A Wet‐Bulb Temperature‐Based Rain‐Snow Partitioning Scheme Improves Snowpack Prediction Over the Drier Western United States
Accumulation of snowfall during winter and snowmelt in the subsequent spring or earlier summer provides a dominant water source in alpine regions. Most land surface and hydrological models use near‐surface air temperature (Ta) thresholds to partition precipitation into snow and rain, underestimating...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geophysical research letters 2019-12, Vol.46 (23), p.13825-13835 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 13835 |
---|---|
container_issue | 23 |
container_start_page | 13825 |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Wang, Yuan‐Heng Broxton, Patrick Fang, Yuanhao Behrangi, Ali Barlage, Michael Zeng, Xubin Niu, Guo‐Yue |
description | Accumulation of snowfall during winter and snowmelt in the subsequent spring or earlier summer provides a dominant water source in alpine regions. Most land surface and hydrological models use near‐surface air temperature (Ta) thresholds to partition precipitation into snow and rain, underestimating snowfall over drier regions. We developed a snow‐rain partitioning scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature (Tw), which is closer to the surface temperature of a falling hydrometeor than Ta. Tw becomes more depressed in drier environments as derived from Tw depression equation using Ta and surface air humidity, resulting in a greater fraction of snowfall. We implemented this new Tw scheme in the Noah‐MP land surface model and evaluated the model against a high‐quality ground‐based snow product over the contiguous United States. The results suggest that the new Tw scheme substantially improves the model skill in simulating snow depth and snow water equivalent over most snow‐covered grids, especially the higher and drier continental mountain ranges in the Western United States, while it retains the modeling accuracy over the more humid Eastern United States.
Plain Language Summary
The partitioning between rainfall and snowfall is important for understanding the impacts of climate change and water resource availability. Most land surface and hydrological models use surface air temperature to partition precipitation into rain and snow and thus underestimate snowfall and snow mass accumulated on the ground in the drier Western United States. A falling hydrometeor evaporates or sublimates at its surface depending on the humidity of the surrounding air and cools off, resulting in a surface temperature that is cooler than the air temperature. The depressed surface temperature is close to the wet‐bulb temperature. We developed a scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature and tested it with a physically based snow model over the contiguous United States. The testing results strongly support the use of wet‐bulb temperature, which enhances snowfall and the snow mass on the ground more significantly over the higher and drier mountains in the Western United States, while it retains the modeling accuracy in the more humid Eastern United States.
Key Points
We developed a snow‐rain partitioning scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature and tested it with a physically based snow model over CONUS
The new scheme produces more snowfall and snow mass on the ground that agree better with a groun |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019GL085722 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2332211235</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2332211235</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3445-f3f21936e45398bca8eb88a5845c455503f35f6ed5605e61ad6c57502bbfcf623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAjEUhRujiYjufIAmbkVv2-kws0RUJCGB8BOWk065I0WYwbZA2BmfwGf0SSzBhStX99ybL-eeHEKuGdwx4Ok9B5Z2epDIJucnpMbSKGokAM1TUgNIg-bN-JxcOLcAAAGC1chni07Rf398PWyWOR3jao1W-Y3Fw0k5nNGhMmVYRmW1owNlvfGmKk35Skd6jiuk3dXaVlt09ECslX6jA4szow8Y7W_RUj9H-mhNUFN0Hm1JJ6XxwXrklUd3Sc4KtXR49TvrZPL8NG6_NHr9Trfd6jW0iCLZKETBWSpijKRIk1yrBPMkUTKJpI6klCAKIYsYZzIGiTFTs1jLpgSe54UuYi7q5OboG_K-b0KSbFFtbBleZlwIzhnjQgbq9khpWzlnscjW1qyU3WcMskPL2d-WA86P-M4scf8vm3WGPZmmIMUPWbyBTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2332211235</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Wet‐Bulb Temperature‐Based Rain‐Snow Partitioning Scheme Improves Snowpack Prediction Over the Drier Western United States</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Wang, Yuan‐Heng ; Broxton, Patrick ; Fang, Yuanhao ; Behrangi, Ali ; Barlage, Michael ; Zeng, Xubin ; Niu, Guo‐Yue</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuan‐Heng ; Broxton, Patrick ; Fang, Yuanhao ; Behrangi, Ali ; Barlage, Michael ; Zeng, Xubin ; Niu, Guo‐Yue</creatorcontrib><description>Accumulation of snowfall during winter and snowmelt in the subsequent spring or earlier summer provides a dominant water source in alpine regions. Most land surface and hydrological models use near‐surface air temperature (Ta) thresholds to partition precipitation into snow and rain, underestimating snowfall over drier regions. We developed a snow‐rain partitioning scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature (Tw), which is closer to the surface temperature of a falling hydrometeor than Ta. Tw becomes more depressed in drier environments as derived from Tw depression equation using Ta and surface air humidity, resulting in a greater fraction of snowfall. We implemented this new Tw scheme in the Noah‐MP land surface model and evaluated the model against a high‐quality ground‐based snow product over the contiguous United States. The results suggest that the new Tw scheme substantially improves the model skill in simulating snow depth and snow water equivalent over most snow‐covered grids, especially the higher and drier continental mountain ranges in the Western United States, while it retains the modeling accuracy over the more humid Eastern United States.
Plain Language Summary
The partitioning between rainfall and snowfall is important for understanding the impacts of climate change and water resource availability. Most land surface and hydrological models use surface air temperature to partition precipitation into rain and snow and thus underestimate snowfall and snow mass accumulated on the ground in the drier Western United States. A falling hydrometeor evaporates or sublimates at its surface depending on the humidity of the surrounding air and cools off, resulting in a surface temperature that is cooler than the air temperature. The depressed surface temperature is close to the wet‐bulb temperature. We developed a scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature and tested it with a physically based snow model over the contiguous United States. The testing results strongly support the use of wet‐bulb temperature, which enhances snowfall and the snow mass on the ground more significantly over the higher and drier mountains in the Western United States, while it retains the modeling accuracy in the more humid Eastern United States.
Key Points
We developed a snow‐rain partitioning scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature and tested it with a physically based snow model over CONUS
The new scheme produces more snowfall and snow mass on the ground that agree better with a ground‐based snow product over the drier Western CONUS</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019GL085722</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Air temperature ; Alpine regions ; Atmospheric precipitations ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Computer simulation ; Environmental impact ; Falling ; Humidity ; Hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Hydrometeors ; Land surface models ; Model accuracy ; Modelling ; Mountains ; Noah‐MP land surface model ; Partitioning ; Precipitation ; precipitation partitioning ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Resource availability ; Snow ; Snow accumulation ; Snow depth ; Snow-water equivalent ; Snowfall ; Snowmelt ; Snowpack ; Surface temperature ; Surface-air temperature relationships ; Water depth ; Water resources ; wet‐bulb temperature</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2019-12, Vol.46 (23), p.13825-13835</ispartof><rights>2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3445-f3f21936e45398bca8eb88a5845c455503f35f6ed5605e61ad6c57502bbfcf623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3445-f3f21936e45398bca8eb88a5845c455503f35f6ed5605e61ad6c57502bbfcf623</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2105-7690 ; 0000-0001-7352-2764 ; 0000-0002-2665-6820 ; 0000-0001-7594-8793 ; 0000-0002-6510-2302 ; 0000-0002-7322-6102 ; 0000-0002-9360-6639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019GL085722$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019GL085722$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuan‐Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broxton, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yuanhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behrangi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlage, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Guo‐Yue</creatorcontrib><title>A Wet‐Bulb Temperature‐Based Rain‐Snow Partitioning Scheme Improves Snowpack Prediction Over the Drier Western United States</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Accumulation of snowfall during winter and snowmelt in the subsequent spring or earlier summer provides a dominant water source in alpine regions. Most land surface and hydrological models use near‐surface air temperature (Ta) thresholds to partition precipitation into snow and rain, underestimating snowfall over drier regions. We developed a snow‐rain partitioning scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature (Tw), which is closer to the surface temperature of a falling hydrometeor than Ta. Tw becomes more depressed in drier environments as derived from Tw depression equation using Ta and surface air humidity, resulting in a greater fraction of snowfall. We implemented this new Tw scheme in the Noah‐MP land surface model and evaluated the model against a high‐quality ground‐based snow product over the contiguous United States. The results suggest that the new Tw scheme substantially improves the model skill in simulating snow depth and snow water equivalent over most snow‐covered grids, especially the higher and drier continental mountain ranges in the Western United States, while it retains the modeling accuracy over the more humid Eastern United States.
Plain Language Summary
The partitioning between rainfall and snowfall is important for understanding the impacts of climate change and water resource availability. Most land surface and hydrological models use surface air temperature to partition precipitation into rain and snow and thus underestimate snowfall and snow mass accumulated on the ground in the drier Western United States. A falling hydrometeor evaporates or sublimates at its surface depending on the humidity of the surrounding air and cools off, resulting in a surface temperature that is cooler than the air temperature. The depressed surface temperature is close to the wet‐bulb temperature. We developed a scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature and tested it with a physically based snow model over the contiguous United States. The testing results strongly support the use of wet‐bulb temperature, which enhances snowfall and the snow mass on the ground more significantly over the higher and drier mountains in the Western United States, while it retains the modeling accuracy in the more humid Eastern United States.
Key Points
We developed a snow‐rain partitioning scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature and tested it with a physically based snow model over CONUS
The new scheme produces more snowfall and snow mass on the ground that agree better with a ground‐based snow product over the drier Western CONUS</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Air temperature</subject><subject>Alpine regions</subject><subject>Atmospheric precipitations</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Falling</subject><subject>Humidity</subject><subject>Hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrometeors</subject><subject>Land surface models</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Noah‐MP land surface model</subject><subject>Partitioning</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>precipitation partitioning</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Resource availability</subject><subject>Snow</subject><subject>Snow accumulation</subject><subject>Snow depth</subject><subject>Snow-water equivalent</subject><subject>Snowfall</subject><subject>Snowmelt</subject><subject>Snowpack</subject><subject>Surface temperature</subject><subject>Surface-air temperature relationships</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>wet‐bulb temperature</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OAjEUhRujiYjufIAmbkVv2-kws0RUJCGB8BOWk065I0WYwbZA2BmfwGf0SSzBhStX99ybL-eeHEKuGdwx4Ok9B5Z2epDIJucnpMbSKGokAM1TUgNIg-bN-JxcOLcAAAGC1chni07Rf398PWyWOR3jao1W-Y3Fw0k5nNGhMmVYRmW1owNlvfGmKk35Skd6jiuk3dXaVlt09ECslX6jA4szow8Y7W_RUj9H-mhNUFN0Hm1JJ6XxwXrklUd3Sc4KtXR49TvrZPL8NG6_NHr9Trfd6jW0iCLZKETBWSpijKRIk1yrBPMkUTKJpI6klCAKIYsYZzIGiTFTs1jLpgSe54UuYi7q5OboG_K-b0KSbFFtbBleZlwIzhnjQgbq9khpWzlnscjW1qyU3WcMskPL2d-WA86P-M4scf8vm3WGPZmmIMUPWbyBTQ</recordid><startdate>20191216</startdate><enddate>20191216</enddate><creator>Wang, Yuan‐Heng</creator><creator>Broxton, Patrick</creator><creator>Fang, Yuanhao</creator><creator>Behrangi, Ali</creator><creator>Barlage, Michael</creator><creator>Zeng, Xubin</creator><creator>Niu, Guo‐Yue</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2105-7690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-2764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2665-6820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-8793</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6510-2302</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7322-6102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9360-6639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191216</creationdate><title>A Wet‐Bulb Temperature‐Based Rain‐Snow Partitioning Scheme Improves Snowpack Prediction Over the Drier Western United States</title><author>Wang, Yuan‐Heng ; Broxton, Patrick ; Fang, Yuanhao ; Behrangi, Ali ; Barlage, Michael ; Zeng, Xubin ; Niu, Guo‐Yue</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3445-f3f21936e45398bca8eb88a5845c455503f35f6ed5605e61ad6c57502bbfcf623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Air temperature</topic><topic>Alpine regions</topic><topic>Atmospheric precipitations</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Falling</topic><topic>Humidity</topic><topic>Hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrometeors</topic><topic>Land surface models</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Noah‐MP land surface model</topic><topic>Partitioning</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>precipitation partitioning</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Resource availability</topic><topic>Snow</topic><topic>Snow accumulation</topic><topic>Snow depth</topic><topic>Snow-water equivalent</topic><topic>Snowfall</topic><topic>Snowmelt</topic><topic>Snowpack</topic><topic>Surface temperature</topic><topic>Surface-air temperature relationships</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>wet‐bulb temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yuan‐Heng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broxton, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Yuanhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Behrangi, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barlage, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niu, Guo‐Yue</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Yuan‐Heng</au><au>Broxton, Patrick</au><au>Fang, Yuanhao</au><au>Behrangi, Ali</au><au>Barlage, Michael</au><au>Zeng, Xubin</au><au>Niu, Guo‐Yue</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Wet‐Bulb Temperature‐Based Rain‐Snow Partitioning Scheme Improves Snowpack Prediction Over the Drier Western United States</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2019-12-16</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>13825</spage><epage>13835</epage><pages>13825-13835</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Accumulation of snowfall during winter and snowmelt in the subsequent spring or earlier summer provides a dominant water source in alpine regions. Most land surface and hydrological models use near‐surface air temperature (Ta) thresholds to partition precipitation into snow and rain, underestimating snowfall over drier regions. We developed a snow‐rain partitioning scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature (Tw), which is closer to the surface temperature of a falling hydrometeor than Ta. Tw becomes more depressed in drier environments as derived from Tw depression equation using Ta and surface air humidity, resulting in a greater fraction of snowfall. We implemented this new Tw scheme in the Noah‐MP land surface model and evaluated the model against a high‐quality ground‐based snow product over the contiguous United States. The results suggest that the new Tw scheme substantially improves the model skill in simulating snow depth and snow water equivalent over most snow‐covered grids, especially the higher and drier continental mountain ranges in the Western United States, while it retains the modeling accuracy over the more humid Eastern United States.
Plain Language Summary
The partitioning between rainfall and snowfall is important for understanding the impacts of climate change and water resource availability. Most land surface and hydrological models use surface air temperature to partition precipitation into rain and snow and thus underestimate snowfall and snow mass accumulated on the ground in the drier Western United States. A falling hydrometeor evaporates or sublimates at its surface depending on the humidity of the surrounding air and cools off, resulting in a surface temperature that is cooler than the air temperature. The depressed surface temperature is close to the wet‐bulb temperature. We developed a scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature and tested it with a physically based snow model over the contiguous United States. The testing results strongly support the use of wet‐bulb temperature, which enhances snowfall and the snow mass on the ground more significantly over the higher and drier mountains in the Western United States, while it retains the modeling accuracy in the more humid Eastern United States.
Key Points
We developed a snow‐rain partitioning scheme using the wet‐bulb temperature and tested it with a physically based snow model over CONUS
The new scheme produces more snowfall and snow mass on the ground that agree better with a ground‐based snow product over the drier Western CONUS</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2019GL085722</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2105-7690</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7352-2764</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2665-6820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7594-8793</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6510-2302</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7322-6102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9360-6639</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2019-12, Vol.46 (23), p.13825-13835 |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2332211235 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library |
subjects | Accuracy Air temperature Alpine regions Atmospheric precipitations Climate change Climate models Computer simulation Environmental impact Falling Humidity Hydrologic models Hydrology Hydrometeors Land surface models Model accuracy Modelling Mountains Noah‐MP land surface model Partitioning Precipitation precipitation partitioning Rain Rainfall Resource availability Snow Snow accumulation Snow depth Snow-water equivalent Snowfall Snowmelt Snowpack Surface temperature Surface-air temperature relationships Water depth Water resources wet‐bulb temperature |
title | A Wet‐Bulb Temperature‐Based Rain‐Snow Partitioning Scheme Improves Snowpack Prediction Over the Drier Western United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A29%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Wet%E2%80%90Bulb%20Temperature%E2%80%90Based%20Rain%E2%80%90Snow%20Partitioning%20Scheme%20Improves%20Snowpack%20Prediction%20Over%20the%20Drier%20Western%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Wang,%20Yuan%E2%80%90Heng&rft.date=2019-12-16&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=13825&rft.epage=13835&rft.pages=13825-13835&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019GL085722&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2332211235%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2332211235&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |