A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam
We review the applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods in energy sector and in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), finding a gap on the non-use of specific methods that deal with divergent opinions, such as a group MCDA method. This way we suggest the application of a gr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Socio-economic planning sciences 2019-12, Vol.68, p.100625, Article 100625 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 100625 |
| container_title | Socio-economic planning sciences |
| container_volume | 68 |
| creator | Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua |
| description | We review the applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods in energy sector and in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), finding a gap on the non-use of specific methods that deal with divergent opinions, such as a group MCDA method. This way we suggest the application of a group MCDA method to demonstrate how it may be used for aiding group decision-making in public sector. Aiming at analyzing the aforementioned problem, we simulate the choosing of the construction alternatives of Belo Monte Dam. The power plant project was marked by several conflicts among stakeholders due to the generation of diversified environmental, social and economic impacts. The results show that a group MCDA method may be used to aid public sector in the analysis of complex problems, by dividing them into several parts, allowing, therefore, a transparent decision-making process, as well as to solve gaps in the EIA methods. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.seps.2018.04.002 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2334204683</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038012117300253</els_id><sourcerecordid>2334204683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f30b36f5573100ce12a1d1cc2f7c85dceaf28ddb67e761698d4fb43c6f3d5ec03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU4Y23kVsSktL6kVm7K2EnvcuiRxsFMEf0-ismY1GunceRxCrhnEDFh2u48DdiHmwIoYkhiAn5AJK3IRZZCwUzIBEEUEjLNzchHCHgYi4emEuDndenfo6HqxnNMG-53T1DhPS6ttu6UalQ3WtVFTfoy9M1S5pqvxm3beVTU2gdqWdoeqtooGVL3zd3SzQ6rKgCP-gLWja9f2SJdlc0nOTFkHvPqrU_L-9LhZvESrt-fXxXwVKTETfWQEVCIzaZoLBqCQ8ZJpphQ3uSpSrbA0vNC6ynLMM5bNCp2YKhEqM0KnqEBMyc1x7nDl5wFDL_fu4NthpeRCJBySrBADxY-U8i4Ej0Z23jal_5EM5ChW7uUoVo5iJSRy0DaE7o8hHO7_suhlUBZbhdr64X-pnf0v_gtcX4Fu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334204683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme ; Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua</creator><creatorcontrib>Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme ; Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua</creatorcontrib><description>We review the applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods in energy sector and in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), finding a gap on the non-use of specific methods that deal with divergent opinions, such as a group MCDA method. This way we suggest the application of a group MCDA method to demonstrate how it may be used for aiding group decision-making in public sector. Aiming at analyzing the aforementioned problem, we simulate the choosing of the construction alternatives of Belo Monte Dam. The power plant project was marked by several conflicts among stakeholders due to the generation of diversified environmental, social and economic impacts. The results show that a group MCDA method may be used to aid public sector in the analysis of complex problems, by dividing them into several parts, allowing, therefore, a transparent decision-making process, as well as to solve gaps in the EIA methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0121</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2018.04.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amazon forest ; Belo Monte ; Dams ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Economic impact ; Environmental Impact Assessment ; Game theory ; Group decision making ; Group MCDA method ; Hydroelectric dam ; Multiple criteria decision making ; Power ; Power plants ; Public sector</subject><ispartof>Socio-economic planning sciences, 2019-12, Vol.68, p.100625, Article 100625</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f30b36f5573100ce12a1d1cc2f7c85dceaf28ddb67e761698d4fb43c6f3d5ec03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f30b36f5573100ce12a1d1cc2f7c85dceaf28ddb67e761698d4fb43c6f3d5ec03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0744-8866 ; 0000-0002-5107-0514</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012117300253$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua</creatorcontrib><title>A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam</title><title>Socio-economic planning sciences</title><description>We review the applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods in energy sector and in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), finding a gap on the non-use of specific methods that deal with divergent opinions, such as a group MCDA method. This way we suggest the application of a group MCDA method to demonstrate how it may be used for aiding group decision-making in public sector. Aiming at analyzing the aforementioned problem, we simulate the choosing of the construction alternatives of Belo Monte Dam. The power plant project was marked by several conflicts among stakeholders due to the generation of diversified environmental, social and economic impacts. The results show that a group MCDA method may be used to aid public sector in the analysis of complex problems, by dividing them into several parts, allowing, therefore, a transparent decision-making process, as well as to solve gaps in the EIA methods.</description><subject>Amazon forest</subject><subject>Belo Monte</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Environmental Impact Assessment</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Group decision making</subject><subject>Group MCDA method</subject><subject>Hydroelectric dam</subject><subject>Multiple criteria decision making</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Power plants</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><issn>0038-0121</issn><issn>1873-6041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU4Y23kVsSktL6kVm7K2EnvcuiRxsFMEf0-ismY1GunceRxCrhnEDFh2u48DdiHmwIoYkhiAn5AJK3IRZZCwUzIBEEUEjLNzchHCHgYi4emEuDndenfo6HqxnNMG-53T1DhPS6ttu6UalQ3WtVFTfoy9M1S5pqvxm3beVTU2gdqWdoeqtooGVL3zd3SzQ6rKgCP-gLWja9f2SJdlc0nOTFkHvPqrU_L-9LhZvESrt-fXxXwVKTETfWQEVCIzaZoLBqCQ8ZJpphQ3uSpSrbA0vNC6ynLMM5bNCp2YKhEqM0KnqEBMyc1x7nDl5wFDL_fu4NthpeRCJBySrBADxY-U8i4Ej0Z23jal_5EM5ChW7uUoVo5iJSRy0DaE7o8hHO7_suhlUBZbhdr64X-pnf0v_gtcX4Fu</recordid><startdate>20191201</startdate><enddate>20191201</enddate><creator>Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme</creator><creator>Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-8866</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-0514</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191201</creationdate><title>A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam</title><author>Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme ; Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-f30b36f5573100ce12a1d1cc2f7c85dceaf28ddb67e761698d4fb43c6f3d5ec03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Amazon forest</topic><topic>Belo Monte</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Environmental Impact Assessment</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Group decision making</topic><topic>Group MCDA method</topic><topic>Hydroelectric dam</topic><topic>Multiple criteria decision making</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Power plants</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Socio-economic planning sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cuoghi, Kaio Guilherme</au><au>Leoneti, Alexandre Bevilacqua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam</atitle><jtitle>Socio-economic planning sciences</jtitle><date>2019-12-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>68</volume><spage>100625</spage><pages>100625-</pages><artnum>100625</artnum><issn>0038-0121</issn><eissn>1873-6041</eissn><abstract>We review the applications of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methods in energy sector and in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), finding a gap on the non-use of specific methods that deal with divergent opinions, such as a group MCDA method. This way we suggest the application of a group MCDA method to demonstrate how it may be used for aiding group decision-making in public sector. Aiming at analyzing the aforementioned problem, we simulate the choosing of the construction alternatives of Belo Monte Dam. The power plant project was marked by several conflicts among stakeholders due to the generation of diversified environmental, social and economic impacts. The results show that a group MCDA method may be used to aid public sector in the analysis of complex problems, by dividing them into several parts, allowing, therefore, a transparent decision-making process, as well as to solve gaps in the EIA methods.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.seps.2018.04.002</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0744-8866</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-0514</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0038-0121 |
| ispartof | Socio-economic planning sciences, 2019-12, Vol.68, p.100625, Article 100625 |
| issn | 0038-0121 1873-6041 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2334204683 |
| source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Amazon forest Belo Monte Dams Decision analysis Decision making Economic impact Environmental Impact Assessment Game theory Group decision making Group MCDA method Hydroelectric dam Multiple criteria decision making Power Power plants Public sector |
| title | A group MCDA method for aiding decision-making of complex problems in public sector: The case of Belo Monte Dam |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T11%3A41%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20group%20MCDA%20method%20for%20aiding%20decision-making%20of%20complex%20problems%20in%20public%20sector:%20The%20case%20of%20Belo%20Monte%20Dam&rft.jtitle=Socio-economic%20planning%20sciences&rft.au=Cuoghi,%20Kaio%20Guilherme&rft.date=2019-12-01&rft.volume=68&rft.spage=100625&rft.pages=100625-&rft.artnum=100625&rft.issn=0038-0121&rft.eissn=1873-6041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.seps.2018.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334204683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334204683&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038012117300253&rfr_iscdi=true |