Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus

Introduction Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt. Methods This retrospec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2020-01, Vol.95 (1), p.78-82
Hauptverfasser: El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali, Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla, El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud, Hanna, Baher Matta, Fattouh, Aya Mohammed, Hijazi, Ziyad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 78
container_title Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 95
creator El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali
Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla
El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud
Hanna, Baher Matta
Fattouh, Aya Mohammed
Hijazi, Ziyad
description Introduction Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt. Methods This retrospective descriptive study describes our experience at two Egyptian centers (Cairo University Children's Hospital & Tanta University Hospital) with transcatheter treatment of rPDAs, from January 2009 to October 2017. Results Twenty cases were treated: 17/20 postsurgical and 3/20 post‐transcatheter, at a mean period of 13.4 ± 9.3 months from the initial procedure. The median rPDA size was 2 mm (range2–3.5 mm). Most common ductal anatomy was the conical shape. All rPDAs were successfully closed with either coils (13/20) or devices (6/20), except one case where the residual flow was within the device mesh material. Coils could be deployed from the antegrade or the retrograde approaches although the latter was associated with a higher incidence of late shunt occlusion. One case with a malpositioned device required simultaneous device and LPA stent deployment. Conclusion Transcatheter closure of rPDAs is feasible in most cases, but may be technically challenging.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ccd.28338
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2334184551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2334184551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-2dba7fad5594ad36f08d34342a42f7e76ef6ad911be0a60bcefb5bda59b652193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1LwzAYx_EgipsvB_8BKXjRQ7fkSZO23qS-wsDLBG8hzQt2dO1MGmT_vdFOD4Kn5PDhy8MPoTOCZwRjmCulZ1BQWuyhKWEAaQ78dX_3J2XGJ-jI-xXGuORQHqIJJQQwp3iKrpdOdl7J4c0MxiWq7X1wJult4oxvdJBtspGD6YZEBzUEn0gXXROVP0EHVrbenO7eY_Ryf7esHtPF88NTdbNIFWW0SEHXMrdSM1ZmUlNucaFpRjOQGdjc5NxYLnVJSG2w5LhWxtas1pKVNWdASnqMLsfuxvXvwfhBrBuvTNvKzvTBCwAKBCjHONKLP3TVB9fF6wRQmpEiY4xEdTUq5XrvnbFi45q1dFtBsPgaVMRBxfeg0Z7viqFeG_0rfxaMYD6Cj6Y12_9Loqpux-QnFYF-xg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334184551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali ; Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla ; El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud ; Hanna, Baher Matta ; Fattouh, Aya Mohammed ; Hijazi, Ziyad</creator><creatorcontrib>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali ; Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla ; El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud ; Hanna, Baher Matta ; Fattouh, Aya Mohammed ; Hijazi, Ziyad</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt. Methods This retrospective descriptive study describes our experience at two Egyptian centers (Cairo University Children's Hospital &amp; Tanta University Hospital) with transcatheter treatment of rPDAs, from January 2009 to October 2017. Results Twenty cases were treated: 17/20 postsurgical and 3/20 post‐transcatheter, at a mean period of 13.4 ± 9.3 months from the initial procedure. The median rPDA size was 2 mm (range2–3.5 mm). Most common ductal anatomy was the conical shape. All rPDAs were successfully closed with either coils (13/20) or devices (6/20), except one case where the residual flow was within the device mesh material. Coils could be deployed from the antegrade or the retrograde approaches although the latter was associated with a higher incidence of late shunt occlusion. One case with a malpositioned device required simultaneous device and LPA stent deployment. Conclusion Transcatheter closure of rPDAs is feasible in most cases, but may be technically challenging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31120630</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Congenital diseases ; Coronary vessels ; Endarteritis ; Health risks ; Hemodynamics ; Implants ; Occlusion ; PDA ; postsurgical ; post‐intervention ; re‐intervention</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2020-01, Vol.95 (1), p.78-82</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-2dba7fad5594ad36f08d34342a42f7e76ef6ad911be0a60bcefb5bda59b652193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-2dba7fad5594ad36f08d34342a42f7e76ef6ad911be0a60bcefb5bda59b652193</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5252-8403</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.28338$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.28338$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31120630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanna, Baher Matta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattouh, Aya Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hijazi, Ziyad</creatorcontrib><title>Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Introduction Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt. Methods This retrospective descriptive study describes our experience at two Egyptian centers (Cairo University Children's Hospital &amp; Tanta University Hospital) with transcatheter treatment of rPDAs, from January 2009 to October 2017. Results Twenty cases were treated: 17/20 postsurgical and 3/20 post‐transcatheter, at a mean period of 13.4 ± 9.3 months from the initial procedure. The median rPDA size was 2 mm (range2–3.5 mm). Most common ductal anatomy was the conical shape. All rPDAs were successfully closed with either coils (13/20) or devices (6/20), except one case where the residual flow was within the device mesh material. Coils could be deployed from the antegrade or the retrograde approaches although the latter was associated with a higher incidence of late shunt occlusion. One case with a malpositioned device required simultaneous device and LPA stent deployment. Conclusion Transcatheter closure of rPDAs is feasible in most cases, but may be technically challenging.</description><subject>Congenital diseases</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Endarteritis</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Implants</subject><subject>Occlusion</subject><subject>PDA</subject><subject>postsurgical</subject><subject>post‐intervention</subject><subject>re‐intervention</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M1LwzAYx_EgipsvB_8BKXjRQ7fkSZO23qS-wsDLBG8hzQt2dO1MGmT_vdFOD4Kn5PDhy8MPoTOCZwRjmCulZ1BQWuyhKWEAaQ78dX_3J2XGJ-jI-xXGuORQHqIJJQQwp3iKrpdOdl7J4c0MxiWq7X1wJult4oxvdJBtspGD6YZEBzUEn0gXXROVP0EHVrbenO7eY_Ryf7esHtPF88NTdbNIFWW0SEHXMrdSM1ZmUlNucaFpRjOQGdjc5NxYLnVJSG2w5LhWxtas1pKVNWdASnqMLsfuxvXvwfhBrBuvTNvKzvTBCwAKBCjHONKLP3TVB9fF6wRQmpEiY4xEdTUq5XrvnbFi45q1dFtBsPgaVMRBxfeg0Z7viqFeG_0rfxaMYD6Cj6Y12_9Loqpux-QnFYF-xg</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali</creator><creator>Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla</creator><creator>El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud</creator><creator>Hanna, Baher Matta</creator><creator>Fattouh, Aya Mohammed</creator><creator>Hijazi, Ziyad</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-8403</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus</title><author>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali ; Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla ; El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud ; Hanna, Baher Matta ; Fattouh, Aya Mohammed ; Hijazi, Ziyad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3538-2dba7fad5594ad36f08d34342a42f7e76ef6ad911be0a60bcefb5bda59b652193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Congenital diseases</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Endarteritis</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Implants</topic><topic>Occlusion</topic><topic>PDA</topic><topic>postsurgical</topic><topic>post‐intervention</topic><topic>re‐intervention</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanna, Baher Matta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fattouh, Aya Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hijazi, Ziyad</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El‐Saiedi, Sonia Ali</au><au>Elshedoudy, Sahar Abdulla</au><au>El‐Sisi, Ammal Mahmoud</au><au>Hanna, Baher Matta</au><au>Fattouh, Aya Mohammed</au><au>Hijazi, Ziyad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>78</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>78-82</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><abstract>Introduction Residual patent ductus arteriosus (rPDAs) can occur following surgical or transcatheter treatment, and are indicated for closure because of the risks of infective endarteritis and hemolysis in addition to the hemodynamic effect of the residual left‐to‐right shunt. Methods This retrospective descriptive study describes our experience at two Egyptian centers (Cairo University Children's Hospital &amp; Tanta University Hospital) with transcatheter treatment of rPDAs, from January 2009 to October 2017. Results Twenty cases were treated: 17/20 postsurgical and 3/20 post‐transcatheter, at a mean period of 13.4 ± 9.3 months from the initial procedure. The median rPDA size was 2 mm (range2–3.5 mm). Most common ductal anatomy was the conical shape. All rPDAs were successfully closed with either coils (13/20) or devices (6/20), except one case where the residual flow was within the device mesh material. Coils could be deployed from the antegrade or the retrograde approaches although the latter was associated with a higher incidence of late shunt occlusion. One case with a malpositioned device required simultaneous device and LPA stent deployment. Conclusion Transcatheter closure of rPDAs is feasible in most cases, but may be technically challenging.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31120630</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.28338</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-8403</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-1946
ispartof Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2020-01, Vol.95 (1), p.78-82
issn 1522-1946
1522-726X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2334184551
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Congenital diseases
Coronary vessels
Endarteritis
Health risks
Hemodynamics
Implants
Occlusion
PDA
postsurgical
post‐intervention
re‐intervention
title Transcatheter closure of residual patent ductus arteriosus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcatheter%20closure%20of%20residual%20patent%20ductus%20arteriosus&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=El%E2%80%90Saiedi,%20Sonia%20Ali&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=78-82&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.28338&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334184551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334184551&rft_id=info:pmid/31120630&rfr_iscdi=true