Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study
Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology pharmacy and pharmacology, 2019, Vol.9 (12), p.1-1166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1166 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Shivalingiah, Jyothi Ramanathan, Rashmi R, Raajaseharan S, Jeyabanu S, Rekha N, Rammohan |
description | Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has grown popularity in medical education as it offers a dynamic and collaborative setting for learning[3] and it is learner centered with group of students (5-12) joining in discussion of a particular topic or a clinical scenario.141 Problem-based learning (PBL) relies almost entirely on SGT methods and many schools with more traditional curricula have incorporated a significant number of SGT sessions into undergraduate programs for medical students. Buzz Group In this method, students (10-12) sit in a circular form and 2-3 participants discuss a specific question or issue to come up with many ideas in a short time. Since the small groups produce buzz sound while discussing, this method is known as buzz group. [...]we need to assess the effectiveness of various SGTs from the students view and analyze how they perceive them as a means of the teachinglearning process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0727210092019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2333624557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333624557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c797-a22f47427adc517d4f3719023c85f972e10d1e9679e93a0757ea17d5908b0d0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMlqwzAQQEVpoaHNP4j2bFeLbUW9hdANAoWSu5hIcuJgS65kB3Lov1dOeulcZnvMwEPogZK8LMryyR36vs8ZoTKXORFMMEqInPorNGOM04wzUl2nOuWsqAS7RfMYDySFLGgiZujny7cW-xofITR-jDh20LZ4F_zY48GC3jduhzs77L2JuHHYuj04PQ1bC8FNBXT-zJhGQ4tHZ2zYBTAjDBbHYTTWDRFneIm173oIMDTHy-J0j25qaKOd_-U7tHl92azes_Xn28dquc60kCIDxupCFEyA0SUVpqi5oJIwrhdlLQWzlBhqZSWklRyIKIWFhJWSLLbEkC2_Q4-Xs33w36ONgzr4Mbj0UTHOecWSTZGo5wulg48x2Fr1oekgnBQlahKuzsLVJFhJ9U84_wVyWXaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333624557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Shivalingiah, Jyothi ; Ramanathan, Rashmi ; R, Raajaseharan ; S, Jeyabanu ; S, Rekha ; N, Rammohan</creator><creatorcontrib>Shivalingiah, Jyothi ; Ramanathan, Rashmi ; R, Raajaseharan ; S, Jeyabanu ; S, Rekha ; N, Rammohan</creatorcontrib><description>Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has grown popularity in medical education as it offers a dynamic and collaborative setting for learning[3] and it is learner centered with group of students (5-12) joining in discussion of a particular topic or a clinical scenario.141 Problem-based learning (PBL) relies almost entirely on SGT methods and many schools with more traditional curricula have incorporated a significant number of SGT sessions into undergraduate programs for medical students. Buzz Group In this method, students (10-12) sit in a circular form and 2-3 participants discuss a specific question or issue to come up with many ideas in a short time. Since the small groups produce buzz sound while discussing, this method is known as buzz group. [...]we need to assess the effectiveness of various SGTs from the students view and analyze how they perceive them as a means of the teachinglearning process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2320-4672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-3206</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0727210092019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Surat: Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists & Pharmacologists</publisher><subject>Cooperative learning ; Critical thinking ; Curricula ; Feedback ; Likert scale ; Medical education ; Medical students ; Performance evaluation ; Physiology ; Questionnaires ; Software ; Students ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology, 2019, Vol.9 (12), p.1-1166</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shivalingiah, Jyothi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R, Raajaseharan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S, Jeyabanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N, Rammohan</creatorcontrib><title>Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study</title><title>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology</title><description>Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has grown popularity in medical education as it offers a dynamic and collaborative setting for learning[3] and it is learner centered with group of students (5-12) joining in discussion of a particular topic or a clinical scenario.141 Problem-based learning (PBL) relies almost entirely on SGT methods and many schools with more traditional curricula have incorporated a significant number of SGT sessions into undergraduate programs for medical students. Buzz Group In this method, students (10-12) sit in a circular form and 2-3 participants discuss a specific question or issue to come up with many ideas in a short time. Since the small groups produce buzz sound while discussing, this method is known as buzz group. [...]we need to assess the effectiveness of various SGTs from the students view and analyze how they perceive them as a means of the teachinglearning process.</description><subject>Cooperative learning</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>2320-4672</issn><issn>2231-3206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMlqwzAQQEVpoaHNP4j2bFeLbUW9hdANAoWSu5hIcuJgS65kB3Lov1dOeulcZnvMwEPogZK8LMryyR36vs8ZoTKXORFMMEqInPorNGOM04wzUl2nOuWsqAS7RfMYDySFLGgiZujny7cW-xofITR-jDh20LZ4F_zY48GC3jduhzs77L2JuHHYuj04PQ1bC8FNBXT-zJhGQ4tHZ2zYBTAjDBbHYTTWDRFneIm173oIMDTHy-J0j25qaKOd_-U7tHl92azes_Xn28dquc60kCIDxupCFEyA0SUVpqi5oJIwrhdlLQWzlBhqZSWklRyIKIWFhJWSLLbEkC2_Q4-Xs33w36ONgzr4Mbj0UTHOecWSTZGo5wulg48x2Fr1oekgnBQlahKuzsLVJFhJ9U84_wVyWXaw</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Shivalingiah, Jyothi</creator><creator>Ramanathan, Rashmi</creator><creator>R, Raajaseharan</creator><creator>S, Jeyabanu</creator><creator>S, Rekha</creator><creator>N, Rammohan</creator><general>Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists & Pharmacologists</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study</title><author>Shivalingiah, Jyothi ; Ramanathan, Rashmi ; R, Raajaseharan ; S, Jeyabanu ; S, Rekha ; N, Rammohan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c797-a22f47427adc517d4f3719023c85f972e10d1e9679e93a0757ea17d5908b0d0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cooperative learning</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shivalingiah, Jyothi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R, Raajaseharan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S, Jeyabanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N, Rammohan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>India Database: Science & Technology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shivalingiah, Jyothi</au><au>Ramanathan, Rashmi</au><au>R, Raajaseharan</au><au>S, Jeyabanu</au><au>S, Rekha</au><au>N, Rammohan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study</atitle><jtitle>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>1166</epage><pages>1-1166</pages><issn>2320-4672</issn><eissn>2231-3206</eissn><abstract>Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has grown popularity in medical education as it offers a dynamic and collaborative setting for learning[3] and it is learner centered with group of students (5-12) joining in discussion of a particular topic or a clinical scenario.141 Problem-based learning (PBL) relies almost entirely on SGT methods and many schools with more traditional curricula have incorporated a significant number of SGT sessions into undergraduate programs for medical students. Buzz Group In this method, students (10-12) sit in a circular form and 2-3 participants discuss a specific question or issue to come up with many ideas in a short time. Since the small groups produce buzz sound while discussing, this method is known as buzz group. [...]we need to assess the effectiveness of various SGTs from the students view and analyze how they perceive them as a means of the teachinglearning process.</abstract><cop>Surat</cop><pub>Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists & Pharmacologists</pub><doi>10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0727210092019</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2320-4672 |
ispartof | National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology, 2019, Vol.9 (12), p.1-1166 |
issn | 2320-4672 2231-3206 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2333624557 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Cooperative learning Critical thinking Curricula Feedback Likert scale Medical education Medical students Performance evaluation Physiology Questionnaires Software Students Teaching methods |
title | Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A24%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20various%20small%20group%20teaching%20methods%20in%20enhancing%20learning%20among%20medical%20undergraduate%20students%20-%20A%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=National%20journal%20of%20physiology,%20pharmacy%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Shivalingiah,%20Jyothi&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1166&rft.pages=1-1166&rft.issn=2320-4672&rft.eissn=2231-3206&rft_id=info:doi/10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0727210092019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2333624557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333624557&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |