The effect of probiotic bacteria in culture media using organic fertilizer for population density, biomass production and nutrient quality of Phronima sp. as natural feed

Phronima sp. is a natural feed with high nutrient content, and it can be an alternative substitute for Artemia. The existence of probiotic bacteria in culture media aims to improve water quality through biodegradation, maintain microbial balance and control pathogenic bacteria, so that nutrients in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Aquaculture research 2020-02, Vol.51 (2), p.836-843
Hauptverfasser: Herawati, Vivi Endar, Pinandoyo, P., Rismaningsih, Nurmanita, Darmanto, D., Hutabarat, Johannes, Radjasa, Ocky Karna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 843
container_issue 2
container_start_page 836
container_title Aquaculture research
container_volume 51
creator Herawati, Vivi Endar
Pinandoyo, P.
Rismaningsih, Nurmanita
Darmanto, D.
Hutabarat, Johannes
Radjasa, Ocky Karna
description Phronima sp. is a natural feed with high nutrient content, and it can be an alternative substitute for Artemia. The existence of probiotic bacteria in culture media aims to improve water quality through biodegradation, maintain microbial balance and control pathogenic bacteria, so that nutrients in culture media can be utilized by Phronima sp. This study aimed to determine the effect of fermented organic fertilizer by probiotic bacteria in mass culture media on the population density, biomass production and nutrient content of Phronima sp. and to find the best culture media composition for mass culture of Phronima sp. The study was conducted with a completely randomized design with five treatments and three replications. The treatments were as follows: A: 0% chicken manure, 50% rice bran, 50% tofu waste; B: 25% chicken manure, 37.5% rice bran, 37.5% tofu waste; C: 50% chicken manure, 25% rice bran, 25% tofu waste; D: 75% chicken manure, 12.5% rice bran, 12.5% tofu waste and E: 100% chicken manure. The test animals were Phronima sp., and during cultivation, fertilization was carried out every 3 days. Population density and biomass were observed, and proximate analysis, amino acid profile analysis and fatty acid profile analysis were performed. The highest population density was at treatment B, with a peak population of 98 individuals/L that occurred on the 16th day of maintenance culture, and the highest biomass of 0.51 g was at the same treatment. The highest nutrient content was obtained at treatment B, for which the highest protein proximate analysis value was 58.90%, the proportion of the fatty acids comprised of eicosapentaenoic acid was 7.53%, and lysine amino acids were found at 44.16 ppm.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/are.14433
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2334155625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2334155625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3323-24961e0991fe039c0af6e551527d6fd11598cfd8384c79cf87a1beac1569b6c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KAzEUhQdRUKsL3-CCK8Fpk8lk2lkW8Q8KilRwN6SZmzYyTab5Qeoj-ZSmrVvvJpfkyzkHTpZdUTKkaUbC4ZCWJWNH2RllFc8LSurj3c55zvn44zQ79_6TEFoSRs-yn_kKAZVCGcAq6J1daBu0hIWQAZ0WoA3I2IXoENbYpovotVmCdUthEqfQBd3pb3SgrIPe9rETQVsDLRqvw_YWkuJaeL8Tb6PcvwnTgonBaTQBNlF0Cdz5v66cNXotwPdDEB6MSMaiSy7YXmQnSnQeL__OQfb-cD-_e8pnL4_Pd9NZLhkrWF6UdUWR1DVVSFgtiVAVck55MW4r1VLK64lU7YRNSjmupZqMBV2gkJRX9aKSFRtk1wfdlHcT0Yfm00ZnkmVTMFZSzquCJ-rmQElnvXeomt6l4G7bUNLsqmhSFc2-isSODuyX7nD7P9hM3-4PP34BNfuONA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334155625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of probiotic bacteria in culture media using organic fertilizer for population density, biomass production and nutrient quality of Phronima sp. as natural feed</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Herawati, Vivi Endar ; Pinandoyo, P. ; Rismaningsih, Nurmanita ; Darmanto, D. ; Hutabarat, Johannes ; Radjasa, Ocky Karna</creator><creatorcontrib>Herawati, Vivi Endar ; Pinandoyo, P. ; Rismaningsih, Nurmanita ; Darmanto, D. ; Hutabarat, Johannes ; Radjasa, Ocky Karna</creatorcontrib><description>Phronima sp. is a natural feed with high nutrient content, and it can be an alternative substitute for Artemia. The existence of probiotic bacteria in culture media aims to improve water quality through biodegradation, maintain microbial balance and control pathogenic bacteria, so that nutrients in culture media can be utilized by Phronima sp. This study aimed to determine the effect of fermented organic fertilizer by probiotic bacteria in mass culture media on the population density, biomass production and nutrient content of Phronima sp. and to find the best culture media composition for mass culture of Phronima sp. The study was conducted with a completely randomized design with five treatments and three replications. The treatments were as follows: A: 0% chicken manure, 50% rice bran, 50% tofu waste; B: 25% chicken manure, 37.5% rice bran, 37.5% tofu waste; C: 50% chicken manure, 25% rice bran, 25% tofu waste; D: 75% chicken manure, 12.5% rice bran, 12.5% tofu waste and E: 100% chicken manure. The test animals were Phronima sp., and during cultivation, fertilization was carried out every 3 days. Population density and biomass were observed, and proximate analysis, amino acid profile analysis and fatty acid profile analysis were performed. The highest population density was at treatment B, with a peak population of 98 individuals/L that occurred on the 16th day of maintenance culture, and the highest biomass of 0.51 g was at the same treatment. The highest nutrient content was obtained at treatment B, for which the highest protein proximate analysis value was 58.90%, the proportion of the fatty acids comprised of eicosapentaenoic acid was 7.53%, and lysine amino acids were found at 44.16 ppm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-557X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/are.14433</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>amino acid profile ; Amino acids ; Aquatic crustaceans ; Artemia ; Artemia sp ; Bacteria ; Biodegradation ; Biological fertilization ; Biomass ; Chickens ; Cultivation ; Culture media ; Eicosapentaenoic acid ; fatty acid profile ; Fatty acids ; Feeds ; Fermentation ; Fermented food ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Lysine ; Manures ; Mass culture ; Microorganisms ; Mineral nutrients ; Nutrient content ; Nutrients ; nutrition ; Organic fertilizers ; Pathogenic bacteria ; Phronima ; Population density ; Poultry ; Poultry manure ; Probiotics ; production ; Rice ; Rice bran ; Soy products ; Test animals ; Tofu ; Water quality</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture research, 2020-02, Vol.51 (2), p.836-843</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3323-24961e0991fe039c0af6e551527d6fd11598cfd8384c79cf87a1beac1569b6c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3323-24961e0991fe039c0af6e551527d6fd11598cfd8384c79cf87a1beac1569b6c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5279-3178</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fare.14433$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fare.14433$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herawati, Vivi Endar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinandoyo, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rismaningsih, Nurmanita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmanto, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutabarat, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radjasa, Ocky Karna</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of probiotic bacteria in culture media using organic fertilizer for population density, biomass production and nutrient quality of Phronima sp. as natural feed</title><title>Aquaculture research</title><description>Phronima sp. is a natural feed with high nutrient content, and it can be an alternative substitute for Artemia. The existence of probiotic bacteria in culture media aims to improve water quality through biodegradation, maintain microbial balance and control pathogenic bacteria, so that nutrients in culture media can be utilized by Phronima sp. This study aimed to determine the effect of fermented organic fertilizer by probiotic bacteria in mass culture media on the population density, biomass production and nutrient content of Phronima sp. and to find the best culture media composition for mass culture of Phronima sp. The study was conducted with a completely randomized design with five treatments and three replications. The treatments were as follows: A: 0% chicken manure, 50% rice bran, 50% tofu waste; B: 25% chicken manure, 37.5% rice bran, 37.5% tofu waste; C: 50% chicken manure, 25% rice bran, 25% tofu waste; D: 75% chicken manure, 12.5% rice bran, 12.5% tofu waste and E: 100% chicken manure. The test animals were Phronima sp., and during cultivation, fertilization was carried out every 3 days. Population density and biomass were observed, and proximate analysis, amino acid profile analysis and fatty acid profile analysis were performed. The highest population density was at treatment B, with a peak population of 98 individuals/L that occurred on the 16th day of maintenance culture, and the highest biomass of 0.51 g was at the same treatment. The highest nutrient content was obtained at treatment B, for which the highest protein proximate analysis value was 58.90%, the proportion of the fatty acids comprised of eicosapentaenoic acid was 7.53%, and lysine amino acids were found at 44.16 ppm.</description><subject>amino acid profile</subject><subject>Amino acids</subject><subject>Aquatic crustaceans</subject><subject>Artemia</subject><subject>Artemia sp</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biological fertilization</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Cultivation</subject><subject>Culture media</subject><subject>Eicosapentaenoic acid</subject><subject>fatty acid profile</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Fermented food</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Lysine</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Mass culture</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrient content</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>nutrition</subject><subject>Organic fertilizers</subject><subject>Pathogenic bacteria</subject><subject>Phronima</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Poultry</subject><subject>Poultry manure</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>production</subject><subject>Rice</subject><subject>Rice bran</subject><subject>Soy products</subject><subject>Test animals</subject><subject>Tofu</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><issn>1355-557X</issn><issn>1365-2109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1KAzEUhQdRUKsL3-CCK8Fpk8lk2lkW8Q8KilRwN6SZmzYyTab5Qeoj-ZSmrVvvJpfkyzkHTpZdUTKkaUbC4ZCWJWNH2RllFc8LSurj3c55zvn44zQ79_6TEFoSRs-yn_kKAZVCGcAq6J1daBu0hIWQAZ0WoA3I2IXoENbYpovotVmCdUthEqfQBd3pb3SgrIPe9rETQVsDLRqvw_YWkuJaeL8Tb6PcvwnTgonBaTQBNlF0Cdz5v66cNXotwPdDEB6MSMaiSy7YXmQnSnQeL__OQfb-cD-_e8pnL4_Pd9NZLhkrWF6UdUWR1DVVSFgtiVAVck55MW4r1VLK64lU7YRNSjmupZqMBV2gkJRX9aKSFRtk1wfdlHcT0Yfm00ZnkmVTMFZSzquCJ-rmQElnvXeomt6l4G7bUNLsqmhSFc2-isSODuyX7nD7P9hM3-4PP34BNfuONA</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Herawati, Vivi Endar</creator><creator>Pinandoyo, P.</creator><creator>Rismaningsih, Nurmanita</creator><creator>Darmanto, D.</creator><creator>Hutabarat, Johannes</creator><creator>Radjasa, Ocky Karna</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5279-3178</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>The effect of probiotic bacteria in culture media using organic fertilizer for population density, biomass production and nutrient quality of Phronima sp. as natural feed</title><author>Herawati, Vivi Endar ; Pinandoyo, P. ; Rismaningsih, Nurmanita ; Darmanto, D. ; Hutabarat, Johannes ; Radjasa, Ocky Karna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3323-24961e0991fe039c0af6e551527d6fd11598cfd8384c79cf87a1beac1569b6c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>amino acid profile</topic><topic>Amino acids</topic><topic>Aquatic crustaceans</topic><topic>Artemia</topic><topic>Artemia sp</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biological fertilization</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Cultivation</topic><topic>Culture media</topic><topic>Eicosapentaenoic acid</topic><topic>fatty acid profile</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Fermented food</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Lysine</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Mass culture</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrient content</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>nutrition</topic><topic>Organic fertilizers</topic><topic>Pathogenic bacteria</topic><topic>Phronima</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Poultry</topic><topic>Poultry manure</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>production</topic><topic>Rice</topic><topic>Rice bran</topic><topic>Soy products</topic><topic>Test animals</topic><topic>Tofu</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herawati, Vivi Endar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinandoyo, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rismaningsih, Nurmanita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darmanto, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutabarat, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radjasa, Ocky Karna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herawati, Vivi Endar</au><au>Pinandoyo, P.</au><au>Rismaningsih, Nurmanita</au><au>Darmanto, D.</au><au>Hutabarat, Johannes</au><au>Radjasa, Ocky Karna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of probiotic bacteria in culture media using organic fertilizer for population density, biomass production and nutrient quality of Phronima sp. as natural feed</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>836</spage><epage>843</epage><pages>836-843</pages><issn>1355-557X</issn><eissn>1365-2109</eissn><abstract>Phronima sp. is a natural feed with high nutrient content, and it can be an alternative substitute for Artemia. The existence of probiotic bacteria in culture media aims to improve water quality through biodegradation, maintain microbial balance and control pathogenic bacteria, so that nutrients in culture media can be utilized by Phronima sp. This study aimed to determine the effect of fermented organic fertilizer by probiotic bacteria in mass culture media on the population density, biomass production and nutrient content of Phronima sp. and to find the best culture media composition for mass culture of Phronima sp. The study was conducted with a completely randomized design with five treatments and three replications. The treatments were as follows: A: 0% chicken manure, 50% rice bran, 50% tofu waste; B: 25% chicken manure, 37.5% rice bran, 37.5% tofu waste; C: 50% chicken manure, 25% rice bran, 25% tofu waste; D: 75% chicken manure, 12.5% rice bran, 12.5% tofu waste and E: 100% chicken manure. The test animals were Phronima sp., and during cultivation, fertilization was carried out every 3 days. Population density and biomass were observed, and proximate analysis, amino acid profile analysis and fatty acid profile analysis were performed. The highest population density was at treatment B, with a peak population of 98 individuals/L that occurred on the 16th day of maintenance culture, and the highest biomass of 0.51 g was at the same treatment. The highest nutrient content was obtained at treatment B, for which the highest protein proximate analysis value was 58.90%, the proportion of the fatty acids comprised of eicosapentaenoic acid was 7.53%, and lysine amino acids were found at 44.16 ppm.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/are.14433</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5279-3178</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-557X
ispartof Aquaculture research, 2020-02, Vol.51 (2), p.836-843
issn 1355-557X
1365-2109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2334155625
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects amino acid profile
Amino acids
Aquatic crustaceans
Artemia
Artemia sp
Bacteria
Biodegradation
Biological fertilization
Biomass
Chickens
Cultivation
Culture media
Eicosapentaenoic acid
fatty acid profile
Fatty acids
Feeds
Fermentation
Fermented food
Fertilization
Fertilizers
Lysine
Manures
Mass culture
Microorganisms
Mineral nutrients
Nutrient content
Nutrients
nutrition
Organic fertilizers
Pathogenic bacteria
Phronima
Population density
Poultry
Poultry manure
Probiotics
production
Rice
Rice bran
Soy products
Test animals
Tofu
Water quality
title The effect of probiotic bacteria in culture media using organic fertilizer for population density, biomass production and nutrient quality of Phronima sp. as natural feed
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A59%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20probiotic%20bacteria%20in%20culture%20media%20using%20organic%20fertilizer%20for%20population%20density,%20biomass%20production%20and%20nutrient%20quality%20of%20Phronima%20sp.%20as%20natural%20feed&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20research&rft.au=Herawati,%20Vivi%20Endar&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=836&rft.epage=843&rft.pages=836-843&rft.issn=1355-557X&rft.eissn=1365-2109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/are.14433&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334155625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334155625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true