Evaluation Capacity Building for Informal STEM Education: Working for Success Across the Field

Informal STEM education (ISE) organizations, especially museums, have used evaluation productively but unevenly. We argue that advancing evaluation in ISE requires that evaluation capacity building (ECB) broadens to include not only professional evaluators but also other professionals such as educat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:New directions for evaluation 2019-03, Vol.2019 (161), p.107-123
Hauptverfasser: Bequette, Marjorie, Cardiel, Christopher L. B., Cohn, Sarah, Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz, Lawrenz, Frances
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 123
container_issue 161
container_start_page 107
container_title New directions for evaluation
container_volume 2019
creator Bequette, Marjorie
Cardiel, Christopher L. B.
Cohn, Sarah
Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz
Lawrenz, Frances
description Informal STEM education (ISE) organizations, especially museums, have used evaluation productively but unevenly. We argue that advancing evaluation in ISE requires that evaluation capacity building (ECB) broadens to include not only professional evaluators but also other professionals such as educators, exhibit developers, activity facilitators, and institutional leaders. We identify four categories of evaluation capacity: evaluation skill and knowledge, use of evaluation, organizational systems related to conducting or integrating evaluation, and values related to evaluation. We studied a field‐wide effort to build evaluation capacity across a network of organizations and found it important to address individuals’ evaluation capacities as well as capacities at the organizational level. Organizational factors that support ECB included redundancy of evaluation capacities across multiple people in an organization, institutional coherence around the value of evaluation, and recognition that ECB can be led from multiple levels of an organizational hierarchy. We argue that the increasing emphasis on evaluation in the ISE field represents an exciting opportunity and that, with targeted strategies and investments, ECB holds great promise for the future of ISE and ISE evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ev.20351
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2331808756</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2331808756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2081-962c3c3b596cbd0a6ecf8589bbf5e55db397d3307b221c274ed9deb0efcb10d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DtPwzAQB3ALgUQpSHwESywsKX7UebBBlUKlIoZWwITlxwVc0qQ4SVG_PaaBkeXuhp_uTn-EzikZUULYFWxHjHBBD9CACj6O0kS8HIaZZEkUJzw-RidNsyKBJlQM0Gu-VWWnWldXeKI2yrh2h287V1pXveGi9nhWhbpWJV4s8wec287s9TV-rv3HH1p0xkDT4Bvj69Dad8BTB6U9RUeFKhs4--1DtJzmy8l9NH-8m01u5pFhJKVRFjPDDdcii422RMVgilSkmdaFACGs5lliOSeJZowalozBZhY0gcJoSiwfoot-7cbXnx00rVzVna_CRck4pykJKcRBXfZq_6SHQm68Wyu_k5TIn_AkbOU-vECjnn65Enb_Opk_9f4bvilvwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331808756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation Capacity Building for Informal STEM Education: Working for Success Across the Field</title><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Bequette, Marjorie ; Cardiel, Christopher L. B. ; Cohn, Sarah ; Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz ; Lawrenz, Frances</creator><creatorcontrib>Bequette, Marjorie ; Cardiel, Christopher L. B. ; Cohn, Sarah ; Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz ; Lawrenz, Frances</creatorcontrib><description>Informal STEM education (ISE) organizations, especially museums, have used evaluation productively but unevenly. We argue that advancing evaluation in ISE requires that evaluation capacity building (ECB) broadens to include not only professional evaluators but also other professionals such as educators, exhibit developers, activity facilitators, and institutional leaders. We identify four categories of evaluation capacity: evaluation skill and knowledge, use of evaluation, organizational systems related to conducting or integrating evaluation, and values related to evaluation. We studied a field‐wide effort to build evaluation capacity across a network of organizations and found it important to address individuals’ evaluation capacities as well as capacities at the organizational level. Organizational factors that support ECB included redundancy of evaluation capacities across multiple people in an organization, institutional coherence around the value of evaluation, and recognition that ECB can be led from multiple levels of an organizational hierarchy. We argue that the increasing emphasis on evaluation in the ISE field represents an exciting opportunity and that, with targeted strategies and investments, ECB holds great promise for the future of ISE and ISE evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6736</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-875X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ev.20351</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fairhaven: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Evaluation ; Hierarchies ; Mathematics education ; Redundancy ; Science education ; STEM education ; Teachers ; Technology education ; Values</subject><ispartof>New directions for evaluation, 2019-03, Vol.2019 (161), p.107-123</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., and the American Evaluation Association</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2081-962c3c3b596cbd0a6ecf8589bbf5e55db397d3307b221c274ed9deb0efcb10d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2081-962c3c3b596cbd0a6ecf8589bbf5e55db397d3307b221c274ed9deb0efcb10d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fev.20351$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fev.20351$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,33753,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bequette, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardiel, Christopher L. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrenz, Frances</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation Capacity Building for Informal STEM Education: Working for Success Across the Field</title><title>New directions for evaluation</title><description>Informal STEM education (ISE) organizations, especially museums, have used evaluation productively but unevenly. We argue that advancing evaluation in ISE requires that evaluation capacity building (ECB) broadens to include not only professional evaluators but also other professionals such as educators, exhibit developers, activity facilitators, and institutional leaders. We identify four categories of evaluation capacity: evaluation skill and knowledge, use of evaluation, organizational systems related to conducting or integrating evaluation, and values related to evaluation. We studied a field‐wide effort to build evaluation capacity across a network of organizations and found it important to address individuals’ evaluation capacities as well as capacities at the organizational level. Organizational factors that support ECB included redundancy of evaluation capacities across multiple people in an organization, institutional coherence around the value of evaluation, and recognition that ECB can be led from multiple levels of an organizational hierarchy. We argue that the increasing emphasis on evaluation in the ISE field represents an exciting opportunity and that, with targeted strategies and investments, ECB holds great promise for the future of ISE and ISE evaluation.</description><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Hierarchies</subject><subject>Mathematics education</subject><subject>Redundancy</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>STEM education</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Technology education</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1097-6736</issn><issn>1534-875X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp10DtPwzAQB3ALgUQpSHwESywsKX7UebBBlUKlIoZWwITlxwVc0qQ4SVG_PaaBkeXuhp_uTn-EzikZUULYFWxHjHBBD9CACj6O0kS8HIaZZEkUJzw-RidNsyKBJlQM0Gu-VWWnWldXeKI2yrh2h287V1pXveGi9nhWhbpWJV4s8wec287s9TV-rv3HH1p0xkDT4Bvj69Dad8BTB6U9RUeFKhs4--1DtJzmy8l9NH-8m01u5pFhJKVRFjPDDdcii422RMVgilSkmdaFACGs5lliOSeJZowalozBZhY0gcJoSiwfoot-7cbXnx00rVzVna_CRck4pykJKcRBXfZq_6SHQm68Wyu_k5TIn_AkbOU-vECjnn65Enb_Opk_9f4bvilvwQ</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Bequette, Marjorie</creator><creator>Cardiel, Christopher L. B.</creator><creator>Cohn, Sarah</creator><creator>Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz</creator><creator>Lawrenz, Frances</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Evaluation Capacity Building for Informal STEM Education: Working for Success Across the Field</title><author>Bequette, Marjorie ; Cardiel, Christopher L. B. ; Cohn, Sarah ; Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz ; Lawrenz, Frances</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2081-962c3c3b596cbd0a6ecf8589bbf5e55db397d3307b221c274ed9deb0efcb10d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Hierarchies</topic><topic>Mathematics education</topic><topic>Redundancy</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>STEM education</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Technology education</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bequette, Marjorie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardiel, Christopher L. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrenz, Frances</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bequette, Marjorie</au><au>Cardiel, Christopher L. B.</au><au>Cohn, Sarah</au><au>Kollmann, Elizabeth Kunz</au><au>Lawrenz, Frances</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation Capacity Building for Informal STEM Education: Working for Success Across the Field</atitle><jtitle>New directions for evaluation</jtitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>2019</volume><issue>161</issue><spage>107</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>107-123</pages><issn>1097-6736</issn><eissn>1534-875X</eissn><abstract>Informal STEM education (ISE) organizations, especially museums, have used evaluation productively but unevenly. We argue that advancing evaluation in ISE requires that evaluation capacity building (ECB) broadens to include not only professional evaluators but also other professionals such as educators, exhibit developers, activity facilitators, and institutional leaders. We identify four categories of evaluation capacity: evaluation skill and knowledge, use of evaluation, organizational systems related to conducting or integrating evaluation, and values related to evaluation. We studied a field‐wide effort to build evaluation capacity across a network of organizations and found it important to address individuals’ evaluation capacities as well as capacities at the organizational level. Organizational factors that support ECB included redundancy of evaluation capacities across multiple people in an organization, institutional coherence around the value of evaluation, and recognition that ECB can be led from multiple levels of an organizational hierarchy. We argue that the increasing emphasis on evaluation in the ISE field represents an exciting opportunity and that, with targeted strategies and investments, ECB holds great promise for the future of ISE and ISE evaluation.</abstract><cop>Fairhaven</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/ev.20351</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1097-6736
ispartof New directions for evaluation, 2019-03, Vol.2019 (161), p.107-123
issn 1097-6736
1534-875X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2331808756
source Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Evaluation
Hierarchies
Mathematics education
Redundancy
Science education
STEM education
Teachers
Technology education
Values
title Evaluation Capacity Building for Informal STEM Education: Working for Success Across the Field
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T15%3A57%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20Capacity%20Building%20for%20Informal%20STEM%20Education:%20Working%20for%20Success%20Across%20the%20Field&rft.jtitle=New%20directions%20for%20evaluation&rft.au=Bequette,%20Marjorie&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=2019&rft.issue=161&rft.spage=107&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=107-123&rft.issn=1097-6736&rft.eissn=1534-875X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ev.20351&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2331808756%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331808756&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true