Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study

Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology pharmacy and pharmacology, 2019, Vol.9 (12), p.1-1166
Hauptverfasser: Shivalingiah, Jyothi, Ramanathan, Rashmi, R, Raajaseharan, S, Jeyabanu, S, Rekha, N, Rammohan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1166
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1
container_title National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology
container_volume 9
creator Shivalingiah, Jyothi
Ramanathan, Rashmi
R, Raajaseharan
S, Jeyabanu
S, Rekha
N, Rammohan
description Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has grown popularity in medical education as it offers a dynamic and collaborative setting for learning[3] and it is learner centered with group of students (5-12) joining in discussion of a particular topic or a clinical scenario.141 Problem-based learning (PBL) relies almost entirely on SGT methods and many schools with more traditional curricula have incorporated a significant number of SGT sessions into undergraduate programs for medical students. Buzz Group In this method, students (10-12) sit in a circular form and 2-3 participants discuss a specific question or issue to come up with many ideas in a short time. Since the small groups produce buzz sound while discussing, this method is known as buzz group. [...]we need to assess the effectiveness of various SGTs from the students view and analyze how they perceive them as a means of the teachinglearning process.
doi_str_mv 10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0727210092019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2333624557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2333624557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c797-a22f47427adc517d4f3719023c85f972e10d1e9679e93a0757ea17d5908b0d0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMlqwzAQQEVpoaHNP4j2bFeLbUW9hdANAoWSu5hIcuJgS65kB3Lov1dOeulcZnvMwEPogZK8LMryyR36vs8ZoTKXORFMMEqInPorNGOM04wzUl2nOuWsqAS7RfMYDySFLGgiZujny7cW-xofITR-jDh20LZ4F_zY48GC3jduhzs77L2JuHHYuj04PQ1bC8FNBXT-zJhGQ4tHZ2zYBTAjDBbHYTTWDRFneIm173oIMDTHy-J0j25qaKOd_-U7tHl92azes_Xn28dquc60kCIDxupCFEyA0SUVpqi5oJIwrhdlLQWzlBhqZSWklRyIKIWFhJWSLLbEkC2_Q4-Xs33w36ONgzr4Mbj0UTHOecWSTZGo5wulg48x2Fr1oekgnBQlahKuzsLVJFhJ9U84_wVyWXaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2333624557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Shivalingiah, Jyothi ; Ramanathan, Rashmi ; R, Raajaseharan ; S, Jeyabanu ; S, Rekha ; N, Rammohan</creator><creatorcontrib>Shivalingiah, Jyothi ; Ramanathan, Rashmi ; R, Raajaseharan ; S, Jeyabanu ; S, Rekha ; N, Rammohan</creatorcontrib><description>Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has grown popularity in medical education as it offers a dynamic and collaborative setting for learning[3] and it is learner centered with group of students (5-12) joining in discussion of a particular topic or a clinical scenario.141 Problem-based learning (PBL) relies almost entirely on SGT methods and many schools with more traditional curricula have incorporated a significant number of SGT sessions into undergraduate programs for medical students. Buzz Group In this method, students (10-12) sit in a circular form and 2-3 participants discuss a specific question or issue to come up with many ideas in a short time. Since the small groups produce buzz sound while discussing, this method is known as buzz group. [...]we need to assess the effectiveness of various SGTs from the students view and analyze how they perceive them as a means of the teachinglearning process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2320-4672</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-3206</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0727210092019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Surat: Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists &amp; Pharmacologists</publisher><subject>Cooperative learning ; Critical thinking ; Curricula ; Feedback ; Likert scale ; Medical education ; Medical students ; Performance evaluation ; Physiology ; Questionnaires ; Software ; Students ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology, 2019, Vol.9 (12), p.1-1166</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shivalingiah, Jyothi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R, Raajaseharan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S, Jeyabanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N, Rammohan</creatorcontrib><title>Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study</title><title>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology</title><description>Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has grown popularity in medical education as it offers a dynamic and collaborative setting for learning[3] and it is learner centered with group of students (5-12) joining in discussion of a particular topic or a clinical scenario.141 Problem-based learning (PBL) relies almost entirely on SGT methods and many schools with more traditional curricula have incorporated a significant number of SGT sessions into undergraduate programs for medical students. Buzz Group In this method, students (10-12) sit in a circular form and 2-3 participants discuss a specific question or issue to come up with many ideas in a short time. Since the small groups produce buzz sound while discussing, this method is known as buzz group. [...]we need to assess the effectiveness of various SGTs from the students view and analyze how they perceive them as a means of the teachinglearning process.</description><subject>Cooperative learning</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>2320-4672</issn><issn>2231-3206</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMlqwzAQQEVpoaHNP4j2bFeLbUW9hdANAoWSu5hIcuJgS65kB3Lov1dOeulcZnvMwEPogZK8LMryyR36vs8ZoTKXORFMMEqInPorNGOM04wzUl2nOuWsqAS7RfMYDySFLGgiZujny7cW-xofITR-jDh20LZ4F_zY48GC3jduhzs77L2JuHHYuj04PQ1bC8FNBXT-zJhGQ4tHZ2zYBTAjDBbHYTTWDRFneIm173oIMDTHy-J0j25qaKOd_-U7tHl92azes_Xn28dquc60kCIDxupCFEyA0SUVpqi5oJIwrhdlLQWzlBhqZSWklRyIKIWFhJWSLLbEkC2_Q4-Xs33w36ONgzr4Mbj0UTHOecWSTZGo5wulg48x2Fr1oekgnBQlahKuzsLVJFhJ9U84_wVyWXaw</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Shivalingiah, Jyothi</creator><creator>Ramanathan, Rashmi</creator><creator>R, Raajaseharan</creator><creator>S, Jeyabanu</creator><creator>S, Rekha</creator><creator>N, Rammohan</creator><general>Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists &amp; Pharmacologists</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study</title><author>Shivalingiah, Jyothi ; Ramanathan, Rashmi ; R, Raajaseharan ; S, Jeyabanu ; S, Rekha ; N, Rammohan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c797-a22f47427adc517d4f3719023c85f972e10d1e9679e93a0757ea17d5908b0d0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cooperative learning</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shivalingiah, Jyothi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramanathan, Rashmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R, Raajaseharan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S, Jeyabanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S, Rekha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>N, Rammohan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>India Database: Science &amp; Technology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shivalingiah, Jyothi</au><au>Ramanathan, Rashmi</au><au>R, Raajaseharan</au><au>S, Jeyabanu</au><au>S, Rekha</au><au>N, Rammohan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study</atitle><jtitle>National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>1166</epage><pages>1-1166</pages><issn>2320-4672</issn><eissn>2231-3206</eissn><abstract>Small Group Teaching; Physiology Tutorials; Student Feedback INTRODUCTION In the era of explosion of information, students are expected to master a large amount of academic load in a short duration making the entire learning process painful, instead of delight. [1,2] Small group teaching (SGT) has grown popularity in medical education as it offers a dynamic and collaborative setting for learning[3] and it is learner centered with group of students (5-12) joining in discussion of a particular topic or a clinical scenario.141 Problem-based learning (PBL) relies almost entirely on SGT methods and many schools with more traditional curricula have incorporated a significant number of SGT sessions into undergraduate programs for medical students. Buzz Group In this method, students (10-12) sit in a circular form and 2-3 participants discuss a specific question or issue to come up with many ideas in a short time. Since the small groups produce buzz sound while discussing, this method is known as buzz group. [...]we need to assess the effectiveness of various SGTs from the students view and analyze how they perceive them as a means of the teachinglearning process.</abstract><cop>Surat</cop><pub>Association of Physiologists, Pharmacists &amp; Pharmacologists</pub><doi>10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0727210092019</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2320-4672
ispartof National journal of physiology, pharmacy and pharmacology, 2019, Vol.9 (12), p.1-1166
issn 2320-4672
2231-3206
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2333624557
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Cooperative learning
Critical thinking
Curricula
Feedback
Likert scale
Medical education
Medical students
Performance evaluation
Physiology
Questionnaires
Software
Students
Teaching methods
title Role of various small group teaching methods in enhancing learning among medical undergraduate students - A comparative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A24%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20various%20small%20group%20teaching%20methods%20in%20enhancing%20learning%20among%20medical%20undergraduate%20students%20-%20A%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=National%20journal%20of%20physiology,%20pharmacy%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Shivalingiah,%20Jyothi&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=1166&rft.pages=1-1166&rft.issn=2320-4672&rft.eissn=2231-3206&rft_id=info:doi/10.5455/njppp.2019.9.0727210092019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2333624557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2333624557&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true