Survey Response-Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management
Sample nonresponse and selection biases that may occur in survey research such as contingent valuation applications are discussed and tested. Correction mechanisms for these types of biases are demonstrated. Results indicate the importance of testing and correcting for unit and item nonresponse bias...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of agricultural economics 2000-05, Vol.82 (2), p.438-450 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 450 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 438 |
| container_title | American journal of agricultural economics |
| container_volume | 82 |
| creator | Messonnier, Mark L. Bergstrom, John C. Cornwell, Christopher M. Teasley, R. Jeff Cordell, H. Ken |
| description | Sample nonresponse and selection biases that may occur in survey research such as contingent valuation applications are discussed and tested. Correction mechanisms for these types of biases are demonstrated. Results indicate the importance of testing and correcting for unit and item nonresponse bias in contingent valuation survey data. When sample nonresponse and selection bias go uncorrected, welfare measures may be overestimated or underestimated contributing to potential errors in resource policy and management decisions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/0002-9092.00037 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_233176842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1244663</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1111/0002-9092.00037</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1244663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4777-a7c97aa14b73795f04a10d4a3ccdd178e1a3b16617e56a63208c971238b920333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtv1DAUhS0EEkNhzYaFxRKR1o-MnbBACunQglqBykOIjXUn8VQeMnZqO8D8BP41dgNFSEh44-t7z_mufBB6SMkhTeeIEMKKmtTsMFVc3kILWgpZVEyK22hxM72L7oWwTU9C62qBfryb_Fe9xxc6jM4GXVzoAaLu8QsDQQdsLG6djcZeahvxRxgmiMbZZ7nb6TGGp8m6073RqQLb49VuNN50MOBmHIdUZDmO7tqbMLi5yogOvx0gEc_BwmUC2Hgf3dnAEPSDX_cB-vBy9b49Lc7enLxqm7OiK6WUBciulgC0XEsu6-WGlEBJXwLvur6nstIU-JoKQaVeChCckSoZKOPVumaEc36AHs_c0burSYeotm7yNq1UjHMqRVWyJDqaRZ13IXi9UaM3O_B7RYnKcascqMqBquu4k-P57PhmBr3_n1w1r5tV7uXWb8CTGeCm8Z_24q9tj2bxNkTn_8hZWQqR_1jMYxOi_n4zBv9FiRTbUp1--qza4-MTSc6pavlPaTSn5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233176842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey Response-Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Messonnier, Mark L. ; Bergstrom, John C. ; Cornwell, Christopher M. ; Teasley, R. Jeff ; Cordell, H. Ken</creator><creatorcontrib>Messonnier, Mark L. ; Bergstrom, John C. ; Cornwell, Christopher M. ; Teasley, R. Jeff ; Cordell, H. Ken</creatorcontrib><description>Sample nonresponse and selection biases that may occur in survey research such as contingent valuation applications are discussed and tested. Correction mechanisms for these types of biases are demonstrated. Results indicate the importance of testing and correcting for unit and item nonresponse bias in contingent valuation survey data. When sample nonresponse and selection bias go uncorrected, welfare measures may be overestimated or underestimated contributing to potential errors in resource policy and management decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8276</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/0002-9092.00037</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAEBA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Aquatic life ; Aquatic plants ; Bias ; C510 ; Coefficients ; Contingencies ; contingent valuation ; Economic surveys ; Flowers & plants ; Polls & surveys ; Q250 ; Q260 ; Questionnaires ; Research biases ; Response rates ; Sample mean ; sample nonresponse bias ; sample selection bias ; Sample size ; Sample variance ; Sampling bias ; Sampling methods ; Selection bias ; survey research ; Valuation</subject><ispartof>American journal of agricultural economics, 2000-05, Vol.82 (2), p.438-450</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 American Agricultural Economics Association</rights><rights>2000 American Agricultural Economics Association 2000</rights><rights>2000 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. May 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4777-a7c97aa14b73795f04a10d4a3ccdd178e1a3b16617e56a63208c971238b920333</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1244663$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1244663$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558,58000,58233</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Messonnier, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergstrom, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornwell, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teasley, R. Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordell, H. Ken</creatorcontrib><title>Survey Response-Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management</title><title>American journal of agricultural economics</title><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><description>Sample nonresponse and selection biases that may occur in survey research such as contingent valuation applications are discussed and tested. Correction mechanisms for these types of biases are demonstrated. Results indicate the importance of testing and correcting for unit and item nonresponse bias in contingent valuation survey data. When sample nonresponse and selection bias go uncorrected, welfare measures may be overestimated or underestimated contributing to potential errors in resource policy and management decisions.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Aquatic life</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>C510</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Contingencies</subject><subject>contingent valuation</subject><subject>Economic surveys</subject><subject>Flowers & plants</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Q250</subject><subject>Q260</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research biases</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Sample mean</subject><subject>sample nonresponse bias</subject><subject>sample selection bias</subject><subject>Sample size</subject><subject>Sample variance</subject><subject>Sampling bias</subject><subject>Sampling methods</subject><subject>Selection bias</subject><subject>survey research</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><issn>0002-9092</issn><issn>1467-8276</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtv1DAUhS0EEkNhzYaFxRKR1o-MnbBACunQglqBykOIjXUn8VQeMnZqO8D8BP41dgNFSEh44-t7z_mufBB6SMkhTeeIEMKKmtTsMFVc3kILWgpZVEyK22hxM72L7oWwTU9C62qBfryb_Fe9xxc6jM4GXVzoAaLu8QsDQQdsLG6djcZeahvxRxgmiMbZZ7nb6TGGp8m6073RqQLb49VuNN50MOBmHIdUZDmO7tqbMLi5yogOvx0gEc_BwmUC2Hgf3dnAEPSDX_cB-vBy9b49Lc7enLxqm7OiK6WUBciulgC0XEsu6-WGlEBJXwLvur6nstIU-JoKQaVeChCckSoZKOPVumaEc36AHs_c0burSYeotm7yNq1UjHMqRVWyJDqaRZ13IXi9UaM3O_B7RYnKcascqMqBquu4k-P57PhmBr3_n1w1r5tV7uXWb8CTGeCm8Z_24q9tj2bxNkTn_8hZWQqR_1jMYxOi_n4zBv9FiRTbUp1--qza4-MTSc6pavlPaTSn5g</recordid><startdate>200005</startdate><enddate>200005</enddate><creator>Messonnier, Mark L.</creator><creator>Bergstrom, John C.</creator><creator>Cornwell, Christopher M.</creator><creator>Teasley, R. Jeff</creator><creator>Cordell, H. Ken</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200005</creationdate><title>Survey Response-Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management</title><author>Messonnier, Mark L. ; Bergstrom, John C. ; Cornwell, Christopher M. ; Teasley, R. Jeff ; Cordell, H. Ken</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4777-a7c97aa14b73795f04a10d4a3ccdd178e1a3b16617e56a63208c971238b920333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Aquatic life</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>C510</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Contingencies</topic><topic>contingent valuation</topic><topic>Economic surveys</topic><topic>Flowers & plants</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Q250</topic><topic>Q260</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research biases</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Sample mean</topic><topic>sample nonresponse bias</topic><topic>sample selection bias</topic><topic>Sample size</topic><topic>Sample variance</topic><topic>Sampling bias</topic><topic>Sampling methods</topic><topic>Selection bias</topic><topic>survey research</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Messonnier, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergstrom, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornwell, Christopher M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teasley, R. Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cordell, H. Ken</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Messonnier, Mark L.</au><au>Bergstrom, John C.</au><au>Cornwell, Christopher M.</au><au>Teasley, R. Jeff</au><au>Cordell, H. Ken</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey Response-Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management</atitle><jtitle>American journal of agricultural economics</jtitle><stitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</stitle><addtitle>American Journal of Agricultural Economics</addtitle><date>2000-05</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>438</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>438-450</pages><issn>0002-9092</issn><eissn>1467-8276</eissn><coden>AJAEBA</coden><abstract>Sample nonresponse and selection biases that may occur in survey research such as contingent valuation applications are discussed and tested. Correction mechanisms for these types of biases are demonstrated. Results indicate the importance of testing and correcting for unit and item nonresponse bias in contingent valuation survey data. When sample nonresponse and selection bias go uncorrected, welfare measures may be overestimated or underestimated contributing to potential errors in resource policy and management decisions.</abstract><cop>Malden</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/0002-9092.00037</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9092 |
| ispartof | American journal of agricultural economics, 2000-05, Vol.82 (2), p.438-450 |
| issn | 0002-9092 1467-8276 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_233176842 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Business Source Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Agricultural economics Aquatic life Aquatic plants Bias C510 Coefficients Contingencies contingent valuation Economic surveys Flowers & plants Polls & surveys Q250 Q260 Questionnaires Research biases Response rates Sample mean sample nonresponse bias sample selection bias Sample size Sample variance Sampling bias Sampling methods Selection bias survey research Valuation |
| title | Survey Response-Related Biases in Contingent Valuation: Concepts, Remedies, and Empirical Application to Valuing Aquatic Plant Management |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T17%3A43%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20Response-Related%20Biases%20in%20Contingent%20Valuation:%20Concepts,%20Remedies,%20and%20Empirical%20Application%20to%20Valuing%20Aquatic%20Plant%20Management&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20economics&rft.au=Messonnier,%20Mark%20L.&rft.date=2000-05&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=438&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=438-450&rft.issn=0002-9092&rft.eissn=1467-8276&rft.coden=AJAEBA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/0002-9092.00037&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1244663%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233176842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1244663&rft_oup_id=10.1111/0002-9092.00037&rfr_iscdi=true |