Social Desirability Bias among Prejudice Instruments: An Integrated Threat
A considerable amount of research has examined the extent to which members of dominant cultures perceive minority groups as threatening their way of life. While various instruments measure these perceptions of threat, few researchers have empirically analysed the statistical properties of these scal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intercultural communication 2019-07 (50), p.1-1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1 |
---|---|
container_issue | 50 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Journal of intercultural communication |
container_volume | |
creator | Croucher, Stephen M Nshom, Elvis Rahmani, Diyako Zeng, Cheng |
description | A considerable amount of research has examined the extent to which members of dominant cultures perceive minority groups as threatening their way of life. While various instruments measure these perceptions of threat, few researchers have empirically analysed the statistical properties of these scales. Specifically, studies have not adequately explored social desirability of threat scales. The current study investigates the extent to which one set of threat scales is internally consistent or reliable (González et al., 2008), and explores social desirability within the González et al. (2008) integrated threat instruments by comparing self-reports to other reports (intimate other and friend reports). Results indicate the instruments are internally consistent and that self-reports and other reports of threat do not differ on most indices of threat. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2334197657</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2334197657</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-bac790f10824aed2ed632914a9b2d4ee993469af85d589ca5dca4e186d6ac9053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjctKAzEUQIMgWKv_EHA9kPck7mp9VQoWOvtyJ7lTM0xnapJZ-PcWdHU4m3OuyIIrpipupLohtzn3jAmthViQj_3kIwz0GXNM0MYhlh_6FCFTOE3jke4S9nOIHulmzCXNJxxLfqSr8eIFjwkKBtp8JYRyR647GDLe_3NJmteXZv1ebT_fNuvVtjo7W6oWfO1Yx5kVCjAIDEYKxxW4VgSF6JxUxkFnddDWedDBg0JuTTDgHdNySR7-suc0fc-Yy6Gf5jRejgchpeKuNrqWvx5xSAs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334197657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social Desirability Bias among Prejudice Instruments: An Integrated Threat</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Croucher, Stephen M ; Nshom, Elvis ; Rahmani, Diyako ; Zeng, Cheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Croucher, Stephen M ; Nshom, Elvis ; Rahmani, Diyako ; Zeng, Cheng</creatorcontrib><description>A considerable amount of research has examined the extent to which members of dominant cultures perceive minority groups as threatening their way of life. While various instruments measure these perceptions of threat, few researchers have empirically analysed the statistical properties of these scales. Specifically, studies have not adequately explored social desirability of threat scales. The current study investigates the extent to which one set of threat scales is internally consistent or reliable (González et al., 2008), and explores social desirability within the González et al. (2008) integrated threat instruments by comparing self-reports to other reports (intimate other and friend reports). Results indicate the instruments are internally consistent and that self-reports and other reports of threat do not differ on most indices of threat.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1404-1634</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Göteborg: Immigrant Institute</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Attitudes ; Bias ; Minority groups ; Prejudice ; Researchers ; Social desirability ; Stereotypes ; Studies ; Threats ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of intercultural communication, 2019-07 (50), p.1-1</ispartof><rights>Copyright Immigrant Institute Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Croucher, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nshom, Elvis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Diyako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Cheng</creatorcontrib><title>Social Desirability Bias among Prejudice Instruments: An Integrated Threat</title><title>Journal of intercultural communication</title><description>A considerable amount of research has examined the extent to which members of dominant cultures perceive minority groups as threatening their way of life. While various instruments measure these perceptions of threat, few researchers have empirically analysed the statistical properties of these scales. Specifically, studies have not adequately explored social desirability of threat scales. The current study investigates the extent to which one set of threat scales is internally consistent or reliable (González et al., 2008), and explores social desirability within the González et al. (2008) integrated threat instruments by comparing self-reports to other reports (intimate other and friend reports). Results indicate the instruments are internally consistent and that self-reports and other reports of threat do not differ on most indices of threat.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Social desirability</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Threats</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1404-1634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNotjctKAzEUQIMgWKv_EHA9kPck7mp9VQoWOvtyJ7lTM0xnapJZ-PcWdHU4m3OuyIIrpipupLohtzn3jAmthViQj_3kIwz0GXNM0MYhlh_6FCFTOE3jke4S9nOIHulmzCXNJxxLfqSr8eIFjwkKBtp8JYRyR647GDLe_3NJmteXZv1ebT_fNuvVtjo7W6oWfO1Yx5kVCjAIDEYKxxW4VgSF6JxUxkFnddDWedDBg0JuTTDgHdNySR7-suc0fc-Yy6Gf5jRejgchpeKuNrqWvx5xSAs</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Croucher, Stephen M</creator><creator>Nshom, Elvis</creator><creator>Rahmani, Diyako</creator><creator>Zeng, Cheng</creator><general>Immigrant Institute</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Social Desirability Bias among Prejudice Instruments: An Integrated Threat</title><author>Croucher, Stephen M ; Nshom, Elvis ; Rahmani, Diyako ; Zeng, Cheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p98t-bac790f10824aed2ed632914a9b2d4ee993469af85d589ca5dca4e186d6ac9053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Social desirability</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Threats</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Croucher, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nshom, Elvis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahmani, Diyako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Cheng</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of intercultural communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Croucher, Stephen M</au><au>Nshom, Elvis</au><au>Rahmani, Diyako</au><au>Zeng, Cheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social Desirability Bias among Prejudice Instruments: An Integrated Threat</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intercultural communication</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><issue>50</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>1</epage><pages>1-1</pages><eissn>1404-1634</eissn><abstract>A considerable amount of research has examined the extent to which members of dominant cultures perceive minority groups as threatening their way of life. While various instruments measure these perceptions of threat, few researchers have empirically analysed the statistical properties of these scales. Specifically, studies have not adequately explored social desirability of threat scales. The current study investigates the extent to which one set of threat scales is internally consistent or reliable (González et al., 2008), and explores social desirability within the González et al. (2008) integrated threat instruments by comparing self-reports to other reports (intimate other and friend reports). Results indicate the instruments are internally consistent and that self-reports and other reports of threat do not differ on most indices of threat.</abstract><cop>Göteborg</cop><pub>Immigrant Institute</pub><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1404-1634 |
ispartof | Journal of intercultural communication, 2019-07 (50), p.1-1 |
issn | 1404-1634 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2334197657 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Anxiety Attitudes Bias Minority groups Prejudice Researchers Social desirability Stereotypes Studies Threats Validity |
title | Social Desirability Bias among Prejudice Instruments: An Integrated Threat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T19%3A39%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20Desirability%20Bias%20among%20Prejudice%20Instruments:%20An%20Integrated%20Threat&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intercultural%20communication&rft.au=Croucher,%20Stephen%20M&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.issue=50&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1&rft.pages=1-1&rft.eissn=1404-1634&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2334197657%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334197657&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |