Mutation as a Toxicological Endpoint for Regulatory Decision‐Making

Mutations induced in somatic cells and germ cells are responsible for a variety of human diseases, and mutation per se has been considered an adverse health concern since the early part of the 20th Century. Although in vitro and in vivo somatic cell mutation data are most commonly used by regulatory...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental and molecular mutagenesis 2020-01, Vol.61 (1), p.34-41
Hauptverfasser: Heflich, Robert H., Johnson, George E., Zeller, Andreas, Marchetti, Francesco, Douglas, George R., Witt, Kristine L., Gollapudi, B. Bhaskar, White, Paul A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 34
container_title Environmental and molecular mutagenesis
container_volume 61
creator Heflich, Robert H.
Johnson, George E.
Zeller, Andreas
Marchetti, Francesco
Douglas, George R.
Witt, Kristine L.
Gollapudi, B. Bhaskar
White, Paul A.
description Mutations induced in somatic cells and germ cells are responsible for a variety of human diseases, and mutation per se has been considered an adverse health concern since the early part of the 20th Century. Although in vitro and in vivo somatic cell mutation data are most commonly used by regulatory agencies for hazard identification, that is, determining whether or not a substance is a potential mutagen and carcinogen, quantitative mutagenicity dose–response data are being used increasingly for risk assessments. Efforts are currently underway to both improve the measurement of mutations and to refine the computational methods used for evaluating mutation data. We recommend continuing the development of these approaches with the objective of establishing consensus regarding the value of including the quantitative analysis of mutation per se as a required endpoint for comprehensive assessments of toxicological risk. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:34–41, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/em.22338
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2334132262</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2334132262</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3838-8a860a5c8c7bc55388e6818ae147a673f55a74b923191ad06dbb3a60b4148a523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQQC0EoqUgcQIUiQ2bFH8Sx1kiCB-pFRIqa2viOJVLEhc7EXTHETgjJyElhR2r2bx5o3kInRI8JRjTS11PKWVM7KExwakIKRV4H42xSFnIeUpH6Mj7FcaERCk9RCNGOMYi4mOUzbsWWmObAHwAwcK-G2UruzQKqiBrirU1TRuU1gVPetlV0Fq3CW60Mr7f-fr4nMOLaZbH6KCEyuuT3Zyg59tscX0fzh7vHq6vZqFigolQgOAYYiVUkqs4ZkJoLogATaIEeMLKOIYkylPKSEqgwLzIcwYc5xGJBMSUTdD54F07-9pp38qV7VzTn5T9-xFhlPItdTFQylnvnS7l2pka3EYSLLe9pK7lT68ePdsJu7zWxR_4G6gHwgF4M5Xe_CuS2XwQfgMhfHJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2334132262</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mutation as a Toxicological Endpoint for Regulatory Decision‐Making</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Heflich, Robert H. ; Johnson, George E. ; Zeller, Andreas ; Marchetti, Francesco ; Douglas, George R. ; Witt, Kristine L. ; Gollapudi, B. Bhaskar ; White, Paul A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heflich, Robert H. ; Johnson, George E. ; Zeller, Andreas ; Marchetti, Francesco ; Douglas, George R. ; Witt, Kristine L. ; Gollapudi, B. Bhaskar ; White, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><description>Mutations induced in somatic cells and germ cells are responsible for a variety of human diseases, and mutation per se has been considered an adverse health concern since the early part of the 20th Century. Although in vitro and in vivo somatic cell mutation data are most commonly used by regulatory agencies for hazard identification, that is, determining whether or not a substance is a potential mutagen and carcinogen, quantitative mutagenicity dose–response data are being used increasingly for risk assessments. Efforts are currently underway to both improve the measurement of mutations and to refine the computational methods used for evaluating mutation data. We recommend continuing the development of these approaches with the objective of establishing consensus regarding the value of including the quantitative analysis of mutation per se as a required endpoint for comprehensive assessments of toxicological risk. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:34–41, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-6692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/em.22338</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31600846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Carcinogens ; Computer applications ; Decision making ; error‐corrected next‐generation sequencing ; germ cell mutation ; Germ cells ; Hazard identification ; Mutagenicity ; Mutation ; point of departure ; Quantitative analysis ; Regulatory agencies ; Risk assessment ; somatic cell mutation ; Somatic cells ; somatic mosaicism</subject><ispartof>Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2020-01, Vol.61 (1), p.34-41</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3838-8a860a5c8c7bc55388e6818ae147a673f55a74b923191ad06dbb3a60b4148a523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3838-8a860a5c8c7bc55388e6818ae147a673f55a74b923191ad06dbb3a60b4148a523</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5643-9942 ; 0000-0002-9435-4867</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fem.22338$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fem.22338$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31600846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heflich, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, George E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeller, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchetti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, George R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Kristine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gollapudi, B. Bhaskar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><title>Mutation as a Toxicological Endpoint for Regulatory Decision‐Making</title><title>Environmental and molecular mutagenesis</title><addtitle>Environ Mol Mutagen</addtitle><description>Mutations induced in somatic cells and germ cells are responsible for a variety of human diseases, and mutation per se has been considered an adverse health concern since the early part of the 20th Century. Although in vitro and in vivo somatic cell mutation data are most commonly used by regulatory agencies for hazard identification, that is, determining whether or not a substance is a potential mutagen and carcinogen, quantitative mutagenicity dose–response data are being used increasingly for risk assessments. Efforts are currently underway to both improve the measurement of mutations and to refine the computational methods used for evaluating mutation data. We recommend continuing the development of these approaches with the objective of establishing consensus regarding the value of including the quantitative analysis of mutation per se as a required endpoint for comprehensive assessments of toxicological risk. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:34–41, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>error‐corrected next‐generation sequencing</subject><subject>germ cell mutation</subject><subject>Germ cells</subject><subject>Hazard identification</subject><subject>Mutagenicity</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>point of departure</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>somatic cell mutation</subject><subject>Somatic cells</subject><subject>somatic mosaicism</subject><issn>0893-6692</issn><issn>1098-2280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQQC0EoqUgcQIUiQ2bFH8Sx1kiCB-pFRIqa2viOJVLEhc7EXTHETgjJyElhR2r2bx5o3kInRI8JRjTS11PKWVM7KExwakIKRV4H42xSFnIeUpH6Mj7FcaERCk9RCNGOMYi4mOUzbsWWmObAHwAwcK-G2UruzQKqiBrirU1TRuU1gVPetlV0Fq3CW60Mr7f-fr4nMOLaZbH6KCEyuuT3Zyg59tscX0fzh7vHq6vZqFigolQgOAYYiVUkqs4ZkJoLogATaIEeMLKOIYkylPKSEqgwLzIcwYc5xGJBMSUTdD54F07-9pp38qV7VzTn5T9-xFhlPItdTFQylnvnS7l2pka3EYSLLe9pK7lT68ePdsJu7zWxR_4G6gHwgF4M5Xe_CuS2XwQfgMhfHJ0</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Heflich, Robert H.</creator><creator>Johnson, George E.</creator><creator>Zeller, Andreas</creator><creator>Marchetti, Francesco</creator><creator>Douglas, George R.</creator><creator>Witt, Kristine L.</creator><creator>Gollapudi, B. Bhaskar</creator><creator>White, Paul A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5643-9942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-4867</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Mutation as a Toxicological Endpoint for Regulatory Decision‐Making</title><author>Heflich, Robert H. ; Johnson, George E. ; Zeller, Andreas ; Marchetti, Francesco ; Douglas, George R. ; Witt, Kristine L. ; Gollapudi, B. Bhaskar ; White, Paul A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3838-8a860a5c8c7bc55388e6818ae147a673f55a74b923191ad06dbb3a60b4148a523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>error‐corrected next‐generation sequencing</topic><topic>germ cell mutation</topic><topic>Germ cells</topic><topic>Hazard identification</topic><topic>Mutagenicity</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>point of departure</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>somatic cell mutation</topic><topic>Somatic cells</topic><topic>somatic mosaicism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heflich, Robert H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, George E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeller, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchetti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, George R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Witt, Kristine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gollapudi, B. Bhaskar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental and molecular mutagenesis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heflich, Robert H.</au><au>Johnson, George E.</au><au>Zeller, Andreas</au><au>Marchetti, Francesco</au><au>Douglas, George R.</au><au>Witt, Kristine L.</au><au>Gollapudi, B. Bhaskar</au><au>White, Paul A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mutation as a Toxicological Endpoint for Regulatory Decision‐Making</atitle><jtitle>Environmental and molecular mutagenesis</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Mol Mutagen</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>34-41</pages><issn>0893-6692</issn><eissn>1098-2280</eissn><abstract>Mutations induced in somatic cells and germ cells are responsible for a variety of human diseases, and mutation per se has been considered an adverse health concern since the early part of the 20th Century. Although in vitro and in vivo somatic cell mutation data are most commonly used by regulatory agencies for hazard identification, that is, determining whether or not a substance is a potential mutagen and carcinogen, quantitative mutagenicity dose–response data are being used increasingly for risk assessments. Efforts are currently underway to both improve the measurement of mutations and to refine the computational methods used for evaluating mutation data. We recommend continuing the development of these approaches with the objective of establishing consensus regarding the value of including the quantitative analysis of mutation per se as a required endpoint for comprehensive assessments of toxicological risk. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:34–41, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31600846</pmid><doi>10.1002/em.22338</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5643-9942</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9435-4867</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-6692
ispartof Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2020-01, Vol.61 (1), p.34-41
issn 0893-6692
1098-2280
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2334132262
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects Carcinogens
Computer applications
Decision making
error‐corrected next‐generation sequencing
germ cell mutation
Germ cells
Hazard identification
Mutagenicity
Mutation
point of departure
Quantitative analysis
Regulatory agencies
Risk assessment
somatic cell mutation
Somatic cells
somatic mosaicism
title Mutation as a Toxicological Endpoint for Regulatory Decision‐Making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A41%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mutation%20as%20a%20Toxicological%20Endpoint%20for%20Regulatory%20Decision%E2%80%90Making&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20and%20molecular%20mutagenesis&rft.au=Heflich,%20Robert%20H.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=34-41&rft.issn=0893-6692&rft.eissn=1098-2280&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/em.22338&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2334132262%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2334132262&rft_id=info:pmid/31600846&rfr_iscdi=true