legal support, particularly at the subnational level, remained present. In response, best practices were identified from each area and recommendations were drawn to improve the current policy landscape. These included the use of controlled use zones as management tool, stronger interface with local stakeholders, strengthening of legal support for City Environment and Natural Resources Office, use of Electronic Filing and Monitoring System portal, institutionalization of the Lawin Program, practice of sitespecies matching, and stronger stakeholder participation in the NGP. Reforms in the structure of oversight agencies and an update in the national baseline policy were sought in the form of an Environmental Protection and Enforcement Bureau proposal and the persistent lobbying for the Sustainable Forest Management Bill.</abstract><cop>Makati City</cop><pub>Philippine Institute for Development Studies</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | |
ispartof | Research paper series (Philippine Institute for Development Studies), 2019-07 (3), p.I-61 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2335163761 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Climate change Deforestation Electronic filing Environmental policy Evolution Forest management Institutionalization International agreements Monitoring systems Natural resources Participation Stakeholders |
title | Forest Protection in the Philippines: Policy Evolution and Sector Outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T12%3A24%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forest%20Protection%20in%20the%20Philippines:%20Policy%20Evolution%20and%20Sector%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Research%20paper%20series%20(Philippine%20Institute%20for%20Development%20Studies)&rft.au=Domingo,%20Sonny%20N&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=I&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=I-61&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2335163761%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2335163761&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |