Effects of digitalization of nuclear power plant control rooms on human reliability analysis – A review

•Control room digitalization has positive and negative effects on human reliability.•Some effects seem universal, but many depend on the specific design.•Established performance shaping factor categories are still relevant.•Training and experience, procedures and task type/complexity are important factors.•Establishment of quantitative effects on the error rate require further research. The changes in the operating conditions of the main control room of nuclear power plants due to new digitalized human-system interfaces (HSIs) pose challenges to traditional human reliability analysis (HRA) methods. This paper reviews current knowledge about the effect of digital HSI on human behavior and reliability, relevant performance shaping factor (PSF) taxonomies as well as research on the effect of PSFs on human error probability estimates in advanced control rooms (ACRs). It cannot be generally concluded that either analog or digitalized control rooms would be always better than the other. ACRs have the potential to offer error reducing and supportive features to the user, but may also introduce increased complexity and interface management tasks as well as potentially error-prone team working practices. Some effects seem universal, but most depend on the specific design. The main PSF categories presented in HRA methods and international guidelines seem still relevant in ACRs. Quantitative empirical studies show that especially training and experience, availability and quality of procedures as well as task type or complexity are important factors. However, digitalization changes the way in which the PSFs should be defined and measured, and the effects of PSFs on the error estimates may be different.