A ground motion model for volcanic areas in Italy

In Italy, earthquakes caused by volcanoes are of primary importance in the evaluation of seismic hazard, since several volcanoes seriously endanger densely populated areas (e.g. Catania and surroundings, Campi Flegrei, Vesuvius). On the other hand, there are very few models for the prediction of gro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2020-01, Vol.18 (1), p.57-76
Hauptverfasser: Lanzano, Giovanni, Luzi, Lucia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 76
container_issue 1
container_start_page 57
container_title Bulletin of earthquake engineering
container_volume 18
creator Lanzano, Giovanni
Luzi, Lucia
description In Italy, earthquakes caused by volcanoes are of primary importance in the evaluation of seismic hazard, since several volcanoes seriously endanger densely populated areas (e.g. Catania and surroundings, Campi Flegrei, Vesuvius). On the other hand, there are very few models for the prediction of ground motion induced by volcanic events, mostly because observations are scarce and volcanic earthquakes less frequent than crustal events. Following the recent earthquakes in the Etna area (mainshock 26/12/2018 M w  = 4.9) and in the island of Ischia (mainshock 21/08/2017 M w  = 3.9), it was possible to increase the number of recordings for volcanic areas in Italy and, in particular, close to the epicentre. The data available after the recent events revealed the limitations of previous models and especially their inadequacy to predict the ground motion observed in the near source, that can be unexpectedly high. We calibrate a new empirical model to predict the amplitudes of several intensity measures for volcanic areas in Italy. The most relevant aspect in the proposed model is the different attenuation with the distance between shallow and deep events, with discerning focal depth fixed at 5 km. The equations are valid for the geometric mean of horizontal components of PGA, PGV and acceleration response spectra ordinates at 5% damping (in period range T = 0.025–5 s). The range of validity in magnitude is 3.5–4.9 and the hypocentral distance range is 1–200 km.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10518-019-00735-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2331786394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2331786394</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-c7152857634bd95d17cd9915552ac4f1d5d40202891284e8ae2edd391176bd823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKtfwFPAczQv2WySYyn-KRS8KHgLaZItW7abmuwK_fbGruDN08yDmXnwQ-gW6D1QKh8yUAGKUNCknFwQfYZmICQnUIn6_OQpkTV8XKKrnHeUMiE1nSFY4G2KY-_xPg5t7Iv40OEmJvwVO2f71mGbgs247fFqsN3xGl00tsvh5lfn6P3p8W35Qtavz6vlYk0cV2IgToJgSsiaVxuvhQfpvNYghGDWVQ144SvKKFMamKqCsoEF77kGkPXGK8bn6G7aPaT4OYY8mF0cU19eGsY5SFVzXZUUm1IuxZxTaMwhtXubjgao-UFjJjSmoDEnNEaXEp9KuYT7bUh_0_-0vgFQF2QY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331786394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A ground motion model for volcanic areas in Italy</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Lanzano, Giovanni ; Luzi, Lucia</creator><creatorcontrib>Lanzano, Giovanni ; Luzi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><description>In Italy, earthquakes caused by volcanoes are of primary importance in the evaluation of seismic hazard, since several volcanoes seriously endanger densely populated areas (e.g. Catania and surroundings, Campi Flegrei, Vesuvius). On the other hand, there are very few models for the prediction of ground motion induced by volcanic events, mostly because observations are scarce and volcanic earthquakes less frequent than crustal events. Following the recent earthquakes in the Etna area (mainshock 26/12/2018 M w  = 4.9) and in the island of Ischia (mainshock 21/08/2017 M w  = 3.9), it was possible to increase the number of recordings for volcanic areas in Italy and, in particular, close to the epicentre. The data available after the recent events revealed the limitations of previous models and especially their inadequacy to predict the ground motion observed in the near source, that can be unexpectedly high. We calibrate a new empirical model to predict the amplitudes of several intensity measures for volcanic areas in Italy. The most relevant aspect in the proposed model is the different attenuation with the distance between shallow and deep events, with discerning focal depth fixed at 5 km. The equations are valid for the geometric mean of horizontal components of PGA, PGV and acceleration response spectra ordinates at 5% damping (in period range T = 0.025–5 s). The range of validity in magnitude is 3.5–4.9 and the hypocentral distance range is 1–200 km.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-019-00735-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Attenuation ; Civil Engineering ; Damping ; Distance ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquakes ; Empirical models ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Geological hazards ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground motion ; Hydrogeology ; Original Research ; Population density ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; Structural Geology ; Volcanic activity ; Volcanoes</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2020-01, Vol.18 (1), p.57-76</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><rights>Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-c7152857634bd95d17cd9915552ac4f1d5d40202891284e8ae2edd391176bd823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-c7152857634bd95d17cd9915552ac4f1d5d40202891284e8ae2edd391176bd823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7947-4281 ; 0000-0003-4312-580X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-019-00735-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-019-00735-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lanzano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luzi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><title>A ground motion model for volcanic areas in Italy</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>In Italy, earthquakes caused by volcanoes are of primary importance in the evaluation of seismic hazard, since several volcanoes seriously endanger densely populated areas (e.g. Catania and surroundings, Campi Flegrei, Vesuvius). On the other hand, there are very few models for the prediction of ground motion induced by volcanic events, mostly because observations are scarce and volcanic earthquakes less frequent than crustal events. Following the recent earthquakes in the Etna area (mainshock 26/12/2018 M w  = 4.9) and in the island of Ischia (mainshock 21/08/2017 M w  = 3.9), it was possible to increase the number of recordings for volcanic areas in Italy and, in particular, close to the epicentre. The data available after the recent events revealed the limitations of previous models and especially their inadequacy to predict the ground motion observed in the near source, that can be unexpectedly high. We calibrate a new empirical model to predict the amplitudes of several intensity measures for volcanic areas in Italy. The most relevant aspect in the proposed model is the different attenuation with the distance between shallow and deep events, with discerning focal depth fixed at 5 km. The equations are valid for the geometric mean of horizontal components of PGA, PGV and acceleration response spectra ordinates at 5% damping (in period range T = 0.025–5 s). The range of validity in magnitude is 3.5–4.9 and the hypocentral distance range is 1–200 km.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Attenuation</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Damping</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Empirical models</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Volcanic activity</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEUxIMoWKtfwFPAczQv2WySYyn-KRS8KHgLaZItW7abmuwK_fbGruDN08yDmXnwQ-gW6D1QKh8yUAGKUNCknFwQfYZmICQnUIn6_OQpkTV8XKKrnHeUMiE1nSFY4G2KY-_xPg5t7Iv40OEmJvwVO2f71mGbgs247fFqsN3xGl00tsvh5lfn6P3p8W35Qtavz6vlYk0cV2IgToJgSsiaVxuvhQfpvNYghGDWVQ144SvKKFMamKqCsoEF77kGkPXGK8bn6G7aPaT4OYY8mF0cU19eGsY5SFVzXZUUm1IuxZxTaMwhtXubjgao-UFjJjSmoDEnNEaXEp9KuYT7bUh_0_-0vgFQF2QY</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Lanzano, Giovanni</creator><creator>Luzi, Lucia</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7947-4281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4312-580X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>A ground motion model for volcanic areas in Italy</title><author>Lanzano, Giovanni ; Luzi, Lucia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-c7152857634bd95d17cd9915552ac4f1d5d40202891284e8ae2edd391176bd823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Attenuation</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Damping</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Empirical models</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Volcanic activity</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lanzano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luzi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lanzano, Giovanni</au><au>Luzi, Lucia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A ground motion model for volcanic areas in Italy</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>57</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>57-76</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>In Italy, earthquakes caused by volcanoes are of primary importance in the evaluation of seismic hazard, since several volcanoes seriously endanger densely populated areas (e.g. Catania and surroundings, Campi Flegrei, Vesuvius). On the other hand, there are very few models for the prediction of ground motion induced by volcanic events, mostly because observations are scarce and volcanic earthquakes less frequent than crustal events. Following the recent earthquakes in the Etna area (mainshock 26/12/2018 M w  = 4.9) and in the island of Ischia (mainshock 21/08/2017 M w  = 3.9), it was possible to increase the number of recordings for volcanic areas in Italy and, in particular, close to the epicentre. The data available after the recent events revealed the limitations of previous models and especially their inadequacy to predict the ground motion observed in the near source, that can be unexpectedly high. We calibrate a new empirical model to predict the amplitudes of several intensity measures for volcanic areas in Italy. The most relevant aspect in the proposed model is the different attenuation with the distance between shallow and deep events, with discerning focal depth fixed at 5 km. The equations are valid for the geometric mean of horizontal components of PGA, PGV and acceleration response spectra ordinates at 5% damping (in period range T = 0.025–5 s). The range of validity in magnitude is 3.5–4.9 and the hypocentral distance range is 1–200 km.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-019-00735-9</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7947-4281</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4312-580X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-761X
ispartof Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2020-01, Vol.18 (1), p.57-76
issn 1570-761X
1573-1456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2331786394
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Acceleration
Attenuation
Civil Engineering
Damping
Distance
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquakes
Empirical models
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Geological hazards
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Ground motion
Hydrogeology
Original Research
Population density
Seismic activity
Seismic hazard
Structural Geology
Volcanic activity
Volcanoes
title A ground motion model for volcanic areas in Italy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T03%3A45%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20ground%20motion%20model%20for%20volcanic%20areas%20in%20Italy&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Lanzano,%20Giovanni&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=57&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=57-76&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-019-00735-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2331786394%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331786394&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true