Restoration of wet features for breeding waders on lowland grassland

1. Over the last century, the loss of around half of the world's wetlands, principally through drainage and conversion to agriculture, has been one of the main drivers of declines in breeding waders. Across Europe, nature reserves have been effective conservation islands for breeding waders, bu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 2008-02, Vol.45 (1), p.305-314
Hauptverfasser: Eglington, Sarah M., Gill, Jennifer A., Bolton, Mark, Smart, Mark A., Sutherland, William J., Watkinson, Andrew R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 314
container_issue 1
container_start_page 305
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 45
creator Eglington, Sarah M.
Gill, Jennifer A.
Bolton, Mark
Smart, Mark A.
Sutherland, William J.
Watkinson, Andrew R.
description 1. Over the last century, the loss of around half of the world's wetlands, principally through drainage and conversion to agriculture, has been one of the main drivers of declines in breeding waders. Across Europe, nature reserves have been effective conservation islands for breeding waders, but management of the wider countryside is needed for more wide-scale population recovery. This is likely to require the restoration of wet features, but in a manner which is compatible with farming operations. 2. Here we explore the extent to which three types of wet feature influence the distribution of breeding lapwings Vanellus vanellus and their chicks on grassland. Footdrains are shallow channels used historically for drainage, but which can also be created and managed for water retention and cause little disruption to farming activities. Footdrain floods are areas where water overtops footdrains. Isolated pools are unmanaged areas of surface water resulting from rainfall or high water tables. 3. We selected 70 fields on nine sites which spanned the range of wet feature type and cover in early April. By May, only around 10% of the water within isolated pools remained, whereas 30-40% water was maintained in footdrains into June. 4. Fields with high footdrain flood densities attracted significantly higher densities of nesting lapwing and nests were more likely to be within 50 m of footdrain floods. Later in the season, footdrains were the primary remaining water source, and chick field use increased significantly with footdrain density. Chicks were also more likely to forage nearer footdrain floods in areas of wet mud created by receding water levels. 5. Synthesis and applications. Areas of shallow, small-scale flooding are of critical importance for breeding waders. Management tools such as footdrains, coupled with appropriate hydrological management, provide a means of retaining water throughout the breeding season. Installation of these features is relatively simple, but maintaining sufficient water levels within the system is critical, especially in the face of increasingly unpredictable water supplies associated with climate change. Such management tools offer a solution that may be both effective at improving breeding wader populations and practicable for commercial grazing marsh management.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01405.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_233420042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20143977</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20143977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4665-3640f0e54cb032e3c77fc33c0f2e88789c5856fc011632f487961b411c6df7693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMtKAzEUDaJgrX6CGASXHW8mmWRm4UJqfVFQfKxDmiZlhnFSkynVvzdxRFyazb1wHvfkIIQJZCS-8yYjlBeTnHOW5QAiA8KgyD520OgX2EUjgJxMygrIPjoIoQGAqqB0hK6eTOidV33tOuws3poeW6P6jTcBW-fxwhuzrLsV3qql8QFHWuu2reqWeOVVCGk7RHtWtcEc_cwxer2evUxvJ_OHm7vp5XyiGY9RKGdgwRRML4DmhmohrKZUg81NWYqy0kVZcKuBEE5zy0pRcbJghGi-tIJXdIxOB9-1d--bGFw2buO7eFLmlLL4fZZHUjmQtHcheGPl2tdvyn9KAjJVJhuZmpGpGZkqk9-VyY8oPfvxV0Gr1nrV6Tr86iOX8EKkExcDb1u35vPf_vL-cZa2qD8e9E3q_o8_YbQSIuInA26Vk2rlY4bX54hSgLJIg34BprGP1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233420042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Restoration of wet features for breeding waders on lowland grassland</title><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Eglington, Sarah M. ; Gill, Jennifer A. ; Bolton, Mark ; Smart, Mark A. ; Sutherland, William J. ; Watkinson, Andrew R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eglington, Sarah M. ; Gill, Jennifer A. ; Bolton, Mark ; Smart, Mark A. ; Sutherland, William J. ; Watkinson, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><description>1. Over the last century, the loss of around half of the world's wetlands, principally through drainage and conversion to agriculture, has been one of the main drivers of declines in breeding waders. Across Europe, nature reserves have been effective conservation islands for breeding waders, but management of the wider countryside is needed for more wide-scale population recovery. This is likely to require the restoration of wet features, but in a manner which is compatible with farming operations. 2. Here we explore the extent to which three types of wet feature influence the distribution of breeding lapwings Vanellus vanellus and their chicks on grassland. Footdrains are shallow channels used historically for drainage, but which can also be created and managed for water retention and cause little disruption to farming activities. Footdrain floods are areas where water overtops footdrains. Isolated pools are unmanaged areas of surface water resulting from rainfall or high water tables. 3. We selected 70 fields on nine sites which spanned the range of wet feature type and cover in early April. By May, only around 10% of the water within isolated pools remained, whereas 30-40% water was maintained in footdrains into June. 4. Fields with high footdrain flood densities attracted significantly higher densities of nesting lapwing and nests were more likely to be within 50 m of footdrain floods. Later in the season, footdrains were the primary remaining water source, and chick field use increased significantly with footdrain density. Chicks were also more likely to forage nearer footdrain floods in areas of wet mud created by receding water levels. 5. Synthesis and applications. Areas of shallow, small-scale flooding are of critical importance for breeding waders. Management tools such as footdrains, coupled with appropriate hydrological management, provide a means of retaining water throughout the breeding season. Installation of these features is relatively simple, but maintaining sufficient water levels within the system is critical, especially in the face of increasingly unpredictable water supplies associated with climate change. Such management tools offer a solution that may be both effective at improving breeding wader populations and practicable for commercial grazing marsh management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01405.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural management ; agriculture ; agri‐environment schemes ; Agroecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birds ; Breeding ; Chicks ; Climate change ; Conservation ; conservation areas ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; drainage channels ; Environmental conservation ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Environmental management ; Floods ; footdrain floods ; footdrains ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Grasses ; Grasslands ; Habitat conservation ; habitat management ; land restoration ; lapwing ; lowland grasslands ; Restoration ; shorebirds ; Sustainable agriculture ; Vanellus vanellus ; waders ; waterfowl ; Wetlands ; wildlife habitats</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2008-02, Vol.45 (1), p.305-314</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2007 The Authors</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4665-3640f0e54cb032e3c77fc33c0f2e88789c5856fc011632f487961b411c6df7693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4665-3640f0e54cb032e3c77fc33c0f2e88789c5856fc011632f487961b411c6df7693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20143977$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20143977$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20016572$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eglington, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkinson, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><title>Restoration of wet features for breeding waders on lowland grassland</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Over the last century, the loss of around half of the world's wetlands, principally through drainage and conversion to agriculture, has been one of the main drivers of declines in breeding waders. Across Europe, nature reserves have been effective conservation islands for breeding waders, but management of the wider countryside is needed for more wide-scale population recovery. This is likely to require the restoration of wet features, but in a manner which is compatible with farming operations. 2. Here we explore the extent to which three types of wet feature influence the distribution of breeding lapwings Vanellus vanellus and their chicks on grassland. Footdrains are shallow channels used historically for drainage, but which can also be created and managed for water retention and cause little disruption to farming activities. Footdrain floods are areas where water overtops footdrains. Isolated pools are unmanaged areas of surface water resulting from rainfall or high water tables. 3. We selected 70 fields on nine sites which spanned the range of wet feature type and cover in early April. By May, only around 10% of the water within isolated pools remained, whereas 30-40% water was maintained in footdrains into June. 4. Fields with high footdrain flood densities attracted significantly higher densities of nesting lapwing and nests were more likely to be within 50 m of footdrain floods. Later in the season, footdrains were the primary remaining water source, and chick field use increased significantly with footdrain density. Chicks were also more likely to forage nearer footdrain floods in areas of wet mud created by receding water levels. 5. Synthesis and applications. Areas of shallow, small-scale flooding are of critical importance for breeding waders. Management tools such as footdrains, coupled with appropriate hydrological management, provide a means of retaining water throughout the breeding season. Installation of these features is relatively simple, but maintaining sufficient water levels within the system is critical, especially in the face of increasingly unpredictable water supplies associated with climate change. Such management tools offer a solution that may be both effective at improving breeding wader populations and practicable for commercial grazing marsh management.</description><subject>Agricultural management</subject><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>agri‐environment schemes</subject><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Chicks</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>drainage channels</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>footdrain floods</subject><subject>footdrains</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>habitat management</subject><subject>land restoration</subject><subject>lapwing</subject><subject>lowland grasslands</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>shorebirds</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Vanellus vanellus</subject><subject>waders</subject><subject>waterfowl</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>wildlife habitats</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUMtKAzEUDaJgrX6CGASXHW8mmWRm4UJqfVFQfKxDmiZlhnFSkynVvzdxRFyazb1wHvfkIIQJZCS-8yYjlBeTnHOW5QAiA8KgyD520OgX2EUjgJxMygrIPjoIoQGAqqB0hK6eTOidV33tOuws3poeW6P6jTcBW-fxwhuzrLsV3qql8QFHWuu2reqWeOVVCGk7RHtWtcEc_cwxer2evUxvJ_OHm7vp5XyiGY9RKGdgwRRML4DmhmohrKZUg81NWYqy0kVZcKuBEE5zy0pRcbJghGi-tIJXdIxOB9-1d--bGFw2buO7eFLmlLL4fZZHUjmQtHcheGPl2tdvyn9KAjJVJhuZmpGpGZkqk9-VyY8oPfvxV0Gr1nrV6Tr86iOX8EKkExcDb1u35vPf_vL-cZa2qD8e9E3q_o8_YbQSIuInA26Vk2rlY4bX54hSgLJIg34BprGP1g</recordid><startdate>200802</startdate><enddate>200802</enddate><creator>Eglington, Sarah M.</creator><creator>Gill, Jennifer A.</creator><creator>Bolton, Mark</creator><creator>Smart, Mark A.</creator><creator>Sutherland, William J.</creator><creator>Watkinson, Andrew R.</creator><general>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200802</creationdate><title>Restoration of wet features for breeding waders on lowland grassland</title><author>Eglington, Sarah M. ; Gill, Jennifer A. ; Bolton, Mark ; Smart, Mark A. ; Sutherland, William J. ; Watkinson, Andrew R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4665-3640f0e54cb032e3c77fc33c0f2e88789c5856fc011632f487961b411c6df7693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agricultural management</topic><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>agri‐environment schemes</topic><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Chicks</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>drainage channels</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>footdrain floods</topic><topic>footdrains</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>habitat management</topic><topic>land restoration</topic><topic>lapwing</topic><topic>lowland grasslands</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>shorebirds</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Vanellus vanellus</topic><topic>waders</topic><topic>waterfowl</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>wildlife habitats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eglington, Sarah M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gill, Jennifer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smart, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutherland, William J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watkinson, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eglington, Sarah M.</au><au>Gill, Jennifer A.</au><au>Bolton, Mark</au><au>Smart, Mark A.</au><au>Sutherland, William J.</au><au>Watkinson, Andrew R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Restoration of wet features for breeding waders on lowland grassland</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2008-02</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>305-314</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Over the last century, the loss of around half of the world's wetlands, principally through drainage and conversion to agriculture, has been one of the main drivers of declines in breeding waders. Across Europe, nature reserves have been effective conservation islands for breeding waders, but management of the wider countryside is needed for more wide-scale population recovery. This is likely to require the restoration of wet features, but in a manner which is compatible with farming operations. 2. Here we explore the extent to which three types of wet feature influence the distribution of breeding lapwings Vanellus vanellus and their chicks on grassland. Footdrains are shallow channels used historically for drainage, but which can also be created and managed for water retention and cause little disruption to farming activities. Footdrain floods are areas where water overtops footdrains. Isolated pools are unmanaged areas of surface water resulting from rainfall or high water tables. 3. We selected 70 fields on nine sites which spanned the range of wet feature type and cover in early April. By May, only around 10% of the water within isolated pools remained, whereas 30-40% water was maintained in footdrains into June. 4. Fields with high footdrain flood densities attracted significantly higher densities of nesting lapwing and nests were more likely to be within 50 m of footdrain floods. Later in the season, footdrains were the primary remaining water source, and chick field use increased significantly with footdrain density. Chicks were also more likely to forage nearer footdrain floods in areas of wet mud created by receding water levels. 5. Synthesis and applications. Areas of shallow, small-scale flooding are of critical importance for breeding waders. Management tools such as footdrains, coupled with appropriate hydrological management, provide a means of retaining water throughout the breeding season. Installation of these features is relatively simple, but maintaining sufficient water levels within the system is critical, especially in the face of increasingly unpredictable water supplies associated with climate change. Such management tools offer a solution that may be both effective at improving breeding wader populations and practicable for commercial grazing marsh management.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01405.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2008-02, Vol.45 (1), p.305-314
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_233420042
source Wiley Online Library Free Content; Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Agricultural management
agriculture
agri‐environment schemes
Agroecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Birds
Breeding
Chicks
Climate change
Conservation
conservation areas
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
drainage channels
Environmental conservation
Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration
Environmental management
Floods
footdrain floods
footdrains
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Grasses
Grasslands
Habitat conservation
habitat management
land restoration
lapwing
lowland grasslands
Restoration
shorebirds
Sustainable agriculture
Vanellus vanellus
waders
waterfowl
Wetlands
wildlife habitats
title Restoration of wet features for breeding waders on lowland grassland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T13%3A13%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Restoration%20of%20wet%20features%20for%20breeding%20waders%20on%20lowland%20grassland&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Eglington,%20Sarah%20M.&rft.date=2008-02&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=305-314&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01405.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20143977%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233420042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20143977&rfr_iscdi=true