Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus
Introduction Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt. Methods This retrospec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2020-01, Vol.95 (1), p.78-82 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 82 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 78 |
container_title | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud Hanna, Baher Matta Fattouh, Aya Mohammed Hijazi, Ziyad |
description | Introduction
Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt.
Methods
This retrospective descriptive study describes our experience at two Egyptian centers (Cairo University Children's Hospital & Tanta University Hospital) with transcatheter treatment of rPDAs, from January 2009 to October 2017.
Results
Twenty cases were treated: 17/20 postsurgical and 3/20 post‐transcatheter, at a mean period of 13.4 ± 9.3 months from the initial procedure. The median rPDA size was 2 mm (range2–3.5 mm). Most common ductal anatomy was the conical shape. All rPDAs were successfully closed with either coils (13/20) or devices (6/20), except one case where the residual flow was within the device mesh material. Coils could be deployed from the antegrade or the retrograde approaches although the latter was associated with a higher incidence of late shunt occlusion. One case with a malpositioned device required simultaneous device and LPA stent deployment.
Conclusion
Transcatheter closure of rPDAs is feasible in most cases, but may be technically challenging. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ccd.28338 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2334184551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2334184551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-2dba7fad5594ad36f08d34342a42f7e76ef6ad911be0a60bcefb5bda59b652193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1LwzAYx_EgipsvB_8BKXjRQ7fkSZO23qS-wsDLBG8hzQt2dO1MGmT_vdFOD4Kn5PDhy8MPoTOCZwRjmCulZ1BQWuyhKWEAaQ78dX_3J2XGJ-jI-xXGuORQHqIJJQQwp3iKrpdOdl7J4c0MxiWq7X1wJult4oxvdJBtspGD6YZEBzUEn0gXXROVP0EHVrbenO7eY_Ryf7esHtPF88NTdbNIFWW0SEHXMrdSM1ZmUlNucaFpRjOQGdjc5NxYLnVJSG2w5LhWxtas1pKVNWdASnqMLsfuxvXvwfhBrBuvTNvKzvTBCwAKBCjHONKLP3TVB9fF6wRQmpEiY4xEdTUq5XrvnbFi45q1dFtBsPgaVMRBxfeg0Z7viqFeG_0rfxaMYD6Cj6Y12_9Loqpux-QnFYF-xg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334184551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali ; Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla ; El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud ; Hanna, Baher Matta ; Fattouh, Aya Mohammed ; Hijazi, Ziyad</creator><creatorcontrib>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali ; Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla ; El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud ; Hanna, Baher Matta ; Fattouh, Aya Mohammed ; Hijazi, Ziyad</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt.
Methods
This retrospective descriptive study describes our experience at two Egyptian centers (Cairo University Children's Hospital & Tanta University Hospital) with transcatheter treatment of rPDAs, from January 2009 to October 2017.
Results
Twenty cases were treated: 17/20 postsurgical and 3/20 post‐transcatheter, at a mean period of 13.4 ± 9.3 months from the initial procedure. The median rPDA size was 2 mm (range2–3.5 mm). Most common ductal anatomy was the conical shape. All rPDAs were successfully closed with either coils (13/20) or devices (6/20), except one case where the residual flow was within the device mesh material. Coils could be deployed from the antegrade or the retrograde approaches although the latter was associated with a higher incidence of late shunt occlusion. One case with a malpositioned device required simultaneous device and LPA stent deployment.
Conclusion
Transcatheter closure of rPDAs is feasible in most cases, but may be technically challenging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31120630</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Congenital diseases ; Coronary vessels ; Endarteritis ; Health risks ; Hemodynamics ; Implants ; Occlusion ; PDA ; postsurgical ; post‐intervention ; re‐intervention</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2020-01, Vol.95 (1), p.78-82</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-2dba7fad5594ad36f08d34342a42f7e76ef6ad911be0a60bcefb5bda59b652193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-2dba7fad5594ad36f08d34342a42f7e76ef6ad911be0a60bcefb5bda59b652193</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5252-8403</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.28338$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.28338$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanna, Baher Matta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattouh, Aya Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hijazi, Ziyad</creatorcontrib><title>Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Introduction
Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt.
Methods
This retrospective descriptive study describes our experience at two Egyptian centers (Cairo University Children's Hospital & Tanta University Hospital) with transcatheter treatment of rPDAs, from January 2009 to October 2017.
Results
Twenty cases were treated: 17/20 postsurgical and 3/20 post‐transcatheter, at a mean period of 13.4 ± 9.3 months from the initial procedure. The median rPDA size was 2 mm (range2–3.5 mm). Most common ductal anatomy was the conical shape. All rPDAs were successfully closed with either coils (13/20) or devices (6/20), except one case where the residual flow was within the device mesh material. Coils could be deployed from the antegrade or the retrograde approaches although the latter was associated with a higher incidence of late shunt occlusion. One case with a malpositioned device required simultaneous device and LPA stent deployment.
Conclusion
Transcatheter closure of rPDAs is feasible in most cases, but may be technically challenging.</description><subject>Congenital diseases</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Endarteritis</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Occlusion</subject><subject>PDA</subject><subject>postsurgical</subject><subject>post‐intervention</subject><subject>re‐intervention</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M1LwzAYx_EgipsvB_8BKXjRQ7fkSZO23qS-wsDLBG8hzQt2dO1MGmT_vdFOD4Kn5PDhy8MPoTOCZwRjmCulZ1BQWuyhKWEAaQ78dX_3J2XGJ-jI-xXGuORQHqIJJQQwp3iKrpdOdl7J4c0MxiWq7X1wJult4oxvdJBtspGD6YZEBzUEn0gXXROVP0EHVrbenO7eY_Ryf7esHtPF88NTdbNIFWW0SEHXMrdSM1ZmUlNucaFpRjOQGdjc5NxYLnVJSG2w5LhWxtas1pKVNWdASnqMLsfuxvXvwfhBrBuvTNvKzvTBCwAKBCjHONKLP3TVB9fF6wRQmpEiY4xEdTUq5XrvnbFi45q1dFtBsPgaVMRBxfeg0Z7viqFeG_0rfxaMYD6Cj6Y12_9Loqpux-QnFYF-xg</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali</creator><creator>Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla</creator><creator>El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud</creator><creator>Hanna, Baher Matta</creator><creator>Fattouh, Aya Mohammed</creator><creator>Hijazi, Ziyad</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-8403</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus</title><author>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali ; Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla ; El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud ; Hanna, Baher Matta ; Fattouh, Aya Mohammed ; Hijazi, Ziyad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-2dba7fad5594ad36f08d34342a42f7e76ef6ad911be0a60bcefb5bda59b652193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Congenital diseases</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Endarteritis</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Occlusion</topic><topic>PDA</topic><topic>postsurgical</topic><topic>post‐intervention</topic><topic>re‐intervention</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanna, Baher Matta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattouh, Aya Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hijazi, Ziyad</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali</au><au>Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla</au><au>El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud</au><au>Hanna, Baher Matta</au><au>Fattouh, Aya Mohammed</au><au>Hijazi, Ziyad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>78-82</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt.
Methods
This retrospective descriptive study describes our experience at two Egyptian centers (Cairo University Children's Hospital & Tanta University Hospital) with transcatheter treatment of rPDAs, from January 2009 to October 2017.
Results
Twenty cases were treated: 17/20 postsurgical and 3/20 post‐transcatheter, at a mean period of 13.4 ± 9.3 months from the initial procedure. The median rPDA size was 2 mm (range2–3.5 mm). Most common ductal anatomy was the conical shape. All rPDAs were successfully closed with either coils (13/20) or devices (6/20), except one case where the residual flow was within the device mesh material. Coils could be deployed from the antegrade or the retrograde approaches although the latter was associated with a higher incidence of late shunt occlusion. One case with a malpositioned device required simultaneous device and LPA stent deployment.
Conclusion
Transcatheter closure of rPDAs is feasible in most cases, but may be technically challenging.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31120630</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.28338</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-8403</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-1946 |
ispartof | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2020-01, Vol.95 (1), p.78-82 |
issn | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2334184551 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Congenital diseases Coronary vessels Endarteritis Health risks Hemodynamics Implants Occlusion PDA postsurgical post‐intervention re‐intervention |
title | Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcatheter%20closure%20of%20residual%20patent%20ductus%20arteriosus&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=El%E2%80%90Saiedi,%20Sonia%20Ali&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=78-82&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.28338&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334184551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334184551&rft_id=info:pmid/31120630&rfr_iscdi=true |