Control Over Spatial Representation Format Enhances Information Extraction but Prevents Long-Term Learning
Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive offloading (i.e., externalizing mental processes) is useful for immediate problem solving. However, long-term effects of cognitive offloading on subsequent problem solving without offloading are remarkably understudied. Our main goal was to investiga...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of educational psychology 2020-01, Vol.112 (1), p.148-165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 148 |
container_title | Journal of educational psychology |
container_volume | 112 |
creator | Moritz, Julia Meyerhoff, Hauke S. Schwan, Stephan |
description | Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive offloading (i.e., externalizing mental processes) is useful for immediate problem solving. However, long-term effects of cognitive offloading on subsequent problem solving without offloading are remarkably understudied. Our main goal was to investigate the effects of representation control (i.e., adjusting the format of the representation to task requirements) on incidental procedural learning in an information extraction task with interactive visualizations. More specifically, we tested how the availability of representation control for solving tasks in a practice phase affects procedural learning measured in a testing phase in which representation control is no longer available. In both phases, we explored time on task as well as proportion correct as proxies of task performance and analyzed how often participants used representation control. We conducted three experiments in which participants could modify and reorganize information displays in the practice phase, whereas in the testing phase, they had to solve equivalent and near transfer problems without this offloading opportunity. We show that representation control is beneficial for immediate task solution, particularly for problems that require a spatial transformation. This benefit was more pronounced for automated (i.e., system-controlled) types of control (Experiment 3). In contrast, in subsequent problem solving without representation control (up to 24 hr later), participants who had been using representation control previously fell back to the level of an untrained baseline condition (Experiments 1 and 2). However, the detrimental effect of representation control was confined to equivalent tasks and did not generalize to a near transfer task.
Educational Impact and Implications Statement
Interactive types of visualizations have become an important form of learning material, both in schools and in higher education. Although previous studies of interactive control of visual representations have focused mainly on their immediate effects on acquisition of learning contents (effects with representation control), the present demonstrates the detrimental long-term effects of the use of representation control on learning procedural tasks (effects of representation control) if this control feature is no longer available to the learner. We further show that reducing active representation control while still visually demonstrating the required procedural |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/edu0000364 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2334208219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1237762</ericid><sourcerecordid>2226071411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-9d0f10c6d49cbf0e3e86d2bdf96710d4c287daca37fff65cd8e9f60ac69ee32f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsX70LAm7iajzW7e5RStVJQtJ5Dmp3olja7TrKi_960Fb05l_l4n5mBl5Bjzi44k8Ul1D1LIVW-Qwa8klUmeKF2yYAxITKmlNwnByEsNoySA7IYtT5iu6QPH4D0uTOxMUv6BB1CAB9T23p60-LKRDr2b8ZbCHTi3Way1safEY3dlPM-0keEj7QX6LT1r9kMcEWnYNA3_vWQ7DmzDHD0k4fk5WY8G91l04fbyeh6mhmZq5hVNXOcWVXnlZ07BhJKVYt57SpVcFbnVpRFbayRhXNOXdm6hMopZqyqAKRwckhOt3c7bN97CFEv2h59eqmFlLlgpUjO_EcJoVjBc84TdbalLLYhIDjdYbMy-KU502vH9Z_jCT7ZwoCN_QXH91zIolAi6edb3XRGd-HLGoyNXUKwPWIybX1Lcy401zwv5TdF544X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2226071411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Control Over Spatial Representation Format Enhances Information Extraction but Prevents Long-Term Learning</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Moritz, Julia ; Meyerhoff, Hauke S. ; Schwan, Stephan</creator><contributor>Kendeou, Panayiota ; Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Julia ; Meyerhoff, Hauke S. ; Schwan, Stephan ; Kendeou, Panayiota ; Graham, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive offloading (i.e., externalizing mental processes) is useful for immediate problem solving. However, long-term effects of cognitive offloading on subsequent problem solving without offloading are remarkably understudied. Our main goal was to investigate the effects of representation control (i.e., adjusting the format of the representation to task requirements) on incidental procedural learning in an information extraction task with interactive visualizations. More specifically, we tested how the availability of representation control for solving tasks in a practice phase affects procedural learning measured in a testing phase in which representation control is no longer available. In both phases, we explored time on task as well as proportion correct as proxies of task performance and analyzed how often participants used representation control. We conducted three experiments in which participants could modify and reorganize information displays in the practice phase, whereas in the testing phase, they had to solve equivalent and near transfer problems without this offloading opportunity. We show that representation control is beneficial for immediate task solution, particularly for problems that require a spatial transformation. This benefit was more pronounced for automated (i.e., system-controlled) types of control (Experiment 3). In contrast, in subsequent problem solving without representation control (up to 24 hr later), participants who had been using representation control previously fell back to the level of an untrained baseline condition (Experiments 1 and 2). However, the detrimental effect of representation control was confined to equivalent tasks and did not generalize to a near transfer task.
Educational Impact and Implications Statement
Interactive types of visualizations have become an important form of learning material, both in schools and in higher education. Although previous studies of interactive control of visual representations have focused mainly on their immediate effects on acquisition of learning contents (effects with representation control), the present demonstrates the detrimental long-term effects of the use of representation control on learning procedural tasks (effects of representation control) if this control feature is no longer available to the learner. We further show that reducing active representation control while still visually demonstrating the required procedural steps may substantially reduce the observed detrimental effects. Therefore, in line with the desirable difficulties approach, the distinction between effects with and effects of representation control may serve as a model to guide the implementation of interactive features for visualizations in learning materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/edu0000364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adults ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Maps ; Cognitive Processes ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer Assisted Testing ; Externalization ; Female ; Human ; Human Channel Capacity ; Imagery ; Incidental Learning ; Learning ; Male ; Problem Solving ; Procedural Knowledge ; Spatial Ability ; Task Analysis ; Time on Task ; Transfer (Learning) ; Transfer of Training ; Visualization ; Young Adults</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2020-01, Vol.112 (1), p.148-165</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-9d0f10c6d49cbf0e3e86d2bdf96710d4c287daca37fff65cd8e9f60ac69ee32f3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0930-5594</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1237762$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kendeou, Panayiota</contributor><contributor>Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyerhoff, Hauke S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwan, Stephan</creatorcontrib><title>Control Over Spatial Representation Format Enhances Information Extraction but Prevents Long-Term Learning</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><description>Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive offloading (i.e., externalizing mental processes) is useful for immediate problem solving. However, long-term effects of cognitive offloading on subsequent problem solving without offloading are remarkably understudied. Our main goal was to investigate the effects of representation control (i.e., adjusting the format of the representation to task requirements) on incidental procedural learning in an information extraction task with interactive visualizations. More specifically, we tested how the availability of representation control for solving tasks in a practice phase affects procedural learning measured in a testing phase in which representation control is no longer available. In both phases, we explored time on task as well as proportion correct as proxies of task performance and analyzed how often participants used representation control. We conducted three experiments in which participants could modify and reorganize information displays in the practice phase, whereas in the testing phase, they had to solve equivalent and near transfer problems without this offloading opportunity. We show that representation control is beneficial for immediate task solution, particularly for problems that require a spatial transformation. This benefit was more pronounced for automated (i.e., system-controlled) types of control (Experiment 3). In contrast, in subsequent problem solving without representation control (up to 24 hr later), participants who had been using representation control previously fell back to the level of an untrained baseline condition (Experiments 1 and 2). However, the detrimental effect of representation control was confined to equivalent tasks and did not generalize to a near transfer task.
Educational Impact and Implications Statement
Interactive types of visualizations have become an important form of learning material, both in schools and in higher education. Although previous studies of interactive control of visual representations have focused mainly on their immediate effects on acquisition of learning contents (effects with representation control), the present demonstrates the detrimental long-term effects of the use of representation control on learning procedural tasks (effects of representation control) if this control feature is no longer available to the learner. We further show that reducing active representation control while still visually demonstrating the required procedural steps may substantially reduce the observed detrimental effects. Therefore, in line with the desirable difficulties approach, the distinction between effects with and effects of representation control may serve as a model to guide the implementation of interactive features for visualizations in learning materials.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Maps</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Testing</subject><subject>Externalization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Channel Capacity</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Incidental Learning</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Procedural Knowledge</subject><subject>Spatial Ability</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Time on Task</subject><subject>Transfer (Learning)</subject><subject>Transfer of Training</subject><subject>Visualization</subject><subject>Young Adults</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsX70LAm7iajzW7e5RStVJQtJ5Dmp3olja7TrKi_960Fb05l_l4n5mBl5Bjzi44k8Ul1D1LIVW-Qwa8klUmeKF2yYAxITKmlNwnByEsNoySA7IYtT5iu6QPH4D0uTOxMUv6BB1CAB9T23p60-LKRDr2b8ZbCHTi3Way1safEY3dlPM-0keEj7QX6LT1r9kMcEWnYNA3_vWQ7DmzDHD0k4fk5WY8G91l04fbyeh6mhmZq5hVNXOcWVXnlZ07BhJKVYt57SpVcFbnVpRFbayRhXNOXdm6hMopZqyqAKRwckhOt3c7bN97CFEv2h59eqmFlLlgpUjO_EcJoVjBc84TdbalLLYhIDjdYbMy-KU502vH9Z_jCT7ZwoCN_QXH91zIolAi6edb3XRGd-HLGoyNXUKwPWIybX1Lcy401zwv5TdF544X</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Moritz, Julia</creator><creator>Meyerhoff, Hauke S.</creator><creator>Schwan, Stephan</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0930-5594</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Control Over Spatial Representation Format Enhances Information Extraction but Prevents Long-Term Learning</title><author>Moritz, Julia ; Meyerhoff, Hauke S. ; Schwan, Stephan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a346t-9d0f10c6d49cbf0e3e86d2bdf96710d4c287daca37fff65cd8e9f60ac69ee32f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Maps</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Testing</topic><topic>Externalization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Channel Capacity</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Incidental Learning</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Procedural Knowledge</topic><topic>Spatial Ability</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Time on Task</topic><topic>Transfer (Learning)</topic><topic>Transfer of Training</topic><topic>Visualization</topic><topic>Young Adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moritz, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyerhoff, Hauke S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwan, Stephan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moritz, Julia</au><au>Meyerhoff, Hauke S.</au><au>Schwan, Stephan</au><au>Kendeou, Panayiota</au><au>Graham, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1237762</ericid><atitle>Control Over Spatial Representation Format Enhances Information Extraction but Prevents Long-Term Learning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>112</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>148</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>148-165</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><abstract>Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive offloading (i.e., externalizing mental processes) is useful for immediate problem solving. However, long-term effects of cognitive offloading on subsequent problem solving without offloading are remarkably understudied. Our main goal was to investigate the effects of representation control (i.e., adjusting the format of the representation to task requirements) on incidental procedural learning in an information extraction task with interactive visualizations. More specifically, we tested how the availability of representation control for solving tasks in a practice phase affects procedural learning measured in a testing phase in which representation control is no longer available. In both phases, we explored time on task as well as proportion correct as proxies of task performance and analyzed how often participants used representation control. We conducted three experiments in which participants could modify and reorganize information displays in the practice phase, whereas in the testing phase, they had to solve equivalent and near transfer problems without this offloading opportunity. We show that representation control is beneficial for immediate task solution, particularly for problems that require a spatial transformation. This benefit was more pronounced for automated (i.e., system-controlled) types of control (Experiment 3). In contrast, in subsequent problem solving without representation control (up to 24 hr later), participants who had been using representation control previously fell back to the level of an untrained baseline condition (Experiments 1 and 2). However, the detrimental effect of representation control was confined to equivalent tasks and did not generalize to a near transfer task.
Educational Impact and Implications Statement
Interactive types of visualizations have become an important form of learning material, both in schools and in higher education. Although previous studies of interactive control of visual representations have focused mainly on their immediate effects on acquisition of learning contents (effects with representation control), the present demonstrates the detrimental long-term effects of the use of representation control on learning procedural tasks (effects of representation control) if this control feature is no longer available to the learner. We further show that reducing active representation control while still visually demonstrating the required procedural steps may substantially reduce the observed detrimental effects. Therefore, in line with the desirable difficulties approach, the distinction between effects with and effects of representation control may serve as a model to guide the implementation of interactive features for visualizations in learning materials.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/edu0000364</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0930-5594</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0663 |
ispartof | Journal of educational psychology, 2020-01, Vol.112 (1), p.148-165 |
issn | 0022-0663 1939-2176 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2334208219 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adults Cognitive ability Cognitive Maps Cognitive Processes Comparative Analysis Computer Assisted Testing Externalization Female Human Human Channel Capacity Imagery Incidental Learning Learning Male Problem Solving Procedural Knowledge Spatial Ability Task Analysis Time on Task Transfer (Learning) Transfer of Training Visualization Young Adults |
title | Control Over Spatial Representation Format Enhances Information Extraction but Prevents Long-Term Learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T04%3A29%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Control%20Over%20Spatial%20Representation%20Format%20Enhances%20Information%20Extraction%20but%20Prevents%20Long-Term%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Moritz,%20Julia&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=148&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=148-165&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/edu0000364&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2226071411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2226071411&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1237762&rfr_iscdi=true |